Open Access

Effect of nutritional recovery with soybean flour diet on body composition, energy balance and serum leptin concentration in adult rats

  • Loanda Maria G Cheim1,
  • Elisângela A Oliveira2,
  • Vanessa C Arantes1,
  • Roberto V Veloso1,
  • Marise Auxiliadora B Reis3,
  • Maria Helena G Gomes-da-Silva1,
  • Everardo M Carneiro3,
  • Antonio C Boschero4 and
  • Márcia Q Latorraca1Email author
Nutrition & Metabolism20096:34

DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-6-34

Received: 20 August 2008

Accepted: 24 August 2009

Published: 24 August 2009

Abstract

Background

Malnutrition in early life is associated with obesity in adulthood and soybean products may have a beneficial effect on its prevention and treatment. This study evaluated body composition, serum leptin and energy balance in adult rats subjected to protein restriction during the intrauterine stage and lactation and recovering on a soybean flour diet.

Methods

Five groups of the Wistar strain of albino rats were used: CC, offspring born to and suckled by mothers fed a control diet and fed the same diet after weaning; CS, offspring born to and suckled by mothers fed a control diet and fed a soybean diet with 17% protein after weaning; LL, offspring of mothers fed a low protein diet and fed the same diet after weaning; LC, offspring of mothers fed a low protein diet, but fed a control diet after weaning; LS, offspring of mothers fed a low protein diet, but fed a soybean diet with 17% protein after weaning. Food intake, body, perirenal and retroperitoneal adipose tissue were measured in grams. Leptin was quantified using the Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA) and insulin by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Carcass composition was determined by chemical methods and energy expenditure was calculated by the difference between energy intake and carcass energy gain. Data were tested by analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

The LC and LS groups had higher energetic intake concerning body weight, lower energy expenditure, proportion of fat carcass and fat pads than CC and CS groups. The LS group showed reduced body weight gain and lower energy efficiency, which was reflected in less energy gain as protein and the proportion of carcass protein, and lower energy gain as lipid than in the LC groups, although both groups had eaten the same amount of diet and showed equal energy expenditure. Serum leptin did not differ among groups and was unrelated to food or energy intake and energy expenditure. Serum insulin was higher in the LS than in the LC group.

Conclusion

Protein restriction during intrauterine life and lactation periods did not provoke obesity in adulthood. Nutritional recovery with soybean diet decreased the body weight at the expense of lower energy efficiency with repercussion on lean mass.

Introduction

Currently, around 600 million people worldwide suffer major nutritional problems including energy deficits and starvation, whilst approximately 300 million people have chronic problems such as energy surpluses and obesity and, in some cases, these problems co-exist [1, 2]. The increase in obesity and the reasons why some individuals appear to gain weight so easily is a much-debated topic [3].

Epidemiological studies show a higher incidence of obesity among men whose mothers experienced food deprivation in pregnancy during the Dutch famine in the Second World War [4]. In addition, central adiposity and other features related to a metabolic syndrome in adults born underweight were also documented [5, 6]. These findings suggest that malnutrition in early life could promote obesity in adulthood.

Body weight, food intake and metabolism are regulated by the hypothalamus, that processes central and peripheral signals. Within the hypothalamus, neurons residing in the ARC (arcuate nucleus) – PVN (paraventricular) – PF/LH (perifornical/lateral hypothalamus) axis communicate with each other and are subjected to the influence of several peripheral factors, including leptin [7]. Leptin is a hormone mainly produced by fat cells in which plasma levels are a function of fat mass [8, 9].

It has been suggested that programming of leptin concentrations by early diet may be one mechanism that links early nutrition with later obesity [10]. Protein restriction is associated to increase in body fat, serum leptin concentrations and food intake, which suggests a state of leptin resistance [11]. When rats are undernourished during the first two weeks of pregnancy and re-fed during the third week, the male offspring develop hyperphagia and obesity in adulthood if maintained either on a high fat diet or on a standard low fat and high carbohydrate diet [1215]. Protein and energy restriction during lactation increase expression of leptin receptors in the pituitary and maintain normal serum leptin concentrations in adult life [16]. Thus, poor nutrition in early life and the type of diet utilized during the recovery phase appear to be critical in the determination of obesity in adulthood.

Considerable energy has been invested in finding new therapeutic approaches to overcome obesity. Studies have shown that the consumption of soybean reduces the body weight and adiposity [17, 18]. These effects were attributed either to soy protein, isoflavones and/or others components (saponins, fiber, etc.) that act together or separately. Soybean did not reduce food intake, but increased the activity of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP-1) in brown adipose tissue, enhanced lipolysis and inhibited the lipogenesis in the white adipose tissue [1923]. In addition, isoflavones reduce serum leptin concentrations in male obese rats, because it diminishes the adiposity [21].

This study was undertaken to evaluate body composition, serum leptin concentration and energy balance in adult rats which had been subjected to protein restriction during intrauterine life and lactation and had recovered on whole soybean flour diet.

