Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression models for predicting weight and fat mass loss at week 9

From: Metabolic adaptation is associated with less weight and fat mass loss in response to low-energy diets

Model

B

R2 adjusted

P

Weight loss at week 9

 

88%

 < 0.001

 Intercept

21.669

 

 < 0.001

 Metabolic adaptation

−0.009

 

 < 0.001

 Adherence to the diet

−0.069

 

 < 0.001

 Average PAL

−6.141

 

 < 0.001

 Sex

−0.304

 

0.711

 FM at baseline

−0.093

 

 < 0.001

 FFM at baseline

−0.277

 

 < 0.001

 CHO group

1.490

 

 < 0.001

Fat mass loss at week 9

 

93%

 < 0.001

 Intercept

19.275

 

 < 0.001

 Metabolic adaptation

−0.008

 

 < 0.001

 Adherence to the diet

−0.079

 

 < 0.001

 Average PAL

−6.023

 

 < 0.001

 Sex

−1.932

 

 < 0.001

 FM at baseline

−0.088

 

 < 0.001

 FFM at baseline

−0.120

 

 < 0.001

 CHO group

1.111

 

 < 0.001

  1. Sex: 1 females; 2 males. PAL: physical activity level; CHO: carbohydrate; FM: fat mass; FFM: fat-free mass