|
Saturated fats
|
Tertile 1
|
Tertile 2
|
Tertile 3
|
P for trend
|
|---|
|
Total saturated fats
| |
|
Median intake (% of energy)
|
7.74
|
10.17
|
13.12
| |
|
Range (% of energy)
|
2.30–9.04
|
9.05–11.38
|
11.38–196.91
| |
|
CVD event (n)
|
93
|
62
|
43
| |
|
HR (95% CI) Crude Model
|
1.00
|
0.74 (0.53–1.03)
|
0.45 (0.30–0.66)
|
< 0.001
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 1
|
1.00
|
0.89 (0.64–1.24)
|
0.68 (0.46–1.01)
|
0.061
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 2
|
1.00
|
0.92 (0.63–1.34)
|
0.75 (0.45–1.23)
|
0.263
|
|
Lauric acid
| |
|
Median intake (% of energy)
|
0.19
|
0.31
|
0.47
| |
|
Range (% of energy)
|
0.02–0.25
|
0.25–0.37
|
0.37–4.53
| |
|
CVD event (n)
|
87
|
70
|
41
| |
|
HR (95% CI) Crude Model
|
1.00
|
0.94 (0.68–1.32)
|
0.54 (0.36–0.80)
|
< 0.001
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 1
|
1.00
|
1.27 (0.90–1.78)
|
0.75 (0.51–1.11)
|
0.228
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 2
|
1.00
|
1.31 (0.93–1.84)
|
0.79 (0.52–1.18)
|
0.377
|
|
Myristic acid
| |
|
Median intake (% of energy)
|
0.52
|
0.83
|
1.19
| |
|
Range (% of energy)
|
0.06–0.68
|
0.68–0.97
|
0.97–4.81
| |
|
CVD event (n)
|
85
|
71
|
42
| |
|
HR (95% CI) Crude Model
|
1.00
|
0.85 (0.61–1.20)
|
0.65 (0.45–0.94)
|
0.007
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 1
|
1.00
|
1.09 (0.77–1.54)
|
0.85 (0.59–1.23)
|
0.452
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 2
|
1.00
|
1.17 (0.83–1.67)
|
0.94
(0.63–1.40)
|
0.874
|
|
Palmitic acid
| |
|
Median intake (% of energy)
|
3.73
|
4.74
|
6.03
| |
|
Range (% of energy)
|
1.87–4.27
|
4.27–5.28
|
5.28–14.42
| |
|
CVD event (n)
|
77
|
68
|
53
| |
|
HR (95% CI) Crude Model
|
1.00
|
0.60 (0.42–0.87)
|
0.77 (0.55–1.09)
|
0.113
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 1
|
1.00
|
0.81 (0.56–1.17)
|
0.96 (0.68–1.36)
|
0.786
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 2
|
1.00
|
0.85 (0.57–1.26)
|
1.05 (0.71–1.54)
|
0.800
|
|
Stearic acid
| |
|
Median intake (% of energy)
|
1.51
|
1.96
|
2.49
| |
|
Range (% of energy)
|
0.67–1.74
|
1.74–2.19
|
2.19–6.69
| |
|
CVD event (n)
|
90
|
65
|
43
| |
|
HR (95% CI) Crude Model
|
1.00
|
0.61 (0.44–0.85)
|
0.45 (0.31–0.65)
|
< 0.001
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 1
|
1.00
|
0.80 (0.57–1.12)
|
0.69 (0.48–1.01)
|
0.052
|
|
HR (95% CI) Model 2
|
1.00
|
0.79 (0.54–1.16)
|
0.70 (0.42–1.16)
|
0.150
|
- Data are hazard ratio (95% CI); proportional hazard Cox regression was used. HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; CVD, Cardio-vascular Disease
- Model 1 was adjusted for sex, waist circumference, body mass index, CVD score, hypertension and physical activity. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for total energy intake (kcal/d), total fat (g/d), total fiber (g/d), cholesterol (mg/d), tea and coffee intake (ml/d)
