From: Effects of Zinc supplementation on serum lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors[ref] Year of Publication; Country | Study design | Duration of Zn supplementation | n control(s)/placebo, n Zn supplement(s) n Other supplements | Gender | Age | Health status | Formulation Elemental Zn dose(s) | Lipid parameters studied | Significant outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Afkhami-Ardekani et al. [18] 2008; Iran | R, P | 1.5 months | 20 20 | Both | 52.67 ± 8.6 | Type-2 diabetes patients | ZnSO4 660 mg/daya | TG, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c | Reduction in TG, TC and LDL |
Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group [48] 2002; United States | R, DB, P | 5 years | 166 202 (Zn),168(Zn + antioxidants) 181 (antioxidants) | Both | 55-80 | Patients with Age-related macular degeneration | ZnO 80 mg/day | TG, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c | Lipid profile not significantly affected by long-term supplementation with Zinc |
Black et al. [36] 1988; United States | R, DB, P | 3 months | 9 13,9 | Males | 19-29 | Healthy | Zn gluconate 50 mg/day (n = 13) 75 mg/day (n = 9) | TG, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, VLDL | Serum TC, VLDL, LDL-c, TG not affected. Both Zn groups had significantly lower HDL than placebo group and lower than baseline |
Bogden et al. [37] 1988; United States | R, DB, P | 3 months | 36 36, 31 | Both | 60-89 | Healthy | Zn acetate 15 mg/day (n = 36) 100 mg/day (n = 31) | TC, HLD-c, | Serum TC and HDL-c was not altered significantly by Zinc |
Boukaïba et al. [35] 1993; France | R, DB, C | 2 months | 23, 21 | Both | 73-106 | Healthy 2 groups Reference- BMI >24 kg/m2 (n = 23) | Zn gluconate 20 mg/day | TG, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c | Reduced TC in both Lean and Reference groups than placebo. Reduced HDL in Reference group. Higher TG in Lean group. No effect on TG in Reference group. Ratio of LDL-c to HDL-c not affected. |
23, 21 | |||||||||
Lean – BMI < 21 kg/m2 (n = 21) | |||||||||
Brewer et al. [49] 1991; United States | O | 1-5 years | No controls | Both | NM | Wilson’s disease | NM | TG, TC, HDL-c, | HDL level reduced in males only. TC reduced in both genders. |
LDL-c, TC/HDL-c | |||||||||
11(F), 13(M) | |||||||||
Chevalier et al. [38] 2002; United States | R, DB, P | 3Â months | 10 | Both | 23-80 | End-Stage Renal | ZnSO4 | TC, HDL-c, | TC and LDL-c increased. No change in HDL-c |
Disease on Haemodialysis | 50Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
10 | |||||||||
Crouse et al. [39] 1984; United States | R, DB, P | 2Â months | 10,11 | Males | 20-55 | Healthy | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | No significant change in lipid parameters in both groups |
2 groups | 28.7Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
11,12 | Endurance trained | ||||||||
(n = 21) | |||||||||
Sedentary (n = 23) | |||||||||
Farvid et al. [34] 2004; Iran | R, DB, P | 3Â months | 18 | Both | 30-69 | Type-2 | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Co-supplementation of Mg, Zn, Vitamins C and E significantly increases HDL-c. TG, TC, LDL-c not altered |
Diabetes patients | 30Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
16 (Zn + Mg), 17(Zn + Mg + Vit.C + Vit.E) 18 (Vit C+ Vit.E) | |||||||||
Federico et al. [45] 2001; Italy | R, CC | 2Â months | 30 | Both | 46-61 | Gut cancer patients | NM | TC | No Significant reduction in TC |
21Â mg/day | |||||||||
30 (Zn + Se) | |||||||||
Feillet-Coudray et al. [40] 2006; France | R, DB, P | 6Â months | 16 (F),16 (M), 16 (F), 16 (M) | Both | 55-70 | Healthy | Zn gluconate | TG, TC, HDL-c, | No significant change in lipid parameters |
16 (F), 16 (M), 15 (F), 16 (M) | |||||||||
LDL-c | |||||||||
15 mg/day(n = 32) | |||||||||
30 mg/day(n = 31) | |||||||||
Foster et al. [33] 2013; Australia | R, DB, P | 3 months | 10 | Females | 65.0 ± 7.8 | Type-2 | Zn sulphate | TG, TC, HDL-c, | No significant change in lipid parameters |
Diabetes patients | 40Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
12 (Zn), 11 (Zn + ALA) | |||||||||
10 (ALA) | |||||||||
Freeland-Graves et al. [50] 1982; United States | R, DB, P | 2Â months | 8 | Females | 18-40 | Healthy | Zn Acetate | HDL-c | A transient non-dose related reduction in HDL-c |
15 mg/day (n = 8) | |||||||||
8, 8, 8 | 50 mg/day (n = 8) | ||||||||
100 mg/day (n = 8) | |||||||||
Gatto and Samman [51] 1995; Australia | R, B, C | 1 month | 10 | Males | 24.3 ± 4.2 | Healthy | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, | No significant changes in TC, LDL-c or TG. HDL2:HDL3 ratio increased |
10 | 50Â mg/day | HDL-c, | |||||||
LDL-c | |||||||||
