Open Access

A cross-sectional study of food group intake and C-reactive protein among children

  • M Mustafa Qureshi1,
  • Martha R Singer1 and
  • Lynn L Moore1Email author
Contributed equally
Nutrition & Metabolism20096:40

DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-6-40

Received: 10 March 2009

Accepted: 12 October 2009

Published: 12 October 2009

Abstract

Background

C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker of sub-clinical inflammation, is a predictor of future cardiovascular diseases. Dietary habits affect serum CRP level however the relationship between consumption of individual food groups and CRP levels has not been established.

Methods

This study was designed to explore the relation between food intake and CRP levels in children using data from the cross-sectional 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. CRP level was classified as low, average or high (<1.0, 1.0-3.0, and >3.0 mg/L, respectively). Adjusted mean daily intakes of dairy, grains, fruit, vegetables, and meat/other proteins in each CRP category were estimated using multivariate analysis of covariance modeling. The effect modification by age (5-11 years vs. 12-16 years), gender and race/ethnicity was explored. We examined whether total or central body fat (using BMI Z-scores and waist circumference) explained any of the observed associations.

Results

A total of 4,010 children and adolescents had complete information on diet, CRP and all covariates of interest and were included in the analyses. Individuals with high CRP levels had significantly lower intake of grains (p < 0.001) and vegetables (p = 0.0002). Selected individual food subgroups (e.g., fluid milk and "citrus, melon and berry" consumption) were more strongly associated with lower CRP than were their respective major food groups. Consumption of meat/other proteins did not influence CRP levels. The addition of body composition variables to the models attenuated the results for all food groups to varying degrees.

Conclusion

Children and adolescents with higher CRP levels had significantly lower intakes of grains and vegetables. The associations between selected childhood dietary patterns and CRP levels seem largely mediated through effects on body composition.

Background

C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute phase protein, is a non specific biomarker of inflammation produced by the liver in response to various inflammatory conditions [1]. The synthesis of CRP is regulated by cytokines, for the most part Interleukin-6 (IL-6) [2]. The development of highly sensitive CRP assays (hs-CRP) has enabled the identification of more subtle elevations in CRP that may predict the increased risk of atherogenic cardiovascular diseases (CVD)[3, 4] with better specificity than traditional risk factors such as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels[4].

Sub-clinical inflammation, as measured by CRP, has been independently associated with fasting insulin levels in overweight children and adolescents [5]. Thus these inflammatory markers may be important early predictors of adult chronic disease risk and may be pro-atherogenic even at that early stage of life [6].

A number of studies have analyzed the relationship between dietary factors and CRP in adults. For example, higher intakes of grains, fruits and vegetables [7, 8] in adults have been associated with lower CRP levels. Similarly, those following or adopting a Mediterranean-style diet [9, 10] had reduced levels of inflammation. Among children, there are few data on the effects of diet on inflammatory markers although dietary fat (but not consumption of milk and meat) was positively associated with CRP levels in 6-14 year-old children[11]. One intervention that combined activity and a diet rich in unrefined carbohydrates, fiber (from grains, fruits and vegetables), protein-based foods and low-fat dairy products led to a lowering of CRP levels in obese children[12].

The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between the intake of foods in each of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) major Food Pyramid serving groups[13] and serum CRP levels in children (ages 5-16 years). Data from the cross-sectional 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) will be used to address this question.

Methods

Study population

The NHANES are cross-sectional population-based surveys conducted by National Center for Health Statistics for the purpose of assessing the health and nutritional status of U.S. adults and children[14, 15]. The survey samples are selected using a stratified multistage probability design with random sampling of the civilian non-institutionalized population, with over-sampling of certain subgroups. Our analyses were conducted with the approval of our Institutional Review Board.

Of the 21,004 individuals who participated in 1999-2002 surveys, we included 5,857 children and adolescents, ages 5 to 16 years. Adolescents' ages 17 years and older were not included in the study since dietary habits during this early post-high school period are often unstable due to significant lifestyle changes [16, 17]. We excluded 539 subjects with missing or unreliable dietary data as well as 204 individuals with extreme energy intake (upper and lower 2% of the distribution). We further excluded subjects meeting any of the following criteria: missing CRP data (n = 590), pregnant or breastfeeding (n = 15), on dialysis or taking oral medications or insulin for diabetes (n = 11), missing data on covariates (n = 204), and those not able to be classified into one of primary racial groups (n = 107). Finally, to eliminate illness as a possible cause of elevated CRP, we excluded 77 subjects (mean CRP = 7.02 mg/L) whose white blood cell count was above the age- and sex-specific upper limit of normal as specified in the NHANES laboratory manuals[18]. The final study population included 4,110 children and adolescents.

