Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Does dietary nitrate boost the effects of caloric restriction on brain health? Potential physiological mechanisms and implications for future research

Nutrition & Metabolism volume 20, Article number: 45 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Dementia is a highly prevalent and costly disease characterised by deterioration of cognitive and physical capacity due to changes in brain function and structure. Given the absence of effective treatment options for dementia, dietary and other lifestyle approaches have been advocated as potential strategies to reduce the burden of this condition. Maintaining an optimal nutritional status is vital for the preservation of brain function and structure. Several studies have recognised the significant role of nutritional factors to protect and enhance metabolic, cerebrovascular, and neurocognitive functions. Caloric restriction (CR) positively impacts on brain function via a modulation of mitochondrial efficiency, endothelial function, neuro-inflammatory, antioxidant and autophagy responses. Dietary nitrate, which serves as a substrate for the ubiquitous gasotransmitter nitric oxide (NO), has been identified as a promising nutritional intervention that could have an important role in improving vascular and metabolic brain regulation by affecting oxidative metabolism, ROS production, and endothelial and neuronal integrity. Only one study has recently tested the combined effects of both interventions and showed preliminary, positive outcomes cognitive function. This paper explores the potential synergistic effects of a nutritional strategy based on the co-administration of CR and a high-nitrate diet as a potential and more effective (than either intervention alone) strategy to protect brain health and reduce dementia risk.

Introduction

Dementia is a progressive, incurable neurodegenerative disease leading to significant alterations of brain structure and function, resulting in cognitive decline, physical impairment, and changes in behaviour [1, 2]. Worldwide, more than 50 million people had dementia in 2020 and this figure is predicted to increase three-fold by 2050 [2, 3]. Cases are not distributed equally across the globe with most (> 60%) cases living in low- and middle-income countries where resources, research and policy focused on dementia is scarce [2, 4, 5]. The increasing number of older adults aged 65 years and over represents one of the major drivers of the growing number of dementia cases globally and the large proportion of dementia cases are expected to occur in very old individuals (≥ 80 years) [3, 5, 6].

Dementia has a multifactorial pathogenesis, and is linked to a plethora of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors including for example increased age, female gender, genetics (e.g., Apolipoprotein e4 allele status), nutrition (poor diet), lifestyle (e.g., smoking, physical activity), socioeconomic status (e.g., deprivation), low education, and poor cardio-metabolic health status (e.g., hypertension, diabetes and obesity) [7]. With no cure, the maintenance of a healthy physical and cognitive trajectory across the life course is an international public health priority to reduce the projected number of dementia cases impacting not only the individual, but also society.

Numerous observational and experimental studies have investigated the links between nutrition and the brain health ranging from testing associations and effects of dietary patterns (i.e., Mediterranean Diet, Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet, to single foods (i.e., green leafy vegetables, oily fish) and nutrients (i.e., minerals, vitamins, phytochemicals) provided alone or in combination [8,9,10]. Caloric restriction (CR) and, more recently, an increased dietary nitrate consumption have been linked independently with several health benefits including anti-ageing effects and improvements of brain health and cognitive performance [8,9,10]. Some of the key biological mechanisms underpinning the benefits of CR and dietary nitrate on brain physiology involve the modulation of oxidative stress [11,12,13], inflammation [14], mitochondrial function [11, 12], insulin [15, 16], and nitric oxide signalling and autophagy [17,18,19]. This opinion paper provides a brief overview of key nutritional factors that may influence brain health, and it proposes a physiological rationale for the synergistic effects of combined CR and dietary nitrate interventions on brain health as an effective strategy for dementia risk reduction and prevention.

Ageing, obesity and vascular dysfunction: the dementia risk triad

Ageing is linked to a progressive decline of vascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive functions [20]. Some of the mechanisms underpinning these functional declines include reduced metabolic efficiency, decreased anti-inflammatory responses, elevated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and declined nitric oxide (NO) production [1, 21,22,23,24]. A progressive loss of synaptic connectivity, neuronal plasticity and accumulation of aberrant native proteins (Beta-Amyloid, Tau-Protein, Lewy-Bodies) are key features of the ageing process [22]. In most individuals, these changes do not result in clinical manifestation of cognitive impairment or dementia [22]. However, if functional and structural damages become more extensive and overcome compensatory mechanisms, cognitive dysfunction may accelerate and lead to the onset of clinical dementia [22]. For a detailed review of pathogenetic hallmarks of ageing and dementia risk, see Hou et al. [20].

Obesity is causally linked to various chronic conditions including diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and cancer [25, 26]. Obesity has also been associated with an accelerated cognitive decline across the life course including impairments in global cognition, logical memory, delayed recall, and verbal fluency [25]. Mid-life obesity is a key risk factor for the onset of late-life dementia [25,26,27]. Obesity also showed an increased risk of atrophy in grey and white matter regions (frontal, temporal and occipital cortices, thalamus, hippocampus, and midbrain) and is linked to a reduction of regional blood flow in the pre-frontal cortex [26]. Excess adiposity has been linked to a decreased whole-body NO production and endothelial dysfunction (could be a result of a reduction in NOS activity [28]), which may affect neuro-vascular coupling, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF) [25, 27]. Obesity-related vascular dysfunction significantly impacts brain function and increases the risk across the various dementia sub-types as cerebrovascular dysfunction represents a common pathogenetic feature [1, 24]. A reduction of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability has been linked to hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion, which are closely linked to the occurrence of major events in the brain such as cerebral ischemia and stroke [24, 29, 30].

