Table 4 Association between the number of metabolic abnormalities and irregular breakfast consumption, using negative binomial regression
Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) referred regular breakfast group in each category | |
|---|---|
Total participants (n = 21,193) | 1.05 (1.01–1.08) |
Men (n = 9022) | 1.11 (1.06–1.15) |
Younger aged Men (n = 3065) | 1.14 (1.06–1.23) |
Middle aged Men (n = 5957) | 1.08 (1.03–1.14) |
Women (n = 12,171) | 1.02 (0.98–1.07) |
Younger aged Women (n = 4254) | 1.06 (0.96–1.17) |
Middle aged Women (n = 7917) | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) |
Non-working population (n = 11,796) | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) |
Men (n = 4527) | 1.07 (1.01–1.14) |
Younger aged Men (n = 1066) | 1.12 (0.97–1.29) |
Middle aged Men (n = 3461) | 1.04 (0.97–1.12) |
Women (n = 7269) | 1.06 (1.00–1.12) |
Younger aged Women (n = 2177) | 1.09 (0.96–1.25) |
Middle aged Women (n = 5092) | 1.06 (0.99–1.13) |
Working population (n = 9397) | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) |
Men (n = 4495) | 1.14 (1.08–1.21) |
Younger aged Men (n = 1999) | 1.15 (1.03–1.27) |
Middle aged Men (n = 2496) | 1.12 (1.04–1.20) |
Women (n = 4902) | 0.99 (0.92–1.06) |
Younger aged Women (n = 2077) | 1.03 (0.90–1.18) |
Middle aged Women (n = 2825) | 0.96 (0.89–1.05) |