Assessment of food group intakes

From 1999 to 2001 dietary intake was assessed in NHANES with a single, multipass 24-hour recall, carried out using a computer-assisted dietary interview system that has been previously described[19]. A revised five step automated multiple-pass instrument was used starting in 2002[20]. Participants aged 12 years and older completed the interview independently. A proxy respondent responded for five-year olds while children ages 6 to11 years completed the interview together with a proxy respondent.

The dietary recalls were analyzed by the USDA using nutrient files that were appropriate to the time period of data collection[21, 22]. Food Pyramid servings were estimated for each subject as defined by the USDA's Dietary Guidelines[23] (see additional file 1).

Measurement of Highly Sensitive CRP (hs-CRP)

Blood samples were collected from all subjects, stored at -20 degrees centigrade and then shipped to the University of Washington Medical Center for analysis. The CRP concentration in serum was measured by a high-sensitivity assay, latex enhanced nephelometry, on a Dade Behring Nephelometer II Analyzer System. The analytical performance of this test has been validated[24] and shown to be comparable to that of ELISA[25].

Potential confounders and modifiers of effect

We considered the following potential confounding variables in our analysis: exact age, race/ethnicity, height (in meters), height-for-age Z-Scores (HAZ), socioeconomic status (SES), body mass index (BMI) and BMI-Z Scores, waist circumference, sedentary behavior (hours of TV watching and video and computer time per day), energy intake (in kilo calories), percentage (%) of calories from carbohydrates, protein and fat and fiber intake per 1000 kilocalories of energy.

Racial/ethnic origin was classified into three categories: non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics (i.e., Mexican-Americans). SES was estimated using combined data on income and food insecurity. Weight was measured on a Toledo Digital Scale and standing height (to the nearest 0.1 centimeter) using a fixed stadiometer. Waist circumference was measured with a steel tape (to the nearest 0.1 centimeter) at the high point of iliac crest at the end of normal expiration[26]. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height, in meters. CDC growth charts were used to calculate age and sex-specific BMI Z-scores and height-for-age Z-scores using the Lambda, Mu, Sigma (LMS) method[27].

Statistical analysis

The goal of the analysis was to evaluate the association between serum CRP levels at 5 to16 years of age and dietary intake in the USDA food pyramid groups. Since NHANES provides only a single 24-hour dietary recall and single recalls may provide reliable estimates of population group means rather than individual means, we chose to estimate the adjusted food group means according to the child's CRP group assignment[28]. CRP was classified into one of three categories that have been previously shown to reflect low, average and high risk of future CVD[29]: <1.0 mg/L, 1.0-3.0 mg/L and >3.0 mg/L, respectively. Adjusted mean intakes of dairy, grains, fruit, vegetables and meat/other proteins were estimated in each of these categories using analysis of covariance modeling with Proc GLM.

All analyses were carried out using SAS, Version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). We used Proc Surveyreg to calculate adjusted mean differences in food group intake by CRP levels accounting for stratification and clustering within primary sampling units. Since we adjusted for the covariates representing the over-sampled subgroups, we did not adjust for sampling weights in our analysis; this adjustment is regarded as a good compromise between efficiency and bias[30]. The results of the Surveyreg Procedure were almost identical to the simpler GLM modeling, leading us to retain the GLM modeling in the results of this manuscript.

Results

The characteristics of the study population in each of the three categories of CRP are summarized in Table 1. There were no meaningful differences in age or sedentary behavior across categories of CRP. The BMI (p < 0.0001), BMI Z-score (p < 0.0001) and waist circumference (p < 0.0001) increased with higher CRP levels. Children with low CRP levels were slightly shorter than those with higher levels. Non-Hispanic whites were most likely to be in the lowest CRP group while Hispanics were most likely to fall into the highest CRP category.
Table 1

Characteristics of children ages 5-16 years by C-reactive protein level in NHANES 1999-2002.

 

C-reactive protein levels (mg/L)

 

Low

(<1.0)

Average

(1.0-3.0)

High

(>3.0)

P value, two sided

 

(n = 2939)

(n = 718)

(n = 453)

 
 

mean (SD)

 

C-reactive protein levels (mg/L)

0.29 (0.23)

1.8 (0.59)

8.6 (8.4)

-

Age (years)

11.4 (3.3)

11.6 (3.3)

11.6 (3.3)

0.084

Height (inches)

58.8 (7.6)

59.4 (7.3)

59.5 (7.2)

0.022

Height-for-age Z-Score

0.12 (1.1)

0.21 (1.1)

0.27 (1.0)

0.002

BMI (Kg/m2)

19.6 (4.1)

23.8 (5.9)

25.2 (7.7)

<0.0001

BMI Z-score

0.29 (1.0)

1.2 (1.0)

1.3 (1.2)

<0.0001

Waist circumference (cms)

68.8 (12.1)

79.4 (16.5)

83.3 (20.4)

<0.0001

Sedentary behavior (hrs/day)*

2.9 (1.5)

2.9 (1.6)

