Regional body composition in college-aged Caucasians from anthropometric measures
© Ritchie and Davidson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 08 March 2007
Accepted: 30 December 2007
Published: 30 December 2007
Quantitating fat and lean tissue in isolated body regions may be helpful or required in obesity and health-outcomes research. However, current methods of regional body composition measurement require specialized, expensive equipment such as that used in computed tomography or dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Simple body size or circumference measurement relationships to body composition have been developed but are limited to whole-body applications. We investigated relationships between body size measurements and regional body composition.
Using DEXA technology we determined the fat and lean tissue composition for six regions of the body in predominantly Caucasian, college-aged men (n = 32) and women (n = 67). Circumference measurements as well as body weight and height were taken for each individual. Equations relating body measurements to a respective regional fat and lean mass were developed using multiple regression analysis.
Multiple regression R2 values ranged from 0.4451 to 0.8953 and 0.1697 to 0.7039 for regional fat and lean mass relationships to body measurements, respectively.
The equations developed in this study offer a simple way of estimating regional body composition in a college-aged adult population. The parameters used in the equations are common body measurements that can be obtained with the use of a measuring tape and weight scale.
Obesity has been described as an epidemic in many places throughout the world and its prevalence is of great concern. The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined obesity as having a body mass index (BMI) over 30 (body mass/ht2). BMI does not directly assess how much fat a person has but is an indirect assessment that assumes that a higher body mass is due to an increasing percentage of the body's mass being fat. Because BMI does not represent true fat content of the body, fat mass index (FMI: fat mass/ht2) or percent body fat (%BF) is often used in obesity research. In order to calculate FMI or %BF the true whole-body fat mass must be known.
There are several methods used to assess whole-body fat including: computed tomography (CT), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), hydrostatic weighing, bioelectrical impedance (BIA), skinfold thickness, and air-displacement plethysmography. Of these, CT and DEXA are also capable of assessing regional body composition which is useful when investigating regional fat changes [1, 2] or relating regional fat deposits to disease risk [3–13]. However, access to either CT or DEXA technologies can be prohibitively costly or otherwise inaccessible. In these cases it would be useful to be able to convert simple anthropometric measures into regional fat mass estimates.
In this study, we developed regional body composition prediction equations that used a combination of anthropometric measurements including circumferences, height, weight, and BMI that correlated to regional body composition data obtained using DEXA.
Ninety-nine predominantly Caucasian college aged volunteers (67 women and 32 men). These subjects volunteered from Brigham Young University where they were recruited mostly from a beginning nutrition class and posted fliers. This study was approved by Brigham Young University's Institutional Review Board and all volunteers gave informed consent.
Regional body composition was determined using LUNAR Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) instrument (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI). The measured amount of lean and fat tissue in each of eight regions was determined including: head, upper arms, lower arms, chest, abdomen, hips, upper leg, and lower leg (Figure 1). Analyses of the arm regions (regions 2 and 4) were combined into one region providing fat and lean mass for both arms.
The multiple regression equations relating anthropometric measures to fat or lean mass were developed using the statistics software InStat 3 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Parameters tested for best fit using multiple regression analysis included: circumference (cm), weight (kg), height (m), body mass index (BMI), and grams of fat associated with the body region.
Male and female averages of personal information and measurements
DEXA % Body Fat
24.3 ± 2.88 (19–33)
82.2 ± 11.39 (64.4–115.5)
1.80 ± 0.06 (1.6–1.9)
20.1 ± 8.02 (4.3–33.0)
16,493.9 ± 8,366.8 (2960–37014)
62,291.7 ± 5,419.3 (53785–75146)
25.5 ± 3.79 (19.2–37.2)
23.0 ± 6.21 (18–52)
63.8 ± 11.95 (43.0–104.4)
1.66 ± 0.07 (1.5–1.8)
32.0 ± 7.13 (18.2–51.8)
20,206.0 ± 8,019.9 (7807–44557)
41,615.1 ± 6,447.9 (30287–65965)
23.0 ± 3.62 (17.8–36.5)
Multiple Regression Analysis
Fat regional prediction equations
Regional fat mass (g) prediction equation (A: Circumference; B: BMI, C: Weight; D: Height)
Multiple Regression Adjusted R2
Standard Error of Residual (g)
Multiple Regression p-value
y = -9754.4 + 56.413*A + 233.61*B
y = -15545 + 100.23*A + 420.94*B
y = -17395 + 160.97*A + 190.77*B
y = -8108.9 + 120.21*A + 49.267*C
y = -5809.4 + 127.18*A + 1321.9*D
y = -4649.7 + 122.64*A + 949.59*D
y = -14403 + 155.90*A + 134.12*B
y = -7716.2 + 69.439*A + 235.28*B
y = -13285 + 132.63*A + 221.32*B
y = -6154.4 + 123.69*A + 48.254*C
y = -4956.0 + 162.73*A + 13.875*C
y = -2229.5 + 100.97*A + 13.001*C
Lean regional prediction equations
Regional lean mass (g) prediction equation (A: Circumference; B: Height; C: Weight)
Multiple Regression Adjusted R2
Standard Error of Residual (g)
Multiple Regression p-value
y = 3243.0 + 99.751*A - 1114.6*B
y = -11795 + 124.63*A + 7283.2*B
y = -1428.3 -126.72A + 8115.4B + 104.16C
y = 9875.5 - 156.43*A + 126.06*C
y = -12279 + 198.10*A + 6384.4*B
y = -8779.1 + 93.336*A + 5455.3*B
y = -16125 + 119.35*A + 8425.8*B
y = 6332.4 - 59.780*A + 80.671*C
y = -15180 + 105.97*A + 7261.9*B
y = -14293 + 51.078*A + 10656*B
y = -8211.5 + 99.987*A + 5590.0*B
y = -3453.0 + 56.120*A + 2469.3*B
The purpose of this study was to generate equations predicting regional body composition from anthropometric measurements. Anthropometric equations have been developed for predicting whole body fat [14, 15], but not regional body fat. Utilizing DEXA technology, we divided the human body into eight regions (Figure 1) and correlated these regional fat and lean tissue masses with several anthropometric measures as shown in Tables 2 and 3.
