Association between dietary phytochemical index and 3-year changes in weight, waist circumference and body adiposity index in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose study

  • Parvin Mirmiran1,

    Affiliated with

    • Zahra Bahadoran2,

      Affiliated with

      • Mahdieh Golzarand2,

        Affiliated with

        • Niloofar Shiva2 and

          Affiliated with

          • Fereidoun Azizi3Email author

            Affiliated with

            Nutrition & Metabolism20129:108

            DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-108

            Received: 14 July 2012

            Accepted: 12 September 2012

            Published: 3 December 2012

            Abstract

            Background

            High intakes of phytochemical-rich foods have favorable effects on the prevention of chronic diseases. In this study we assessed the dietary phytochemical index (PI) in relation to 3-year change in weight, waist circumference (WC), body adiposity index (BAI) among Tehranian adults.

            Methods

            This longitudinal study was conducted in the framework of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, between 2006–2008 and 2009–2011, on 1938 adults, aged 19–70 y. The usual intake of participants was measured at baseline using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire and dietary PI was calculated. Anthropometric measures were assessed both at baseline and 3 years later. Multiple regression models were used to estimate mean difference changes in anthropometrics associated with various dietary PI.

            Results

            The mean age of participants was 40.4 ± 13.0 y, at baseline, respectively. Mean weight gain was 1.49 ± 5.06 kg (1.65 ± 5.3 kg in men and 1.34 ± 4.9 kg in women) during 3-year period. After adjustment for potential confounding variables including age at baseline, sex, BMI, educational levels, smoking, physical activity, total energy intake, dietary intake of carbohydrate, fat and protein, dietary intakes of whole grains in the highest quartile category of PI were inversely associated with 3-year changes in weight and WC (P for trend <0.05). Dietary intake of fruits in the highest quartile was also associated with lower weight gain during the study period (P for trend <0.05). There was significant inverse association between the highest quartile category of dietary PI with the 3-year changes in weight and BAI (P for trend <0.05).

            Conclusion

            Higher dietary PI could have favorable effects on prevention of weight gain and reduction of body adiposity in adults.

            Keywords

            Dietary phytochemical index Waist circumference Body adiposity index Weight gain Tehran lipid and Glucose study

            Background

            Obesity and abdominal obesity are major public health problems worldwide, and are associated with increased risk of non-communicable diseases, morbidity and mortality [13]. The global prevalence of obesity has doubled between 1980 and 2008. In 2008, 1.5 billion adults, aged 20 year and older, were overweight and 500 million were obese worldwide, figures estimated to reach 2.3 billion (overweight) and over 700 million (obese) in 2015 [4, 5]. Parallel to the ascending trend of overweight and obesity worldwide, the prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing in Iran; one study reported that the estimated total prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity in 1999–2001 were 15.8 and 36.5% in men and 31.3 and 76.7% in Iranian women, respectively [6]. An increasing trend in the prevalence of obesity and abdominal fat gain was also observed among adults during the last years [7].

            Obesity is a multi-factorial disease and dietary intake is the major modifiable factor which may be responsible for the increasing trend in overweight and obesity. Several studies have documented that plant foods and plant-based diets like vegetarian diets are associated with the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases [810]. Epidemiological and cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that vegetarian diets have an inverse association with weight and body mass index (BMI) [1114] and a recent meta-analysis conducted on 60 studies has shown that vegetarians had significantly lower weight and BMI compared with non-vegetarians [15]. Others studies have been shown that high intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and legumes have inverse associations with obesity and weight gain and recommend high consumption of these food groups for prevention obesity and maintenance of weight [1618].

            There is growing evidence that the beneficial effects of whole plant foods, in addition to lower energy density and glycemic index, may be contributed by the many phytochemicals found in these food groups. Phytochemicals are natural non-nutritive bioactive compounds including phenolic compounds (flavonoids, phenolic acids, hydroxycinammic acids, lignans, tyrosol esters, stilbenoids), isoperenoids, organosulfor compounds (allyl sulfors, isothiocyanates) found in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, legumes and other plant foods [1921]. These phytochemicals in addition to direct antioxidant activity, their anti-inflammatory potential and the modulation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, have anti-obesity properties [21].

            In this population based longitudinal study, we assessed the baseline dietary phytochemical index (PI) developed by McCarty as an index of total dietary phytochemical content, in relation to 3-year changes in weight, waist circumference and body adiposity index (BAI) among Tehranian adults.

            Methods

            Study population

            This study was conducted within the framework of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS). Briefly, TLGS is a community-based prospective study conducted to investigate and prevent non-communicable diseases, in a representative sample of residents, aged ≥ 3y, from district 13 of Tehran, the capital city of Iran. The first phase of the TLGS began in March 1999 and data collection, at three-year intervals, is ongoing [22, 23].

            For the current study, 2799 men and women aged 19–70 y, were recruited. Participants were excluded if they under- or over reported dietary intakes (less than 800 kcal/d or more than 4200 kcal/d, respectively), or they were on specific diets. The final sample at baseline (2006–2008), included 2567 adults (1129 men and 1438 women). The mean duration of the follow-up was approximately 3 years. Of the 2567 initial participants who attended the baseline examination, 629 participants who had no follow-up information on anthropometric measurements were excluded and final analysis was performed in 1938 (75.5%) participants.

