Table 3 Logistic regression analysis models investigating the associations between DAQS and T2DM

DAQS

0–1

2–3

4–5

 Model 1

1.00 (ref)

0.98(0.80–1.20)

0.80(0.66–0.98)

 Model 2

1.02(0.81–1.28)

0.84(0.68–1.05)

 Model 3

1.03(0.82–1.30)

0.85(0.68–1.06)

Vitamin A

< 233.55

233.55-4762.65

> 4762.65

 Model 1

1.00 (ref)

0.82(0.71–0.94)

0.79(0.68–0.91)

 Model 2

0.81(0.70–0.94)

0.80(0.69–0.93)

 Model 3

0.85(0.74–0.99)

0.78(0.67–0.91)

Vitamin C

< 35.87

35.87–59.22

> 59.22

 Model 1

1.00 (ref)

1.03(0.89–1.19)

1.09(0.95–1.26)

 Model 2

1.05(0.91–1.21)

1.18(1.02–1.37)

 Model 3

1.05(0.90–1.21)

1.14(0.98–1.33)

Vitamin E

< 92.49

92.49-161.61

> 161.61

 Model 1

1.00 (ref)

1.20(1.03–1.40)

1.49(1.29–1.73)

 Model 2

1.16(1.00-1.35)

1.31(1.13–1.52)

 Model 3

1.19(1.02–1.39)

1.34(1.15–1.56)

Se

< 43.24

43.24–73.91

> 73.91

 Model 1

1.00 (ref)

0.98(0.85–1.13)

0.81(0.70–0.94)

 Model 2

1.00(0.87–1.15)

0.85(0.73–0.99)

 Model 3

1.03(0.89–1.19)

0.83(0.71–0.97)

Zn

< 8.45

8.45–11.59

> 11.59

 Model 1

1.00 (ref)

1.01(0.88–1.16)

0.83(0.72–0.96)

 Model 2

1.03(0.89–1.18)

0.88(0.76–1.02)

 Model 3

1.05(0.91–1.22)

0.86(0.74–1.01)