Nutrition and brain health

Maintaining brain functions requires an optimal supply of energy and nutrients. The brain is an energy-demanding organ (20% of the total body energy production), heavily relying on the oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates and fat [31, 32]. Glucose and ketone bodies are the primary sources of energy for the brain to drive ATP production, preserve neuronal and glial cellular integrity and ensure the efficiency of neurotransmission [33]. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3), vitamins B (1, 6, 9, and 12), D, E, and C, minerals (iron, copper, calcium, and zinc), and other nutrients with antioxidant properties (i.e., polyphenols, dietary nitrates) may have a crucial role in the preservation of cerebrovascular and cognitive functions by regulating synaptic transmission, membrane fluidity, endothelial function, and neurotransmitter and signal-transduction pathways [8,9,10].

Unhealthy dietary patterns, sedentary lifestyle, social isolation, low educational attainment, smoking, and alcohol addiction are common risk factors for cardiovascular disease and cognitive impairment [2, 21]. In the last decade, greater emphasis has been given to multi-dimensional approaches to dementia prevention, including testing the effects of healthy dietary patterns and providing multiple sources of protective nutrients [34,35,36,37,38]. The Mediterranean diet (MED) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) are examples of dietary patterns, which have been linked to a reduction in cardiovascular and dementia risk in observational and intervention studies [34, 35]. Morris et al. have amalgamated the key features of the two dietary patterns to propose the MIND diet (MED + DASH), which essentially promotes a high consumption of plant-based products (similar to the MED, but with a particular emphasis on increasing the intake of berries and green leafy vegetables) to reduce dementia risk [37]. These dietary patterns emphasize the consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and healthy fats. [37, 39, 40] and encourage a controlled energy intake to match or reduce levels below an individual’s energy requirements (CR). They are rich in protective nutrients including fibre, mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids, vitamins, antioxidants, and other nutrients such as polyphenols or dietary nitrate that can positively influence vascular, metabolic, and cognitive functions [30, 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Dietary nitrate may represent a crucial health-enhancing element within plant-based dietary regimens [50, 51]. Hord et al. [52] conducted an estimation indicating that the DASH diet has the potential to deliver as much as 1200 mg/day of dietary nitrate. This is in comparison to the typical daily intake of approximately 110 mg/day found in the general population [53]. In randomized clinical trials, a common dosage of dietary nitrate involves supplementation of around 600 mg/day, achievable through the consumption of two bottles of concentrated high-nitrate beetroot juice [51]. CR strategies and dietary nitrate may therefore represent potential effective nutritional strategies to prevent both endothelial and cognitive dysfunction, thus, reducing the risk of dementia.

Caloric restriction

Current evidence

CR aims to reduce the daily caloric intake without causing malnutrition to enhance physical and mental health [54]. CR has been linked to an increase in lifespan across various species and a decrease in age-related morbidity and mortality including rodents, primates, and humans [21, 54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. In addition, CR enhances the neuro-inflammatory responses [14] and lowers the occurrence of oxidative damage by improving mitochondrial efficiency [11, 63, 64], with a reduction of white matter loss [62], improved cerebral blood flow [21, 56] in several brain regions [11, 64], and enhanced cognitive function [14]. Although much of the evidence for a salutary effect of CR is derived from animal model studies, some human investigations have also identified promising effects of CR on markers of cardiometabolic/brain health.

Forty-nine healthy overweight and obese older adults were randomised to a three-month CR intervention which significantly improved memory, insulin, glucose, and C Reactive Protein compared to high PUFA and a control diet [15]. Nevertheless, not all CR studies have reported beneficial effects [65,66,67]. This could be related to the heterogeneous methods employed, including differences in the CR protocol (e.g., different caloric intake and intervention duration) and study cohort (e.g., animal, and human populations with different ages, sex, and health status). For example, a 6-month randomised trial tested the interactive effects of CR and exercise in forty-eight participants but no significant improvement in cognition was found [67]. In young rats, a two-month CR intervention had an adverse effect on the brain, decreasing neurogenesis and spatial learning assessed using the Morris water maze [68]. On the other hand, a more extended CR intervention (ten months) with older mice showed an improvement in spatial learning [69]. The characteristics of some of the key studies, identified by a non-systematic search of human randomised clinical trials (RCTs) on PubMed, that have investigated the effects of CR on brain health (cognitive function and CBF) are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Key studies investigating the effects of caloric restriction on brain health in humans
Full size table