            Informed written consents were obtained from all participants and the study protocol was approved by the research council of the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

            Dietary assessment and phytochemical index calculation

            Dietary data were collected using a validated semi-quantitative FFQ with 168 food items. Trained dietitians with at least 5 years of experience in TLGS survey asked participants to designate their intake frequency for each food item consumed during the past year on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. Portion sizes of consumed foods reported in household measures were then converted to grams [23]. The validity and reliability of the FFQ were assessed in a random sample (based on sex and age groups), by comparing the data from two FFQs completed 1 y apart and comparing the data from the FFQs and multiple 24-hour dietary recalls, respectively. The validity and reliability of the FFQ for dietary intakes were acceptable; the correlation coefficients between the FFQ and multiple 24 recalls were 0.59 and 0.38 and those between the two FFQs were 0.43 and 0.42 in male and female participants, respectively.

            Because the Iranian Food Composition Table (FCT) is incomplete, and has limited data on nutrient content of raw foods and beverages, to analyze foods and beverages for their energy and nutrient content we used the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) FCT (23).

            The dietary phytochemical index was calculated based on method developed by McCarty; [PI = (daily energy derived from phytochemical-rich foods kcal/total daily energy intake kcal) × 100] [24]. Foods included in the phytochemical-rich category were fruits and vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts, soy products, olives and olive oil. Potatoes were not considered as vegetables because they are often consumed as a starch component rather than as vegetables. Natural fruit and vegetable juices as well as tomato sauces were included in the fruit and vegetable groups because these are also considered as rich sources of phytochemicals.

            Lifestyle and anthropometric measurement

            Trained interviewers collected information using a pretested questionnaire. Information on age (years), current smoking (yes/no), educational level (illiterate, primary, academic and advanced academic education) and physical activity (MET-h/wk) were assessed at baseline examination (2006–2008). Smoking status was obtained using face-to-face interviews and participants who smoked daily or occasionally were considered current smokers, and non-smoker included those who had never smoked or those who cessation smoking. Physical activity level was assessed using the Persian translated Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) [25]. The frequency and time spent on light, moderate, hard and very hard intensity activities according to the list of common activities of daily life over the past year were obtained. Physical activity levels were expressed as metabolic equivalent hours per week (METs h/wk). High reliability and relatively moderate validity were reported for the Persian translated MAQ in Tehranian adults [26]. Anthropometric measurements were assessed at baseline by trained staff. Weight was measured to the nearest 100 g using digital scales, while the participants were minimally clothed, without shoes. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm, in a standing position without shoes, using a tape meter. Waist circumference (WC) and hip were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, at anatomical landmarks, at the widest portion, over light clothing, using a soft, cloth tape meter, without any pressure to the body. Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg) divided by square of the height (m2). Body adiposity index was calculated as [hip(cm)/height(m) 1.5-18 [27]. All measurements at follow-up (2009–2011) were again obtained by the same protocol used during baseline examinations.

            Statistical methods

            All statistical analysis were conducted using SPSS (Version 16.0; Chicago, IL), and P values < 0.05 was considered significant. Participant characteristics were compared across quartile categories of PI, adjusted for sex and age, using the general linear model or the Chi-square test. Mean dietary intakes of participants were compared across quartile categories of PI using the general linear model with adjustment for sex and age. P values for linear trend between the PI score as continuous variables and participant characteristics and dietary intakes as were assessed using linear regression for continuous characteristics and logistic regression for dichotomous characteristics.

            Changes of anthropometric measures, during 3-year follow-up, were calculated as [(follow-up measure - baseline measure)/baseline measure] × 100. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the association between dietary PI and% of changes in weight, WC and BAI. Dietary PI was categorized into quartiles (<20.9, 20.9-28.3, 28.4-37.1 and >37.1). Participants with dietary PI < 20.9 were considered as the reference group. To determine the association between each phytochemical-rich food groups and 3-year changes in anthropometric measures, we also categorized energy adjusted intakes of whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, soy, olives and olive oil, into quartiles. Mean changes percent of all anthropometric measures associated with each category of dietary PI or phytochemical-rich food, compared with the reference group and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the multiple regression models with adjustment for potential confounding variables. The variables adjusted in the models were sex, age at baseline (y, continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), education (4 categories), smoking (yes or no), physical activity (MET-h/wk, continuous), total energy intake (kcal/d), dietary carbohydrate (% of energy), fat (% of energy) and protein (% of energy). A linear trend test was performed considering each ordinal score variable as a continuous variable in the model.

