Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Physiologic requirement for iron in pregnant women, assessed using the stable isotope tracer technique

Nutrition & Metabolism volume 17, Article number: 33 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of the physiologic requirement for iron, the core index for the formulation of a dietary reference intake (DRI), is of great importance for the health of a pregnant woman and her fetus, and can help a mother accurately plan her iron supplementation. However, direct measurements of the physiologic requirement for iron during pregnancy are still lacking.

Method

Eleven women of reproductive age from Hebei Province, China, who planned to become pregnant in the near future, were enrolled between January and March 2015 and included in the final analysis. Subjects participated in a 2-week metabolic trial in which they consumed 50 mg of the stable isotope 58Fe, and were then followed for ~ 2 years. The abundance of 58Fe and the total iron concentration in the circulation were measured using Multi-collector Inductively-Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, respectively. The physiologic requirement for iron during pregnancy was then calculated by the formula derived from our previously published work.

Results

The mean physiologic requirement for iron in the 11 subjects, across their entire pregnancies, was 3.05 mg.d− 1 in total and 44.0 μg.kg− 1.d− 1 after adjustment for body mass. The physiologic requirements for iron in the first, second, and third trimesters were 2.04 mg.d− 1, 3.26 mg.d− 1, and 4.13 mg.d− 1, respectively. When adjusted for body mass, the physiologic requirements for iron in different trimesters were 32.3 μg.kg− 1.d− 1, 46.9 μg.kg− 1.d− 1, and 55.7 μg.kg− 1.d− 1, respectively.

Conclusion

We preliminarily explored the physiologic requirement for iron in pregnant women. The data demonstrated that pregnant women needed about twice iron than non-pregnant women. This research may be helpful for the design of future studies and the modification of iron DRIs.

Trial registration

ChiCTR, ChiCTR-OCH-14004302. Registered 14 February 2014, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=5267

Introduction

The nutritional status of pregnant women with respect to iron is of great importance for both maternal health and fetal nutrition, and inadequate supply of iron leads to iron deficiency anemia (IDA). According to the World Health Organization report on anemia [1], 38.2% of pregnant women worldwide develop anemia, predominantly as a result of iron deficiency (ID), and the Chinese national nutrition survey has shown that the prevalence of anemia in pregnant women in China was 17.2% in 2010–2012 [2], indicating that the iron status of pregnant women around the world is sub-optimal.

During pregnancy, the physiologic demand for iron increases markedly because of the expansion of red blood cell mass, and the requirement to secure an adequate iron supply for placental function and the growing fetus [3]. The iron store of pregnant women is often insufficient to meet these great requirements [4], and if combined with inadequate iron absorption, this gives rise to ID, and potentially IDA. IDA can lead to a series of negative health outcomes, such as low birth mass [5] and higher mortality of parturient mothers and newborns [6, 7]. In recent years, iron supplementation has been widely recommended for pregnant women to prevent IDA [8], but the level of supplementation is important, because excessive iron intake is also associated with health problems, such as cardiovascular disease, pancreatic damage, neurological disease and cancers [9,10,11]. The appropriate level of iron supplementation is dependent on the use of accurate dietary reference intakes (DRIs), a set of recommended values calculated based on measured physiologic requirements and absorption rates. However, due to the lack of direct experimental data regarding the physiologic requirement for iron in pregnant women, the iron DRIs that are currently in use are derived from values calculated for non-pregnant women, which based on the direct experimental data for men [12].

After absorbed by body, most of iron combines with the globin and then exists in red blood cells to participate in oxygen transport, while a small part of iron exists in myoglobin to participate in tissue respiration or be stored for emergency needs [13, 14]. There is no controlled mechanism in human body for the excretion of iron and the iron balance mainly relies on the regulation by iron absorption [13, 15]. Most iron is excreted by the digestive tract and a very small amount of iron is excreted in urine and sweat [16]. The menstruation and pregnancy bleeding of women will also excrete iron. The physiologic requirement for iron in adult men with a stable body mass is usually regarded as being equal to iron loss [12].

