Skip to main content

Table 3 Metabolic characteristics of RG1, RG2 and RG3

From: Variation in metabolic responses to meal challenges differing in glycemic index in healthy women: Is it meaningful?

 

RG1

RG2

RG3

 

Mean ± SEM

Range

Mean ± SEM

Range

Mean ± SEM

Range

Weight (kg)

77.3 ± 1.4

66.0 - 89.7

71.6 ± 0.6

69.3 - 72.9

74.6 ± 2.9

69.2 - 83.7

BMI (kg/m2)

27.1 ± 0.3

24.3 - 29.5

26.8 ± 0.5

25.7 - 28.1

27.8 ± 0.5

26.8 - 29.7

Age (y)

29.9 ± 2.0

19.8 - 46.6

27.7 ± 3.2

21.2 - 36.8

35.3 ± 4.7

22.1 - 44.8

*FM (kg)

30.0 ± 0.6a

25.7 - 34.6

25.5 ± 1.1b

22.6 - 29.0

30.0 ± 1.4a, b

27.7 - 34.4

NEFA (mmol/L)

0.60 ± 0.05

0.14 - 0.97

0.51 ± 0.08

0.27 - 0.77

0.35 ± 0.08

0.12 - 0.57

  1. For fat mass, designated by '*', there was a main effect of group (p < 0.05). Means with different superscripts are significantly different using Tukey-Kramer's post-hoc analysis (p = 0.04) as evaluated by a 3 × 2 ANOVA. RG = Response Group; BMI = body mass index; FM = fat mass; NEFA = non-esterified fatty acids
Back to article page

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us