Skip to main content

Table 4 Descriptives of included predictive equations

From: Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients

Author, year of publication and referred to as

Study population and n

Age (mean ± SD or range)

REE Equations (kcal/day)

Bernstein, 1983 [24]

Obese individuals; patients who enrolled the Weight Control Unit of the Obesity Research Center IC instrument: Beckman

n: 48 M/154 F

M: 39 ± 12 y

M: 11.02 × WT + 10.23 × HTCM - 5.8 × AGE – 1032

F: 40 ± 13 y

F: 7.48 × WT - 0.42 × HTCM - 3.0 × AGE + 844

FAO/WHO/UNU, 1985 [15]

WHO-wt

WHO-wtht

n: 575 M/734 F

All: 30–82y

M 18–30: (15.3 × WT) + 679

F 18–30: (14.7 × WT) + 496

M 30–60: (11.6 × WT) + 879

F 30–60: (8.7 × WT) + 829

M 60+: (13.5 × WT) + 487

F 60+: (10.5 × WT) + 596

Equations based on weight and height

M 18–30: (15.4 × WT) – (27 × HTM) + 717

F 18–30: (13.3 × WT) + (334 × HTM) + 35

M 30–60: (11.3 × WT) + (16 × HTM) + 901

F 30–60: (8.7 × WT) - (25 × HTM) + 865

M 60+: (8.8 × WT) + (1128 × HTM) – 1071

F 60+: (9.2 × WT) + (637 × HTM) – 302

Harris & Benedict, 1918 [10]

n: 136 M/103 F

M: 27 ± 9 (16–63) y

M: 66.4730 + (13.7516 × WT) + (5.0033 × HTCM) – (6.7550 × AGE)

F: 31 ± 14 (15–74) y

F: 655.0955 + (9.5634 × WT) + (1.8496 × HTCM) – (4.6756 × AGE)

Harris & Benedict, 1984 Roza & Shizgal [11]

H&B by Roza

Data of Harris & Benedict (1918) and data of two further studies by Benedict with data on additional subjects (n: 168 M/169 F)

M: 30 ± 14 y

M: 88.362 + (13.397 × WT) + (4.799 × HTCM) – (5.677 × AGE)

F: 44 ± 22 y

F: 447.593 + (9.247 × WT) + (3.098 × HTCM) – (4.330 × AGE)

Korth, 2007 [18]

Healthy euthyroid weight stable subjects who were recruited by local announcements

n: 50 M/54 F

M: 39 ± 14 (21–68) y

All: (41.5 × WT) – (19.1 × AGE) + (35.0 × HTCM) + (1107.4 × SEX) – 1731.2/4.184

F: 35 ± 15 (20–66) y

 

Livingston, 2005 [23]

Institute of Medicine population

n: 299 M/356 F

M: 36 ± 15 (18–95) y

M: 293 × WT 0.4330 – (5.92 × AGE)

F: 39 ± 13 (18–77) y

F: 248 × WT 0.4356 – (5.09 × AGE)

Mifflin, 1990 [22]

IC instrument: metabolic measurement cart with a canopy hood (Metabolic Measurement Cart Horizons System)

n: 251 M (122 obese)/247 F (112 obese)

M: 44 ± 14 (19–78) y

M: (9.99 × WT) + (6.25 × HTCM) – (4.92 × AGE) + 5

F: 45 ± 14 (20–76) y

F: (9.99 × WT) + (6.25 × HTCM) – (4.92 × AGE) – 161

Muller, 2004 [21]