Key molecular mechanisms

The main molecular pathways linking CR to the improvement of endothelial and cognitive functions involve sirtuins (SIRT; proteins family), protein kinase B (Akt), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), autophagy and NO [17]. Sirtuins could be upregulated by various stressors such as energy reduction (CR); when activated and overexpressed, sirtuin catalyses NAD-dependent deacetylase, which has been found to be associated with longevity [58, 59]. In addition, SIRT1 could act as an antioxidant that influences several protein regulations (such as p53, Ku/Bax and FOXO) to resist the stress-induced damage, reduce apoptosis and protect neurons [58, 70]. Additionally, SIRT1 is involved in various metabolic pathways linked to adiposity (PPARγ downregulation), insulin, glucose, and lipid metabolism (PGC-1α and LXRα deacetylation, and UCP2 expression) [58, 70]. Sirtuins have a significant role in enhancing NO bioavailability by activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), directly or indirectly, through the activation of the AMPK pathway [29, 71, 72]. CR-induced Akt phosphorylation through the insulin-PI3K-Akt signalling pathway is important for cell growth and resilience, and synaptogenesis [73], which could enhance vascular [71] and cognitive [74] functions. The activation of AMPK, SIRT1, and Akt during CR plays a crucial role in regulating endothelial function via the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) stimulation, which upregulates eNOS and leads to an increased NO synthesis [75]. CR stimulates autophagy [69, 76] and downregulates hippocampal mTOR, which acts as a neuroprotector by reducing neuronal apoptosis [77]. Results from experimental models also call for a more cautious interpretation of the current evidence as an excessive NO production, associated with the activation of iNOS, may be related to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease [78, 79]. The existence of an optimal range of NO production is established as both high and low production rates have been linked to abnormal pathogenetic processes [80]. However, an increased NO production, achieved via the stimulation of the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway and still maintained within an optimal range, has been consistently associated with positive effects on several physiological functions [81].

Dietary nitrate

Current evidence

Inorganic or dietary nitrate is a water-soluble polyatomic ion which can be found in various food sources; particularly green leafy and root vegetables (e.g., beetroot) [52, 82]. Dietary nitrate may be an effective nutritional intervention for improving vascular and metabolic health via an increased NO production produced in the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway [83,84,85]. Dietary nitrate supplementation may reduce the risk of cognitive decline by improving neuronal metabolism and CBF, with effects on several domains including decision-making and memory [86,87,88]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 16 RCTs, including 254 participants, assessing the impact of dietary nitrate on blood pressure, showed a significant reduction in systolic (-4.4 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and diastolic (-1.1 mm Hg; p < 0.06) BP, and a significant inverse association between the daily nitrate intake and systolic BP (p < 0.05) [44].

A double-blind, crossover RCT showed that a 3-day dietary nitrate supplementation in healthy young males improved brain oxygen metabolism and CBF [89]. Two RCTs recruited healthy young adults (age = 24.4 ± 5.7 SD) and ischemic overweight old patients (age = 67.4 ± 10.2 SD) and both found a significant enhancement of CBF after one-week dietary nitrate supplementation [90, 91]. A single administration of nitrate-rich beetroot juice to healthy young (age range 18 to 27) participants significantly improved cognitive function and CBF measured by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) at rest and during cognitive stimulation [45]. These effects could be explained by several mechanisms such as improvement of endothelial function, neurovascular coupling and cerebral autoregulation due to an increased NO bioavailability. Despite these promising findings, not all studies have reported a beneficial effect of dietary nitrate supplementation on cognitive function/cerebral blood flow. A systematic review and meta-analysis of twenty-two RCTs investigating the impact of dietary nitrate on cognitive function (n = 13 studies, total participants = 297) and CBF (n = 9 studies, total participants = 163), found no significant effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on cognitive function or CBF. However, most studies were of short duration (time range 90 min to 3 days) and included mostly young (mean age 22.6) non-obese healthy participants with the exception of one study testing effects of sodium nitrite in older adults (aged 50 to 79) for longer duration (10-weeks) [88]. Also, a more recent RCT not included in the meta-analysis (which addressed many of the limitations of earlier studies in this area) reported no significant effects of a 13-week dietary nitrate supplementation on cognitive function and CBF measured by NIRS in overweight and obese older adults (n = 62, age range 60 to 75 years) [92]. However, they found that the moderate and low dosages could have a significant improvement on systolic BP (low; p = 0.03, and moderate; p = 0.04) and microvascular perfusion (p = 0.02 for both arms in both outcomes) when compared to high and placebo groups, without significant difference between the moderate and low doses [93]. Hence, the duration and dosage need to be considered when evaluating the current literature. The lack of convincing evidence, the short duration of the studies to justify changes in cognition, and limited sensitivity of some methods to measure CBF and microvascular perfusion certainly call for more robust study designs and adoption of deep-phenotyping approaches to evaluate the effects of dietary nitrate on brain functions.

Dietary nitrate is closely linked with dietary antioxidants and oxidative metabolism. The ingestion of compounds with anti-oxidant properties such as ascorbic acid, vitamin E or phenolic compounds (i.e., quercetin, resveratrol) can enhance the generation of NO by promoting a greater conversion of nitrate into nitrite in the gastric acidic lumen and/or by reducing the presence of ROS capable of quenching and inactivating both nitrite and NO [94,95,96]. Supplementation of dietary nitrate after acute hyperglycaemia in old obese adults decreased levels of two independent markers of oxidative stress significantly when compared to the placebo (3-nitrotyrosine; mitochondrial superoxide production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)) [12]. Larsen et al. [97] demonstrated in humans that the dietary nitrate administration for 3 days improved oxidative phosphorylation efficiency (P/O ratio) and induced a decrease in state 4 respiration in skeletal muscle, which mechanistically was linked to a reduced expression of a protein involved in proton conductance (ATP/ADP translocase). The same group subsequently demonstrated in an animal model of renal and cardiovascular diseases that dietary nitrate was able to decrease oxidative stress markers in plasma (malondialdehyde) and urine (Class VI F2-isoprostanes and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine) [98]. An increased dietary nitrate intake induced upregulation of catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, mitofusin 2 and PGC1α in PBMCs in patients with metabolic syndrome [99]. Nevertheless, no significant effects of dietary nitrate supplementation were found on markers of oxidative stress (i.e., malondialdehyde, mitochondrial superoxide, 8-isoprostane) in other studies [100,101,102], which clearly emphasizes the need for further basic and translational research in this area.

