Open Access

Differential vascular dysfunction in response to diets of differing macronutrient composition: a phenomenonological study

  • Sameer Fatani1,
  • Lucy C Pickavance2Email author,
  • Claire J Sadler1,
  • Joanne A Harrold3,
  • Roslyn Cassidy1,
  • John PH Wilding1 and
  • Ebrahim K Naderali1
Contributed equally
Nutrition & Metabolism20074:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-4-15

Received: 21 September 2006

Accepted: 14 June 2007

Published: 14 June 2007

Abstract

Background

Vascular dysfunction can develop from consumption of an energy-rich diet, even prior to the onset of obesity. However, the roles played by different dietary components remain uncertain. While attempting to develop models of obesity in a separate study, we observed that two high-energy diets of differing macronutrient compositions affected vascular function differently in overweight rats.

Methods

Male Wistar rats (n = 6/group) were fed diets providing varying percentages of energy from fat and carbohydrate (CHO). For 10 weeks, they were fed either chow, as control diet (10% of energy from fat; 63% from CHO), chow supplemented with chocolate biscuit (30% fat; 56% CHO) or a high-fat diet (45% fat; 35% CHO). Blood concentrations of biochemical markers of obesity were measured, and epididymal fat pads weighed as a measure of adiposity. Mesenteric arteries were dissected and their contractile and relaxant properties analysed myographically. Data were tested by analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Weight gain and plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin and leptin were similar in all groups. However, biscuit-fed animals showed increased food intake (+27%; p < 0.01) and elevated concentrations of TGs and NEFAs (+41% and +17%; both p < 0.05). High-fat-fed animals showed an increase only in NEFAs (+38%; p < 0.01). Arterial vasoconstriction in response to NA and KCl increased only in biscuit-fed rats (both p < 0.01), while vasorelaxation in response to CCh and SNP, but not histamine, was attenuated in both groups (both p < 0.01). Furthermore, whereas the effect of the high-fat diet was most pronounced in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation, the biscuit diet had the greater effect on endothelium-independent vasorelaxation.

Conclusion

Vascular dysfunction resulting from consumption of a high-fat or combined relatively high-fat/high-CHO diet occurs through different physiological processes, which may be attributable to their differing macronutrient compositions. Combining potentially atherogenic macronutrients induces more extensive vascular impairment than that of high-fat alone, and may be attributable to the more marked dyslipidaemia observed with such a diet. Thus, these findings help clarify the role of dietary components in vascular impairment, which has implications for clinical approaches to preventing cardiovascular disease.

Background

The link between obesity and vascular dysfunction is well-established [18], but its causes remain uncertain. Of the circulating factors increased in obesity – including leptin, insulin, NEFAs and TGs [5, 6, 914] – only the latter two are raised by short-term high-energy feeding (prior to obesity onset), suggesting they may play the more critical role [1518]. Dissecting out the relative importance of dietary macronutrients in atherogenic dyslipidaemia is complex [19], but it is believed that carbohydrate plays the primary role by stimulating insulin secretion, downstream of which fatty acid metabolism is determined [20, 21]. The mechanisms by which these dietary constituents' effects alter vascular function, particularly in animal models, is less clear, although some attempts have been made by different methods in humans [16, 22]. In view of this, we took the opportunity to investigate these mechanisms during an exploratory study in which we compared a number of high-energy diets for their abilities to induce weight gain in rats.

Methods

Male Wistar rats (192 ± 4 g) were fed diets of differing compositions for 10 weeks (n = 6/group). Controls received standard chow (CRM Biosure, Cambridge, UK; 'chow'group). One experimental group received chow supplemented with chocolate biscuit (McVitie's 'HobNobs', Ashby de la Zouch, Leics, UK; 'biscuit' group), and the other received a fat-enriched diet (Research Diets, Inc, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; 'high-fat' group; Table 1). Food intake was measured daily and body weight weekly.
Table 1

Dietary breakdown of macronutrients (% of energy)

Diet

Total CHO

Complex CHO

Simple CHO

Total Fat

Saturated fat

MUFA

PUFA

Total protein

Chow

63.0

57.7

5.3

10.3

1.7

3.0

5.6

28.1

'Biscuit'

55.9

37.2

18.7

30.0

12.9

10.6

5.4

15.0

High-fat

35.0

16.9

16.9

45.0

39.1

0.0

5.5

20.0

At termination, fasting blood samples were collected and plasma glucose, NEFA and TG concentrations determined by diagnostic kit, and insulin and leptin by RIA. A single epididymal fat pad was dissected from each animal and weighed as a measure of adiposity. Length-tension characteristics of mesenteric arteries (6/rat) were determined, followed by evaluation of arterial contractility and relaxation, as described previously [18].

Before statistical analysis, vascular reactivity data were quantified as AUC. Experimental groups were compared on all parameters to controls by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis.

Results

Biscuit-fed rats showed a higher daily energy intake and increased TG concentrations. The high-fat diet increased NEFAs by twice the proportion of the biscuit diet. There were non-significant rises in body weight and epididymal fat mass on both experimental diets, but neither affected glucose, insulin or leptin concentrations (Table 2).
Table 2

Body weight, energy intake and metabolic parameters

 

Chow

Biscuit

High-fat

Daily energy intake (kJ/d)

361 ± 15

459 ± 14**

390 ± 13

Body weight gain (g)

299 ± 22

347 ± 15

339 ± 22

Epididymal fat mass (g)

4.5 ± 0.6

7.7 ± 0.8

6.6 ± 2.2

Glucose (mM)

9.8 ± 1.0

8.9 ± 1.7

9.3 ± 1.0

Insulin (μU/ml)

22.2 ± 2.6

21.1 ± 1.2

19.4 ± 1.6

Leptin (ng/ml)

5.3 ± 0.9

6.3 ± 0.3

5.9 ± 0.4

Triglycerides (mg/dL)

89.4 ± 4.8

126.5 ± 10.1*

77.7 ± 3.6

NEFAs (mM)

0.29 ± 0.01

0.34 ± 0.01*

0.40 ± 0.02**

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 vs chow

The experimental diets did not alter vessel diameter (data not shown; both p > 0.05 vs chow). Both KCl and NA, however, increased vasoconstriction in the biscuit group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001), but had no effect in the high-fat group (both p > 0.05; Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Arterial contractility.

In response to cumulative addition of CCh (10 nM-100 μM), NA-pre-constricted arteries from biscuit- and high-fat-fed rats displayed a significant rightward shift of concentration-response curves, compared with controls (EC50 biscuit: 0.28 ± 0.01; high-fat: 0.52 ± 0.04 μM; both p < 0.001 vs chow: 0.11 ± 0.01 μM; Fig. 2a). Maximal vasorelaxation to 100 μM CCh was reduced by 13% in both biscuit- and high-fat-fed rats (both p < 0.01 vs chow-fed), but was more attenuated in the latter at lower CCh concentrations (3.16–316 nM; p < 0.01 vs biscuit; Fig. 2a). Histamine-induced vasorelaxation was similar in all groups (Fig. 2b).
Figure 2

Arterial relaxation.

The endothelium-independent vasodilator, SNP, also induced concentration-dependent vasorelaxation in arteries from all groups, the curves shifted to the right in the biscuit- and high-fat-fed groups (EC50 biscuit: 1.58 ± 0.02; high-fat: 0.24 ± 0.01; both p ≤ 0.01 vs chow: 0.13 ± 0.02). However, maximum SNP-induced responses were similar in all groups. Compared with the chow- and high-fat-fed groups, SNP-induced relaxation in biscuit-fed rats was attenuated by more than 2-fold (both p < 0.001). Attenuation of SNP responses was also significant, though less pronounced, in high-fat-fed animals (vs control: p < 0.05; Fig. 2c).

