Skip to main content

Table 4 The relationship between alcohol consumption and biliary diseases

From: The role of diet and nutrition related indicators in biliary diseases: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis

First author, Year

No. of included studies

Type of study

Dietary factor (subgroup or dose response)

Effects model

MA metric

Estimates

95%CI

Test for overall effect (p-value)

I2% (p-value)

Egger test (p-value)

Publication bias and small-study effect

Gallbladder cancer

Bagnardi [16]

8

Case–control(4); Cohort(4)

Alcohol (Light vs. none)c

Random

RR

1.23

(0.84 − 1.83)

NA

18 (NA)

NA

NA

Bagnardi [16]

8

Case–control(4); Cohort(4)

Alcohol (Light vs. none)c

Random

RR

0.88

(0.68 − 1.13)

NA

10 (NA)

NA

NA

Bagnardi [16]

8

Case–control(4); Cohort(4)

Alcohol (Light vs. none)c

Random

RR

2.64

(1.62 − 4.30)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Ying Li [50]

2

Case–control

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Fixed

OR

0.7

99%CI(0.49–1.00)

0.009

16 (0.27)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0–0.5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.07

(0.91–1.26)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0.5–1 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.1

(0.87–1.39)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies

Cohort

Alcohol (1– < 3 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

0.94

(0.74–1.21)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies

Cohort

Alcohol (3– < 5, vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.16

(0.69–1.94)

NA

0 (0.57)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies

Cohort

Alcohol (> 5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

2.39

(0.63–9.12)

NA

64.9 (0.02)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies

Cohort

Alcohol (every 1drink/d increment)a

–

HR

0.98

(0.92–1.05)

0.31

12 (NA)

NA

NA

Biliary tract cancer

Ying Li [50]

2(eCCA)

Case–control

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Fixed

OR

1.14

99%CI(0.75–1.75)

0.41

0 (0.81)

NA

NA

Ying Li [50]

2(VPC)

Case–control

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

OR

0.68

99%CI(0.20–2.37)

0.43

77 (0.04)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(iCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0–0.5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

0.79

(0.62–1.00)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(iCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0.5–1 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

0.91

(0.65–1.26)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(iCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (1– < 3 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

0.98

(0.73–1.31)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(iCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (3– < 5, vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.25

(0.77–2.02)

NA

8.5 (0.37)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(iCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

2.35

(1.46–3.78)

NA

0 (0.52)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(iCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (every 1drink/d increment)a

–

HR

1.03

(1.01–1.06)

0.04

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(eCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0–0.5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

0.87

(0.68–1.12)

NA

30.8 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(eCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0.5–1 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.14

(0.82–1.58)

NA

28.4 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(eCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (1– < 3 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.08

(0.74–1.58)

NA

48.3 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(eCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (3– < 5, vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.82

(0.98–3.39)

NA

57.2 (0.01)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(eCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.02

(0.64–1.62)

NA

0 (0.84)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(eCCA)

Cohort

Alcohol (every 1drink/d increment)a

–

HR

1.03

(0.98–1.08)

0.84

25.3 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(VPC)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0–0.5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.08

(0.80–1.45)

NA

13.7 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(VPC)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 0.5–1 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

0.99

(0.69–1.41)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(VPC)

Cohort

Alcohol (1– < 3 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.33

(0.99–1.80)

NA

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(VPC)

Cohort

Alcohol (3– < 5, vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.16

(0.66–2.01)

NA

0 (0.93)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(VPC)

Cohort

Alcohol (> 5 vs. 0 drink/d)a

Random

HR

1.59

(0.85–2.98)

NA

0 (0.73)

NA

NA

Emma E. McGee [35]

Total 26 studies(VPC)

Cohort

Alcohol (every 1drink/d increment)a

–

HR

1.00

(0.95–1.04)

0.35

0 (NA)

NA

NA

Xiao-Hua Ye [51]

7(eCCA)

Total case–control(6);Cohort(1)

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

RR

1.09

(0.87–1.37)

NA

0 (0.575)

0.296

No publication bias

Xiao-Hua Ye [51]#

6(eCCA)

Case–control(6)

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

RR

1.10

(0.86–1.41)

NA

0 (0.447)

0.296

No publication bias

Xiao-Hua Ye [51]#

1(eCCA)

