Open Access

Timing of supplementation of selenium and isoflavones determines prostate cancer risk factor reduction in rats

  • Jessica R Tolman1,
  • Edwin D Lephart2,
  • Kenneth DR Setchell3,
  • Dennis L Eggett4 and
  • Merrill J Christensen1, 5Email author
Contributed equally
Nutrition & Metabolism20085:31

DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-5-31

Received: 05 June 2008

Accepted: 10 November 2008

Published: 10 November 2008

Abstract

Background

High dietary intake of selenium or isoflavones reduces risk factors for prostate cancer. We tested whether combined supplementation of these two dietary components would reduce prostate cancer risk factors in rats more than supplementation of each component individually.

Methods

Male Noble rat pups were exposed from conception to diets containing an adequate (0.33–0.45 mg/kg diet) or high (3.33–3.45 mg/kg) concentration of selenium as Se-methylselenocysteine and a low (10 mg/kg) or high (600 mg/kg) level of isoflavones in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Pups consumed their respective diets until sacrifice at 35, 100, or 200 days. Male Noble rat breeders, whose exposure to the diets began after puberty, were sacrificed at 336 days. Rats were weighed biweekly. Blood was collected at the time of sacrifice and body fat and prostates were dissected and weighed. Serum levels of leptin, IGF-1, and testosterone were determined using ELISA kits. Serum levels of isoflavones were assayed by GC/MS. Liver activity of selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase 1 was measured as an indicator of selenium status.

Results

Serum isoflavone concentrations were nearly 100-fold higher at 35 days of age (1187.1 vs. 14.4 ng/mL, mean ± SD) in pups fed the high vs. low isoflavone diets, and remained so at 100 and 200 days, and in breeders. There were no dietary differences in liver glutathione peroxidase activity in pups or breeders. High isoflavone intake significantly (p = 0.001–0.047) reduced body weight in rat pups from 35 days onward, but not in breeders. Body fat and leptin were likewise significantly reduced by high isoflavones in pups while effects in breeders were less pronounced but still significant. High intake of Se and isoflavones each decreased serum IGF-1 in pups at 100 and 200 days, but not in breeders. No consistent dietary effects were observed on serum testosterone or relative weights of prostates. In pups, the combination of high isoflavones and high selenium produced the lowest weight gain, the lowest serum leptin, and the lowest serum IGF-1 concentrations of all four diets.

Conclusion

Combined intake of high selenium and high isoflavones may achieve greater chemopreventive effects than either compound individually. The timing of supplementation may determine the significance of its effects.

Background

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in American men. The American Cancer Society projects that there will be 186,320 new cases of prostate cancer in the U.S. in 2008, and 28,660 deaths from this disease [1]. The high occurrence and long latency period of prostate cancer make it a good candidate for intervention and chemoprevention by diet and other means.

Many host factors, including the hormonal profile to which tumors are exposed, contribute to their growth and spread. Obesity and excess body fat increase risk of several cancers, including that of aggressive prostate cancer [2]. High plasma concentrations of insulin and insulin-like growth factors (e.g. IGF-1) are likewise associated with increased risk [3, 4]. Serum leptin concentrations show a direct association with prostate cancer risk [57], and testosterone is a well-known promoter of the growth of both normal prostate tissue and prostate tumors [8, 9]. Several of these factors are responsive to dietary manipulation.

Selenium (Se) and soy products containing isoflavones are among the most promising dietary constituents whose intake may reduce risk for prostate cancer [10, 11] and among the most popular supplements taken by men in a recent prostate cancer trial [12]. In their review of diet in the development and progression of prostate cancer, Chan et al. [13] found the evidence more convincing for a protective effect of the essential trace element Se than for any other dietary component. Several lines of evidence confirm the chemopreventive efficacy of high dietary Se intake or status against prostate cancer [1418]. The World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research [19], in their recently released summary, concluded that "The evidence from cohort and case-control studies is consistent, with a dose-response relationship. There is evidence for plausible mechanisms. Foods containing selenium probably protect against prostate cancer."

Molecular targets for Se have been identified [15, 20, 21] and mechanisms for its protective effects have been proposed [2227]. These mechanisms include alteration of various aspects of steroid hormone metabolism [27, 28].

Prostate cancers rates are particularly low in Asian countries where the typical diet contains high levels of soy products [29]. In contrast, the highest rates of prostate cancer are seen in countries where the so-called "Western diet" is the norm and intake of soy products is very low [19, 3033]. Many investigators have attributed the inverse correlation between soy intake and prostate cancer to the estrogenic isoflavones found in soy [3436]. High intake of soy products has been correlated in epidemiologic [37, 38] and case control studies [39] with reduced risk for prostate cancer, although not all studies are in agreement [40, 41]. Mechanisms for the chemopreventive effects of soy have been reviewed [42, 43]. Effects of phytoestrogen consumption may depend in part on genotype [44]. Much of the mechanistic work related to soy consumption has focused on individual isoflavones supplemented in cell culture medium or provided to animals by injection or diet. Among other effects, dietary isoflavones have been shown to modify body weight [45, 46], deposition of body fat [46, 47], leptin [46, 47] and insulin [47, 48] levels, and various aspects of steroid hormone metabolism [47, 49, 50].