Materials and methods

Animals and diets

Experimental procedures followed the COBEA guidelines (Brazilian Committee on Experimental Animal Care) adapted by the Federal University of Mato Grosso. Virgin female Wistar rats (85–90 d old) were obtained from the University's own breeding colony. Paring was performed by housing males with females overnight, and pregnancy was confirmed by the examination of vaginal smears for the presence of sperm. Pregnant females were separated at random and maintained from the first day of pregnancy until the end of lactation on isocaloric diets containing 6% protein (LP diet) or 17% protein (C diet). Spontaneous delivery took place on day 22 of pregnancy after which, at 3 d of age, large litters were reduced to eight pups, thus ensuring a standard litter size per mother. At weaning (4 wk after birth) six male pups from each group were killed for biochemical and hormonal analysis and for measurements of carcass composition. The remaining male animals were maintained on mother's diet for 10 days and then divided in five groups: CC, consisting of offspring born to and suckled by mothers fed a control (C) diet and fed the same diet after weaning; CS, offspring born to and suckled by mothers fed a C diet and fed a soybean flour diet with 17% protein after weaning; LL, offspring of mothers fed a LP diet and fed the same diet after weaning; LC, offspring of mothers fed a LP diet, but fed a C diet after weaning; LS, offspring of mothers fed a LP diet, but fed a soybean flour diet with 17% protein after weaning. The diets are described in Table 1. In the soybean diet, adjustments were made to equalize the carbohydrate, lipids, fiber contents, and energy value to a casein diet, suppressing the soybean oil and reducing fiber. The whole, inactivate soybean flour was obtained by industrial processing (thermal treatment, peeling, grinding, and micronization) that reduced the enzymatic and antitrypsin factor content and contained 80% of the nutritional value of animal casein. Throughout the experimental period, the rats were maintained in individual cages and given free access to food and water. They were kept under standard lighting conditions (12-h light/dark cycle) at a temperature of 24°C. The rats were weight weekly and food intake was daily measured (5 days/wk). The rate of spillage was not accounted for calculation of energy intake. At 90 d of age, the rats were killed by decapitation (between 8:00 and 10:00 AM) and blood samples were collected allowed clotting and the sera stored at -20°C for the subsequent measurement of serum leptin concentrations (Kits Cristal Chem Inc.) and serum insulin concentrations, determined by radioimmunoassay using rat insulin as a standard, 125I-labeled bovine insulin as the radioactive tracer, and guinea pig anti-porcine insulin serum as the antibody [24]. The following determinations were performed immediately after decapitation: serum glucose, serum albumin and serum total protein [2527]. The ratio of serum insulin concentration to serum glucose concentration was calculated to assess the insulin sensitivity. After a medium laparotomy, the retroperitoneal (RET) and perirenal (PERI) white adipose tissues were quickly removed for determination of fresh weight. Carcasses were eviscerated, weighted and stored at -20°C for measurement of their composition.
Table 1

Composition of the control, low-protein and soybean flour diets

Ingredient

Control

Low protein

Soybean flour **

 

(17% protein)

(6% protein)

(17% protein)

  

g/kg

 

Casein (84% protein)

202.0

71.5

-

Soybean flour

-

-

415.0

Cornstarch

397.0

480.0

312.2

Dextrinized cornstarch

130.5

159.0

103.7

Sucrose

100.0

121.0

78.6

Soybean oil

70.0

70.0

-

Fiber

50.0

50.0

40.0

Mineral mix (AIN-93)G*

35.0

35.0

35.0

Vitamin mix (AIN-93)G*

10.0

10.0

10.0

L-cystine

3.0

1.0

3.0

Choline bitartrate

2.5

2.5

2.5

*See [Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC Jr: AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 1993, 123:1939–1951.] for more details.

** Composition of soybean flour (100 g): 455 Kcal, 41 g carbohydrate, 25.5 g protein, 21 g total fat, 2 g fiber, 6 g humidity, 4.5 g ash, 100 mg isoflavone.

Measurements of carcass composition and energy intake

The water carcass was measured by oven drying the carcasses at 80°C until constant weight. Body water was measured by subtracting dry carcass weight from wet carcass weight. The carcass fat was measured after fat extraction in petroleum ether using a Soxhlet continuous fat extractor. Fat content was then calculated by subtracting fat-free dry mass from dry carcass weight. Ash content was estimated following combustion of carcasses at 550°C until constant weight. Protein content was determined by subtracting water, fat and ash content from wet carcass weight.

To calculate energy intake, we assumed the energy content of protein and carbohydrate to be 16.74 Kj/g and fat to be 37.7 Kj/g. The body energy content was calculated from the amount of fat and protein using constant 40 Kj/g fat and 24 Kj/g protein. The calculated baseline energy was estimated by the relationship between carcass components of weaned rats under similar dietary treatment. To CC and CS groups the calculated baseline energy was 793 ± 435 Kj, and to LC, LS and LL groups the value was 188 ± 33 Kj. From the difference between the carcass composition from adult rats and the carcass composition from weaned rats, the lipid gain, protein gain, energy gain, energy efficiency (the ratio of energy gain to energy intake × 100), protein efficiency (the ratio of body weight gain to protein intake), and energy expenditure (the difference between energy intake and energy gain) were calculated.