Cohort(1)

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

RR

1.06

(0.60–1.87)

NA

–

0.296

No publication bias

Clements [1]

15(iCCA)

Case–control

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

OR

3.15

(2.24–4.41)

NA

87 (NA)

Only funnel plot (N)

No publication bias

Clements [1]

11(eCCA)

Case–control

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

OR

1.75

(1.20–2.55)

NA

87 (NA)

Only funnel plot (N)

No publication bias

Cholecystolithiasis/gallbladder diease

Jiantao Wang [52]

18

Total case–control(10);Cohort(8)

Alcohol (highest vs. lowest)

Random

RR

0.62

(0.49–0.78)

NA

94.6 (0.000)

0.836

No publication bias

Jiantao Wang [52]#

10

Case–control(10)

Alcohol (highest vs. lowest)

Random

RR

0.58

(0.45–0.73)

NA

37.8 (0.107)

0.836

No publication bias

Jiantao Wang [52]#

8

Cohort(8)

Alcohol (highest vs. lowest)

Random

RR

0.66

(0.48–0.91)

NA

96.8 (0.000)

0.836

No publication bias

Jiantao Wang [52]

3

Case–control(1);Cohort(2)

Alcohol (types of drink beer highest vs. lowest)b

Random

RR

0.64

(0.52–0.78)

NA

0 (0.368)

0.836

No publication bias

Jiantao Wang [52]

3

Case–control(1);Cohort(2)

Alcohol (types of drink wine highest vs. lowest)b

Random

RR

0.72

(0.54–0.96)

NA

44.1 (0.167)

0.836

No publication bias

Jiantao Wang [52]

2

Cohort(2)

Alcohol (types of drink liquor highest vs. lowest)b

Random

RR

0.71

(0.64–0.85)

NA

1 (0.421)

0.836

No publication bias

Byung [27]

23

Case–control(14);Cohort(9)

Alcohol (drinker vs. non-drinker)

Random

RR

0.84

(0.79–0.89)

NA

61 (< 0.01)

0.009

Exist publication bias

Byung [27]

11

Total case–control(5);Cohort(6)

Alcohol (Light vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.96

(0.94–0.99)

NA

0 (0.75)

0.383

No publication bias

Byung [27]#

5

Case–control

Alcohol (Light vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.98

(0.95–1.01)

NA

0 (0.99)

0.383

No publication bias

Byung [27]#

6

Cohort

Alcohol (Light vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.94

(0.89–0.98)

NA

0 (0.51)

0.383

No publication bias

Byung [27]

14

Total case–control(8);Cohort(6)

Alcohol (Moderate vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.80

(0.75–0.85)

NA

17 (0.27)

0.523

No publication bias

Byung [27]#

8

Case–control

Alcohol (Moderate vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.76

(0.72–0.80)

NA

0 (0.70)

0.523

No publication bias

Byung [27]#

6

Cohort

Alcohol (Moderate vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.85

(0.80–0.91)

NA

0 (0.57)

0.523

No publication bias

Byung [27]

14

Total case–control(8);Cohort(6)

Alcohol (Heavy vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.66

(0.56–0.79)

NA

61 (< 0.01)

0.602

No publication bias

Byung [27]#

8

Case–control

Alcohol (Heavy vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.58

(0.40–0.85)

NA

54 (0.03)

0.602

No publication bias

Byung [27]#

6

Cohort

Alcohol (Heavy vs. none)d

Random

RR

0.73

(0.68–0.79)

NA

0 (0.61)

0.602

No publication bias

  1. #: Subgroup analysis of the different study design types of the corresponding study
  2. a: Alcoholic drinks per day(0 [referent], > 0–0.5, > 0.5–1, 1– < 3, 3– < 5, > 5 drink/d) and continuously (analyzed per one drink), One alcoholic drink was defined as 14 g of ethanol
  3. b: The types of drink: wine, beer and liquor
  4. c: The author decided to consider as light, moderate and heavy drinking every interval whose midpoint was respectively ≤ 12.5 g, ≤ 50 g and > 50 g per day of alcohol
  5. d: Drinking level for each category: light, F < 7 and M < 14 g/day; moderate, F 7–17 and M 14–18 g/day; high, F > 14 and M > 28 g/day. F, female; M, male, B, both