Skip to main content

Table 3 The performance of different threshold of GRS to predict increased weight TMI growth trajectory

From: Association between genetic risk score and tri-ponderal mass index growth trajectories among different dietary consumption adolescents in a prospective Taiwanese cohort

GRS

ORa

95% CI

p-value

Participants with Increased weight in different risk categories

8

2.02

0.61, 6.63

0.25

GRS ≧ 8 (90.4%) vs. GRS < 8 (9.6%): 8.39% vs. 4.41%

9

2.27*

1.01, 5.10

0.04

GRS ≧ 9 (77.0%) vs. GRS < 9 (23.0%): 9.12% vs. 4.29%

10

4.00*

1.99, 8.05

< 0.001

GRS ≧ 10 (56.6%) vs. GRS < 10 (43.4%): 11.66% vs. 3.24%

11

2.34*

1.35, 4.05

0.003

GRS ≧ 11 (28.1%) vs. GRS < 11 (71.9%): 13.00% vs. 6.05%

  1. CI confidence interval, GRS genetic risk score, OR odds ratio
  2. aAdjusted for gender and age
  3. *p-value < 0.05
Back to article page

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us