Statistical analysis

The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for the number of rats (n) indicated. The C and LP groups were compared with unpaired t test. Two-way analysis of variance (effects of nutritional status and diet) was used to compare data from CC, CS, LC and LS groups. The same data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance when assessing whether diet was effective in improving nutritional status in the LC, LS and LL groups. When necessary, these analyses were complemented by the Tukey test to determine the significance of individual differences. Levene's test for homogeneity of variances was initially used to determine whether the data complied with assumptions of parametric analysis of variance. When necessary, the data were log-transformed to correct for variance heterogeneity or non-normality [28]. P < 0.05 indicated significance. All statistical comparisons were done using the Statistic Software package (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

Results

At birth, rats from dams maintained on low protein diet during pregnancy had body weight lower than that control rats (p < 0.0001). At weaning, the LP group showed hypoalbunaemia (p < 0.002), hypoinsulinaemia and body weight was reduced by 73%, compared to C group (p < 0.001). Serum glucose and leptin concentrations from LP group did not differ from those of the C group (Table 2).
Table 2

Body weight at birth and weaning, serum albumin, glucose, insulin and leptin concentrations of weaned rats from mothers maintained on control (C) or low-protein (LP) diets during pregnancy and lactation

 

Groups

Variable

C

LP

Body weigth at birth (g)

5.3 ± 0.2

(6)

4.9 ± 0.2*

(4)

Body weigth at weaning (g)

103 ± 9

(6)

28 ± 4**

(6)

Albumin (g/l)

37 ± 6

(6)

23 ± 5*

(6)

Glucose (mmol/l)

5.0 ± 0.9

(6)

5.4 ± 1.2

(6)

Insulin (pmol/l)

387 ± 253

(6)

145 ± 44*

(5)

Leptin (pg/ml)

3,598 ± 1,286

(6)

2,759 ± 755

(6)

Values are means ± SD of numbers of litters or rats in parentheses. *Indicates means values significantly different (nonpaired t tests; p < 0.05).

Hence, the carcass weight from LP group was also reduced by 72%, compared with that of the C group. Protein restriction interfered significantly with the chemical composition of the carcass: the ash, water, protein and carcass fat content from LP group were, respectively, 2.5, 3.3, 3.7 and 4.7-times lower than for the C group (p < 0.0001). When expressed as a percentage of carcass, the LP group exhibited lipid content 1.3-times lower (p < 0.05) and ash content 1.4-times higher (p < 0.0001) than those in the C group. No difference was found between LP and C groups when the protein and water content were expressed in relation to carcass weight (Table 3).
Table 3

Carcass composition of weaned rats from mothers maintained with control (C) or low-protein (LP) diets during pregnancy and lactation

 

Groups

Variable

C

(6)

LP

(6)

 

g

Carcass fresh

75 ± 7

21 ± 4*

Protein

14.0 ± 1.4

3.8 ± 0.4*

Lipid

11.4 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 0.7*

Water

47 ± 5

14 ± 3*

Ash

2.3 ± 0.2

0.9 ± 0.1*

 

g/100 g of carcass weight

Protein

18.8 ± 0.4

18.4 ± 2.1

Lipid

15.4 ± 1.7

11.7 ± 3.0*

Water

62.7 ± 1.4

65.5 ± 3.5

Ash

3.1 ± 0.1

4.4 ± 0.5*

Values are means ± SD for the number of rats in parentheses. *Indicates means values significantly different (nonpaired t tests; p < 0.05).

At the beginning of the recovery phase, LC, LS and LL rats had similar body weights and, in all cases, these were significantly lower than those found in CC and CS rats. At the end of this period, body weight of rats from LC and LS groups were lower than those rats from CC and CS groups (F1,26 = 173.53, p < 0.0001). Also, rats from CS and LS groups had lower final body weight than those from CC and LC groups (F1,26 = 12.73, p < 0.05). Although LS rats had a greater final body weight than LL rats (p < 0.001), their mean weight was still significantly lower than that of the LC rats (p < 0.05). The serum albumin, serum protein, serum glucose and serum leptin concentrations were not significantly among CC, CS, LC and LS rats. Serum insulin was lower in LC and LS groups, as compared to CC and CS groups (F1,20 = 48.701, p < 0.0001), but it was higher in CS and LS groups than in CC and LC groups (F1,20 = 10.270, p < 0.01). The ratio of serum insulin levels to serum glucose levels was lower in LC and LS groups than in CC and CS groups (F1,20 = 26.039, p < 0.0001), and higher in CS and LS groups than in CC and LC groups (F1,20 = 8.111, p < 0.01). The In LS and LC rats serum albumin and serum total protein levels were significantly higher than in LL rats (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). No difference among these groups was observed in terms of serum glucose and leptin concentrations. Serum insulin and the ratio of serum insulin concentration to glucose concentration were similar in LC and LL rats and significantly lower than LS rats (p < 0.002; p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 4).
Table 4