3.0 (1.5)

0.728

Food groups (servings/day)

    

   Dairy

2.0 (1.6)

1.8 (1.4)

1.9 (1.6)

0.012

   Grains

7.1 (3.8)

6.8 (3.6)

6.3 (3.5)

<0.0001

   Fruit

1.5 (2.0)

1.3 (1.6)

1.4 (1.9)

0.384

   Vegetables

2.6 (2.4)

2.4 (2.1)

2.2 (2.2)

0.002

   Meat/Other Proteins

4.0 (3.2)

4.0 (3.2)

3.9 (3.1)

0.380

Energy intake (kcal)

2103.5 (14.7)

2011.9 (29.8)

1930.4 (37.5)

<0.0001

Energy adjusted macronutrients

    

   % calories from fat

32.8 (7.5)

32.7 (8.2)

32.2 (8.4)

0.213

   % calories from carbohydrates

54.7 (9.3)

54.6 (10.0)

54.8 (11.0)

0.917

   % calories from protein

13.7 (3.9)

13.8 (4.1)

14.1 (4.4)

0.064

   fiber intake/1000 kcal of energy

6.4 (2.9)

6.3 (2.8)

6.2 (3.1)

0.163

 

No. (row percent)

 

Gender

    

   Girls

1435 (69.9)

373 (18.2)

245 (11.9)

0.057

   Boys

1504 (73.1)

345 (16.8)

208 (10.1)

 

Race/Ethnicity

   

<0.0001

   Non-Hispanic Whites

885 (78.7)

144 (12.8)

96 (8.5)

 

   Non-Hispanic Blacks

922 (72.0)

227 (17.7)

131 (10.2)

 

   Hispanic

1132 (66.4)

347 (20.4)

226 (13.3)

 

Socioeconomic Status

   

0.006

   Low

997 (69.1)

259 (17.9)

188 (13.0)

 

   High

1942 (72.8)

459 (17.2)

265 (9.9)

 

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; SD, standard deviation; kcal, kilocalories of energy

* The number of usual hours spent watching television, playing video games or using a computer

CRP levels were inversely associated with energy intake (p < 0.0001); those in highest CRP group reported consuming the fewest calories. To address the concern of biased reporting of energy intake, we also examined the association between energy intake and BMI. We found that those in the highest tertile of BMI consumed fewer calories (2014.2 kcal) than those in middle (2079.3 kcal) and lower (2112.0 kcal) tertiles (data not shown).

The adjusted mean food group intakes in the three categories of CRP are shown in Table 2. After adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, height, SES, and sedentary behavior, children in the lowest CRP category consumed more grains (p < 0.001), vegetables (p = 0.0002) and dairy (p = 0.047). We also explored controlling for the height-for-age Z-scores and found nearly identical results, leading us to retain the original height variable in the models (see additional file 2).
Table 2

Adjusted mean food intakes according to C-reactive protein level in children ages 5-16 years

C-reactive protein levels (mg/L)*

n

Dairy

Grains

Fruit

Vegetables

Meat/Other Proteins

  

mean (SE)

 

Baseline analysis

Low

2939

1.98

(0.03)

7.09

(0.07)

1.46

(0.04)

2.59

(0.04)

4.05

(0.06)

Average

718

1.81

(0.06)

6.81

(0.14)

1.31

(0.07)

2.41

(0.08)

3.98

(0.12)

High

453

1.90

(0.07)

6.35

(0.17)

1.41

(0.09)

2.19

(0.11)

3.88

(0.15)

P for trend

 

0.047

<.0001

0.244

0.0002

0.249

 

Body composition

 

Adding BMI Z-Score to the baseline model

Low

2939

1.96

(0.03)

7.04

(0.07)

1.44

(0.04)

2.58

(0.04)

4.06

(0.06)

Average

718

1.84

(0.06)

6.92

(0.14)

1.34

(0.07)

2.43

(0.09)

3.96

(0.12)

High

453

1.93

(0.07)

6.48

(0.18)

1.46

(0.09)

2.21

(0.11)

3.86

(0.15)

P for trend

 

0.304

0.006

0.751

0.001

0.199

 

Adding Waist Circumference to the baseline model

Low

2922

1.95

(0.03)

7.02

(0.07)

1.44

(0.04)

2.59

(0.04)

4.05

(0.06)

Average

713

1.87

(0.06)

6.96

(0.14)

1.35

(0.08)

2.41

(0.09)

3.97

(0.12)

High

450

1.97

(0.07)

6.59

(0.18)

1.49

(0.10)

2.18

(0.11)

3.88

(0.15)

P for trend

 

0.770

0.057

0.925

0.001

0.277

 

Other dietary factors

 

Adding other dietary food groups to the baseline model

Low

2939

1.96

(0.03)

7.06

(0.07)

1.45

(0.04)

2.58

(0.04)

4.02

(0.06)