Measurements of the physiologic requirement for iron have already been carried out in toddlers, young men, and non-pregnant women [16,17,18,19], but not in pregnant women. These studies all have used an iron isotope, whether radioactive or stable, to trace the daily loss of iron and extrapolate the physiologic requirement for the study participants [16,17,18,19]. With technologic progress and improvements in ethical standards, the use of the stable isotopes, 57Fe and 58Fe, has completely replaced the use of radioisotopes in recent years [18, 19]. We have used 58Fe to establish an appropriate means of calculating the iron physiologic requirement in young adults and women of child-bearing age [18, 20]. In this study, we aimed to use this approach to assess the physiologic requirements for pregnant women for the first time.

Materials and methods

Subjects and experimental design

Eighty-two non-pregnant women of reproductive age lived in Xingtang County, Hebei Province, were planned to be enrolled in this study between January and March 2015. Participants were included if they were aged 20–35 years and planned to become pregnant in the near future. Potential participants were excluded if they: 1. had a disease that could affect iron absorption or metabolism (such as malabsorption, gastrointestinal ulcer, or inflammatory disease), or had abnormal iron nutritional status; 2. regularly took medication that could affect iron absorption or metabolism; 3. they were already pregnant before the study or menstruating during the metabolic trial.

After 2 days of adaptation, a 2-week metabolic trial began during which they consumed 58Fe in their meals, in order to trace their iron metabolism. It was anticipated that the women would become pregnant after the absorbed iron had equilibrated within their bodies. Participants who then gave birth were followed for 3 months after delivery. The participants who did not become pregnant during the study were also followed for about 2 years and the results of them were published in the previous article [20]. The flow chart of this study was shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart

Full size image

The participants consumed 58Fe in meals in the form of 58FeSO4, 10 times over 5 days, providing a total of ~ 50 mg, at the beginning of the trial. During this 2-week period, the participants stayed in arranged accommodation to ensure compliance with the regimen. Diet and stool samples during the 2-week metabolic trial were collected every day to quantify the absorption of iron according to the metabolic balance method. Venous blood samples were collected to measure the 58Fe abundance and total iron concentration at the beginning and the ending of the metabolic trial. After the metabolic trial, participants would still be followed and provide venous blood samples at the first month, second month, forth month and every 4 months. Throughout the follow-up period, close attention was paid to the health of the participants, to ensure that they did not exhibit symptoms related to blood loss or abnormal iron metabolism. The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No: ChiCTR-OCH-14004302). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to their participation.

Sample analysis

Blood samples were initially acid-digested using a Microwave Digestion System (Mars 6, GEM, USA) and 70% HNO3 solution. The digestion procedure was as follows: 120 °C: ramp 6 min, hold 5 min; 150 °C: ramp 5 min, hold 15 min; 190 °C: ramp 5 min, hold 30 min; 1600 W. Total iron concentration was quantified using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (PinAAcle 900, PerkinElmer). The abundance of 58Fe was analyzed using multi-collector inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS), and a standard-sample bracketing method. A mixture of argon and H2 was used as the collision gas to eliminate interference [21]. Under optimized conditions, the precision was 0.01–0.03% (relative standard deviation, RSD). Iron biochemical indices were measured using an automated iron biochemical analyzer (Hitach7180, Japan): serum ferritin (SF), unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC), serum iron (SI), and transferrin (TRF). Inflammatory markers were also measured (C-reactive protein (CRP) and α- acid glycoprotein (α-AGP)).