Initial and final body weight, serum total protein, albumin, glucose, insulin and leptin concentrations of adult rats maintained with control (CC and LC) or soybean flour (CS or LS) or low protein (LL) diets after weaning

 

Groups

Variable

CC

CS

LC

LS

LL

Initial body weight (g)

182 ± 22

(8)

189 ± 12

(8)

42 ± 11

(7)

45 ± 10

(7)

42 ± 11

(7)

Final body weight (g)

431 ± 27

(8)

387 ± 51

(8)

266 ± 24a

(7)

220 ± 25b

(7)

114 ± 35c

(7)

Total protein (g/L)

63 ± 16

(8)

66 ± 3

(8)

67 ± 3a

(7)

64 ± 4a

(7)

54 ± 4b

(7)

Albumin (g/L)

31 ± 5

(8)

33 ± 4

(8)

29 ± 2a

(7)

31 ± 8a

(7)

18 ± 8b

(7)

Glucose (mmol/L)

3.6 ± 0.9

(6)

3.7 ± 0.5

(6)

3.6 ± 0.9

(6)

3.3 ± 0.8

(6)

3.1 ± 1.2

(5)

Insulin (pmol/L)

170 ± 35

(6)

211 ± 46

(6)

69 ± 18b

(6)

117 ± 32a

(6)

81 ± 22b

(5)

Insulin/glucose ratio

49 ± 12

(6)

58 ± 14

(6)

19 ± 3b

(6)

38 ± 15a

(6)

28 ± 9b

(5)

Leptin (pg/ml)

1,350 ± 371

(6)

1,724 ± 781

(6)

1,012 ± 345

(6)

1,512 ± 623

(6)

1,217 ± 934

(5)

Values are means ± SD for the numbers of rats in parentheses. Means with different superscript letters are significantly different by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Carcass weight, carcass fat and protein contents were lower in LS and LC rats than in CS and CC rats (F1,26 = 155.46, p < 0.0001; F1,26 = 48.68, p < 0.0001; F1,26 = 35.66, p < 0.0001, respectively), as well as in CS and LS groups, compared with CC and LC groups (F1,26 = 7.60, p < 0.05; F1,26 = 5.87, p < 0.05; and F1,26 = 9.23, p < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of fat carcass was reduced only in LC and LS groups when compared with CC and CS groups (F1,26 = 15.00, p < 0.001). No difference was observed among groups when the carcass protein content was expressed in relation to body weight. Carcass fresh weight, protein content and the proportion of carcass protein were significantly greater in LS rats, compared to LL rats (p < 0.001), but significantly lower than LC groups (p < 0.05). Carcass lipid content was similar in LS and LL rats, and significantly lower than LC rats (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), but the percentage of carcass lipid did not differ among LS, LC and LL rats (Table 5). Absolute and relative RET fat weight was lesser in the LS and LC rats than in the CS and CC rats (F1,26 = 114.15, p < 0.0001 and F1,26 = 41.52, p < 0.0001, respectively) and in the CS and LS rats, compared to the CC and LC rats (F1,26 = 18.96, p < 0.001 and F1,26 = 13.84, p < 0.001, respectively). The PERI fat weights of rats from the LS and LC groups were similar, however they were lower than in CS and CC rats (p < 0.01). Concerning body weight, the PERI fat weight was lower in the LS and LC rats than in the CS and CC rats (F1,26 = 32.51, p < 0.0001) and in the CS and LS rats, compared to CC and LC rats (F1,26 = 12.48, p < 0.01). It was noticed that LS and LL rats had RET fat weights (absolute values) similar between them but significantly lower than LC rats (p < 0.05), whereas PERI fat weights from LS rats were equal to LC and LL rats (p < 0.05). No difference was verified in the relative values of RET and PERI fat weights among three groups of rats (Table 5).
Table 5

Carcass composition, absolute and relative weight of white adipose tissue retroperitoneal (RET) and perirenal (PERI) of adult rats maintained with control (CC and LC) or soybean flour (CS or LS) or low protein (LL) diets after weaning

 

Groups

Variable

CC

(8)

CS

(8)

LC

(7)

LS

(7)

LL

(7)