Gunasekara et al. [46] 2011; Sri Lanka | R, B, P | 4 months | 32 | Both | M-54.6 ± 7.0 | Type-2 | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Reduced TC, LDL and TC/HDL-c ratio only in the group receiving Zinc + MVM supplementation. |
F- 54.9 ± 9.0 | Diabetes patients | 22 mg/day | LDL-c | ||||||
28 (Zn + MVM) | |||||||||
26 (MVM) | |||||||||
Hashemipour et al. [17] 2009; Iran | R, DB, C | 2Â months | 60 | Both | 6-10 | Obese | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | TC, LDL-c and TG reduced. No change in HDL-c |
20Â mg/day | LDL-c | ||||||||
60 | |||||||||
Hercberg et al. [44] 2005; France | R, DB, P | 7.5Â years | 3869 (F), 2508(M) | Both | 35-60 | Healthy | Multi-vitamin | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Significant reduction of HDL-c in men. No significant change in other lipid parameters |
3844 (F), 2520(M) | (Zn 20Â mg/day) | LDL-c | |||||||
Hininger-Favier et al. [41] 2007; Europe | R, DB, P | 6Â months | 130 | Both | 55-85 | Healthy | Zn Gluconate | TG, TC, HDL-c, | No effect with Zinc 15Â mg/day or 30Â mg/day |
15Â mg/day | LDL-c, LDL:HDL | ||||||||
126, 131 | (n = 126) | ||||||||
30 mg/day (n = 131) | |||||||||
Hooper et al. [52] 1980, United States | P | 5Â weeks | 8 | Males | 23-35 | Healthy | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | 25Â % reduction of HDL-c. TC, TG, and LDL-c no significant change. |
160Â mg/day | |||||||||
LDL-c | |||||||||
12 | |||||||||
Kadhim et al. [20] 2006; Iraq | DB, P | 3 months | 15 (Metformin + Placebo) | Both | 40-64 | Type-2 Diabetes patients | Zn acetate | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Reduced TC, TG and LDL-c. HDL-c significantly increased. |
18 (Metformin + Melatonin + Zn) | 50 mg/daya | LDL-c | |||||||
13 (Melatonin + Zn) | |||||||||
Khan et al. [42], 2013; India | R, P | 3Â months | 21 | Both | 40-69 | Type-2 Diabetes patients | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Decrease in TG. HDL-c increased. No change in TC and LDL-c. |
23 | 50Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
Kim and Lee [21] 2012; South Korea | P | 2Â months | 20 | Females | 19-28 | Obese | Zn gluconate | TG, TC, HDL-c | No significant change in lipid parameters |
30Â mg/day | |||||||||
20 | |||||||||
Li et al. [28] 2010; China | R, DB, P | 6.5Â months | 29 | Females | 18-55 | Obese | Multi-vitamin | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Reduced TC and LDL-c and increased HDL-c in multivitamin & mineral supplemented group. No change in TG. |
(Zn 15Â mg/day) | LDL-c | ||||||||
30 (multivitamin & mineral) | |||||||||
28 (Calcium) | |||||||||
Partida-Hernández et al. [19] 2006, Mexico | R, DB, C | 3 months | 27 | Males | 35-65 | Type-2 | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Reduced TC, TG, VLDL-c. Increased HDL-c |
Diabetes patients | 100Â mg/daya | LDL-c, VLDL-c | |||||||
27 | |||||||||
Payahoo et al. [26] 2013; Iran | R, DB, P | 1Â month | 30 | Both | 18-45 | Obese | Zn gluconate | TG, TC, HDL-c, | TG level decreased. |
30 | |||||||||
30Â mg/daya | LDL-c | No change in other lipid parameters | |||||||
Rahimi-Ardabili et al. [27] 2012; Iran | R, DB, P | 2 months | 30 | Both | 52.8 ± 12.7 | End-Stage Renal | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | No change in TC, TG and LDL-c. |
30 | |||||||||
Disease on Haemodialysis | 100Â mg/daya | LDL-c | Increase in HDL | ||||||
RangaRao et al. [53] 1990; India | CC | 1Â month | 5 | Males | NM | Type-1 | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c | No significant change in lipid parameters |
Diabetes patients | 660Â mg/daya | ||||||||
7 | |||||||||
Roozbeh et al. [22] 2009; Iran | R, DB, P | 1.5Â months | 26 | Both | 55.7 | End-Stage Renal | ZnSO4 | TG, TC, HDL-c, | Increase in TC, TG, LDL-c and HDL-c |
Disease on Haemodialysis | 50Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
27 | |||||||||
Samman and Roberts [54] 1988; Australia | R, DB, C | 1.5 months | 41 | Both | M-28.2 ± 2.0 | Healthy | ZnSO4 | TC, LDL- | No change in TC. In females LDL-C reduced. HDL2 increased and HDL 3 decreased. |
41 | F- 26.8 ± 1.6 | 150 mg/day | c, HDL-c, | ||||||
HDL2, HDL3 | |||||||||
Seet et al. [23] 2011; Singapore | R, B, P | 3Â months | 20 | Males | NM | Type-2 | Zn gluconate | TG, TC, HDL-c, | No significant change in lipid parameters |
Diabetes patients | 240Â mg/day | LDL-c | |||||||
20 | |||||||||
Shah et al. [43] 1988; India | R, P | 1 month | 10 | Males | 31-70 | Ischaemic Heart | ZnSO4 | TC, TG, α- and | Significant reduction in TC, β-lipoprotein. Increase in α-lipoprotein. No change in TG |
Disease patients | 600 mg/daya | β-lipoprotein | |||||||
10 | |||||||||
Thurnham et al. [55] 1988; Chiina | R, DB, P | 13.5Â months | 610b | Both | 35-64 | Healthy | Zn gluconate | TC | No significant change |
50Â mg/d |