In this study we investigated the effects of combined dietary supplementation of Se and isoflavones to determine if risk factors for prostate cancer might be reduced more by their combined use than by supplementation of either dietary component individually. The molecular mechanisms by which Se and soy isoflavones act individually are being critically examined by many investigators, but the potential chemopreventive efficacy of combining supplementation of these two dietary components remains to be explored.

Methods

All procedures involving animals were approved by the BYU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Male and female Noble rats, aged 35–42 days were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Females were housed individually in shoebox cages and males were housed individually in hanging wire cages. For breeding, females were placed with males in the hanging wire cages, which facilitated identification of the vaginal plug after mating. Following the appearance of the plug, females were returned to their shoebox cages. All cages were kept in a temperature- and light-controlled room (12 h, 0600–1800, light:12 h, 1800–0600, dark). Animals were given free access to food (as described below) and tap water.

Four males and eight females were assigned to each of the four experimental diets. After consuming their respective diets for at least 30 days males and females within each dietary group were bred to produce pups whose exposure to the diets began at conception. Dams continued consuming their respective diets through pregnancy and lactation. Male pups were weaned at 21 days of age to the same diets consumed by their dams, and used as experimental subjects. Male breeders continued to consume their respective diets until they were sacrificed at approximately 336 days of age. Thus, continued feeding of breeders made possible comparisons between animals whose exposure to the diets began at conception and those whose exposure began after sexual maturity.

Rats were fed one of two basal stock diets, with or without a supplement of Se, in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Stock diets were 1) a phytoestrogen-reduced formulation (Zeigler Bros., Inc., Gardners, PA; Phytoestrogen Reduced Diet I); or 2) a standard soy-based laboratory chow (8604, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI). Previous analysis showed these formulations to contain approximately 10 (Low) and 600 mg (High) isoflavones/kg diet, respectively [51]. Product data sheets reported that the basal diets contained 0.33–0.45 mg Se/kg diet (Adequate Se). Half of the diets were supplemented with 3.0 mg/kg Se as Se-methylselenocysteine (a generous gift from Kelatron Corp., Ogden, UT; High Se). A detailed analysis of the two basal stock diets is shown in Additional file 1.

Rats were weighed biweekly. All rats were weighed immediately prior to sacrifice. Eight pups in each dietary group were killed at 35, 100, or 200 days of age by decapitation. Breeders were sacrificed at approximately 336 days of age. Blood was collected, allowed to clot, and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 minutes to separate serum from clotting factors and cells. White adipose tissue was dissected from the abdomino-pelvic cavity of 200 day old rats and breeders, and weighed. For pups and breeders, testis and ventral prostate lobes were dissected and weighed. Livers were also dissected and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent analysis of cellular Se-dependent glutathione peroxidase 1 (EC 1.11.1.9; GPX1) activity.

Analysis of serum isoflavone content was performed as described previously [52]. Briefly, phytoestrogen concentrations were analyzed for each dietary treatment group via gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). This was performed by liquid-solid extraction and liquid gel chromatographic techniques to isolate the phytoestrogen fractions using standards (internal controls) to validate the assay. As a measure of Se status, activity of GPX1 was assayed in cytosolic fractions from livers of all animals at each time point in each of the four dietary groups, and in breeders, as previously described [53].

Serum hormone levels were assayed using commercially available ELISA kits according to the manufacturers' directions. IGF-1 was measured using R&D Systems Mouse IGF-1 Immunoassay Quantikine kit (#MG100, Minneapolis, MN). Intra-assay precision of this kit ranges from 3.3–5.6% (CV) and inter-assay precision ranges from 4.3–9.0% (CV). Testosterone was assayed using an ELISA kit from Fitzgerald Industries International Inc. (#RDI-RE52151, Concord, MA). Intra-assay variation for this kit ranges from 3.28–4.16% (CV) while inter-assay variation is between 4.73–9.94% (CV). The mouse/rat leptin ELISA kit used was from BioVendor (#RD291001200, Candler, NC). For this kit, reported intra-assay variability (CV) is 2.2%, while inter-assay variability (CV) is 3.4%. Microplates were read on a FLUOstar Optima microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Durham, NC).

Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) to determine main effects of Se and isoflavones, and their interactions. This was followed by Fisher's and Tukey's pairwise comparisons to determine significance of differences between dietary groups. Differences for which p values were < 0.05 were judged statistically significant.