            Results

            The mean age of participants was 40.4 ± 13.0 y, and mean BMI was 27.03 ± 4.9 kg/m2 at baseline; forty-seven percent of participants were men. The mean weight gain was 1.49 ± 5.06 kg (1.65 ± 5.3 kg in men and 1.34 ± 4.9 kg in women) during the 3-year period. The means for WC of participants at baseline and 3-year change in WC were 89.6 ± 13.2 cm (94.8 ± 10.8 in men, and 85.6 ± 13.6 in women), and 4.3 ± 6.9 cm (1.8 ± 4.8 in men, and 6.3 ± 7.7 in women), respectively. The means for BAI at baseline and BAI change during 3 years were 30.6 ± 6.3% (26.0 ± 3.4 in men, and 34.2 ± 5.8 in women), and −0.02 ± 2.28% (0.42 ± 1.71 in men, and −0.37 ± 2.5 in women), respectively. The mean PI was 29.8 ± 12.3 (28.5 ± 12.1 in men, and 30.9 ± 12.3 in women), and dietary PI ranged from 20.9 to 37.1 and was associated with several participant characteristics (Table 1). Participants in the highest PI quartile category were more likely to be women than men (65.2 vs. 34.8%, P for trend <0.05), were older (36 vs. 46 years, P for trend <0.001), and were less likely to be current smokers (8.2 vs. 14.5%, P for trend <0.01). They also had lower weight (71.6 vs. 74.3 kg, P for trend <0.05), and waist circumference (88.3 vs. 91.1 cm, P for trend <0.001) at baseline, and lower weight (72.9 vs. 75.9 kg, P for trend <0.05) at the follow up. The three-year weight gain in participants with highest dietary PI was significantly lower than those in the lower quartile of PI (0.9 vs. 1.9 kg, P for trend <0.05).
            Table 1

            Characteristics of participants by categories of dietary phytochemical index: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study 1

             

            (n= 1938)

             

            Q1

            Q2

            Q3

            Q4

            P 1

            Dietary phytochemical index

                 

             Range

            <20.9

            20.9–28.3

            28.4–37.1

            >37.1

             

             Mean

            17.4 ± 5.6

            25.4 ± 6.4

            32.9 ± 8.3

            42.7 ± 10.7

             

            Age at baseline (yr)

            36.4 ± 0.5

            38.2 ± 0.5

            40.5 ± 0.5

            46.0 ± 0.5

            <0.001

            Men (%)

            55.9

            44.4

            40.2

            34.8

            <0.05

            Weight (kg)

                 

             Baseline

            74.3 ± 0.6

            73.3 ± 0.6

            71.9 ± 0.6

            71.6 ± 0.6

            0.015

             After 3 year

            75.9 ± 0.6

            74.5 ± 0.6

            73.6 ± 0.6

            72.9 ± 0.6

            0.017

             3-year change

            1.9 ± 0.2

            1.4 ± 0.2

            1.7 ± 0.2

            0.9 ± 0.2

            0.017

            Waist circumference (cm)

                 

             Baseline

            91.1 ± 0.5

            90.0 ± 0.5

            89.1 ± 0.5

            88.3 ± 0.5

            0.003

             After 3 year

            94.7 ± 0.5

            94.0 ± 0.5

            93.7 ± 0.5

            93.2 ± 0.5

            0.24

             3-year change

            4.1 ± 0.3

            4.2 ± 0.3

            4.6 ± 0.3

            4.3 ± 0.3

            0.74

            Body adiposity index (%)

                 

             Baseline

            30.4 ± 0.2

            30.4 ± 0.2

            30.6 ± 0.2

            30.8 ± 0.2

            0.52

             After 3 year

            30.5 ± 0.1

            30.5 ± 0.1

            30.7 ± 0.1

            30.6 ± 0.1

            0.23

             3-year change

            1.09 ± 0.32

            0.28 ± 0.32

            0.69 ± 0.32

            −0.38 ± 0.32

            0.01

            Physical activity (Met-h/week)

                 

             Job activity

            30.7 ± 2.4

            26.3 ± 2.3

            24.6 ± 2.3

            23.2 ± 2.4

            0.17

             Leisure time activity

            9.8 ± 0.8

            9.5 ± 0.7

            10.0 ± 0.7

            11.2 ± 0.7

            0.43

             Total

            40.5 ± 2.6

            35.7 ± 2.4

            34.6 ± 2.4

            34.4 ± 2.5

            0.31

            Current smoker (%)

            14.5

            12.6

            9.6

            8.2

            0.01

            Education status (%)

                 

             Illiterate

            2.0

            1.6

            1.8

            3.7

            0.11

             Primary education

            7.9

            6.4

            0.0

            5.6

            0.81

             Academic education

            84.2

            83.0

            91.4

            83.3

            0.81

             Advanced academic education

            7.9

            10.6

            8.6

            11.1

            0.81

            1 Data are age-adjusted mean ± SEM.

            2P values compared the characteristics of participants across quartiles of dietary phytochemical index using Chi square test or linear regression models with adjustment of sex and age.

            The mean dietary intake of participants across dietary PI quartile categories is presented in Table 2. Dietary energy and fat intakes decreased significantly across quartiles of PI (P for trend <0.001), while dietary intakes of carbohydrate, protein, fiber, vitamin E and vitamin C increased significantly (P for trend <0.001). Dietary intakes of whole grains, fruits, vegetables and legumes in the highest quartile category of PI, were respectively 25, 3.5, 1.7 and 1.5 times higher compared with lower quartile categories.
            Table 2

            Mean dietary intake of participants by categories of dietary phytochemical index at baseline (2006–2008) 1

             

            (n = 1938)

             

            Q1

            Q2

            Q3

            Q4

            P 1

            Dietary phytochemical index

                 

            Range

            <20.9

            20.9-28.3

            28.4–37.1

            >37.1

             

            Mean

            17.4 ± 5.6

            25.4 ± 6.4

            32.9 ± 8.3

            42.7 ± 10.7

             

            Energy intake (kcal/d)