Some of the key human RCTs, identified by a non-systematic search of PubMed, that investigated the effects of dietary nitrate on brain health (cognition and CBF) are described in Table 2.

Table 2 Findings from key studies reporting the effects of dietary nitrate on brain health in humans
Full size table

Molecular Mechanisms: Dietary nitrate could improve brain health via increased NO production. Dietary nitrate requires reduction by oral microbiota (e.g., Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes) [103] into nitrite [83, 104,105,106] or can be converted into nitrite more slowly via mammalian nitrate reductases [107]. Nitrite is then reduced to bioactive NO either in the stomach (acidosis) or in the circulation after absorption by the intestine (especially in hypoxia), and this requires reduction by enzymes (e.g., XOR: xanthine-oxidoreductase), haemoglobin, myoglobin polyphenols, ascorbate or protons [83, 104,105,106]. NO plays an essential role in regulating mitochondrial efficiency, immune and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), and neuronal metabolism. NO can have direct or indirect effects; the former is possibly the most significant which involves the NO-cGMP pathway via sGC activation, an increase of cGMP production, which impacts the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) and platelet function through cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) production [83, 104,105,106]. PKG activates the myosin light-chain phosphatase (MLCP) and vasodilator-stimulated Phosphoprotein (VASP) that are linked to vasodilation, anticoagulation and reduced VSMC proliferation [83, 104,105,106]. NO can also influence mitochondrial metabolism by binding with the cytochrome c oxidase (62, 74, 76), enhancing the efficiency of respiratory chain and reducing ROS production via a competing interaction of reactive nitrogen species (RNSs) with complex 1 of the respiratory chain [18]. NO may improve pre-synaptic neurotransmission by facilitating the opening of the voltage-gated Ca+ 2 channels (VGCCs). This mechanism facilitates the transfer of Ca+ 2 to the post-synaptic (anterograde signalling) space via the NMDA receptor (activated by glutamate) to bind with Calmodulin (CaM), leading to the activation of nNOS and generation of NO [108, 109]. The locally produced NO exerts retrograde signalling to the pre-synaptic space, and this mechanism appears to be important for the consolidation of memory and learning (long-term potentiation; LTP) [108, 109]. Dietary nitrate could induce autophagy by PPAR expression, SIRT3 and AMPK activation [18, 19]. Studies testing the effects of dietary nitrate on glucose and insulin metabolism in animals and humans have produced mixed findings [12, 16, 110, 111]. The putative effects of dietary nitrate on glucose uptake may be linked to an increased generation of NO via the XOR pathway, consequent activation of PKG signalling and increased expression of glucose transporters (GLUT-1, GLUT-4 and HK-2) [110]. However, the exact mechanisms underpinning the effects of nitrate-nitrite-NO on brain metabolism are still largely unknown.

Does dietary nitrate boost the effects of caloric restriction on brain health?

It is possible that CR and dietary nitrate could have synergistic/additive effects on brain health via their effects on common mechanistic pathways involving regulating mitochondrial, metabolic, immune, endothelial and neuronal functions. Figure 1 provides a schematic representation of the putative mechanistic pathways. As described in the CR and dietary nitrate sections on molecular mechanisms, both interventions could influence mitochondria efficiency by enhancing the efficiency of respiratory chain, reducing ROS generation and increasing ATP yield. CR positively impacts on macronutrient oxidative metabolism via activation of SIRT1, Akt, AMPK and NO pathways; similarly, dietary nitrate enhances the NO bioavailability with a potential impact on glucose and lipid metabolism via increased GLUT-1, GLUT-2, GLUT-4, PPAR-alpha and AMPK expression. These combined mechanisms could potentiate the effects of the single interventions on maintaining a healthy ageing trajectory and reducing the risk of chronic metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. Autophagy is a critical process for maintaining cell function via the coordinated removal and recycling of damaged and dysfunctional molecules [112, 113]. An increase in autophagy activity has been linked to both interventions via mTOR inhibition (by CR) [69, 76], and increased PPAR expression and AMPK activation (by dietary nitrate) [18, 19]. CR and dietary nitrate could have a synergistic effect on NO production via the activation of different pathways influencing both the enzymatic and non-enzymatic synthesis NO pathways including for example the activation of the SIRT, Akt and AMPK pathways. Alharbi, et al. (2023) showed for the first time that the combination of dietary nitrate with CR for two weeks among middle-aged and older adults with overweight and obesity improved microvascular perfusion (p = 0.03), cognitive function (TMT-B; p = 0.01), and reduced urinary 8-isoprostanes (p = 0.02) compared to CR alone [13]. The derived synergism of the two interventions on the proposed mechanisms may provide an effective strategy to minimise age-related cognitive decline and reduce dementia risk.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Synergistic effects of dietary nitrate and caloric restriction on brain health. Both interventions could induce NO bioavailability through the nitrate/nitrite/NO pathway or Akt, AMPK and SIRT1 pathways. NO would increase mitochondrial efficiency by reducing ROS and inducing ATP from oxygen and ADP. In addition, NO would improve the endothelial function by interacting with sGC to convert GTP into cGMP, which activates PKG leading to MLCP (smooth muscle relaxation) and VASP (platelet aggregation inhibitor) activation. Moreover, NO could modulate inflammation that acts as pro-inflammatory when it reacts with O2- (from uncoupled mitochondria) to form ONOO-. Furthermore, NO could enhance neurotransmission through activation of the antero-and retrograding signalling, which facilitates Ca + transferal. CR and dietary nitrate have several pathways that could increase the autophagy process by mTOR inhibition, Akt, AMPK, and SIRT activation. Key: AMPK, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; Akt, protein kinase B; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; MLCP, myosin light-chain phosphatase; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; PKG, protein kinase G; sGC, soluble guanylate cyclase; SIRT1 and SIRT3, sirtuin; VASP, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein; XOR, xanthine-oxidoreductase