Calculations

The following formula was used to calculate the physiologic requirement for iron, which was based on the change in abundance of 58Fe during a set period of time, and the calculation of the mean iron requirement across various time periods. The formula was derived in our previously published work [18].

$$ \mathrm{R}=\mathrm{T}\times \mathrm{V}\times \left({\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{i}}-{\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{i}+\mathrm{t}}\right)\div \mathrm{t}\div \left[\left({\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{i}}+{\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{i}+\mathrm{t}}\right)/2-\mathrm{NA}\right]\div \mathrm{C} $$
(1)

where T is the total iron concentration in the blood (mg. L− 1), Pi is the isotopic abundance on day i, NA is the natural abundance of the isotope, t is the study period (days), R is the daily loss or intake of iron (mg), and V is the blood volume (L), which was calculated using the formula published by Carlsen and Bruun [22]:

V (ml) = (45.2 + 25.3 × exp.(− 0.0198 × DDW)) × BM (kg),

where DDW = 100 × (BM (kg) − 7.582 × exp.(0.01309 × BH (cm))) / 7.090(0.01309 × BH (cm)).

C is the iron circulation rate (the proportion of iron in the blood compared with that in the entire body), which was previously calculated to be 80.4% for non-pregnant women. Further details are given in Table S1.

We were unable to measure the body mass of every individual in each trimester of pregnancy. Therefore, we estimated the body mass in specific trimester of pregnancy using the measured baseline body mass and the expected increase in mass in each trimester of pregnancy according to the American Medical Association data [23]. The expected increase in mass varies with BMI, such that the mean expected weekly mass gains are 0.22 kg, 0.28 kg, 0.425 kg, and 0.51 kg when the BMI is > 30 kg.(m2)− 1, 25.0–29.9 kg.(m2)− 1, 18.5–24.9 kg.(m2)− 1, and < 18.5 kg.(m2)− 1, respectively (Table S2).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The normality of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test. Variables that conform to a normal distribution are expressed as mean ± SD and others are expressed as median (lower quartile, upper quartile). Differences between two groups were evaluated using Student’s t-test and among more than two groups using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The rank sum test was used to compare CRP and TFR values on different days. P < 0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance.

Results

Baseline information and follow-up

At the beginning of the study, 82 non-pregnant women were enrolled, and 21 became pregnant during follow-up. Of these 21, one underwent a spontaneous abortion in her first trimester, no blood samples were obtained from four, and only one blood sample was obtained from five participants, which was insufficient to contribute to the iron requirement calculation. Therefore, 11 participants remained for whom data derived from two or more blood samples could be included in the analysis. The abundance of 58Fe was measured in blood samples from these 11 pregnant women. As shown in Fig. 2, the abundance of 58Fe increased rapidly after consumption of the isotope began, peaked at around 20 days, and remained stable for after 240 days.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The abundance of 58Fe of pregnant women

Full size image

The mean height was 157.5 cm at baseline, the mean body mass was 62.5 kg, the mean BMI was 24.8 kg.(m2)− 1, the mean age was 27 years, and the median time from the commencement of the study to getting pregnant was 335 days. Additional information is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline Information of Subjects
Full size table

Monitoring of the iron nutritional status of the participants

We measured iron biochemical indicators in these 11 pregnant women to evaluate their iron nutritional status in each trimester of pregnancy. The test results of 20 serum samples (more than one sample per person) showed that most of them were within the normal range (SF:12 ~ 150 μg. L− 1, UIBC:31.0 ~ 51.0 μmol. L− 1, SI:9.0–27.0 μmol. L− 1, TRF:1.93〜3.98 g.L− 1, CRP:< 5 mg. L− 1, α-AGP:0.55 ~ 1.4 g.L− 1) in each trimester (Table 2).

Table 2 Iron Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women
Full size table

Physiologic requirement for iron in pregnant women

Blood samples from two adjacent time points were selected to calculate the physiologic requirement for iron. The mean physiologic requirement across the entire pregnancy of the 11 participants was 3.05 mg.d− 1 and the mean requirement adjusted for body mass was 44.0 μg.kg− 1.d− 1. The detailed findings are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Physiologic Requirements for Iron in 11 Pregnant Women
Full size table

The physiologic requirements for iron in the first, second, and third trimesters were 2.04 mg.d− 1, 3.26 mg.d− 1, and 4.13 mg.d− 1, respectively. When adjusted for body mass, the requirements were 32.3 μg.kg− 1.d− 1, 46.9 μg.kg− 1.d− 1, and 55.7 μg.kg− 1.d− 1, respectively. Both the raw and adjusted iron requirements changed with the progression of pregnancy were shown in Table 4 and Fig. 3.