Results

Nutritional status indicators

Serum isoflavone levels (genistein + daidzein + equol) were significantly higher in rats fed the high isoflavone diets, even at the earliest time point measured. At 35 days serum concentrations averaged 1235 ± 117 (mean ± SD) and 1140 ± 275 ng/mL in rat pups consuming high isoflavone diets, with and without a 3.0 mg/kg Se supplement, respectively. In contrast, serum concentrations in pups fed the low isoflavone diets, with and without the Se supplement, averaged 11.9 ± 4.1 and 16.8 ± 2.5 ng/mL, respectively. Supplemental Se had no effect on serum isoflavone levels. These differences persisted at 100 days and at 200 days in pups, and comparable differences were seen in breeders (1419 ± 135 vs. 17.3 ± 3.2 ng/mL, in rats fed 600 vs. 10 mg isoflavones/kg diet, respectively). The serum isoflavone concentrations in rats fed 600 mg/kg were similar to those seen in adults in Asian countries while the serum levels in rats fed only 10 mg/kg were comparable to those in persons consuming diets typical of Western countries [31, 54].

There were no statistically significant differences due to diet at any time point, in pups or in breeders, in the activity of hepatic GPX1. This was expected since all diets provided a Se concentration higher than needed to maximize GPX1 activity in rat liver [55]. Mean activities at different time points in the four dietary groups ranged from 461.6–868.7 mU/mg protein, which were comparable to previously published values for GPX1 activity in Se-adequate rat liver [53, 56].

Growth and body composition

Diet had a significant effect on weight gain of rat pups (Figure 1A). From 35 days until termination of the feeding period the main effect of isoflavones was significant in reducing body weight (p = 0.047 and p = 0.001 at 35 days and 200 days, respectively). Only at the 35 day time point did the main effect of Se approach statistical significance (p = 0.05). In contrast to the effects in pups exposed to their respective treatments from conception, diet had no statistically significant effect on body weight of breeders whose exposure to the diets began after sexual maturity (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Weight gain of pups and breeders. A. Body weights of pups. Symbols and error bars represent means ± SEM for each dietary group at each time point. N = 23–24 rats/group up to 35 days, N = 15–16 rats/group from 35–100 days, and from 100–200 days N = 8 rats/group. By ANOVA, diet was a significant determinant (p < 0.005) of body weight as early as 35 days, which significance continued until the end of the study. At 35 days and 200 days means not sharing a common superscript are significantly (p < 0.05) different by Fisher's pairwise comparisons. The main effect of isoflavones was statistically significant at each time point (p = 0.047 and p = 0.001 at 35 days and 200 days, respectively) while the main effect of Se was not. B. Body weights of breeders. N = 3–4 for each dietary group at each time point. Symbols and error bars represent means ± SEM for each dietary group at each time point. There were no statistically significant effects of diet on body weight at any time point. Abbreviations: Adequate (0.33–0.45 mg/kg diet) Se, Adq. Se; High (3.33–3.45 mg/kg) Se, High Se; Low (10 mg/kg) isoflavones, Low IF; High (600 mg/kg) isoflavones, High IF.

Comparable to its effects on body weight, high isoflavone intake was associated with significantly lower body fat in 200 day old rat pups (p < 0.001; Figure 2A). Dietary Se intake had no statistically significant effect on body fat (p = 0.779) nor was the interaction between Se and isoflavones significant. In breeders the main effect of phytoestrogen consumption was significant (p = 0.038) while effects of Se and the interaction were not (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Body fat of pups and breeders. A. Body fat, as a percentage of body weight, in pups sacrificed at 200 days of age. Bars and error bars represent means + SEM for each dietary group, N = 8 rats/group. The main effect of isoflavones was highly significant (p < 0.001) while the effect of Se and of the interaction were not. Means not sharing a common superscript are significantly (p < 0.05) different by Fisher's pairwise comparisons. B. Body fat, as a percentage of body weight, in breeders sacrificed at approximately 336 days of age. Bars and error bars represent means + SEM for each dietary group, N = 3–4 rats/group. The main effect of isoflavones was significant (p = 0.038) while the effects of Se and the interaction were not. Means not sharing a common superscript are significantly (p < 0.05) different by Fisher's pairwise comparisons.

There were no consistent, significant effects of diet on relative weights (g/100 g body weight) of ventral prostate lobes or of testis in pups at different time points or in breeders.