Full size image

Conclusions

Against the background of an ageing society and an impending increase in dementia cases, there is an urgent need to identify strategies to maintain healthy active ageing, including a specific focus on brain ageing. Dietary interventions have the potential to reduce the risk of age-related diseases including cardiometabolic and neurodegenerative conditions. Some, but not all, previous investigations have suggested that CR and dietary nitrate can have beneficial effects on metabolic, vascular, and cognitive functions. However, this evidence is typically characterised by small sample sizes, short-duration interventions, and a preponderance of young, healthy participants. Moreover, studies have applied a variety of different cognitive tools and imaging methods, contributing to heterogeneous results. In this paper, we advocate for a synergism between CR and dietary nitrate which could provide a feasible and more effective nutritional strategy (than either intervention alone) to improve cardio-metabolic and brain health. Currently, only one study has tested this hypothesis, which showed preliminary benefits of a combined CR and dietary nitrate intervention on endothelial and cognitive function. We identify plausible mechanistic pathways through which combined CR and dietary nitrate could improve cardio-metabolic and brain health. As a first step towards investigating the potential additive/synergistic effect of these two dietary strategies, we advocate prospective epidemiological studies to investigate the association between CR and dietary nitrate, alone and combined, with cognitive impairment and dementia in healthy and in ‘at risk’ populations. Such investigations could provide potential proof-of-concept, which could be further explored in randomised controlled trials focusing on feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy. Given the absence of effective treatments for dementia, the identification of novel dietary (and other lifestyle) approaches to reduce societal burden of this condition are greatly needed.

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

CR:

Caloric Restriction

NO:

Nitric Oxide

CBF:

Cerebral Blood Flow

NOS:

Nitric Oxide Synthase

eNOS:

Endothelial NOS

nNOS:

Neuronal NOS

iNOS:

Inducible NOS

ROS:

Reactive Oxygen Species

BMI:

Body Mass Index

References

  1. Duong S, Patel T, Chang F. Dementia: what pharmacists need to know. Can Pharmacists Journal: CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Can: RPC. 2017;150(2):118–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Who.int. Dementia. 2021 [cited 2021 01/10/2021]; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia.

  3. Cao Q, et al. The prevalence of Dementia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(3):1157–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stephan BCM, et al. Secular trends in Dementia Prevalence and Incidence Worldwide: a systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(2):653–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prince M, et al. The global prevalence of Dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63–75e2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garre-Olmo J. [Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s Disease and other Dementias]. Rev Neurol. 2018;66(11):377–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Society As. Five things you should know about dementia. 2021; Available from: https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-dementia/five-things-you-should-know-about-dementia.

  8. Gómez-Pinilla F. Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(7):568–78.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bourre JM. Effects of nutrients (in food) on the structure and function of the nervous system: update on dietary requirements for brain. Part 1: micronutrients. J Nutr Health Aging. 2006;10(5):377–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hennig B, et al. Nutritional implications in vascular endothelial cell metabolism. J Am Coll Nutr. 1996;15(4):345–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merry BJ. Molecular mechanisms linking calorie restriction and longevity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34(11):1340–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ashor AW, et al. Inorganic Nitrate supplementation in Young and Old obese adults does not affect Acute glucose and insulin responses but lowers oxidative stress. J Nutr. 2016;146(11):2224–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alharbi M et al. Caloric restriction (CR) plus high-nitrate beetroot juice does not amplify CR-Induced metabolic adaptation and improves vascular and cognitive functions in overweight adults: a 14-Day pilot randomised Trial. Nutrients, 2023. 15(4).

  14. Fontana L et al. Effects of dietary restriction on neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative Diseases. J Exp Med, 2021. 218(2).