            2763 ± 26

            2374 ± 24

            2172 ± 24

            1822 ± 25

            <0.001

            Carbohydrate (% of total energy)

            54.7 ± 0.3

            56.1 ± 0.3

            58.4 ± 0.3

            61.2 ± 0.3

            <0.001

            Fat (% of total energy)

            33.3 ± 0.3

            32.6 ± 0.3

            30.8 ± 0.3

            28.5 ± 0.3

            <0.001

            Protein (% of total energy)

            12.9 ± 0.1

            13.4 ± 0.1

            13.7 ± 0.1

            14.4 ± 0.1

            <0.001

            Total fiber (g/d)

            36.1 ± 0.8

            36.1 ± 0.7

            38.3 ± 0.7

            41.4 ± 0.8

            <0.001

            Total carotenoids (μg/d)

            6330 ± 303

            9364 ± 267

            11237 ± 263

            12774 ± 294

            <0.001

            Vitamin E (mg/d)

            10.9 ± 0.2

            12.1 ± 0.2

            11.7 ± 0.2

            11.9 ± 0.2

            <0.001

            Vitamin C (mg/d)

            77.3 ± 3.8

            141 ± 3.4

            167 ± 3.3

            195 ± 3.6

            <0.001

            Whole grains (g/d)

            7.5 ± 4.1

            63.0 ± 3.6

            120 ± 3.6

            177 ± 4.0

            <0.001

            Fruits (g/d)

            149 ± 11.8

            365 ± 10.3

            437 ± 10.2

            528 ± 11.4

            <0.001

            Vegetables (g/d)

            207 ± 9.2

            284 ± 8.1

            327 ± 8.0

            358 ± 8.9

            <0.001

            Legumes (g/d)

            11.8 ± 1.0

            14.6 ± 0.9

            17.9 ± 0.9

            17.7 ± 1.0

            <0.001

            Seeds (g/d)

            0.3 ± 0.2

            1.9 ± 0.2

            1.8 ± 0.2

            3.1 ± 0.2

            <0.001

            Nuts (g/d)

            3.0 ± 0.4

            6.9 ± 0.4

            8.7 ± 0.4

            9.8 ± 0.4

            <0.001

            Olive oil (g/d)

            0.1 ± 0.1

            0.6 ± 0.1

            0.9 ± 0.1

            1.4 ± 0.1

            <0.001

            Soy sources (g/d)

            1.0 ± 0.2

            1.7 ± 0.1

            1.6 ± 0.1

            2.5 ± 0.2

            0.005

            1 Data are age-and energy adjusted mean ± SEM.

            2P values compared the dietary intakes of participants across quartiles of dietary phytochemical index using linear regression models with adjustment of sex, age and energy intakes.

            After adjustment for potential confounding variables, dietary intakes of whole grains in the highest quartile category were inversely associated with 3-year changes in weight (Table 3) and WC (Table 4) (P for trend <0.05). Dietary intake of fruits in the highest quartile also was associated with lower weight gain during the study period (P for trend <0.05) (Table 3). Inverse associations between dietary intakes of vegetables and nuts and 3-year changes in weight (Table 3), WC (Table 4) and BAI (Table 5) were stronger across quartiles categories (P for trend <0.05). As presented in Table 6, there was significant inverse association between highest quartile category of dietary PI and 3-year changes in weight and BAI in the study participants (P for trend <0.05).
            Table 3

            The association between dietary intake of phytochemical-rich foods at baseline and 3-year change in weight 1

              

            Adjusted weight change

             

            Whole grains

            Vegetables

            Fruits

            Legumes

            Soy

            Nuts

            Olive and olive oils

            Q1 (reference)

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

             

            0.0

            Q2

            −0.61 (−1.54, 0.31)

            0.15 (−0.49, 0.78)

            −0.77 (−1.7, 0.15)

            −0.24 (−0.87, 0.39)

            0.01 (−1.27, 1.29)

            0.34 (−0.89, 0.96)

            0.12 (−0.79, 1.02)

            Q3

            −0.16 (−1.08, 0.76)

            −0.32 (−0.96, 0.32)

            −0.71 (−1.63, 0.22)

            0.12 (−0.51, 0.76)

            0.53 (−0.28, 1.37)

            −0.14 (−1.05, 0.78)

            0.61 (−0.85, 0.97)

            Q4

            −1.10 (−2.02, -0.18)

            −1.01 (−0.74, 0.54)

            −1.19 (−2.11, -0.26)

            0.13 (−0.50, 0.76)

            0.59 (−0.23, 1.40)

            −0.55 (−1.48, 0.37)

            0.85 (−0.59, 1.76)

            P for trend2

            0.05

            0.03

            0.01

            0.41

            0.11

            0.01

            0.22

            1Data are β regression and 95% confidence interval were estimated by using multiple regression models with adjustment for sex, age at baseline (y, continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), education (4 categories), smoking (yes or no), physical activity (MET-h/wk, continuous), total energy intake (kcal/d), dietary carbohydrate (% of energy), fat (% of energy) and protein (% of energy).

            2A linear trend test was performed by considering each ordinal score variable as a continuous variable in the model.