Average

718

1.83

(0.05)

6.90

(0.13)

1.32

(0.07)

2.43

(0.08)

4.01

(0.11)

High

453

1.95

(0.07)

6.40

(0.17)

1.45

(0.09)

2.22

(0.11)

4.00

(0.14)

P for trend

 

0.309

0.001

0.521

0.001

0.839

 

Adding percent calories from fat to baseline model

Low

2939

1.98

(0.03)

7.09

(0.07)

1.46

(0.04)

2.59

(0.04)

4.04

(0.05)

Average

718

1.81

(0.06)

6.81

(0.14)

1.31

(0.07)

2.41

(0.08)

3.98

(0.11)

High

453

1.91

(0.07)

6.34

(0.17)

1.39

(0.09)

2.21

(0.11)

3.93

(0.14)

P for trend

 

0.059

<.0001

0.152

0.0004

0.394

 

Adding percent of calories from carbohydrates to baseline model

Low

2939

1.98

(0.03)

7.09

(0.07)

1.46

(0.03)

2.59

(0.04)

4.05

(0.05)

Average

718

1.81

(0.06)

6.81

(0.14)

1.31

(0.07)

2.41

(0.08)

3.98

(0.10)

High

453

1.90

(0.07)

6.35

(0.17)

1.41

(0.09)

2.19

(0.11)

3.90

(0.13)

P for trend

 

0.049

<.0001

0.212

0.0002

0.233

 

Adding percent of calories from proteins to baseline model

Low

2939

1.98

(0.03)

7.08

(0.07)

1.46

(0.04)

2.59

(0.04)

4.07

(0.05)

Average

718

1.81

(0.05)

6.81

(0.14)

1.31

(0.07)

2.41

(0.08)

3.98

(0.09)

High

453

1.88

(0.07)

6.39

(0.17)

1.42

(0.09)

2.19

(0.11)

3.75

(0.12)

P for trend

 

0.022

<.0001

0.287

0.0002

0.011

 

Adding Fiber intake/1000 kilocalories of energy to baseline model

Low

2939

1.98

(0.03)

7.09

(0.07)

1.45

(0.03)

2.57

(0.04)

4.07

(0.06)

Average

718

1.81

(0.06)

6.82

(0.14)

1.32

(0.07)

2.44

(0.08)

3.96

(0.11)

High

453

1.89

(0.07)

6.36

(0.17)

1.45

(0.09)

2.25

(0.10)

3.84

(0.14)

P for trend

 

0.031

<.0001

0.520

0.002

0.127

Abbreviations: SE, standard error;

*CRP levels: Low = <1.0 mg/L, Average = 1.0-3.0 mg/L, High = >3.0 mg/L

Adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, height, socioeconomic status, and sedentary behavior. 25 subjects were missing information on waist circumference

Effect modification was assessed using a product term in the multivariable models. The only statistically significant interactions were found between age and CRP levels (for grain intake) (p = 0.03) and for race/ethnicity and CRP levels for meat intake (p = 0.02). In that model, there was an inverse association between CRP and meat intake among Hispanics (p = 0.021) but no association was observed among Non-Hispanic whites (p = 0.617) and Non-Hispanic blacks (p = 0.792) (see additional file 3).

Exploring role of body composition and other dietary factors

The weak but beneficial association between CRP level and dairy consumption in the baseline analysis was attenuated by controlling for either BMI Z-score (p for linear trend changed from p = 0.047 to p = 0.304) or waist circumference (changed from p = 0.047 to p = 0.770). There was only a small amount of attenuation of the associations of grains and vegetables with CRP level. In the final analysis in this table, all other food groups were added to the baseline multivariable models. In this analysis, only an independent association remained for grains and vegetables with CRP. In contrast, the inclusion of energy-adjusted macronutrients and fiber to the models did not fully attenuate the observed associations between any of the food groups and CRP in these children.

The associations of food subgroups and CRP levels are shown in Table 3. A number of the food subgroups here are consumed infrequently by these children and adolescents (e.g., yogurt, whole grains, dark green/leafy vegetables, deep yellow/orange vegetables), giving us little statistical power to examine their relationship with CRP. The milk subgroup was inversely associated with CRP (p = 0.040) while cheese consumption was not. Refined grain intake appeared to be beneficially associated with CRP (p < 0.0001). Other food subgroups found to be beneficially related to CRP level included citrus, melons, and berries (p = 0.053), tomatoes (p = 0.001), total non-starchy vegetables (p = 0.004), and total starchy vegetables (p = 0.012). Neither total meat nor any of the meat/other protein subgroups were associated with CRP levels.
Table 3

Adjusted mean food subgroups intakes according to C-reactive protein level in children ages 5-16 years

 

C-reactive protein levels (mg/L)

 

Low

(<1.0)

Average

(1.0-3.0)

High

(>3.0)

P for trend

 