Serum hormone concentrations

Serum leptin in pups exposed to diets from conception followed the same pattern as body weight and body fat (Figure 3A). Interestingly, the effects of Se and isoflavones varied over time. At 35 days the main effect of Se on serum leptin levels was significant (p < 0.001) while the effect of isoflavones was not (p = 0.637). At 100 days the main effect of each dietary component was significant (isoflavones, p = 0.033; Se, p = 0.001), with high intake of each being associated with lower leptin levels. By the time rats were 200 days old, the effect of isoflavones was pronounced (p < 0.001) but the effect of Se was no longer significant (p = 0.068). As seen in Figure 3B, the pattern of dietary effects in breeders was similar to that in 200 day old pups. High isoflavone intake significantly (p = 0.004) reduced serum leptin levels, while high Se intake had no effect (p = 0.807).
Figure 3

Serum leptin in pups and breeders. A. Mean serum leptin concentration in pups at 35, 100, and 200 days of age. Symbols and error bars represent means ± SEM for each dietary group at each time point. At 35 days N = 23–24 rats/group, at 100 days N = 15–16 rats/group, and at 200 days N = 8 rats/group. At each time point, means not sharing a common superscript are significantly (p < 0.05) different by Fisher's pairwise comparisons. At 35 days only Se had a significant effect (p < 0.001) on serum leptin concentrations. At 100 days both Se (p = 0.001) and isoflavones (p = 0.033) had significant main effects. At 200 days only isoflavone intake had a significant main effect (p < 0.001). B. Mean serum leptin concentration in male breeders at 336 days. Only the main effect of isoflavones was statistically significant (p = 0.004). Means not sharing a common superscript are significantly (p < 0.05) different by Fisher's pairwise comparisons.

Concentrations of IGF-1 were affected by diet in pups at all time points (Figure 4A) but not in breeders (Figure 4B). At 35 days, effects of Se (p < 0.0001), isoflavones (p = 0.019), and the interaction (p = 0.004) were all statistically significant. At 100 days, the main effects of Se (p = 0.022) and isoflavones (p < 0.0001) were each significant but the interaction was not. At 200 days, Se (p = 0.003) and isoflavones (p = 0.046) each had significant main effects, and the interaction was also significant (p = 0.034). In breeders, neither dietary component significantly affected serum IGF-1 levels.
Figure 4

Serum IGF-1 in pups and breeders. A. Serum IGF-1 concentrations in pups sacrificed at 35, 100, and 200 days of age. Bars and error bars represent means + SEM for each dietary group, N = 7–8 rats/group. For each time point, means not sharing a common superscript are significantly (p < 0.05) different using Fisher's or Tukey's pairwise comparisons. At each time point the main effects of Se (p < 0.0001, p = 0.022, and p = 0.003 at 35 days, 100 days, and 200 days, respectively) and of isoflavones (p = 0.019, p = 0.022, and p = 0.046 at 35 days, 100 days, and 200 days, respectively) were statistically significant. Interactions were statistically significant at 35 days (p = 0.004) and 200 days (p = 0.034). B. Serum IGF-1 concentrations in male breeders sacrificed at approximately 336 days of age. Neither isoflavones nor Se was significantly associated with serum IGF-1 levels in breeders.

There were no consistent, significant effects of diet on serum testosterone levels in pups at different time points or in breeders.

Discussion

The findings in this study of decreased body weight, decreased adiposity, and decreased leptin due to high isoflavone consumption are consistent with most previous reports [46, 47, 57, 58] but at variance with others [59, 60]. In the Noble rats used in this study neither high Se nor high isoflavone intake had a consistent, significant effect on serum testosterone levels or prostate weights. In earlier investigations in our laboratories and others, high dietary isoflavone intake either decreased [61, 62] or had no effect [63, 64] on serum testosterone levels, and reduced [61, 64, 65] or did not affect [63] prostate weights. These differences in phytoestrogen effects in previous studies may be due, in part, to the different rat strains used in those studies. A recent report [66] showed that Sprague-Dawley rats were less sensitive to phytoestrogens than Fisher 344 rats or CD-1 mice in evaluations of estrogenic activity. To compare results from the present study with those found in previous experiments employing Noble rats, a computer-assisted literature search was conducted. That search found only one published paper presenting results from a study examining soy effects in Noble rats, which showed anti-inflammatory effects in the prostate but no effect on the weights of testis or accessory sex glands [67].

It is of interest to note that pronounced dietary effects seen in rat pups, exposed to the various diets from conception, were in some cases minimal or totally absent in breeders, whose exposure to the diets began after sexual maturity. While this result may be due in part to the relatively small number (3–4) of breeders in each dietary group, similar findings suggesting prenatal imprinting or programming due to diet have been previously reported. Mardon et al. [59] showed that prenatal or perinatal exposure of Wistar rats to phytoestrogens led to a high bone mineral density later in life, compared to animals receiving postnatal exposure. Klein et al. [68] demonstrated long-lasting effects of early exposure to genistein on the immune and endocrine systems of rats. Prepubertal exposure to genistein was shown in other work to increase mammary gland differentiation and suppress DMBA-induced cancer [69].