  15. Witte AV, et al. Caloric restriction improves memory in elderly humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(4):1255–60.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Villar ML, et al. The effects of dietary nitrate on plasma glucose and insulin sensitivity in sheep. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2019;103(6):1657–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lanza IR, et al. Chronic caloric restriction preserves mitochondrial function in senescence without increasing mitochondrial biogenesis. Cell Metab. 2012;16(6):777–88.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundberg JO, Carlström M, Weitzberg E. Metabolic Effects of Dietary Nitrate in Health and Disease. Cell Metabol. 2018;28(1):9–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer A, et al. Supplementation with nitrate only modestly affects lipid and glucose metabolism in genetic and dietary-induced murine models of obesity. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2020;66(1):24–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hou Y, et al. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative Disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(10):565–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prolla TA, Mattson MP. Molecular mechanisms of brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders: lessons from dietary restriction. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tönnies E, Trushina E. Oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(4):1105–21.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carter SJ, et al. Potential health effects of dietary nitrate supplementation in aging and chronic degenerative Disease. Med Hypotheses. 2020;141:109732.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raz L, Knoefel J, Bhaskar K. The neuropathology and cerebrovascular mechanisms of Dementia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(1):172–86.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C et al. Obesity Reduces Cognitive and Motor Functions across the Lifespan Neural Plast, 2016. 2016: p. 2473081.

  26. Dye L, et al. The relationship between obesity and cognitive health and decline. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017;76(4):443–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buie JJ, et al. Obesity-related cognitive impairment: the role of endothelial dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;132:104580.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Virdis A. Endothelial dysfunction in obesity: role of inflammation. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2016;23(2):83–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. El Assar M, Angulo J, Rodríguez-Mañas L. Oxidative stress and vascular inflammation in aging. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;65:380–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stephan BC, et al. Cardiovascular Disease, the nitric oxide pathway and risk of cognitive impairment and Dementia. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(9):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Watts ME, Pocock R, Claudianos C. Brain Energy and Oxygen Metabolism: emerging role in normal function and Disease. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:216.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Attwell D, et al. Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature. 2010;468(7321):232–43.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mergenthaler P, et al. Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(10):587–97.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wengreen H, et al. Prospective study of Dietary approaches to stop Hypertension–and Mediterranean-style dietary patterns and age-related cognitive change: the Cache County study on memory, Health and Aging. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(5):1263–71.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tangney CC, et al. Relation of DASH-and Mediterranean-like dietary patterns to cognitive decline in older persons. Neurology. 2014;83(16):1410–6.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baumgart M, et al. Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and Dementia: a population-based perspective. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015;11(6):718–26.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Morris MC, et al. MIND diet associated with reduced incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015;11(9):1007–14.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Morris M, et al. MIND diet slows cognitive decline with aging. Alzheimers Dement this study examined all three dietary patterns investigated in this review, and concluded that low MIND diet adherence is more predictive of cognitive decline than either low MeDi or DASH diet scores. Article PubMed PubMed Central. 2015;11(9):1015–22.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Davis C, et al. Definition of the Mediterranean diet: a literature review. Nutrients. 2015;7(11):9139–53.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. de Paula TP, et al. The role of Dietary approaches to stop Hypertension (DASH) diet food groups in blood pressure in type 2 Diabetes. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(1):155–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Morris MC, et al. Relation of the tocopherol forms to incident Alzheimer Disease and to cognitive change. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(2):508–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ravaglia G, et al. Homocysteine and folate as risk factors for Dementia and Alzheimer disease–. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(3):636–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Corzo L, et al. Decreased levels of serum nitric oxide in different forms of Dementia. Neurosci Lett. 2007;420(3):263–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Siervo M, et al. Inorganic nitrate and beetroot juice supplementation reduces blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr. 2013;143(6):818–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wightman EL, et al. Dietary nitrate modulates cerebral blood flow parameters and cognitive performance in humans: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover investigation. Physiol Behav. 2015;149:149–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Siervo M, et al. Does dietary nitrate say NO to cardiovascular ageing? Current evidence and implications for research. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018;77(2):112–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Solfrizzi V, et al. Nutritional interventions and cognitive-related outcomes in patients with late-life cognitive disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2018;95:480–98.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Morris MC, et al. Nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables and cognitive decline: prospective study. Neurology. 2018;90(3):e214–22.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Stanaway L, et al. Acute supplementation with nitrate-rich beetroot juice causes a greater increase in plasma nitrite and reduction in blood pressure of older compared to younger adults. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1683.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lidder S, Webb AJ. Vascular effects of dietary nitrate (as found in green leafy vegetables and beetroot) via the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75(3):677–96.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Griffiths A, et al. Exploring the advantages and disadvantages of a whole Foods Approach for elevating Dietary Nitrate intake: have researchers concentrated too much on Beetroot Juice? Appl Sci. 2023;13(12):7319.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hord NG, Tang Y, Bryan NS. Food sources of nitrates and nitrites: the physiologic context for potential health benefits. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(1):1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Babateen AM, et al. Assessment of dietary nitrate intake in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(4):878–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Most J, et al. Calorie restriction in humans: an update. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:36–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Anton S, Leeuwenburgh C. Fasting or caloric restriction for healthy aging. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(10):1003–5.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mattson MP, et al. Suppression of brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders by dietary restriction and environmental enrichment: molecular mechanisms. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001;122(7):757–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mattson MP, Wan R. Beneficial effects of intermittent fasting and caloric restriction on the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. J Nutr Biochem. 2005;16(3):129–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Martin B, Mattson MP, Maudsley S. Caloric restriction and intermittent fasting: two potential diets for successful brain aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2006;5(3):332–53.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Contestabile A. Benefits of caloric restriction on brain aging and related pathological States: understanding mechanisms to devise novel therapies. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(3):350–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Van Cauwenberghe C, et al. Caloric restriction: beneficial effects on brain aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. Mamm Genome. 2016;27(7–8):300–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fontana L, Partridge L. Promoting health and longevity through diet: from model organisms to humans. Cell. 2015;161(1):106–18.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pifferi F, et al. Caloric restriction increases lifespan but affects brain integrity in grey mouse lemur primates. Commun Biology. 2018;1(1):30.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gillette-Guyonnet S, Vellas B. Caloric restriction and brain function. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metabolic Care, 2008. 11(6).

