Skip to main content

Table 3 Association of vitamin D status with lipid profile and hs-CRP in the second trimestera

From: Vitamin D status affects the relationship between lipid profile and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

Variables

β (95%CI)

Vitamin D Status

25(OH)D ≥ 50 nmol/L

25(OH)D<50 nmol/L

TC(mg/dL)

 Model 1b

−0.212(− 0.304,-0.120)*

−8.384(−11.965,-4.803)*

Refd

 Model 2c

− 0.248(− 0.344,-0.152)*

−8.690(− 12.333,-5.046)*

Ref

TG(mg/dL)

  

 Model 1b

−0.477(− 0.689,-0.265)*

−13.630(−21.916,-5.344)*

Ref

 Model 2c

−0.468(− 0.687,-0.250)*

−13.254(− 21.544,-4.963)*

Ref

HDL-C(mg/dL)

 Model 1b

−0.018(− 0.050,0.014)

−1.307(−2.554,-0.060)*

Ref

 Model 2c

− 0.045(− 0..078,-0.011)*

−1.910(−3.176,-0.644)*

Ref

LDL-C(mg/dL)

 Model 1b

−0.171(− 0.234,-0.107)*

−5.360(−7.831,-2.888)*

Ref

 Model 2c

− 0.176(− 0.242,-0.109)*

−4.933(− 7.458,-2.409)*

Ref

Hs-CRP(mg/L)

 Model 1b

− 0.002(− 0.003,-0.001)*

− 0.050(− 0.080,-0.019)*

Ref

 Model 2c

−0.002(− 0.002,-0.001)*

−0.034(− 0.064,-0.004)*

Ref

  1. a.25(OH)D 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; hs-CRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; TC Total cholesterol; TG Triglyceride; HDL-C High density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; Unit conversion factors: TC, HDL-C, LDL-C((mg/dL) × 0.0259 = mmol/L); TG((mg/dL) × 0.0113 = mmol/L);
  2. b.Model 1 unadjusted confounding factor;
  3. c.Model 2 controls confounding factors based on Model 1, including adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics (maternal age, education, income, season), perinatal health status(pre-pregnancy BMI, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure), lifestyle(sedentary time, physical activities, paternal alcohol and smoking consumption, fish oil supplement, multivitamin supplement, milk intake, soy product intake and dessert intake), hs-CRP or lipid profile
  4. d. “Refd” indicates 25(OH)D<50 nmol/L as a reference group
  5. * Indicates P < 0.05
Back to article page

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us