Besides its effects on serum leptin levels, which decreased with the age of the rat, high dietary Se intake had a statistically significant main effect only on serum IGF-1 levels. The decrease in IGF-1 serum level due to high Se was highly significant in rat pups at 35, 100, and 200 days, but non-significant in breeders. This observation suggests that, like isoflavones, Se may also be involved in prenatal programming or imprinting of later biological response.

Effects of Se on IGF-1 have been examined in comparatively few studies. Chandrasekher and Sailaja [70] found that Se significantly inhibited the ability of IGF-1 to stimulate PI3K activity in cultured lens epithelial cells. More relevant to the present work, Meltzer and Haug [71] fed women daily supplements of 100–300 μg Se as Se-rich bread for 6 weeks, or 400 μg selenomethionine for 15 weeks. Although serum Se levels were significantly increased, no significant changes in IGF-1 were observed. These results were comparable to those seen with breeder rats in this study. Previous work in rats showed that high levels of Se that decreased IGF-1 concentrations also were growth inhibitory [71]. In this work, the main effect of Se on IGF-1 was statistically significant, but no growth effects of Se were observed. This provides clear evidence that, although the supplemented diets provided high levels of Se (3.33–3.45 mg/kg diet), this level was non-toxic to growing Noble rats.

Given the complexity of cancer, with dysfunctional changes at multiple stages and in multiple metabolic pathways, it is perhaps not surprising that the results of clinical trials of single agents have been largely disappointing. This has prompted some investigators to propose a redefinition of "dietary chemoprevention" to focus on combinations and "cocktails" of dietary agents to reduce risk for cancer [72]. Our use in this study of a combination of Se supplements with high isoflavone diets is consistent with this recommendation. It is important to note in this study that in pups exposed to test diets from conception, the combination of high Se with high isoflavones resulted in the lowest weight gain (Figure 1A), the lowest serum leptin (Figure 3A), and the lowest serum IGF-1 concentrations (Figure 4A) of all four dietary treatments. This finding has obvious implications for men in whom prostate cancer risk is increased by higher fat mass [2], higher serum leptin [57, 73], and/or higher IGF-1 levels [3, 4, 74, 75].

Conclusion

In summary, high isoflavone intake decreased weight gain, body fat mass, and serum leptin in rat pups exposed to experimental diets from conception. Exposure of breeders to the same diets beginning after sexual maturation produced minimal or no effects. This observation provides support for the possibility of in utero imprinting by high isoflavone intake and may call into question the merit of beginning isoflavone supplementation in mature men diagnosed with prostate cancer. High intake of dietary Se was associated in this study with decreased IGF-1 levels in pups prenatally exposed, but not in breeders, suggesting the possibility of prenatal programming by Se, as well. Combining high isoflavones with high Se produced the greatest effects on the parameters measured. This finding provides support for the combination approach to cancer chemoprevention by dietary constituents being advocated by an increasing number of investigators.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the invaluable technical assistance of Brett R. Barzee, Russell L. Legg and Cameron T. Lovinger. This study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health to MJC (CA106374).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food Science, Brigham Young University
(2)
Department of Physiology, Developmental Biology and the Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University
(3)
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Medical Center
(4)
Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University
(5)
Cancer Research Center, Brigham Young University