  64. Poljsak B. Strategies for reducing or preventing the generation of oxidative stress. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2011;2011:194586–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Lieberman HR, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled test of 2 d of calorie deprivation: effects on cognition, activity, sleep, and interstitial glucose concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(3):667–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lieberman HR, et al. Two days of calorie Deprivation Induced by Underfeeding and Aerobic Exercise degrades Mood and lowers interstitial glucose but does not impair cognitive function in young adults. J Nutr. 2017;147(1):110–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Martin CK, et al. Examination of cognitive function during six months of calorie restriction: results of a randomized controlled trial. Rejuvenation Res. 2007;10(2):179–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Cardoso A, Marrana F, Andrade JP. Caloric restriction in young rats disturbs hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016;133:214–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dong W, et al. Autophagy involving age-related cognitive behavior and hippocampus injury is modulated by different caloric intake in mice. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(7):11843–53.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Guarente L. Sirtuins in aging and Disease. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:483–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dolinsky VW, Dyck JR. Calorie restriction and resveratrol in cardiovascular health and Disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(11):1477–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Shinmura K. Cardiovascular protection afforded by caloric restriction: essential role of nitric oxide synthase. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2011;11(2):143–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gabbouj S, et al. Altered insulin signaling in Alzheimer’s Disease brain - special emphasis on PI3K-Akt pathway. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:629.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ma L, et al. Caloric restriction can improve learning ability in C57/BL mice via regulation of the insulin-PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Neurol Sci. 2014;35(9):1381–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. García-Prieto CF, et al. Caloric restriction induces H(2)O(2) formation as a trigger of AMPK-eNOS-NO pathway in obese rats: role for CAMKII. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;139:35–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Chung KW, Chung HY. The effects of calorie restriction on Autophagy: role on aging intervention. Nutrients, 2019. 11(12).

  77. Ma L, et al. Effect of caloric restriction on the SIRT1/mTOR signaling pathways in senile mice. Brain Res Bull. 2015;116:67–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Aquilano K, et al. Role of nitric oxide synthases in Parkinson’s Disease: a review on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of polyphenols. Neurochem Res. 2008;33(12):2416–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Asiimwe N et al. Nitric Oxide: Exploring the Contextual Link with Alzheimer’s Disease Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016. 2016: p. 7205747.

  80. Siervo M, et al. Measurement of in vivo nitric oxide synthesis in humans using stable isotopic methods: a systematic review. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(4):795–804.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Lundberg JO, Carlström M, Weitzberg E. Metabolic Effects of Dietary Nitrate in Health and Disease. Cell Metab. 2018;28(1):9–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Walker R. Naturally occuring nitrate/nitrite in foods. J Sci Food Agric. 1975;26(11):1735–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Bondonno CP, Croft KD, Hodgson JM. Dietary nitrate, Nitric Oxide, and Cardiovascular Health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(12):2036–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Omar S, et al. Therapeutic effects of inorganic nitrate and nitrite in cardiovascular and metabolic Diseases. J Intern Med. 2016;279(4):315–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M. Medium-term effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017;35(7):1353–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Venturelli M, et al. Impact of nitric oxide bioavailability on the Progressive cerebral and peripheral circulatory impairments during aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Physiol. 2018;9:169.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Paul V, Ekambaram P. Involvement of nitric oxide in learning & memory processes. Indian J Med Res. 2011;133(5):471–8.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Clifford T, et al. Effects of inorganic nitrate and nitrite consumption on cognitive function and cerebral blood flow: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(15):2400–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Aamand R, et al. A NO way to BOLD? Dietary nitrate alters the hemodynamic response to visual stimulation. NeuroImage. 2013;83:397–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Fan JL, et al. Dietary nitrate supplementation enhances cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity in a sex-specific manner. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019;127(3):760–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Fan JL, et al. Dietary nitrate reduces blood pressure and cerebral artery velocity fluctuations and improves cerebral autoregulation in transient ischemic Attack patients. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020;129(3):547–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Babateen AM et al. Incremental doses of Nitrate-Rich Beetroot Juice do not modify cognitive function and cerebral blood Flow in overweight and obese older adults: a 13-Week pilot randomised clinical trial. Nutrients, 2022. 14(5).

  93. Babateen AM, et al. Moderate doses of dietary nitrate elicit greater effects on blood pressure and endothelial function than a high dose: a 13-week pilot study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2023.