Choice of Parameters
The parameters used to predict the regional grams of fat mass with the highest correlation and significance were circumference, BMI, weight (kg), and height (m). The parameters used to predict the regional grams of lean mass with the highest correlation and significance were circumference, weight (kg), and height (m). Each prediction equation used a combination of at least two different parameters in predicting regional body composition. Other parameters tested (ie. FMI, lean body mass index, non-regional circumferences, etc.) were either not significant or provided a lower adjusted R2 value than those listed and are not shown.
Correlations of fat and lean tissues mass
In our study, regional fat mass prediction equations had higher correlations than regional lean mass equations. Lower correlations in lean mass were likely due to the wide variation in individual muscle mass as a result of resistance training or genetic variation in growth hormone. Resistance training histories were not recorded for this study but would be expected to vary widely between individuals.
Errors and Limitations of Equations
The standard error of the estimates (or standard deviation of the residuals) are listed in Tables 2 and 3. The error values are smaller than the expected regional fat or lean mass changes during a reasonable weight change. For example, using regional body composition data for 20 – 29 yr-old females from Kotani et al. , and following the observation of Garrow  that the regional percentage contribution to total body fat is similar before and after weight change, and assuming that 75% of weight change is due to fat , the change in regional fat mass during a reasonable weight loss of 16.6 kg where BMI changes from 35 to 29 (obese to overweight) for chest, waist, thigh, calf and upper arm is: -1780 g, -5986 g, -2613 g, -814 g and -769 g, respectively, compared to the standard deviation of the residuals for the same regions: 354 g, 341 g, 364 g, 281 g, and 52 g, respectively. This suggests that the errors inherent in the equations reported in this study are much lower than the actual changes in region body composition in this example.
A limit of applicability for the equations reported in this study would be exceeded with a much smaller weight change. A 3 kg wt loss applied to the 20 – 29 yr-old female data from Kotani et al.  yields changes in regional fat mass of -322 g, -1082 g, -472 g, -147, and -139 g for chest, waist, thigh, calf and upper arm, respectively. In this case, the standard deviation of the residuals for the chest and calf equations reported in this study are slightly larger than the chest and calf regional fat changes from the Kotani data. This suggests that these equations might not be suitable for identifying changes in regional body composition for total body weight losses of 3 kg or less for the Kotani data set. Limits for other data sets might be expected to be different depending on beginning regional fat and lean compositions and BMI.
Potential Uses and Relevance
Muller et al.  suggested that regional lean body mass (LBM) is a determinant of resting energy expenditure (REE). As whole body LBM increases more lean mass accumulates in the arm and leg regions than the trunk regions. The ratio of LBM (trunk)/LBM (arms and legs) then decreases and might be used to determine increases in REE.
Okura et al.  observed in obese women who were on a weight reduction diet that fat tissue in legs had a negative association for some CHD risk factors. They confirmed what had been stated in previous studies that fat tissue in legs was associated with a protective effect against metabolic disorders. However, truncal fat tissue correlated positively with some CHD risk factors at baseline and in response to weight reduction. Central fat and truncal fat deposition, especially intra-abdominal fat tissue, plainly correlated with hypertension and the glucose and lipid metabolic abnormalities. Regional body composition is also important for evaluating the improvement of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors during weight-reduction treatment for obesity .
Several cross-sectional studies have suggested a relationship connecting regional body composition, especially truncal adiposity measured by DEXA, and many coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors [4–7, 9, 10, 12, 13]. Ito et al.  suggested that indices for fat distribution such as waist-to-hip ratio and FMtrunk/FMlegs were related to cardiovascular risk factors more accurately than overall adiposity. Anthropometric and DEXA indices were comparable in their accuracy of detecting risk factors .