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58: 71-96. 10.3322/CA.2007.0010View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Freedland SJ, Platz EA: Obesity and prostate cancer: making sense out of apparently conflicting data. Epidemiol Rev 2007, 29: 88-97. 10.1093/epirev/mxm006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gennigens C, Menetrier-Caux C, Droz JP: Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) family and prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006, 58: 124-145. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.10.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Meinbach DS, Lokeshwar BL: Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in prostate cancer: cause or consequence? Urol Oncol 2006, 24: 294-306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Onuma M, Bub JD, Rummel TL, Iwamoto Y: Prostate cancer cell-adipocyte interaction: leptin mediates androgen-independent prostate cancer cell proliferation through c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase. J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 42660-42667. 10.1074/jbc.M304984200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ribeiro R, Lopes C, Medeiros R: The link between obesity and prostate cancer: the leptin pathway and therapeutic perspectives. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2006, 9: 19-24. 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500844View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Saglam K, Aydur E, Yilmaz M, Goktas S: Leptin influences cellular differentiation and progression in prostate cancer. J Urol 2003, 169: 1308-1311. 10.1097/01.ju.0000055903.18400.25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Culig Z, Bartsch G: Androgen axis in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem 2006, 99: 373-381. 10.1002/jcb.20898View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyamoto H, Altuwaijri S, Cai Y, Messing EM, Chang C: Inhibition of the Akt, cyclooxygenase-2, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 pathways in combination with androgen deprivation therapy: potential therapeutic approaches for prostate cancer. Mol Carcinog 2005, 44: 1-10. 10.1002/mc.20121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung E, Wadhera P, Dorff T, Pinski J: Diet and prostate cancer risk reduction. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2008, 8: 43-50. 10.1586/14737140.8.1.43View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wigle DT, Turner MC, Gomes J, Parent M-E: Role of hormonal and other factors in human prostate cancer. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2008, 11: 242-259.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Grainger EM, Kim HS, Monk JP, Lemeshow SA, Gong M, Bahnson RR, Clinton SK: Consumption of dietary supplements and over-the-counter and prescription medications in men participating in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial at an academic center. Urol Oncol 2008, 26: 125-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan JM, Gann PH, Giovannucci EL: Role of diet in prostate cancer development and progression. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23: 8152-8160. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1492View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rayman MP: Selenium in cancer prevention: a review of the evidence and mechanism of action. Proc Nutr Soc 2005, 64: 527-542. 10.1079/PNS2005467View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein EA: Chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2005, 54: 1-10. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.11.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Brinkman M, Reulen RC, Kellen E, Buntinx F, Zeegers MP: Are men with low selenium levels at increased risk of prostate cancer? Eur J Cancer 2006, 42: 2463-2471. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.02.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Etminan M, FitzGerald JM, Gleave M, Chambers K: Intake of selenium in the prevention of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2005, 16: 1125-1131. 10.1007/s10552-005-0334-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Li H, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL, Morris JS, Willett WC, Gaziano JM, Ma J: A prospective study of plasma selenium levels and prostate cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96: 696-703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research: Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington, D.C., American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Combs GF Jr: Status of selenium in prostate cancer prevention. Br J Cancer 2004, 91: 195-199.Google Scholar
  21. McCarty MF: Targeting multiple signaling pathways as a strategy for managing prostate cancer: multifocal signal modulation therapy. Integr Cancer Ther 2004, 3: 349-380. 10.1177/1534735404270757View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ganther HE: Selenium metabolism, selenoproteins and mechanisms of cancer prevention: complexities with thioredoxin reductase. Carcinogenesis 1999, 20: 1657-1666. 10.1093/carcin/20.9.1657View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu Y, Benya RV, Carroll RE, Diamond AM: Allelic loss of the gene for the GPX1 selenium-containing protein is a common event in cancer. J Nutr 2005, 135: 3021S-3024S.Google Scholar
  24. Lu J, Jiang C: Selenium and cancer chemoprevention: hypotheses integrating the actions of selenoproteins and selenium metabolites in epithelial and non-epithelial target cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005, 7: 1715-1727. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1715View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson KK, Bacon B, Christensen MJ: Selenite supplementation decreases expression of MAZ in HT29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Nutr Cancer 1996, 26: 73-81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Spallholz JE, Palace VP, Reid TW: Methioninase and selenomethionine but not Se-methylselenocysteine generate methylselenol and superoxide in an in vitro chemiluminescent assay: implications for the nutritional carcinostatic activity of selenoamino acids. Biochem Pharmacol 2004, 67: 547-554. 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.09.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang Q, Christensen MJ: Selenium regulates gene expression for estrogen sulfotransferase and alpha 2U-globulin in rat liver. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998, 64: 239-244. 10.1016/S0960-0760(97)00201-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen DV, Nielsen DR, Felin EM, Johnson JI, Christensen MJ: Regulation of gene expression in rat prostate by selenium. FASEB J 2000, 14: A513.Google Scholar