            Table 4

            The association between dietary intake of phytochemical-rich foods at baseline and 3-year change in waist circumference 1

              

            Adjusted waist circumference change

             

            Whole grains

            Vegetables

            Fruits

            Legumes

            Soy

            Nuts

            Olive and olive oils

            Q1 (reference)

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            Q2

            −0.57 (−1.15, 1.04)

            1.02 (0.02, 2.03)

            0.26 (−0.74, 1.28)

            0.50 (−0.48, 1.49)

            −0.45 (−1.85, 0.95)

            0.42 (−1.49, 0.65)

            −0.03 (−10.3, 0.96)

            Q3

            −0.78 (−1.88, 0.32)

            0.17 (−0.87, 1.20)

            0.33 (0.68, 1.35)

            0.35 (−0.64, 1.34)

            −0.03 (−0.92, 0.85)

            −0.21 (−1.29, 0.87)

            −0.34 (−1.34, 0.65)

            Q4

            −1.43 (−2.53, -0.33)

            0.66 (−0.46, 1.78)

            −0.27 (−1.30, 0.76)

            0.54 (−0.45, 1.53)

            0.47 (−0.41, 1.34)

            −0.51 (−1.58, 0.56)

            0.78 (−0.26, 1.81)

            P for trend2

            0.001

            0.27

            0.006

            0.12

            0.33

            0.032

            0.12

            1Data are β regression and 95% confidence interval were estimated by using multiple regression models with adjustment for sex, age at baseline (y, continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), education (4 categories), smoking (yes or no), physical activity (MET-h/wk, continuous), total energy intake (kcal/d), dietary carbohydrate (% of energy), fat (% of energy) and protein (% of energy).

            2A linear trend test was performed by considering each ordinal score variable as a continuous variable in the model.

            Table 5

            The association between dietary intake of phytochemical-rich foods at baseline and 3-year change in body adiposity index 1

              

            Adjusted body adiposity index change

             

            Whole grains

            Vegetables

            Fruits

            Legumes

            Soy

            Nuts

            Olive and olive oils

            Q1 (reference)

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            Q2

            −0.69 (−1.61, 0.21)

            1.03 (0.14, 1.93)

            −0.48 (−1.40, 0.44)

            0.24 (−0.64, 1.12)

            −0.68 (−1.94, 0.58)

            −0.69 (−1.61, 0.22)

            0.49 (−0.39, 1.38)

            Q3

            −0.56 (−1.48, 0.35)

            0.83 (−0.07, 1.73)

            −0.62 (−1.55, 0.29)

            0.29 (−0.59, 1.18)

            −0.07 (−0.87, 0.73)

            −0.28 (−1.19, 0.63)

            0.10 (−0.79, 0.98)

            Q4

            −0.46 (−1.42, 0.51)

            0.78 (−3.6, 1.70)

            −1.36 (−2.29, 0.44)

            0.53 (−0.35, 1.41)

            0.52 (−0.28, 1.31)

            −0.26 (−1.18, 0.67)

            0.56 (−0.36, 1.50)

            P for trend2

            0.001

            0.001

            0.006

            0.001

            0.001

            0. 45

            0.22

            1Data are β regression and 95% confidence interval were estimated by using multiple regression models with adjustment for sex, age at baseline (y, continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), education (4 categories), smoking (yes or no), physical activity (MET-h/wk, continuous), total energy intake (kcal/d), dietary carbohydrate (% of energy), fat (% of energy) and protein (% of energy).

            2A linear trend test was performed by considering each ordinal score variable as a continuous variable in the model.

            Table 6

            The association between dietary phytochemical index at baseline and 3-year change in anthropometric measures 1

             

            Weight change

            Waist circumference change

            Body adiposity change

            Q1 (reference)

            0.0

            0.0

            0.0

            Q2

            −0.54 (−1.46, 0.38)

            0.15 (−0.95, 1.26)

            −0.79 (−1.72, 0.12)

            Q3

            −0.26 (−1.18, 0.66)

            0.51 (−0.58, 1.62)

            −0.40 (−1.32, 0.52)

            Q4

            −1.41 (−2.33, -0.48)

            −0.05 (−1.15, 1.06)

            −1.49 (−2.41, -0.56)

            P for trend2

            0.001

            0.001

            0.001

            1Data are β regression and 95% confidence interval were estimated by using multiple regression models with adjustment for sex, age at baseline (y, continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), education (4 categories), smoking (yes or no), physical activity (MET-h/wk, continuous), total energy intake (kcal/d), dietary carbohydrate (% of energy), fat (% of energy) and protein (% of energy).

            2A linear trend test was performed by considering each ordinal score variable as a continuous variable in the model.

            Medians of dietary phytochemical index quartiles were 17.3, 24.9, 31.8, and 41 in the first1, 2, 3 and 4th quartile categories, respectively.

            Discussion

            In this longitudinal study, we found that increased energy intakes, more than 37% of energy, from phytochemical rich foods could prevent weight gain and decrease body adiposity in adults during 3 year follow-up. Higher intakes of whole grains and fruits appeared to benefit more than other phytochemical-rich foods in prevention of weight and body fat gain. In our study, we observed higher intakes of phytochemical-rich foods and dietary PI in older; it suggesting that older participants are more likely to have healthy diets characterized by the consumption of plant foods. These findings in agreement with other studies, demonstrate that diet quality improved with age [28].