Discussion

This study confirms previous observations that high-energy diets lead to vascular dysfunction [5, 6, 17, 18, 23, 24]. The high-fat and biscuit diets induced similar degrees of modest weight gain and adiposity despite different macronutrient compositions, suggesting these account for the differences observed in vascular reactivity. The biscuit diet had a detrimental effect on both vasoconstriction, and -relaxation, whereas the high-fat diet affected only the latter. The attenuation of vasorelaxation in response to the cGMP-mediated actions of both CCh and SNP shows that this effect of both diets is mediated through both endothelium and vascular smooth muscle. Consumption of other high-energy diets has shown this dual process [5, 17, 18], although some such diets exert their effects only through one mechanism [23], further highlighting the specificity of effects depending on dietary components. The failure of either diet to alter cAMP-mediated vasorelaxation (i.e., histamine-induced responses) also appears to be a common feature of high-energy diets [17, 18].

Intriguingly, the degree of abnormality seen in both endothelium- and smooth muscle-mediated vasodilation also differed according to diet. CCh-induced vasorelaxation was more severely attenuated by the high-fat diet, and the SNP response more so by the biscuit diet. These findings suggest that different dietary components affect vasorelaxation by different processes, that a diet high in fat has greater deleterious effects on the arterial endothelial lining, whereas a diet relatively rich in carbohydrate and fat largely compromises the vascular smooth muscle. There is substantial supporting evidence that dietary components play a role in vascular function. Humans and animals fed diets high in fat, particularly saturated fat [19, 2426], show endothelial abnormalities. On the other hand, reports of the protective effects of high-carbohydrate (low-saturated fat) diets and diets high in unsaturated fats are contentious [16, 19, 22, 27, 28]. The biscuit diet, although lower in both total and saturated fat than the high-fat diet, contained a significantly greater amount of MUFAs. Although these are associated with improved cardiovascular risk [27, 29], at high levels they can acutely impair endothelial function [16]. Recent reviews of the literature note that stimulation of insulin release by increased carbohydrates promotes adipogenesis, weight gain and atherogenesis, all associated with the metabolic syndrome [19, 28, 30]. The biscuit diet was higher in overall carbohydrate content than the high-fat diet, and it may be this, in combination with relatively high fat content, that accounts for its more detrimental effects. The relatively lower saturated fat and higher carbohydrate content may also be more palatable and account for the increased daily intake in the biscuit-fed animals, and, hence, epididymal adiposity (though short of significance) and overall greater hyperlipidaemia. This would have to be more carefully analysed in future, however, by matching intake volume and overall energy content between groups. An adipocentric view would suggest that the increased adiposity per se of biscuit-fed animals is critically linked with the worsened vascular defects in this group, with excessive fat mass in this depot resulting in fat cell dysfunction, which in turn contributes to the metabolic disorders that increase the risk of atherosclerosis [31].

High-carbohydrate meals may also stimulate sympathetic nervous system activity in vivo [32], and counteract insulin-induced vasodilation. Although fasting insulin levels were similar in all groups, it is possible that differences in post-prandial insulin (which would be expected to be higher in rats fed a carbohydrate-enriched diet and resulting adipogenesis) and then raised plasma TGs, resulting in part from de novo lipogenesis, may account for the vascular differences. Indeed, hypertriglyceridaemia is a recognized atherogenic risk factor (e.g., [5, 19, 33]). This can be the case even in the absence of insulin resistance [5] or symptoms of atherosclerosis [34]. Although our animal model did not adequately mimic human obesity in terms of weight gain and some of its metabolic disturbances – probably due in part to a lack of statistical power – it remains predictive of vascular dysfunction in the absence of these and therefore further highlights the insidiousness of the disorder.

Finally, although % energy derived from protein was lower in both biscuit and high-fat diets compared to chow, the total average daily protein intake was similar (67 g and 78 g/day, respectively; biscuit vs high-fat: p > 0.05). Hence, it is unlikely that protein deficiency explains the differences in vascular function. Dietary antioxidant levels may also play a role (e.g., [35, 36]), but it is not possible to comment further on these as they were not measured.