  29. Sarkar FH, Li Y: Soy isoflavones and cancer prevention. Cancer Invest 2003, 21: 744-757. 10.1081/CNV-120023773View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Adlercreutz H, Mazur W, Bartels P, Elomaa V, Watanabe S, Wahala K, Landstrom M, Lundin E, Bergh A, Damber JE, Aman P, Widmark A, Johansson A, Zhang JX, Hallmans G: Phytoestrogens and prostate disease. J Nutr 2000, 130: 658S-659S.Google Scholar
  31. Griffiths K, Denis L, Turkes A, Morton PS: Phytoestrogens and diseases of the prostate gland. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998,12(4):625-647. 10.1016/S0950-351X(98)80008-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazur W, Adlercreutz H: Overview of naturally occurring endocrine-active substances in the human diet in relation to human health. Nutrition 2000, 16: 654-658. 10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00333-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Setchell KDR: Phytoestrogens: biochemistry, physiology and implications for human health of soy isoflavones. Am J Clin Nutr 1998,68(6 Suppl):1333S-1346S.Google Scholar
  34. Adlercreutz H, Mazur W: Phyto-oestrogens and Western diseases. Ann Med 1997, 29: 95-120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Murkies AL, Wilcox G, Davis SR: Phytoestrogens-review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998, 83: 297-303. 10.1210/jc.83.2.297Google Scholar
  36. Setchell KDR, Cassidy A: Dietary isoflavones-biological effects and relevance to human health. J Nutr 1999, 129: 758S-767S.Google Scholar
  37. Messina M, Kucuk O, Lampe JW: An overview of the health effects of isoflavones with an emphasis on prostate cancer risk and prostate-specific antigen levels. J AOAC Int 2006, 89: 1121-1134.Google Scholar
  38. Yan L, Spitznagel EL: Meta-analysis of soy food and risk of prostate cancer in men. Int J Cancer 2005, 117: 667-669. 10.1002/ijc.21266View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hedelin M, Klint A, Chang ET, Bellocco R, Johansson J-E, Andersson SO, Heinonen SM, Adlercreutz H, Adami HO, Gronberg H, Balter KA: Dietary phytoestrogen, serum enterolactone and risk of prostate cancer: the cancer prostate Sweden study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 2006, 17: 169-180. 10.1007/s10552-005-0342-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ganry O: Phytoestrogens and prostate cancer risk. Prev Med 2005, 41: 1-6. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Low Y-L, Taylor JI, Grace PB, Mulligan AA, Welch AA, Scollen S, Dunning AM, Luben RN, Khaw K-T, Day NE, Wareham NJ, Bingham SA: Phytoestrogen exposure, polymorphisms in COMT, CYP19, ESR1, and SHBG genes, and their associations with prostate cancer risk. Nutr Cancer 2006, 56: 31-39. 10.1207/s15327914nc5601_5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Holzbeierlein JM, McIntosh J, Thrasher JB: The role of soy phytoestrogens in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2005, 15: 17-22. 10.1097/00042307-200501000-00005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Magee PJ, Rowland IR: Phyto-oestrogens, their mechanism of action: current evidence for a role in breast and prostate cancer. Br J Nutr 2004, 91: 513-531. 10.1079/BJN20031075View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hedelin M, Balter KA, Chang ET, Bellocco R, Klint A, Johansson J-E, Wiklund F, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Adami H-O, Gronberg H: Dietary intake of phytoestrogens, estrogen receptor-beta polymorphisms and the risk of prostate cancer. Prostate 2006, 66: 1512-1520. 10.1002/pros.20487View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Bu L, Lephart ED: Regulatory behavior and skin temperature in mid-aged male rats on three different isoflavone-containing diets. J Med Food 2006, 9: 567-571. 10.1089/jmf.2006.9.567View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Bu L, Setchell KDR, Lephart ED: Influences of dietary soy isoflavones on metabolism but not nociception and stress hormone responses in ovariectomized female rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2005, 3: 58-58. 10.1186/1477-7827-3-58View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Lephart ED, Setchell KDR, Handa RJ, Lund TD: Behavioral effects of endocrine-disrupting substances: phytoestrogens. ILAR J 2004, 45: 443-454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Bhathena SJ, Velasquez MT: Beneficial role of dietary phytoestrogens in obesity and diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2002, 76: 1191-1201.Google Scholar
  49. Lephart ED, Lund TD, Horvath TL: Brain androgen and progesterone metabolizing enzymes: biosynthesis, distribution and function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001, 37: 25-37. 10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00111-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. van Veldhuizen PJ, Thrasher JB, Ray G, Cherian R, Ward J, Holzbeierlein J, Gutow S, Banerjee SK: Dose effect of soy supplementation in prostate cancer: a pilot study. Oncol Rep 2006, 16: 1221-1224.Google Scholar
  51. Weber KS, Setchell KDR, Stocco DM, Lephart ED: Dietary soy-phytoestrogens decrease testosterone levels and prostate weight, without altering LH, prostate 5alpha-reductase or testicular StAR levels in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. J Endocrinol 2001., 170:Google Scholar
  52. Setchell KD, Brown NM, Desai P, Zimmer-Nechemias L, Wolfe BE, Brashear WT, Kirschner AS, Cassidy A, Heubi JE: Bioavailability of pure isoflavones in healthy humans and analysis of commercial soy isoflavone supplements. J Nutr 2001, 131: 1362S-1375.Google Scholar