(n = 2939)

(n = 718)

(n = 453)

 
 

mean (SE)*

 

Dairy (total)

1.98 (0.03)

1.81 (0.06)

1.90 (0.07)

0.047

   Milk

1.36 (0.02)

1.26 (0.05)

1.26 (0.06)

0.040

   Cheese

0.59 (0.01)

0.52 (0.03)

0.62 (0.04)

0.838

   Yogurt

0.02 (0.002)

0.02 (0.005)

0.01 (0.01)

0.406

Grains (total)

7.09 (0.07)

6.81 (0.14)

6.35 (0.17)

<.0001

   Refined grains

6.36 (0.06)

6.09 (0.13)

5.70 (0.16)

<.0001

   Whole Grains

0.73 (0.02)

0.72 (0.05)

0.65 (0.06)

0.258

Fruit (total)

1.46 (0.04)

1.31 (0.07)

1.41 (0.09)

0.244

   Citrus, melon, berries

0.70 (0.03)

0.63 (0.05)

0.58 (0.07)

0.053

   Other fruit

0.76 (0.02)

0.67 (0.05)

0.83 (0.06)

0.707

Vegetables (total)

2.59 (0.04)

2.41 (0.08)

2.19 (0.11)

0.0002

   Total Non-Starchy (Green, Yellow, Tomatoes and Others)

1.19 (0.02)

1.07 (0.05)

1.03 (0.06)

0.004

Dark green

0.07 (0.01)

0.07 (0.01)

0.06 (0.02)

0.461

Deep yellow/orange

0.09 (0.01)

0.08 (0.01)

0.06 (0.02)

0.104

Tomatoes

0.50 (0.01)

0.41 (0.03)

0.42 (0.03)

0.001

Other vegetables

0.53 (0.02)

0.52 (0.03)

0.49 (0.04)

0.295

   Total Starchy (Potatoes, legumes & Others)

1.40 (0.03)

1.34 (0.07)

1.16 (0.08)

0.012

Legumes

0.20 (0.01)

0.18 (0.02)

0.15 (0.03)

0.090

Potatoes

1.07 (0.03)

1.05 (0.06)

0.91 (0.08)

0.079

Other Starchy Vegetables

0.12 (0.01)

0.11 (0.02)

0.10 (0.02)

0.212

Meat/Other Proteins

4.05 (0.06)

3.98 (0.12)

3.88 (0.15)

0.249

   Red meat

1.52 (0.04)

1.50 (0.08)

1.55 (0.10)

0.952

   White meat (poultry, fish, other seafood)

1.34 (0.04)

1.32 (0.08)

1.20 (0.10)

0.258

   Organ meats

0.01 (0.004)

0.005 (0.01)

0.01 (0.01)

0.308

   Processed meats

0.74 (0.02)

0.70 (0.05)

0.73 (0.06)

0.626

   Other protein sources (Eggs, Nuts, Seeds and Soy)

0.43 (0.02)

0.46 (0.03)

0.39 (0.04)

0.610

Abbreviations: SE, standard error;

*Adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, height, socioeconomic status, and sedentary behavior.

Discussion

This study found that children and adolescents with higher CRP levels had significantly lower intakes of grains and vegetables. There was also a weak beneficial association between dairy intake and CRP level, particularly for milk consumption. The low intakes of a number of food subgroups made it difficult to assess the associations of these dietary factors with CRP. Certain subgroups such as tomatoes and citrus, melon and berries were found to be beneficially associated with CRP. Both starchy and non-starchy vegetables had similar associations with CRP.

In general, the addition of body composition variables to the multivariable models attenuated the associations between food consumption pattern and CRP levels. Only the intakes of grains and vegetables were independent of BMI and waist circumference. The mechanism by which different foods may affect the sub-clinical inflammatory state is not clear although these results do suggest that body composition plays a role.

Obesity is a potent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis as well as non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and these effects may be due in part to the sub-clinical inflammatory response associated with excess adipose tissue[31]. It has been reported that adipose tissue secrete cytokines such as IL-6 that in turn regulate CRP production[32]. Both obesity and inflammation are related in a circular fashion. Excessive weight gain stimulates an inflammatory response while inflammation itself leads to greater weight gain[33]. Recent published studies in children indicate that excess adiposity is associated with significantly higher levels of CRP[34, 35] and several other studies suggest that high CRP levels may lead to early atherosclerotic changes in children[36].

The association between fruit and vegetable consumption and CRP in this study is consistent with some earlier studies of adults. Higher intakes of citrus, melon, berries or tomatoes may be linked with healthier lifestyles in general and with beneficial effects on body fat acquisition. Fruits and vegetables are low-energy dense foods (fewer calories per gram of food) with high contents of water and fiber. The larger volume of food consumed combined with the low energy density may benefit satiety[37], energy balance and weight status[38]. While controlling for body composition in our analyses attenuated the effects of fruit intake, the association between vegetable consumption and CRP was unchanged, suggesting that the effects of vegetables in this study was not entirely explained by differences in body composition.

