Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Metabolic characteristics of RG1, RG2 and RG3

From: Variation in metabolic responses to meal challenges differing in glycemic index in healthy women: Is it meaningful?

  RG1 RG2 RG3
  Mean ± SEM Range Mean ± SEM Range Mean ± SEM Range
Weight (kg) 77.3 ± 1.4 66.0 - 89.7 71.6 ± 0.6 69.3 - 72.9 74.6 ± 2.9 69.2 - 83.7
BMI (kg/m2) 27.1 ± 0.3 24.3 - 29.5 26.8 ± 0.5 25.7 - 28.1 27.8 ± 0.5 26.8 - 29.7
Age (y) 29.9 ± 2.0 19.8 - 46.6 27.7 ± 3.2 21.2 - 36.8 35.3 ± 4.7 22.1 - 44.8
*FM (kg) 30.0 ± 0.6a 25.7 - 34.6 25.5 ± 1.1b 22.6 - 29.0 30.0 ± 1.4a, b 27.7 - 34.4
NEFA (mmol/L) 0.60 ± 0.05 0.14 - 0.97 0.51 ± 0.08 0.27 - 0.77 0.35 ± 0.08 0.12 - 0.57
  1. For fat mass, designated by '*', there was a main effect of group (p < 0.05). Means with different superscripts are significantly different using Tukey-Kramer's post-hoc analysis (p = 0.04) as evaluated by a 3 × 2 ANOVA. RG = Response Group; BMI = body mass index; FM = fat mass; NEFA = non-esterified fatty acids