 

g

Carcass fresh

318 ± 42

300 ± 27

199 ± 16a

159 ± 186b

80 ± 29c

Protein

76 ± 5

70 ± 17

50 ± 36a

38 ± 4b

17 ± 6c

Lipid

45 ± 10

36 ± 14

19 ± 86a

11 ± 3b

8 ± 5b

RET

9.93 ± 1.38

7.16 ± 1.57

3.90 ± 1.756a

2.18 ± 0.56b

1.22 ± 1.10b

PERI

3.80 ± 0.73A

2.46 ± 0.49AB

1.37 ± 0.60Ca

0.90 ± 0.36Cab

0.43 ± 0.32b

 

g/100 g of carcass weight

Protein

24.2 ± 2.9

23.1 ± 5.1

25.0 ± 0.7a

24.0 ± 0.4b

21.9 ± 0.9c

Lipid

14.2 ± 3.0

12.0 ± 5.0

9.6 ± 3.3

6.9 ± 1.0

9.3 ± 3.8

 

g/100 g of body weight

RET

2.30 ± 0.23

1.78 ± 0.34

1.43 ± 0.54

0.98 ± 0.22

0.92 ± 0.61

PERI

0.87 ± 0.13

0.61 ± 0.10

0.50 ± 0.20

0.40 ± 0.13

0.34 ± 0.15

Values are means ± SD for the numbers of rats in parentheses. Means with different superscript capital letters are significantly different by two-way ANOVA and with superscript minuscule letters are significantly different by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p < 0.05).

The total energy intake during the recovery phase was lower in LC and LS rats, compared to CC and CS rats (F1,26 = 188.99, p < 0.0001) and in CS and LS groups than in the CC and LC groups (F1,26 = 11.14, p < 0.01). During the recovery phase, the total energy intake was similar in the LS and LC groups and significantly greater than in the LL group (Figure 1A). When expressed per gram of body weight, the energy intake was higher in the LC and LS groups, in relation to the CC and CS groups (F1,26 = 37.58, p < 0.0001) (CC = 3609 ± 120 Kj/100 g body weight, CS = 3593 ± 251 Kj/100 g body weight, LC = 3987 ± 154 Kj/100 g body weight, LS = 4264 ± 350 Kj/100 g body weight). Rats from LS and LC groups had energy intake/100 g body weight similar among them, but significantly lower than the LL group (6432 ± 1230 Kj/100 g body weight, p < 0.001) (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Total (A) and relative (B) energy intake, carcass energy (C) energy gain (D), gain as lipid (E), gain as protein (F), calculated energy expenditure (G) and energy efficiency (H) of adult rats maintained with control (CC and LC) or soybean flour (CS or LS) or low protein (LL) diets after weaning. Values are means ± SD for the numbers of rats in parentheses. Means with different superscript letters are significantly different by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Also, rats from LC and LS groups had smaller carcass energy (F1,26 = 178.68, p < 0.0001), energy gain (F1,26 = 74.89, p < 0.0001), gain as lipid (F1,26 = 20.12, p < 0.0001), gain as protein (F1,26 = 27.31, p < 0.0001), calculated energy expenditure (F1,26 = 149.34, p < 0.0001) and energy efficiency (F1,26 = 8.36, p < 0.01) than rats from CC and CS groups. These variables were lower in the CS and LS groups than in the CC and CS groups (F1,26 = 19.77, p < 0.0001, F1,26 = 19.77, p < 0.001, F1,26 = 5.87, p < 0.03, F1,26 = 6.42, p < 0.02, F1,26 = 4.35, p < 0.05 and F1,26 = 11.77, p < 0.01, respectively) (Figures 1C–1H). Carcass energy (Figure 1C), energy gain (Figure 1D), gain as protein (Figure 1F) and energy efficiency (Figure 1H) were lower in the LS group than in LC group (p < 0.05), but higher than in the LL group (p < 0.05). The gain as lipid (Figure 1E) was similar in the LS and LL groups but significantly lower than in the LC group (p < 0.05). In the LS and LC groups, the calculated energy expenditure (Figure 1G) did not differ and was significantly higher than LL group (p < 0.05).

Discussion

In this study, protein restriction during fetal and neonatal life led to a low weight at birth and at weaning, in agreement with our previous observations [29]. At weaning, the poor nutrition status was confirmed by hipoalbuminemia and hipoinsulinemia, features commonly found in malnourished infants and in animals [30, 31]. In contrast to what has been observed in those subjected to protein restriction during growth phase after weaning which showed increases in the proportion of body fat, in this study we verified decreases in the total fat mass and percentage of body fat, but no alteration in the proportion of body protein [11, 32]. Thus, it seems that protein restriction in early life affects body fat to a greater degree than it does body protein.

Undernourished rats and those subjected to protein-restricted during intrauterine life show similar and higher body weights, respectively, after nutritional recovery, compared to control rats [13, 15, 33]. In this and in previous studies, nutritional rehabilitation after weaning did not correct the body weight deficit, regardless of dietary protein quality [34, 35]. Despite low body weight, the proportion of protein carcass remained similar in recovered and control rats, in contrast to study showing that rats submitted to prenatal and early postnatal protein malnutrition present reduced fat-free dry mass protein after nutritional rehabilitation [36]. Based on these observations, prenatal period and caloric restriction are more critical for obesity genesis than the postnatal period and protein restriction.

Obesity is thought to be result of an energy intake – energy expenditure imbalance. Although both recovered groups have showed higher energetic intake relative to body weight and lower energy expenditure, they exhibited lower proportion of carcass fat and fatty deposits than control rats, an indication that our model did not induce obesity. However, this study ended when the rats were 90 days old and it is possible that body composition changes as rats grow old.