            The mean for yearly weight gain of the participants in this study, was estimated of 0.49 kg/y over the 3 years follow-up; as compared with the higher quartile category of PI, participants in the lower quartile had twice the mean weight gain (0.64 vs. 0.31 kg/y), during the 3-year follow-up. Even modest weight gains have been shown to increase the risk of cardiovascular, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and other chronic diseases [29]; therefore, a beneficial effect of high dietary PI and phytochemical-rich foods intake over a 3-year period on weight gain, as observed in this study, could be instrumental in to attenuating the development of chronic disease.

            The body fat, rather than the amount of excess weight, is associated with cardio-metabolic risk factors and determines the health risks of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease [30]. BAI, which estimates percentage of adiposity directly, has been recently proposed as a new and more reliable measurement enable to facilitating fat mass determination better than BMI [27, 31]. In the current study, dietary PI was inversely associated with change in body adiposity during the study follow-up; participants with higher dietary PI had 1.47% decrease in BAI as compared with the reference group.

            Recently, Vincent et al. [32] in a cross-sectional study of 54 healthy young adults (18–30 y) reported that PI score was inversely related to BMI, WC, waist-to-hip ratio and body fat. There are no other data in relation to dietary PI and anthropometric measures. However several previous investigations have confirmed the beneficial effects of vegetarian diets and whole plant foods to be rich sources of phytochemicals effective in body weight management [12, 33, 34].

            In addition to dietary PI, higher intake of whole grains in this study was inversely associated with 3-year changes in weight and BAI; higher intake of fruit was also related with lower weight gain. We also found weak inverse associations between higher intakes of vegetables with lower weight gain, higher intakes of nuts with lower weight gain and WC change, and higher intakes of fruits with lower abdominal fat gain and reduction in body fat during the 3-year follow-up.

            Many cross-sectional studies reported that higher intake of whole grains is related with lower BMI, and smaller WC in adults [35]; confirmed by the results of longitudinal studies one unit difference in BMI was observed between the highest and lowest whole grain intakes [36, 37]. Higher intakes of whole grain foods also have been associated with lower abdominal fat as measured by dual-energy X ray absorptiometry, and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volume [38, 39]. In addition low glycemic index and high fiber content of whole grains, high phytochemical content including phenolic compounds (Ferulic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, syringic acid, cumaric acid, anthocyanidins, quinines, flavonols, chalones, flavones and flavanones) may contribute to the beneficial effects of whole grains [40]. Fruits and vegetables are other rich sources of phytochemicals. A recent systematic review of 23 longitudinal and experimental studies indicated that higher consumption of fruits and vegetables was associated with a very gradual weight gain, and contributed to reduced adiposity in overweight and obese adults in clinical trials [41].

            Our findings did not demonstrate a significant association between dietary legumes and 3-year changes in anthropometric measures, but the association between legumes and BAI positively intensified across increase quartiles of legumes intakes; a similar trend was observed for the association of soy intakes and 3-year BAI change. Despite legumes being considered as a component of a healthy diet [42], there is insufficient evidence to draw clear conclusions about the protective effect of legumes on weight [43]. Soy Isoflavones, mainly genistein, daidzein and glycitein, have been found as anti obesity factors in cell culture and animal studies; but the results of human studies are inconsistent [44, 45].

            Another noteworthy finding in our results was a significant trend in intensity of inverse relation between nuts intake and 3-year changes in weight and abdominal fat in adults. Nuts in addition to mono- and polyunsaturated fat are also rich sources of fiber, plant sterol, antioxidant vitamins and polyphenols may mediate multiple health benefits. Longitudinal follow-up studies, reported that frequent nut consumption was associated with a significantly reduced risk of weight gain [46, 47].

            There are several mechanisms that could explain the favorable effects of phytochemical-rich diets against obesity. The inverse association of phytochemicals and anthropometric measures may be mediated through their effects on decrease of appetite, regulation of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and direct effects on adipocytes [21]. A number of fruit and vegetable polyphenols such as quercetin, naringenin, rutin, hesperidin and resveratrol were shown to inhibit preadipocyte proliferation and induce apoptosis. Several other flavonoids also decrease adipogenesis and stimulate lipolysis in adipocytes [48]. Some phytochemicals also act as natural ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), and regulate lipid metabolism in the liver, promote uptake, utilization, and catabolism of fatty acids by up-regulation of genes involved in fatty acid transport and peroxisomal and mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation [49].

            To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal population-based study on usual dietary PI and changes in weight, WC and BAI. Use of a validated FFQ to assess usual dietary intakes, and 3 year follow-up to evaluate the anthropometric changes of the participants may be considered as strengths of this study.

            Some limitations of the current study should be considered; usual dietary intakes of participants were only assessed at baseline, while several evaluations of dietary intakes could be increased the validity of the results. Using the USDA FCT rather than a complete Iranian FCT is another limitation.

            Conclusion

            We found that increased dietary PI score as energy intake from phytochemical rich foods, especially whole grains and fruits, had favorable effects on prevention of weight gain and decrease of body adiposity during 3 year follow-up, as main factors contributing to development of chronic disease. Based on these results and other previous reports, definition of recommendations for food selection improvement and increase energy intakes from phytochemical rich foods is essential.