Table 4 Physiologic Requirements for Iron in Different Pregnancy Periods
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The physiologic requirements for iron of pregnant women

Full size image

Discussion

The iron nutritional status of the pregnant women in the present study was in the normal range throughout their pregnancies. The physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy include changes in the requirement for and metabolism of iron. In addition to a requirement for iron to support the greater blood volume, pregnant women also require additional iron to supply the fetus and placenta, and to create a reserve to replace that lost during childbirth. Previous studies have shown that SF and SI concentrations gradually decrease during pregnancy [24, 25], while serum TFR can slightly increase by the third trimester in iron-replete individuals [26]. Most of the iron transfer to the fetus occurs during the third trimester [27], which coincides with the lowest maternal hepcidin expression, permitting the maximum rate of iron supply to the maternal circulation, also facilitated by the steady increase in maternal TFR production during pregnancy [26]. The findings for the 11 pregnant women in our study showed no consistent trend, mainly because the data obtained during each trimester were not from the same individuals, and therefore could not reflect accurate longitudinal changes. However, the mean values of the iron biochemical indicators were still capable of demonstrating that the iron nutritional status was normal in the study cohort.

The total physiologic requirements of pregnant women over 18 years old for iron stated in DRIs by the Chinese Society of Nutrition are 1.09 mg.d− 1 in the first trimester, 4.62 mg.d− 1 in the second trimester, and 5.50 mg.d− 1 in the third trimester [28]. The requirements calculated in our study demonstrate a consistent trend towards an increase with the progress of pregnancy. However, we have shown a higher requirement in the first trimester and a lower requirement in the second and third trimesters than the Chinese DRIs. Due to the small sample size of each trimester, this part of the content could be further verified in the future researches. At present, the DRIs for the iron requirement of pregnant women from the USA and Canada [12], Australia and New Zealand [29], Japan [30], and Southeast Asia [31] have all been estimated using the basal loss of iron in men or non-pregnant women, rather than using data derived from direct measurements conducted in pregnant women.

Although no previous studies have performed measurements in pregnant women, the requirements for toddlers, adult men, and non-pregnant women have been reported [16,17,18,19,20, 32, 33]. These showed the mean requirements to be ~ 1 mg.d− 1 and 14 μg.kg− 1.d− 1 for adult men, and 1.2 ~ 1.5 mg.d− 1 and 21 ~ 24 μg.kg− 1.d− 1 for women at reproductive age. The present study has shown that the mean requirement for pregnant women across their entire pregnancies is 3.05 mg.d− 1, and 44.0 μg.kg− 1.d− 1 after adjustment for body mass, which is about two times the iron requirement for women at reproductive age. The greater need for iron in pregnant women can mainly be ascribed to the expansion of maternal blood volume, the demands of tissue synthesis in the fetus, and the creation of an iron reserve during pregnancy. Meanwhile, pregnant women do not lose iron as a result of menstruation, which offsets the additional requirement for iron to a certain extent.

The present study assessed the physiologic requirement for iron of pregnant women for the first time. However, it also had some limitations. Firstly, pregnant women demonstrate modifications to their usual iron metabolism, but there is few evidence to suggest that they are in iron homeostasis and that their mean daily iron loss is similar to their iron requirement. Because of the lack of existing methods to evaluate the physiologic requirement for iron in pregnant women, we adopted the method used for studying adult men and non-pregnant women, which should be further validated in the future. Secondly, we estimated the body mass of the participants in their three trimesters because we were unable to obtain their actual body masses during the follow-up period, which might negatively affect the accuracy of the data. Thirdly, because it was difficult to collect blood during pregnancy, we could not calculate the requirements in each trimester for the same individual, in order to make longitudinal comparisons. Thus, the data for the three trimesters reflect a general trend, rather than a precise dynamic change. Furthermore, the sample size of each trimester is relatively small, so we have not made the statistical comparison but just showed the figures. Therefore, the changes of iron demand in different pregnancy periods could be further verified in future researches.

It should be noted that, the special physiological conditions of pregnant women brought difficulties to the trial and follow-up, resulting in the relatively small sample size of this study. Even so, our results are comparable with the same data provided by other studies [32, 33]. In fact, the sample size of this type of study is limited by the acceptability of isotopes and the long-term follow-up; for example, the study by Finch in 1959 [32] only reported the daily iron loss of 12 nonmenstruating women and 6 menstruating women, and in the study by Janet R Hunt in 2009 [33], there was only 15 menstruating women and 5 postmenopausal women included. The data on pregnant women is even lacking. Despite some limitations, our findings still represent a significant step forward, both with regard to the methodology and the data generated. The calculated physiologic requirements for iron in pregnant women might be helpful for the design of future studies and the modification of iron DRIs.

Conclusion

In this study, the physiologic requirements for iron in pregnant women were found to be 3 mg.d− 1 and 44 μg.kg− 1.d− 1 across the entire pregnancy, which are about twice of that in non-pregnant women.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AAS:

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

ANOVA:

Analysis of Variance

α-AGP:

α- acid Glycoprotein

CRP:

C-reactive Protein

DRI:

Dietary Reference Intake

ID:

Iron Deficiency

IDA:

Iron Deficiency Anemia

MC-ICP-MS:

Multi-collector Inductively-coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

RSD:

Relative Standard Deviation

SF:

Serum Ferritin

SI:

Serum Iron

TRF:

Transferrin

UIBC:

Unsaturated Iron-binding Capacity

References

  1. Organization WH. THE GLOBAL PREVALENCE OF ANAEMIA IN 2011. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu W, Jile C. Monitoring of nutritional and health status of Chinese residents: a comprehensive report for 2010–2013 years. 1st ed. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Milman N, Taylor CL, Merkel J, Brannon PM. Iron status in pregnant women and women of reproductive age in Europe. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1655S–62S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McMahon LP. Iron deficiency in pregnancy, obstetric medicine. 3rd ed; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rasmussen K. Is There a Causal Relationship between Iron Deficiency or Iron-Deficiency Anemia and Weight at Birth, Length of Gestation and Perinatal Mortality? J Nutr. 2001;131:590S–601S. discussion 601S–603S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brabin BJ, Premji Z, Verhoeff F. An analysis of anemia and child mortality. J Nutr. 2001;131:636S–45S. discussion 646S–648S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brabin BJ, Hakimi M, Pelletier D. An analysis of anemia and pregnancy-related maternal mortality. J Nutr. 2001;131:604S–14S. discussion 614S–615S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor CL, Brannon PM. Introduction to workshop on iron screening and supplementation in iron-replete pregnant women and young children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1547S–54S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lieu PT, Heiskala M, Peterson PA, Yang Y. The roles of iron in health and disease. Mol Asp Med. 2001;22:1–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ribeiro JR, Marques VB, Nunes DO, Stefanon I, Dos SL. Chronic iron overload induces functional and structural vascular changes in small resistance arteries via NADPH oxidase-dependent O2(−) production. Toxicol Lett. 2017;279:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos GA, Cruzado VL, Macias CN, Linares GT, Rodriguez FM. Unnoticed iron overload leading to irreversible pancreatic damage. Nefrologia. 2018;38:223–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Micronutrients IOMU. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wallace DF. The regulation of Iron absorption and homeostasis. Clin Biochem Rev. 2016;37:51–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hahn PF, Bale WF, Lawrence EO, Whipple GH. Radioactive iron and its metabolism in Anemia : its absorption, transportation, and utilization. J Exp Med. 1939;69:739–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hurrell R, Egli I. Iron bioavailability and dietary reference values. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1461S–7S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Green R, Charlton R, Seftel H, Bothwell T, Mayet F, Adams B, et al. Body iron excretion in man: a collaborative study. Am J Med. 1968;45:336–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saito H, Sargent TR, Parker HG, Lawrence JH. Whole-body iron loss in normal man measured with a gamma spectrometer. J Nucl Med. 1964;5:571–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai J, Ren T, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gou L, Huang Z, et al. Iron physiological requirements in Chinese adults assessed by the stable isotope labeling technique. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2018;15:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fomon SJ, Nelson SE, Serfass RE, Ziegler EE. Absorption and loss of iron in toddlers are highly correlated. J Nutr. 2005;135:771–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu J, Cai J, Ren T, Wu J, Mao D, Li W, et al. Physiological requirements for iron in women of reproductive age assessed by the stable isotope tracer technique. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2019;16:55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou T, Zhao M, Wang J, Lu H. Absolute measurements and certified reference material for iron isotopes using multiple-collector inductively coupled mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22:717–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carlsen O, Bruun P. A method for determination of normal or abnormal blood volume in patients subjected to radionuclide cardiography. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990;50:63–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. YA RK. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines: Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larsson A, Palm M, Hansson LO, Axelsson O. Reference values for clinical chemistry tests during normal pregnancy. BJOG. 2008;115:874–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Milman N, Bergholt T, Byg KE, Eriksen L, Hvas AM. Reference intervals for haematological variables during normal pregnancy and postpartum in 434 healthy Danish women. Eur J Haematol. 2007;79:39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher AL, Nemeth E. Iron homeostasis during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1567S–74S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cao C, O'Brien KO. Pregnancy and iron homeostasis: an update. Nutr Rev. 2013;71:35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nutrition CSO. Dietary reference intakes for Chinese residents (2013). Beijing: Science Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  29. National Health and Medical Research Council. Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand Including Recommended Dietary Intakes. Australian Government., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sasaki S. Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) in Japan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(Suppl 2):420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barba CV, Cabrera MIZ. Recommended dietary allowances harmonization in Southeast Asia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(Suppl 2):405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. FINCH CA. Body iron exchange in man. J Clin Invest. 1959;38:392–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hunt JR, Zito CA, Johnson LK. Body iron excretion by healthy men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(6):1792–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This project was supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.: 81330066) & Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (no.: SZSM201611017).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jie Cai, Tongxiang Ren and Jiaxi Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Key Laboratory of Trace Element Nutrition, National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese center for disease control and prevention, 29 Nan Wei Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People’s Republic of China

    Jie Cai, Jiaxi Lu, Jinghuan Wu, Deqian Mao, Weidong Li, Yu Zhang, Min Li, Jianhua Piao, Lichen Yang & Xiaoguang Yang

  2. Hospital Management Institute, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, People’s Republic of China

    Jie Cai

  3. National Institute of Metrology, No.18, Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 10050, People’s Republic of China

    Tongxiang Ren & Jun Wang

  4. Hebei Medical University, 361 Zhongshan East Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050017, People’s Republic of China

    Yuxia Ma

Authors
  1. Jie Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tongxiang Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiaxi Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinghuan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Deqian Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weidong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Min Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jianhua Piao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lichen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yuxia Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiaoguang Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XY LY. Performed the experiments: YM JW TR JL. Analyzed the data: JC TR JL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JW DM WL YZ JP ML. Wrote the paper: JC. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lichen Yang, Yuxia Ma, Jun Wang or Xiaoguang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The informed consent was also obtained from all subjects prior to participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The Circulation Rate of Non-pregnant Women.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Estimation of Maternal Weight Gain during Pregnancy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, J., Ren, T., Lu, J. et al. Physiologic requirement for iron in pregnant women, assessed using the stable isotope tracer technique. Nutr Metab (Lond) 17, 33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00452-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00452-0

Keywords

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us