Soybean diet has been associated to reduction in the fat deposits due to the action of isoflavone that increases energy expenditure by altering the brown-fat activity and the thyroid function [21]. In this study, soybean diet was more effective than the casein diet in reducing the proportion of fat deposits, although the animals maintained on soybean diet had eaten proportionally the same amount of diet and had showed lower energy expenditure than those fed the casein diet. It has been reported that genistein, an isoflavone of soy, decreases lipogenesis, enhances lipolysis and counteracts the antilipolytic action of insulin in isolated rat adipocytes genistein [22, 37]. Recently, we reported that our rats fed with the soybean diet show considerable amount of genistein in the sera [38] and express less mRNA of acetyl-CoA carboxylase in the liver [39]. Thus, the reduced adiposity seen in our animals maintained on soybean diet could be an effect of this isoflavone on lipid metabolism.

However, we observed a lower energy efficiency of soybean diet than casein diet. Especially in the LS group, the low energy efficiency was reflected in less energy gain as protein and proportion of carcass protein, and lower energy gain as lipid. We have recently verified that our soybean diet has lower digestibility than the casein diet (RV Veloso, MQ Latorraca, VC Arantes, MAB Reis, F Ferreira, AC Boschero and EM Carneiro unpublished results), and perhaps this effect was critical to accretion of carcass protein in animals that suffered previous nutritional deficit. Nevertheless, since the rats maintained with the soybean or casein diet showed serum albumin and total protein concentrations similar to control rats and higher as compared to malnourished rats, it became clear that the soybean diet was efficient for the recovery of the nutritional status of the rats. The lower accretion of lipid in depots and in carcass in animals recovered with soybean diet could be beneficial if in our animal model age determine changes in the body composition, favoring the development of obesity.

In agreement to what has been observed by others [40, 41], we verified that basal concentration of serum leptin did not differ among weaned protein-deprived rats, in the adults rats recovered from early protein restriction and in the control rats. Although isoflavones have been associated with reduction in leptin levels [18, 21], our rats fed with the soybean diet had similar leptin levels to those fed the casein diet. It is known that insulin and glucose together regulate leptin production and secretion [42]. Moreover, genistein increases insulin secretion by isolated islets in the presence of basal, physiologic and supraphysiologic glucose concentrations [43, 44]. In this study, rats kept on a soybean diet showed high serum insulin concentrations, as compared with those fed with a casein diet. In contrast, recovered and malnourished rats showed reduction in the serum insulin concentrations, as previously described [34]. Equivalent serum leptin levels in rats exhibiting reduced proportion of fat depots and low insulin/glucose ratio, such as it was seen in our LC and LL groups in relation to CC and CS, are consistent with the concept that early protein restriction enhances the leptin response, by increasing insulin sensitivity of adipocyte glucose uptake [41]. On the other hand, in rats maintained on soybean diet, the same effect was perhaps favored by high insulin levels, which appeared to stimulate leptin production [45].

Circulating levels of leptin are proportional to the total fat mass, and food intake and energy expenditure are regulated by leptin [46, 47]. In this study, recovered and malnourished rats, as well as those fed with soybean diet that exhibited lower fat mass, had similar serum leptin levels when compared to control rats and animals fed with casein diet. This suggests that although these animals possess fewer adipocytes, they obtain a higher amount of leptin than their controls. Also, we observed that energy expenditure appear to be related to body weight. Interestingly, serum leptin concentrations were not associated to energy expenditure or to energy intake. Even so, maintenance of normal serum leptin concentrations can be beneficial to prevent leptin resistance and obesity.

Thus, our results indicate that protein restriction during intrauterine life and lactation periods did not provoke obesity in adulthood, despite the increase in food intake in relation to body weight and reduction of energy expenditure. Nutritional recovery with soybean diet did not interfere in the serum leptin concentration, food behavior and energy expenditure, but decreased the body weight at the expense of lower energy efficiency with repercussion on lean mass.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work is part of a Dissertation presented by Loanda Maria Gomes Cheim as partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master's degree in Health Science at the Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UFMT. This work was partly supported by the Brazilian foundations FAPEMAT (grant # 175/04), CNPq (grant # 479138/2003-6), and FINEP/PRONEX (grant # 134/97).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição, Faculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
(2)
Secretaria de Estado de Saúde
(3)
Departamento de Ciências Básicas em Saúde, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
(4)
Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