            Abbreviations

            PI: 

            Phytochemical index

            WC: 

            Waist circumference

            BAI: 

            Body adiposity index

            BMI: 

            Body mass index

            TLGS: 

            Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

            FFQ: 

            Food frequency questionnaire

            FCT: 

            Food Composition Table

            USDA: 

            U.S. Department of Agriculture

            PPARs: 

            Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.

            Declarations

            Acknowledgment

            We thank the TLGS participants and the field investigators of the TLGS for their assistance in physical examinations, biochemical and nutritional evaluation and database management. This study was supported by grant 121 from National Research Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

            Authors’ Affiliations

            (1)
            Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
            (2)
            Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
            (3)
            Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

            References

            1. Mathieu P, Lemieux I, Després JP: Obesity, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010, 87: 407-416. 10.1038/clpt.2009.311.View Article
            2. Sucharda P: Abdominal obesity. Cas Lek Cesk. 2009, 148: 78-82.
            3. Targher G, Zoppini G, Moghetti P, Day CP: Disorders of coagulation and hemostasis in abdominal obesity: emerging role of fatty liver. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010, 36: 41-48. 10.1055/s-0030-1248723.View Article
            4. World Health Organization: Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. 2011, Geneva: WHO
            5. Bray GA, Clearfield MB, Fintel D, Nelinson DS: Overweight and obesity: the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic risk. Clin Cornerstone. 2009, 9: 30-40.View Article
            6. Esteghamati A, Khalilzadeh O, Mohammad K, Meysamie A, Rashidi A, Kamgar M, Abbasi M, Asgari F, Haghazali M: Secular trends of obesity in Iran between 1999 and 2007: National Surveys of Risk Factors of Non-communicable Diseases. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010, 8: 209-213. 10.1089/met.2009.0064.View Article
            7. Hosseinpanah F, Barzin M, Amiri P, Azizi F: The trends of metabolic syndrome in normal-weight Tehranian adults. Ann Nutr Metab. 2011, 58: 126-132. 10.1159/000327147.View Article
            8. Fraser GE: Vegetarian diets: what do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 1607S-1612S. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736K.View Article
            9. Ginter E: Vegetarian diets, chronic diseases and longevity. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008, 109: 463-466.
            10. de Luis Román D, Aller R, Castaño O: Vegetarian diets; effect on health. Rev Clin Esp. 2007, 207: 141-143. 10.1157/13100230.View Article
            11. Sabaté J, Blix G: Vegetarian diets and obesity prevention. Vegetarian Nutrition. Edited by: Sabate J. 2001, Florida: CRC Press, 91-108. 1View Article
            12. Newby PK, Tucker KL, Wolk A: Risk of overweight and obesity among semivegetarian, lactovegetarian, and vegan women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 1267-1274.
            13. Brathwaite N, Fraser HS, Modeste N, Broome H, King R: Obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and vegetarian status among Seventh-Day Adventists in Barbados: preliminary results. Ethn Dis. 2003, 13: 34-39.
            14. Thedford K, Raj S: A vegetarian diet for weight management. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011, 111: 816-818. 10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.014.View Article
            15. Sabaté J, Wien M: Vegetarian diets and childhood obesity prevention. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 91: 1525S-1529S. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28701F.View Article
            16. Rezazadeh R, Rashidkhani B: The association of general and central obesity with major dietary patterns of adult women living in Tehran, Iran. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2010, 56: 132-138. 10.3177/jnsv.56.132.View Article
            17. Venn BJ, Perry T, Green TJ, Skeaff CM, Aitken W, Moore NJ, Mann JI, Wallace AJ, Monro J, Bradshaw A, Brown RC, Skidmore PM, Doel K, O’Brien K, Frampton C, Williams S: The effect of increasing consumption of pulses and whole grains in obese people: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Nutr. 2010, 29: 365-372.View Article
            18. Lapointe A, Provencher V, Weisnagel SJ, Bégin C, Blanchet R, Dufour-Bouchard AA, Trudeau C, Lemieux S: Dietary intervention promoting high intakes of fruits and vegetables: short-term effects on eating behaviors in overweight-obese postmenopausal women. Eat Behav. 2010, 11: 305-308. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.08.005.View Article
            19. Han X, Shen T, Lou H: Dietary polyphenols and their biological significance. Int J of Mole Sci. 2010, 8: 950-988.View Article
            20. Vazquez-Prieto MA, Miatello RM: Organosulfur compounds and cardiovascular disease. Mol Aspects Med. 2010, 31: 540-545. 10.1016/j.mam.2010.09.009.View Article
            21. Tucci SA: Phytochemical in the control of human appetite and body weight. Pharmaceuticals. 2010, 3: 748-763. 10.3390/ph3030748.View Article
            22. Azizi F, Rahmani M, Emami H, Mirmiran P, Hajipour R, Madjid M, Ghanbili J, Ghanbarian A, Mehrabi Y, Saadat N, Salehi P, Mortazavi N, Heydarian P, Sarbazi N, Allahverdian S, Saadati N, Ainy E, Moeini S: Cardiovascular risk factors in an Iranian urban population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. J Sco Prev Med. 2002, 47: 408-426.View Article
            23. Hosseini-Esfahani F, Jessri M, Mirmiran P, Bastan S, Azizi F: Adherence to dietary recommendations and risk of metabolic syndrome: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Metabolism. 2010, 59: 1833-1842. 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.06.013.View Article
            24. McCarty MF: Proposal for a dietary “phytochemical index”. Med Hypothes. 2004, 63: 813-817. 10.1016/j.mehy.2002.11.004.View Article
            25. Kriska AM, Knowler WC, LaPorte RE, Drash AL, Wing RR, Blair SN, Bennett PH, Kuller LH: Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Prima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1990, 13: 401-411. 10.2337/diacare.13.4.401.View Article
            26. Momenan AA, Delshad M, Sarbazi N, Rezaei Ghaleh N, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F: Reliability and Validity of the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) in an Iranian Urban Adult Population. Arch Iran Med. 2012, 15: 279-282.
            27. Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, Xiang AH, Watanabe RM: A better index of body adiposity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011, 19: 1083-1089. 10.1038/oby.2011.38.View Article
            28. Schröder H, Marrugat J, Covas M, Elosua R, Pena A, Weinbrenner T, Fito M, Vidal MA, Masia R, REGICOR Investigators: Population dietary habits and physical activity modification with age. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004, 58: 302-311. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601782.View Article
            29. Willett WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH: Weight, weight change, and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the ‘normal’ weight range. JAMA. 1995, 273: 461-465. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520300035033.View Article
            30. Després JP, Lemieux I, Prud’homme D: Treatment of obesity: need to focus on high risk abdominally obese patients. BMJ. 2001, 322: 716-720. 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.716.View Article
            31. Godoy-Matos AF, Moreira RO, Valerio CM, Mory PB, Moises RS: A New Method for Body Fat Evaluation, Body Adiposity Index, Is Useful in Women With Familial Partial Lipodystrophy. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011, 20: 440-443.View Article
            32. Vincent HK, Bourguignon CM, Taylor AG: Relationship of the dietary phytochemical index to weight gain, oxidative stress and inflammation in overweight young adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010, 23: 20-29. 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.00987.x.View Article
            33. Farmer B, Larson BT, Fulgoni VL, Rainville AJ, Liepa GU: A vegetarian dietary pattern as a nutrient-dense approach to weight management: an analysis of the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2004. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011, 111: 819-827. 10.1016/j.jada.2011.03.012.View Article
            34. Berkow SE, Barnard N: Vegetarian diets and weight status. Nutr Rev. 2006, 64: 175-188. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00200.x.View Article
            35. Jonnalagadda SS, Harnack L, Liu RH, McKeown N, Seal C, Liu S, Fahey GC: Putting the whole grain puzzle together: health benefits associated with whole grains–summary of American Society for Nutrition 2010 Satellite Symposium. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 1011S-1022S. 10.3945/jn.110.132944.View Article
            36. McKeown NM, Meigs JB, Liu S, Wilson PW, Jacques PF: Whole-grain intake is favorably associated with metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002, 76: 390-398.
            37. Newby PK, Maras J, Bakun P, Muller D, Ferrucci L, Tucker KL: Intake of whole grains, refined grains, and cereal fiber measured with 7-d diet records and associations with risk factors for chronic disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 1745-1753.
            38. McKeown NM, Yoshida M, Shea MK, Jacques PF, Lichtenstein AH, Rogers G, Booth SL, Saltzman E: Whole-grain intake and cereal fiber are associated with lower abdominal adiposity in older adults. J Nutr. 2009, 139: 1950-1955. 10.3945/jn.108.103762.View Article
            39. McKeown NM, Troy LM, Jacques PF, Hoffmann U, O’Donnell CJ, Fox CS: Whole- and refined-grain intakes are differentially associated with abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adiposity in healthy adults: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 92: 1165-1171. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29106.View Article
            40. Okarter N, Liu RH: Health benefits of whole grain phytochemicals. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010, 50: 193-208. 10.1080/10408390802248734.View Article
            41. Ledoux TA, Hingle MD, Baranowski T: Relationship of fruit and vegetable intake with adiposity: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011, 12: e143-e150. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00786.x.View Article
            42. Azadbakht L, Haghighatdoost F, Esmaillzadeh A: Legumes: A component of a healthy diet. J Res Med Sci. 2011, 16: 121-122.
            43. Williams PG, Grafenauer SJ, O’Shea JE: Cereal grains, legumes, and weight management: a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence. Nutr Rev. 2008, 66: 171-182. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00022.x.View Article
            44. Ørgaard A, Jensen L: The effects of soy isoflavones on obesity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2008, 233: 1066-1080. 10.3181/0712-MR-347.View Article
            45. Velasquez MT, Bhathena SJ: Role of dietary soy protein in obesity. Int J Med Sci. 2007, 4: 72-82.View Article
            46. Bes-Rastrollo M, Sabaté J, Gómez-Gracia E, Alonso A, Martínez JA, Martínez-González MA: Nut consumption and weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: The SUN study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15: 107-116. 10.1038/oby.2007.507.View Article
            47. Mozaffarian D, Hao T, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB: Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 2392-2404. 10.1056/NEJMoa1014296.View Article
            48. Rayalam S, Della-Fera MA, Baile CA: Phytochemicals and regulation of the adipocyte life cycle. J Nutr Biochem. 2008, 19: 717-726. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.12.007.View Article
            49. Ko JK, Lee SS, Martin H: Phytochemicals as Modulators of PPARs and RXRs. PPAR Res. 2010, 201: 407650-

            Copyright

            © Mirmiran et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            Advertisement