Some food groups such as vegetables and fruits are particularly rich in antioxidant compounds including vitamin C[39], beta carotene[40], dietary flavonoids[41], and lycopene[42]. These anti-oxidants may lower the concentration of CRP, thereby reducing sub-clinical inflammation. In one study, the total antioxidant capacity of the diet was shown to be independently associated with lower CRP levels, leading the authors to suggest that this mechanism might be part of the explanation for the beneficial effects of certain dietary factors such as fruits, whole cereals and red wine on the risk of CVD [43]. In addition, low levels of antioxidant vitamin intake have also been associated with obesity in children[44].

Unlike vegetables, the association between CRP levels and dairy consumption in this study was attenuated by the inclusion of either BMI or waist circumference in the multivariable models. Thus, it is possible that the association between dairy and CRP is explained by previously shown beneficial effects of dairy intake on body composition[45]. Dairy intake may also be linked with greater satiety or a healthier diet in general. In a recent study in mice, a diet rich in dairy led to decreases in the expression of several inflammatory cytokine genes in adipose tissue[46] which was in turn followed by decreases in the levels of plasma IL-6 and its associated inflammatory marker CRP.

The inverse association between CRP and grain intake was not explained by differences in body composition. Neither body composition nor the intake of macronutrients or other foods explained the relation between CRP and refined grains. The CRP-grain association in this study is consistent with findings among adults in NHANES-III[47] but not consistent with effects found in other studies[48]. In one recent study of adults on a hypo-caloric diet, the intake of both whole and refined grains was associated with moderate weight loss but only whole grain consumption led to reductions in CRP levels[49].

There are several limitations of this study, the most important of which is its cross-sectional design. Certainly, it is very unlikely that the reported dietary intake in this study is biased by knowledge of CRP level. However, it is possible that the reported dietary intakes are biased by the level of body fat which is closely linked with CRP. This bias is more likely present among adolescents than among younger children.

A second important limitation of this study is the availability of only a single 24 hour dietary recall, thereby providing a less precise measure of intake. The use of a single recall does not introduce bias but will reduce the power to detect true effects that may exist, especially in population subgroups (e.g., stratifying by race/ethnicity) and for infrequently-eaten foods. To minimize error associated with using a single 24-hour recall to classify children according to dietary intake, we classified the children according to CRP level and examined mean dietary intakes in these groups[28].

We were unable to exclude certain chronic diseases or prevalent acute infections in the children. However, we did exclude those subjects whose white blood cell count was above the upper limit of the reference range from the NHANES laboratory procedural manual. Another limitation of this analysis is that we were unable to control for physical activity since these data were not collected for children at ages 5-11 years of age. While the association between physical activity and CRP levels during childhood is uncertain[50], we attempted to address this potential confounding issue by including a measure of sedentary behavior in the multivariable models.

There are certain strengths of this study that we would like to mention. NHANES is a comprehensive national survey with a large sample size (and over-sampling of minorities), making the results more generalizable to US population. To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the effects of USDA food group intakes on CRP levels in children, while examining the role of number of potential modifiers of this relationship.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in this cross-sectional study, higher levels of CRP were associated with lower intakes of vegetables and grains and, to a lesser degree, lower intakes of dairy. Only the associations seen with grains and vegetable intakes were independent of body composition. Higher intakes of certain food subgroups, such as milk, citrus, melons and berries, and tomatoes were also associated with lower levels of CRP. These dietary relationships with CRP should be further examined in future prospective studies.

Notes

Abbreviations

CRP

C-reactive protein

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys

BMI

Body mass index

IL-6

Interleukin-6

hs-CRP

highly sensitive CRP assays

CVD

cardiovascular diseases

LD L: 