The focus of some obesity research has been to spot reduce fat in different areas of the body . Spot reducing has been largely ineffective except for the reduction of intra-abdominal fat with aerobic exercise . Having a simple method of determining regional body composition may be beneficial in assessing regional body compositional changes while facilitating larger, easier studies or the development and use of at-home body composition-tracking computer software.
The multiple regression equations produced in this study offer a simple and effective way of estimating regional body composition for individuals in a young adult population. The parameters used in the equations are common anthropometric measurements that can be obtained with the use of a measuring tape and scales.
List of abbreviations
-dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Coronary heart disease
Lean body mass
Resting energy expenditure
Body mass index
Bioelectrical impedance analysis
Supported by a Brigham Young University Mentored Environment Grant.
- Muller MJ, Illner K, Bosy-Westphal A, Brinkmann G, Heller M: Regional lean body mass and resting energy expenditure in non-obese adults. European Journal of Nutrition 2001,40(3):93-97. 10.1007/s003940170008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heymsfield SB Lohman, T. G., Wang, Z., Going, S. B: Human Body Composition. 2nd edition. Champaign, IL , Human Kinetics; 2005:523.Google Scholar
- Zhu SK, Wang ZM, Heshka S, Heo MS, Faith MS, Heymsfield SB: Waist circumference and obesity-associated risk factors among whites in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: clinical action thresholds. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002,76(4):743-749.Google Scholar
- Williams MJ, Hunter GR, KekesSzabo T, Snyder S, Treuth MS: Regional fat distribution in women and risk of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997,65(3):855-860.Google Scholar
- Van Pelt RE, Evans EM, Schechtman KB, Ehsani AA, Kohrt WM: Contributions of total and regional fat mass to risk for cardiovascular disease in older women. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002,282(5):E1023-E1028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Alexandersen P, Larsen PJ, Christiansen C: Peripheral adiposity exhibits an independent dominant antiatherogenic effect in elderly women. Circulation 2003,107(12):1626-1631. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000057974.74060.68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rissanen P, Hamalainen P, Vanninen E, TenhunenEskelinen M, Uusitupa M: Relationship of metabolic variables to abdominal adiposity measured by different anthropometric measurements and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese middle-aged women. International Journal of Obesity 1997,21(5):367-371. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rexrode KM, Carey VJ, Hennekens CH, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Manson JAE: Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association 1998,280(21):1843-1848. 10.1001/jama.280.21.1843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paradisi G, Smith L, Burtner C, Leaming R, Garvey WT, Hook G, Johnson A, Cronin J, Steinberg HO, Baron AD: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of fat mass distribution and its association with the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes Care 1999,22(8):1310-1317. 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okura T, Nakata Y, Yamabuki K, Tanaka K: Regional body composition changes exhibit opposing effects on coronary heart disease risk factors. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 2004,24(5):923-929. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000125702.26272.f6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenchaiah S, Evans JC, Levy D, Wilson PWF, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Vasan RS: Obesity and the risk of heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine 2002,347(5):305-313. 10.1056/NEJMoa020245View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito H, Nakasuga K, Ohshima A, Maruyama T, Kaji Y, Harada M, Fukunaga M, Jingu S, Sakamoto M: Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by indices of obesity obtained from anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Japanese individuals. International Journal of Obesity 2003,27(2):232-237. 10.1038/sj.ijo.802226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carey DG, Jenkins AB, Campbell LV, Freund J, Chisholm DJ: Abdominal fat and insulin resistance in normal and overweight women - Direct measurements reveal a strong relationship in subjects at both low and high risk of NIDDM. Diabetes 1996,45(5):633-638. 10.2337/diabetes.45.5.633View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tran ZV, Weltman A: Generalized Equation for Predicting Body Density of Women from Girth Measurements. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 1989,21(1):101-104. 10.1249/00005768-198902000-00018View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weltman A, Seip RL, Tran ZV: Practical Assessment of Body-Composition in Adult Obese Males. Human Biology 1987,59(3):523-535.Google Scholar
- Kotani K, Tokunaga K, Fujioka S, Kobatake T, Keno Y, Yoshida S, Shimomura I, Tarui S, Matsuzawa Y: Sexual Dimorphism of Age-Related-Changes in Whole-Body Fat Distribution in the Obese. International Journal of Obesity 1994,18(4):207-212.Google Scholar
- Garrow JS: Is Body Fat Distribution Changed by Dieting? Acta Medica Scandinavica 1988, 723: Suppl 199-203.Google Scholar
- Westerterp KR, Donkers J, Fredrix E, Boekhoudt P: Energy-Intake, Physical-Activity and Body-Weight - a Simulation-Model. British Journal of Nutrition 1995,73(3):337-347. 10.1079/BJN19950037View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz KV: “Spot” Reduction of Fat. Annals of Internal Medicine 1971,75(2):316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okura T, Nakata Y, Lee DJ, Ohkawara K, Tanaka K: Effects of aerobic exercise and obesity phenotype on abdominal fat reduction in response to weight loss. International Journal of Obesity 2005,29(10):1259-1266. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.