References

  1. International Obesity Task Force. http://www.iotf.org
  2. Maire B, Delpeuch F, Cornu A, Tchibindat F, Simondon F, Massamba JP, Salem G, Chevassus-Agnes S: Urbanization and nutritional transition in sub-saharan Africa: exemplified by Congo and Senegal. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1992, 40: 252-258.Google Scholar
  3. Webber J: Energy balance in obesity. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003, 62: 539-543. 10.1079/PNS2003256.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ravelli GP, Stein ZA, Susser MW: Obesity in young men after famine exposure in utero and early infancy. N Engl J Med. 1976, 295: 349-353.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Valdez R, Athens MA, Thompson GH, Bradshaw BS, Stern MP: Birthweight and adult health outcomes in a biethnic population in the USA. Diabetologia. 1994, 37: 624-631. 10.1007/BF00403383.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker DJ, Meade TW, Fall CH, Lee A, Osmond C, Phipps K, Stirling Y: Relation of fetal and infant growth to plasma fibrinogen and factor VII concentrations in adult life. BMJ. 1992, 304: 148-152. 10.1136/bmj.304.6820.148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sahu A: A hypothalamic role in energy balance with special emphasis on leptin. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 2613-2620. 10.1210/en.2004-0032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fruhbeck G, Jebb SA, Prentice AM: Leptin: physiology and pathophysiology. Clin Physiol. 1998, 18: 399-419. 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1998.00129.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fruhbeck G: A heliocentric view of leptin. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001, 60: 301-318. 10.1079/PNS200196.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Singhal A, Farooqi IS, O'Rahilly S, Cole TJ, Fewtrell M, Lucas A: Early nutrition and leptin concentrations in later life. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002, 75: 993-999.Google Scholar
  11. Du F, Higginbotham DA, White BD: Food intake, energy balance and serum leptin, concentrations in rats fed low-protein diets. J Nutr. 2000, 130: 514-521.Google Scholar
  12. Jones AP, Friedman MI: Obesity and adipocyte abnormalities in offspring of rats undernourished during pregnancy. Science. 1982, 215: 1518-1519. 10.1126/science.7063860.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones AP, Simson EL, Friedman MI: Gestational undernutrition and the development of obesity in rats. J Nutr. 1984, 114: 1484-1492.Google Scholar
  14. Jones AP, Assimon SA, Friedman MI: The effect of diet on food intake and adiposity in rats made obese by gestational undernutrition. Physiol Behav. 1986, 37: 381-386. 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90194-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Anguita RM, Sigulem DM, Sawaya AL: Intrauterine food restriction is associated with obesity in young rats. J Nutr. 1993, 123: 1421-1428.Google Scholar
  16. Vicente LL, de Moura EG, Lisboa PC, Monte Alto Costa A, Amadeu T, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA, Passos MC: Malnutrition during lactation in rats is associated with higher expression of leptin receptor in the pituitary of adult offspring. Nutrition. 2004, 20: 924-928. 10.1016/j.nut.2004.06.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Baba N, Radwan H, Itallie TV: Effect of casein versus soy protein diets on body composition and serum lipid levels in adult rats. Nutr Res. 1992, 12: 279-10.1016/S0271-5317(05)80733-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bu L, Setchell KD, Lephart ED: Influence of dietary soy isoflavones on metabolism but not nociception and stress hormone response in ovariectomizes female rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005, 3: 58-10.1186/1477-7827-3-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lang V, Bellisle F, Oppert JM, Craplet C, Bornet FR, Slama G, Guy-Grand B: Satiating effect of proteins in healthy subjects: a comparison of egg albumin, casein, gelatin, soy protein, pea protein, and wheat gluten. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998, 67: 1197-1204.Google Scholar
  20. Lang V, Bellisle F, Alamowitch C, Craplet C, Bornet FR, Slama G, Guy-Grand B: Varying the protein source in mixed meal modifies glucose, insulin and glucagon kinetics in healthy men, has weak effects on subjective satiety and fails to affect food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999, 53: 959-965. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600881.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lephart ED, Setchell KD, Handa RJ, Lund TD: Behavioral effects of endocrine-disrupting substances: phytoestrogens. ILAR J. 2004, 45: 443-454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Szkudelska K, Nogowski L, Szkudelski T: Genistein affects lipogenesis and lipolysis in isolated rat adipocytes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2000, 75: 265-271. 10.1016/S0960-0760(00)00172-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Szkudelska K, Szkudelski T, Nogowski L: Daidzein, coumestrol and zearalenone affect lipogenesis and lipolysis in rat adipocytes. Phytomedicine. 2002, 9: 338-345. 10.1078/0944-7113-00148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott AM, Atwater I, Rojas E: A Method for the simultaneous measurement of insulin release and B-cell membrane potential in single mouse islets of Langerhans. Diabetologia. 1981, 21: 470-475. 10.1007/BF00257788.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Trinder P: Determination of blood glucose using an oxidase-peroxidase system with a non-carcinogenic chromogen. J Clin Path. 1969, 22: 158-10.1136/jcp.22.2.158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Doumas BT, Watson WA, Biggs HG: Albumin standards and measurements of serum albumin with bronocresol green. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1971, 31: 87-10.1016/0009-8981(71)90365-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolfson WQ, Chon C, Calvary F, Ichiba F: Studies in serum proteins. 5. A rapid procedure for the estimation of total protein, true albumin, total glubulin, alpha globulin, and gamma globulin in 1.0 ml of serum. Am J Clin Pathol. 1948, 18: 723-Google Scholar
