|
Intakes
|
P for trend
|
---|
T1 (n = 112)
|
T2 (n = 114)
|
T3 (n = 113)
|
---|
Median nuts (serving/wk./1000 kcal)
|
0.34
|
0.99
|
2.78
| |
Model 1
|
1.00
|
0.83 (0.47–1.46)
|
0.49 (0.27–0.89)
|
0.018
|
Model 2
|
1.00
|
0.72 (0.39–1.31)
|
0.42 (0.22–0.81)
|
0.011
|
Model 3
|
1.00
|
0.70 (0.38–1.28)
|
0.41 (0.21–0.79)
|
0.010
|
Median energy-dense nutrient-poor solid snacks (serving/wk./1000 kcal)
|
2.13
|
3.83
|
5.83
| |
Model 1
|
1.00
|
0.95 (0.54–1.69)
|
0.76 (0.42–1.37)
|
0.367
|
Model 2
|
1.00
|
1.15 (0.62–2.13)
|
1.02 (0.54–1.91)
|
0.954
|
Model 3
|
1.00
|
1.13 (0.61–2.11)
|
1.00 (0.53–1.89)
|
0.985
|
- cIMT carotid intima-media thickness
- Model 1 was crude
- Model 2 was adjusted for sex, age, energy intake, pubertal status, physical activity
- Model 3 was adjusted for model 2 variables plus BMI
- Using the median values for tertiles of snacks as continuous variables