low-density lipoprotein

USDA

United States Department of Agriculture

SES

socioeconomic status

ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

LMS

lambda, Mu, Sigma

TAC

Total antioxidant capacity

p

p for trend

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine

References

  1. Ballou SP, Kushner I: C-Reactive Protein and the Acute-Phase Response. Adv Intern Med. 1992, 37: 313-336.Google Scholar
  2. Ganapathi MK, Rzewnicki D, Samols D, Jiang SL, Kushner I: Effect of Combinations of Cytokines and Hormones on Synthesis of Serum Amyloid-A and C-Reactive Protein in Hep 3B-Cells. J Immunol. 1991, 147: 1261-1265.Google Scholar
  3. Pai JK, Pischon T, Ma J, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Joshipura K, Curhan GC, Rifai N, Cannuscio CC, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB: Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 2599-2610. 10.1056/NEJMoa040967.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR: Comparison of C-reactive protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1557-1565. 10.1056/NEJMoa021993.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kelly AS, Wetzsteon RJ, Kaiser DR, Steinberger J, Bank AJ, Dengel DR: Inflammation, insulin, and endothelial function in overweight children and adolescents: the role of exercise. J Pediatr. 2004, 145: 731-736. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Retnakaran R, Hanley AJ, Connelly PW, Harris SB, Zinman B: Elevated C-reactive protein in Native Canadian children: an ominous early complication of childhood obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006, 8 (5): 483-491. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00533.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Esmaillzadeh A, Kimiagar M, Mehrabi Y, Azadbakht L, Hu FB, Willett WC: Fruit and vegetable intakes, C-reactive protein, and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 1489-1497.Google Scholar
  8. Wannamethee SG, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Bruckdorfer KR, Whincup PH: Associations of vitamin C status, fruit and vegetable intakes, and markers of inflammation and hemostasis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 567-574.Google Scholar
  9. Chrysohoou C, Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Das UN, Stefanadis C: Adherence to the Mediterranean diet attenuates inflammation and coagulation process in healthy adults - The ATTICA study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004, 44: 152-158. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.039.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Esposito K, Marfella R, Ciotola M, Di Palo C, Giugliano F, Giugliano G, D'Armiento M, D'Andrea F, Giugliano D: Effect of a Mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inflammation in the metabolic syndrome - A randomized trial. JAMA. 2004, 292: 1440-1446. 10.1001/jama.292.12.1440.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Aeberli I, Molinari L, Spinas G, Lehmann R, l'Allemand D, Zimmermann MB: Dietary intakes of fat and antioxidant vitamins are predictors of subclinical inflammation in overweight Swiss children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 748-755.Google Scholar
  12. Kelishadi R, Hashemi M, Mohammadifard N, Asgary S, Khavarian N: Association of changes in oxidative and proinflammatory states with changes in vascular function after a lifestyle modification trial among obese children. Clin Chem. 2008, 54: 147-153. 10.1373/clinchem.2007.089953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. 2005, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Accessed October 6, 2008, 6, http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/pdf/DGA2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire, Examination Protocol and Laboratory Protocol. 1999, Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Accessed September 3, 2009, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes99_00.htmGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire, Examination Protocol and Laboratory Protocol. 2001, Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Accessed September 3, 2009, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes01-02.htmGoogle Scholar
  16. Brunt AR, Rhee YS: Obesity and lifestyle in US college students related to living arrangemeents. Appetite. 2008, 51: 615-621. 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Post-Skagegard M, Samuelson G, Karlstrom B, Mohsen R, Berglund L, Bratteby LE: Changes in food habits in healthy Swedish adolescents during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002, 56: 532-538. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601345.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Laboratory Procedure Manual. Accessed October 6, 2008, http://www.cdc.gov/NCHS/data/nhanes/frequency/lab25_met_complete_blood_count.pdf
  19. National Center for Health Statistics: The NHANES 1999-2001 Dietary Interviewers Procedure Manual. 2000, Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, Accessed September 3, 2009, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/currentnhanes.htm#InterviewerGoogle Scholar
  20. Dwyer J, Ellwood K, Moshfegh AJ, Johnson CL: Integration of the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001, 101: 1142-1143. 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00279-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 16. Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page. 2001, Accessed October 6, 2008, http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/ndlGoogle Scholar
  22. U.S. Department of Agriculture: Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 1.0. 2004, Beltsville, MD: Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group, Accessed October 6, 2008, http://www.ars.usda.gov/ba/bhnrc/fsrgGoogle Scholar
  23. US Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. 2000, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, Accessed September 3, 2009, 5, http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/DGAs2000Guidelines.htmGoogle Scholar
  24. Ledue TB, Weiner DL, Sipe JD, Poulin SE, Collins MF, Rifai N: Analytical evaluation of particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assays for C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A and mannose-binding protein in human serum. Ann Clin Biochem. 1998, 35: 745-753.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Rifai N, Tracy RP, Ridker PM: Clinical efficacy of an automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein assay. Clin Chem. 1999, 45: 2136-2141. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980228)17:4<407::AID-SIM742>3.0.CO;2-L.Google Scholar
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Anthropometry Procedures Manual. Accessed October 6, 2008, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/bm.pdf