  94. Baião DDS, Silva D, Paschoalin VMF. Beetroot, a remarkable vegetable: its nitrate and phytochemical contents can be adjusted in Novel formulations to Benefit Health and Support Cardiovascular Disease therapies. Volume 9. Antioxidants (Basel); 2020. 10.

  95. Georgiev VG, et al. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of Betalain extracts from intact plants and hairy Root cultures of the Red Beetroot Beta vulgaris cv. Detroit Dark Red. Volume 65. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition; 2010. pp. 105–11. 2.

  96. Forte M et al. Targeting Nitric Oxide with Natural Derived Compounds as a Therapeutic Strategy in Vascular Diseases Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016. 2016: p. 7364138.

  97. Larsen FJ, et al. Dietary inorganic nitrate improves mitochondrial efficiency in humans. Cell Metabol. 2011;13(2):149–59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Carlström M, et al. Dietary nitrate attenuates oxidative stress, prevents cardiac and renal injuries, and reduces blood pressure in salt-induced Hypertension. Cardiovascular Res. 2010;89(3):574–85.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Ferrer MD et al. Dietary Sodium Nitrate activates antioxidant and mitochondrial dynamics genes after moderate intensity Acute Exercise in metabolic syndrome patients. J Clin Med, 2021. 10(12).

  100. Carriker CR, et al. Acute dietary nitrate does not reduce resting metabolic rate or oxidative stress marker 8-isoprostane in healthy males and females. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2019;70(7):887–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Carvalho LRRA, et al. Effects of chronic dietary nitrate supplementation on longevity, vascular function and cancer incidence in rats. Redox Biol. 2021;48:102209.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Ishaq A, et al. Palmitate induces DNA damage and senescence in human adipocytes in vitro that can be alleviated by oleic acid but not inorganic nitrate. Exp Gerontol. 2022;163:111798.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. González-Soltero R et al. Role of oral and gut microbiota in Dietary Nitrate metabolism and its impact on sports performance. Nutrients, 2020. 12(12).

  104. Amdahl MB, DeMartino AW, Gladwin MT. Inorganic nitrite bioactivation and role in physiological signaling and therapeutics. Biol Chem. 2019;401(1):201–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Cooke JP, Ghebremariam YT. Dietary nitrate, nitric oxide, and restenosis. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(4):1258–60.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT. The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(2):156–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Jansson EA, et al. A mammalian functional nitrate reductase that regulates nitrite and nitric oxide homeostasis. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4(7):411–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Picón-Pagès P, Garcia-Buendia J, Muñoz FJ. Functions and dysfunctions of nitric oxide in brain Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, 2019. 1865(8): p. 1949–67.

  109. Reis P et al. Role of Nitric Oxide Synthase in the Function of the Central Nervous System under Normal and Infectious Conditions. 2017.

  110. McNally BD, et al. Inorganic Nitrate promotes glucose uptake and oxidative catabolism in White Adipose tissue through the XOR-Catalyzed nitric oxide pathway. Diabetes. 2020;69(5):893–901.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Norouzirad R, González-Muniesa P, Ghasemi A. Hypoxia in Obesity and Diabetes: Potential Therapeutic Effects of Hyperoxia and Nitrate Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2017. 2017: p. 5350267.

  112. Glick D, Barth S, Macleod KF. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Pathol. 2010;221(1):3–12.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Klionsky DJ, et al. Autophagy in major human Diseases. Embo j. 2021;40(19):e108863.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Zotova AV, et al. [The efficacy of low calorie diet therapy in patients with arterial Hypertension and chronic cerebral ischemia]. Volume 115. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im; 2015. pp. 25–8. 10S S Korsakova.

  115. Prehn K, et al. Caloric restriction in older adults-Differential effects of Weight loss and reduced weight on Brain structure and function. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(3):1765–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Kim C et al. Energy Restriction enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis-Associated memory after four weeks in an Adult Human Population with Central Obesity; a Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients, 2020. 12(3).

  117. Leclerc E, et al. The effect of caloric restriction on working memory in healthy non-obese adults. CNS Spectr. 2020;25(1):2–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Teong XT, et al. Eight weeks of intermittent fasting versus calorie restriction does not alter eating behaviors, mood, sleep quality, quality of life and cognitive performance in women with overweight. Nutr Res. 2021;92:32–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Kelly J, et al. Effects of short-term dietary nitrate supplementation on blood pressure, O2 uptake kinetics, and muscle and cognitive function in older adults. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;304(2):R73–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Nicholas Blockley for his useful comments on the manuscript.

Funding

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, The University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Mushari Alharbi

  2. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 22252, Saudi Arabia

    Mushari Alharbi

  3. Curtin Dementia Centre of Excellence, EnAble Institute, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia

    Blossom CM Stephan & Mario Siervo

  4. Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK

    Oliver M Shannon

Authors
  1. Mushari Alharbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Blossom CM Stephan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oliver M Shannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mario Siervo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The structure of the review was conceived by MS. MA and MS drafted the manuscript, with MS taking a lead role. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Siervo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not required.

Competing interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alharbi, M., Stephan, B.C., Shannon, O.M. et al. Does dietary nitrate boost the effects of caloric restriction on brain health? Potential physiological mechanisms and implications for future research. Nutr Metab (Lond) 20, 45 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-023-00766-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-023-00766-9

Keywords

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us