Data from seven different research centers in Germany

IC instruments: Deltatrac, Beckman, Mouthpiece (metabolic chamber)

n BMI < 18.5: 58

n BMI 18.5–25: 444

n BMI 25–30: 266

n BMI > 30: 278

BMI ≤ 18.5: 32 ± 12 y

All: (0.047 × WT) + (1.009 × SEX) – (0.01452 × AGE) + 3.21/4.184 ×1000

BMI > 18.5–25: 38 ± 17 y

BMI ≤ 18.5: (0.07122 × WT) – (0.02149 × AGE) + (0.82 × SEX) + 0.731/4.184 ×1000

Muller

BMI > 25–30: 53 ± 16 y

BMI > 18.5–25: (0.02219 × WT) + (0.02118 × HTCM) + (0.884 × SEX) – (0.01191 × AGE) + 1.233/4.184 ×1000

MullerBMI

BMI ≥ 30: 47 ± 13 y

BMI > 25–30: (0.04507 × WT) + (1.006 × SEX) – (0.01553 × AGE) + 3.407/4.184 ×1000

 

BMI ≥ 30: (0.05 × WT) + (1.103 × SEX) – (0.01586 × AGE) + 2.924/4.184 ×1000

Henry, 2005 [20]

Worldwide population (excluded

Italian subjects) from several papers

M 18–30 y: 2821/2816

F 18–30 y: 1664/1655

M 30–60 y: 1010/1006

F 30–60 y: 1023/1023

M 60+ y: 534/533

F 60+ y: 334/324

M 18–30: 22 y

M 18–30 y: (16 × WT) + 545

Henry-wt

F 18–30: 22 y

F 18–30 y: (13.1 × WT) + 558

M 30–60: 40 y

M 30–60 y: (14.2 × WT) + 593

F 30–60: 41 y

F 30–60 y: (9.74 × WT) + 694

M 60+: 70 y

M 60+ y: (13.5 × WT) + 514

F 60+: 69 y

F 60+ y: (10.1 × WT) + 569

 

Equations based on weight and height

Henry-wtht

 

M 18–30 y: (14.4 × WT) + (313 × HTM) + 113

 

F 18–30 y: (10.4 × WT) + (615 × HTM) – 282

 

M 30–60 y: (11.4 × WT) + (541 × HTM) – 137

 

F 30–60 y: (8.18 × WT) + (502 × HTM) – 11.6

 

M 60+ y: (11.4 × WT) + (541 × HTM) – 256

 

F 60+ y: (8.52 × WT) + (421 × HTM) + 10.7

Schofield, 1985 [19]

Collection of different authors and papers

M 18–30 y: 2879

M 30–60 y: 646

M 60+ y: 50

F 18–30 y: 829

F 30–60 y: 372

F 60+ y: 38

M 18–30: 22 y

M 18–30 y: (0.063 × WT) + 2.896/4.184 × 1000

Schofield-wt

F 18–30: 22 y

F 18–30 y: (0.062 × WT) + 2.036/4.184 × 1000

M 30–60: 40 y

M 30–60 y: (0.048 × WT) + 3.653/4.184 × 1000

F 30–60: 40 y

F 30–60 y: (0.034 × WT) + 3.538/4.184 × 1000

M 60+: 72 y

M 60+ y: (0.049 × WT) + 2.459/4.184 × 1000

F 60+: 66 y

F 60+ y: (0.038 × WT) + 2.755/4.184 × 1000

 

Equations based on weight and height

Schofield-wtht

 

M 18–30 y: (0.063 × WT) – (0.042 × HTM) + 2.953/4.184 × 1000

 

F 18–30 y: (0.057 × WT) + (1.184 × HTM) + 0.411/4.184 × 1000

 

M 30–60 y: (0.048 × WT) – (0.011 × HTM) + 3.67/4.184 × 1000

 

F 30–60 y: (0.034 × WT) + (0.006 × HTM) + 3.53/4.184 × 1000

 

M 60+ y: (0.038 × WT) + (4.068 × HTM) – 3.491/4.184 × 1000

 

F 60+ y: (0.033 × WT) + (1.917 × HTM) + 0.074/4.184 × 1000

  1. M male, F female, y years, WT weight in kilogram, HTM height in meters, HTCM height in centimetres; SEX (male = 1, female = 0) sex, REE resting energy expenditure; kcal/d kilocalories a day, IC indirect calorimetry