  27. Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA: British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1998, 17: 407-429. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980228)17:4<407::AID-SIM742>3.0.CO;2-L.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Posner BM, Martin-Munley SS, Smigelski C, Cupples LA, Cobb JL, Schaefer E, Miller DR, D'Agostino RB: Comparison of Techniques for Estimating Nutrient Intake - the Framingham-Study. Epidemiology. 1992, 3: 171-177. 10.1097/00001648-199203000-00016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, Criqui M, Fadl YY, Fortmann SP, Hong Y, Myers GL, Rifai N, Smith SC, Taubert K, Tracy RP, Vinicor F, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; American Heart Association: Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease application to clinical and public health practice - A statement for healthcare professionals from the centers for disease control and prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003, 107: 499-511. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801792.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Korn EL, Graubard BI: Epidemiologic studies utilizing surveys: accounting for the sampling design. Am J Public Health. 1991, 81: 1166-1173. 10.2105/AJPH.81.9.1166.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Festa A, D'Agostino R, Williams K, Karter AJ, Mayer-Davis EJ, Tracy RP, Haffner SM: The relation of body fat mass and distribution to markers of chronic inflammation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001, 25: 1407-1415. 10.2337/diabetes.52.8.2097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohamed-Ali V, Goodrick S, Rawesh A, Katz DR, Miles JM, Yudkin JS, Klein S, Coppack SW: Subcutaneous adipose tissue releases interleukin-6, but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997, 82: 4196-4200. 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00312-3.Google Scholar
  33. Engstrom G, Hedblad B, Stavenow L, Lind P, Janzon L, Lindgarde F: Inflammation-sensitive plasma proteins are associated with future weight gain. Diabetes. 2003, 52: 2097-2101. 10.1542/peds.107.1.e13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Cook DG, Mendall MA, Whincup PH, Carey IM, Ballam L, Morris JE, Miller GJ, Strachan DP: C-reactive protein concentration in children: relationship to adiposity and other cardiovascular risk factors. Atherosclerosis. 2000, 149: 139-150. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000024222.06463.21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener MH, Harris TB: Low-grade systemic inflammation in overweight children. Pediatrics. 2001, 107:Google Scholar
  36. Jarvisalo MJ, Harmoinen A, Hakanen M, Paakkunainen U, Viikari J, Hartiala J, Lehtimäki T, Simell O, Raitakari OT: Elevated serum C-reactive protein levels and early arterial changes in healthy children. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002, 22: 1323-1328. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000024222.06463.21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Duncan KH, Bacon JA, Weinsier RL: The Effects of High and Low-Energy Density Diets on Satiety, Energy-Intake, and Eating Time of Obese and Non-Obese Subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983, 37: 763-767.Google Scholar
  38. Yao MJ, Roberts SB: Dietary energy density and weight regulation. Nutr Rev. 2001, 59: 247-258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Block G, Jensen C, Dietrich M, Norkus EP, Hudes M, Packer L: Plasma C-reactive protein concentrations in active and passive smokers: Influence of antioxidant supplementation. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004, 23: 141-147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Erlinger TP, Guallar E, Miller ER, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Appel LJ: Relationship between systemic markers of inflammation and serum beta-carotene levels. Arch Intern Med. 2001, 161: 1903-1908. 10.1017/S0007114507791894.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Chun OK, Chung SJ, Claycombe KJ, Song WO: Serum c-reactive protein concentrations are inversely associated with dietary flavonoid intake in US adults. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 753-760. 10.1079/BJN20051400.Google Scholar
  42. Jacob K, Periago MJ, Bohm V, Berruezo GR: Influence of lycopene and vitamin C from tomato juice on biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation. Br J Nutr. 2008, 99: 137-146. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802719.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Brighenti F, Valtuena S, Pellegrini N, Ardigo D, Del Rio D, Salvatore S, Piatti P, Serafini M, Zavaroni I: Total antioxidant capacity of the diet is inversely and independently related to plasma concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in adult Italian subjects. Br J Nutr. 2005, 93: 619-625. 10.1038/oby.2006.116.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Molnar D, Decsi T, Koletzko B: Reduced antioxidant status in obese children with multimetabolic syndrome. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004, 28: 1197-1202. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802719.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore LL, Bradlee ML, Gao D, Singer MR: Low dairy intake in early childhood predicts excess body fat gain. Obesity. 2006, 14: 1010-1018. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602070.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Zemel MB, Sun XC: Dietary calcium and dairy products modulate oxidative and inflammatory stress in mice and humans. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 1047-1052.Google Scholar
  47. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Liu S: Healthy Eating Index and C-reactive protein concentration: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, 1988-1994. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005, 59: 278-283. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602070.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Nettleton JA, Steffen LM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Jenny NS, Jiang R, Herrington DM, Jacobs DR: Dietary patterns are associated with biochemical markers of inflammation and endothelial activation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 1369-1379. 10.1542/peds.111.2.332.Google Scholar
  49. Katcher HI, Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Gillies PJ, Demers LM, Bagshaw DM, Kris-Etherton PM: The effects of a whole grain-enriched hypocaloric diet on cardiovascular disease risk factors in men and women with metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008, 87: 79-90.Google Scholar
  50. Isasi CR, Deckelbaum RJ, Tracy RP, Starc TJ, Berglund L, Shea S: Physical fitness and C-reactive protein level in children and young adults: The Columbia University BioMarkers Study. Pediatrics. 2003, 111: 332-338. 10.1542/peds.111.2.332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Qureshi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement