Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression models for predicting weight and fat mass loss at week 9

From: Metabolic adaptation is associated with less weight and fat mass loss in response to low-energy diets

Model B R2 adjusted P
Weight loss at week 9   88%  < 0.001
 Intercept 21.669    < 0.001
 Metabolic adaptation −0.009    < 0.001
 Adherence to the diet −0.069    < 0.001
 Average PAL −6.141    < 0.001
 Sex −0.304   0.711
 FM at baseline −0.093    < 0.001
 FFM at baseline −0.277    < 0.001
 CHO group 1.490    < 0.001
Fat mass loss at week 9   93%  < 0.001
 Intercept 19.275    < 0.001
 Metabolic adaptation −0.008    < 0.001
 Adherence to the diet −0.079    < 0.001
 Average PAL −6.023    < 0.001
 Sex −1.932    < 0.001
 FM at baseline −0.088    < 0.001
 FFM at baseline −0.120    < 0.001
 CHO group 1.111    < 0.001
  1. Sex: 1 females; 2 males. PAL: physical activity level; CHO: carbohydrate; FM: fat mass; FFM: fat-free mass