  28. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Assumptions of analysis of variance. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Edited by: Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. New York: W H Freeman and Company, 392-450.Google Scholar
  29. Latorraca MQ, Carneiro EM, Boschero AC, Mello MAR: Protein deficiency during pregnancy and lactation impairs glucose-induced insulin secretion but increases the sensitivity to insulin in weaned rats. Br J Nutr. 1998, 80: 291-297.Google Scholar
  30. Milner RD: Metabolic and hormonal responses to glucose and glucagon in patients with infantile malnutrition. Pediatr Res. 1971, 5: 33-39. 10.1203/00006450-197101000-00006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Reis MA, Carneiro EM, Mello MA, Boschero AC, Saad MJ, Velloso LA: Glucose-induced insulin secretion is impaired and insulin-induced phosphorylation of the insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 are increased in protein-deficient rats. J Nutr. 1997, 127: 403-410.Google Scholar
  32. White BD, Dean RG, Martin RJ: An association between low levels of dietary protein, elevated NPY gene expression in the basomedial hypothalamus and increased food intake. Nutr Neurosci . 1998, 1: 173-182.Google Scholar
  33. Holness MJ: Impact of early growth retardation on glucoregulatory control and insulin action in mature rats. Am J Physiol. 1996, 270: E946-954.Google Scholar
  34. Latorraca MQ, Reis MAB, Carneiro EM, Mello MAR, Velloso LA, Saad MJ, Boschero AC: Protein deficiency and nutritional recovery modulate insulin secretion and the early steps of insulin action in rats. J Nutr. 1998, 128: 1643-1649.Google Scholar
  35. Shepherd PR, Crowther NJ, Desai M, Hales CN, Ozanne SE: Altered adipocyte properties in the offspring of protein malnourished rats. Br J Nutr. 1997, 78: 121-129. 10.1079/BJN19970124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bartness TJ, Goodlett CR, Morgane PJ: Effects of pre- and early postnatal protein malnutrition on carcass composition and lipoprotein lipase activity in male rats. Physiol Behav. 1987, 39: 721-726. 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90256-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Szkudelska K, Nogowski L, Szkudelski T: Genistein, a plant-derived isoflavone, counteracts the antilipolytic action of insulin in isolated rat adipocytes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008, 109: 108-114. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.12.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. de Arruda Oliveira E, Gomes Cheim LM, Veloso RV, Arantes VC, Reis MA, Carneiro EM, Boschero AC, Latorraca MQ: Nutritional recovery with a soybean flour diet improves the insulin response to a glucose load without modifying glucose homeostasis. Nutrition. 2008, 24: 76-83. 10.1016/j.nut.2007.09.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Milanski M, Souza KL, Reis SR, Feres NH, de Souza LM, Arantes VC, Carneiro EM, Boschero AC, Reis MA, Latorraca MQ: Soybean diet modulates acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase expression in livers of rats recovering from early-life malnutrition. Nutrition. 2009, 25: 774-781. 10.1016/j.nut.2008.12.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Plagemann A, Waas T, Harder T, Rittel F, Ziska T, Rohde W: Hypothalamic neuropeptide Y levels in weaning offspring of low-protein malnourished mother rats. Neuropeptides. 2000, 34: 1-6. 10.1054/npep.1999.0778.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Holness MJ: Enhanced glucose uptake into adipose tissue induced by early growth restriction augments excursions in plasma leptin response evoked by changes in insulin status. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001, 25: 1775-1781. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801836.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Mueller WM, Gregoire FM, Stanhope KL, Mobbs CV, Mizuno TM, Warden CH, Stern JS, Havel PJ: Evidence that glucose metabolism regulates leptin secretion from cultures rat adipocytes. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 551-558. 10.1210/en.139.2.551.Google Scholar
  43. Sorenson R, Brelje CT, Roth C: Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on islets of Langerhans: evidence for tyrosine kinase in the regulation of insulin secretion. Endocrinology. 1994, 4: 1975-1978. 10.1210/en.134.4.1975.Google Scholar
  44. Liu D, Zhen W, Yang Z, Carter JD, Si H, Reynolds KA: Genistein acutely stimulates insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells through a cAMP-dependent protein kinase pathway. Diabetes. 2006, 55: 1043-1050. 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1089.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Koopmans SJ, Frolich M, Gribnau EH, Westendorp RG, DeFronzo RA: Effect of hyperinsulinemia on plasma leptin concentrations and food intake in rats. Am J Physiol. 1998, 274: E998-E1001.Google Scholar
  46. Frederich RC, Hamann A, Anderson S, Lollmann B, Lowell BB, Flier JS: Leptin levels reflect body lipid content in mice: evidence for diet-induced resistance to leptin action. Nat Med. 1995, 1: 1311-1314. 10.1038/nm1295-1311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Pelleymounter MA, Cullen MJ, Baker MB, Hecht R, Winters D, Boone T, Collins F: Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science. 1995, 269: 540-543. 10.1126/science.7624776.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Cheim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.