  53. Christensen MJ, Cammack PM, Wray CD: Tissue specificity of selenoprotein gene expression in rats. J Nutr Biochem 1995, 6: 367-372. 10.1016/0955-2863(95)80004-VView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Weber KS, Setchell KDR, Lephart ED: Maternal and perinatal brain aromatase: effects of dietary soy phytoestrogens. Brain Res 2001, 126: 217-221. 10.1016/S0165-3806(00)00138-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC Jr: AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 1993, 123: 1939-1951.Google Scholar
  56. Wycherly BJ, Moak MA, Christensen MJ: High dietary intake of sodium selenite induces oxidative DNA damage in rat liver. Nutr Cancer 2004, 48: 78-83. 10.1207/s15327914nc4801_11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Velasquez MT, Bhathena SJ: Role of dietary soy protein in obesity. Int J Med Sci 2007, 4: 72-82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Rachon D, Vortherms T, Seidlova-Wuttke D, Wuttke W: Effects of dietary equol on body weight gain, intra-abdominal fat accumulation, plasma lipids, and glucose tolerance in ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats. Menopause 2007, 14: 925-932. 10.1097/gme.0b013e31802d979bView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Mardon J, Mathey J, Kati-Coulibaly S, Puel C, Davicco MJ, Lebecque P, Horcajada MN, Coxam V: Influence of lifelong soy isoflavones consumption on bone mass in the rat. Exp Biol Med 2008, 233: 229-237. 10.3181/0707-RM-202View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Oh HY, Lim S, Lee JM, Kim D-Y, Ann E-S, Yoon S: A combination of soy isoflavone supplementation and exercise improves lipid profiles and protects antioxidant defense-systems against exercise-induced oxidative stress in ovariectomized rats. Biofactors 2007, 29: 175-185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Weber KS, Setchell KD, Stocco DM, Lephart ED: Dietary soy-phytoestrogens decrease testosterone levels and prostate weight without altering LH, prostate 5alpha-reductase or testicular steroidogenic acute regulatory peptide levels in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. J Endocrinol 2001, 170: 591-599. 10.1677/joe.0.1700591View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Pan L, Xia X, Feng Y, Jiang C, Huang Y: Exposure to the phytoestrogen daidzein attenuates apomorphine-induced penile erection concomitant with plasma testosterone level reduction in dose- and time-related manner in adult rats. Urology 2007, 70: 613-617. 10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Weber KS, Jacobson NA, Setchell KD, Lephart ED: Brain aromatase and 5alpha-reductase, regulatory behaviors and testosterone levels in adult rats on phytoestrogen diets. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1999, 221: 131-135. 10.1046/j.1525-1373.1999.d01-66.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Lund TD, Rhees RW, Setchell KD, Lephart ED: Altered sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area (SDN-POA) volume in adult Long-Evans rats by dietary soy phytoestrogens. Brain Res 2001, 914: 92-99. 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02779-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Lephart ED, Adlercreutz H, Lund TD: Dietary soy phytoestrogen effects on brain structure and aromatase in Long-Evans rats. Neuroreport 2001, 12: 3451-3455. 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Thigpen JE, Setchell KDR, Padilla-Banks E, Haseman JK, Saunders HE, Caviness GF, Kissling GE, Grant MG, Forsythe DB: Variations in phytoestrogen content between different mill dates of the same diet produces significant differences in the time of vaginal opening in CD-1 mice and F344 rats but not in CD Sprague-Dawley rats. Environ Health Perspect 2007, 115: 1717-1726.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Yatkin E, Streng T, Kauppila M-L, Bernoulli J, Saarinen N, Santti R: The soy effect in the disease models of nonbacterial prostatitis and obstructive voiding. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2007,232(5):674-681.Google Scholar
  68. Klein SL, Wisniewski AB, Marson AL, Glass GE, Gearhart JP: Early exposure to genistein exerts long-lasting effects on the endocrine and immune systems in rats. Mol Med 2002, 8: 742-749.Google Scholar
  69. Murrill WB, Brown NM, Zhang JX, Manzolillo PA, Barnes S, Lamartiniere CA: Prepubertal genistein exposure suppresses mammary cancer and enhances gland differentiation in rats. Carcinogenesis 1996, 17: 1451-1457. 10.1093/carcin/17.7.1451View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Chandrasekher G, Sailaja D: Alterations in lens protein tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling during selenite cataract formation. Curr Eye Res 2004, 28: 135-144. 10.1076/ceyr.28.2.135.26232View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Meltzer HM, Haug E: Oral intake of selenium has no effect on the serum concentrations of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins 1 and 3 in healthy women. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995, 33: 411-415.Google Scholar
  72. Siddiqui IA, Afaq F, Adhami VM, Mukhtar H: Prevention of prostate cancer through custom tailoring of chemopreventive regimen. Chem Biol Interact 2008, 171: 122-132. 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.03.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Stattin P, Soderberg S, Hallmans G, Bylund A, Kaaks R, Stenman UH, Bergh A, Olsson T: Leptin is associated with increased prostate cancer risk: a nested case-referent study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001, 86: 1341-1345. 10.1210/jc.86.3.1341Google Scholar
  74. Barnard RJ: Prostate cancer prevention by nutritional means to alleviate metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 2007, 86: s889-893.Google Scholar
  75. Hammarsten J, Hogstedt B: Clinical, haemodynamic, anthropometric, metabolic and insulin profile of men with high-stage and high-grade clinical prostate cancer. Blood Press 2004, 13: 47-55. 10.1080/08037050310025735View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tolman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement