Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations of anthropometric and DXA measures of body composition with MRI and MRS measures in obese and normal-weight subjects

From: Waist to hip ratio and trunk to extremity fat (DXA) are better surrogates for IMCL and for visceral fat respectively than for subcutaneous fat in adolescent girls

 

Obese girls

Normal-weight girls

 

IMCL

(AU)

VAT

(cm 2 )

SAT

(cm 2 )

IMCL

(AU)

VAT

(cm 2 )

SAT

(cm 2 )

 

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

r

p

Subscapular skinfold thickness (mm)

ns

ns

0.77

0.003

0.95

< 0.0001

ns

ns

ns

ns

0.47

0.09

Triceps skinfold (mm)

ns

ns

0.56

0.06

0.63

0.03

ns

ns

ns

ns

0.53

0.05

Waist circumference-umbilicus (cm)

ns

ns

0.79

0.002

0.82

0.001

ns

ns

0.74

0.002

0.85

< 0.0001

Waist circumference-iliac crest (cm)

ns

ns

0.78

0.003

0.89

0.0001

ns

ns

0.81

0.0005

0.86

< 0.0001

Waist to hip ratio

0.78

0.008

0.62

0.04

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

ns

Waist to height ratio

ns

ns

0.82

0.001

0.73

0.007

ns

ns

0.73

0.003

0.86

< 0.0001

Total fat (kg)

ns

ns

0.56

0.05

0.96

< 0.0001

ns

ns

0.70

0.003

0.65

0.009

Percent body fat (%)

0.57

0.05

0.55

0.05

0.77

0.002

ns

ns

0.70

0.003

0.66

0.007

Trunk fat (kg)

0.56

0.06

0.59

0.03

0.91

< 0.0001

ns

ns

0.77

0.0007

0.74

0.002

Extremity fat (kg)

ns

ns

0.54

0.05

0.93

< 0.0001

ns

ns

ns

ns

0.48

0.07

Percent trunk fat (%)

0.69

0.01

0.70

0.007

0.52

0.07

ns

ns

0.79

0.0004

0.71

0.003

Percent extremity fat (%)

-0.59

0.04

-0.70

0.008

-0.53

0.06

ns

ns

-0.80

0.0004

-0.63

0.01

Trunk to extremity fat ratio

0.59

0.04

0.72

0.006

0.53

0.06

ns

ns

0.79

0.0004

0.72

0.003

  1. ns: not significant; P values <0.10 are reported with corresponding correlation coefficients
  2. IMCL: intramyocellular lipid; VAT: visceral adipose tissue; SAT: subcutaneous adipose tissue