Conclusion

The limitations of this study, therefore, revolve around the fact that the nutrient contents of the diets were not sufficiently controlled to draw very precise conclusions regarding their comparative effects. We cannot know whether their differential effects on vascular function were direct effects of nutrient content or indirect effects of resulting adiposity and/or circulating lipids. However, this study does show that high-energy diets of varying compositions can induce vascular dysfunction to varying degrees in the rat via mechanisms involving different layers of the vascular wall. The combination of high-fat and high-carbohydrate diets may be particularly damaging, possibly through increased hyperlipidaemia.

Notes

Abbreviations

ANOVA: 

analysis of variance

AUC: 

area under the curve

CCh: 

carbamylcholine

CHO: 

carbohydrate

KCl: 

potassium chloride

MUFA: 

monounsaturated fatty acid

NA: 

noradrenaline

NEFA: 

non-esterified fatty acid

PUFA: 

polyunsaturated fatty acid

RIA: 

radioimmunoassay

TG: 

triglyceride

SNP: 

sodium nitroprusside

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Biomedical Services Unit, University of Liverpool, for their conscientious care of the animals and Dr. Joanne Elliott for her assistance with data collection and tissue sampling. This study was supported in part by a grant from the British Heart Foundation (FS/02/002). EKN is a BHF research fellow.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool
(2)
Department of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, University of Liverpool
(3)
School of Psychology, University of Liverpool

References

  1. Lakka HM, Lakka TA, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT: Abdominal obesity is associated with increased risk of acute coronary events in men. Eur Heart J 2002,23(9):706-713. 10.1053/euhj.2001.2889View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcaro G, Zamboni M, Rossi L, Turcato E, Covi G, Armellini F, Bosello O, Lechi A: Body fat distribution predicts the degree of endothelial dysfunction in uncomplicated obesity. Int J Obes 1999, 23: 936-942. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801022View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cowan GS, Defibaugh N, White T, Hiler ML, Somes G: Aorta and iliac arterial sizes in pre-operative morbidly obese patients: a preliminary report. Obes Surg 1991, 1: 155-159. 10.1381/096089291765561178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Dobrian AD, Davies MJ, Prewitt RL, Lauterio TJ: Development of hypertension in a rat model of diet-induced obesity. Hypertension 2000,35(4):1009-1015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Naderali EK, Brown MJ, Pickavance LC, Wilding JPH, Doyle PJ, Williams G: Dietary obesity in the rat induces endothelial dysfunction without causing insulin resistance: a possible role of triacylglycerols. Clin Sci 2001, 101: 499-506. 10.1042/CS20010088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Naderali EK, Pickavance LC, Wilding JPH, Williams G: Diet-induced endothelial dysfunction in the rat is independent of the degree of increase in total body weight. Clin Sci 2001, 100: 635-641. 10.1042/CS20000279View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Perticone F, Ceravolo R, Candigliota M, Ventura G, Iacopino S, Sinopoli F, Mattioli PL: Obesity and body fat distribution induce endothelial dysfunction by oxidative stress: protective effect of vitamin C. Diabetes 2001,50(1):159-165. 10.2337/diabetes.50.1.159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD: Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 1996,97(11):2601-2610.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Despres JP, Lamarche B, Mauriege P, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ: Hyperinsulinemia as an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 1996,334(15):952-958. 10.1056/NEJM199604113341504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Glueck CJ, Lang JE, Tracy T, Sieve-Smith L, Wang P: Contribution of fasting hyperinsulinemia to prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease status in 293 hyperlipidemic patients. Metabolism 1999,48(11):1437. 10.1016/S0026-0495(99)90156-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Steinberg HO, Tarshoby M, Monestel R, Hook G, Cronin J, Johnson A, Bayazeed B, Baron AD: Elevated circulating free fatty acid levels impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation. J Clin Invest 1997,100(5):1230-1239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Soderberg S, Ahren B, Jansson JH, Johnson O, Hallmans G, Asplund K, Olsson T: Leptin is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction. J Intern Med 1999,246(4):409-418. 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00571.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tkac I, Kimball BP, Lewis G, Uffelman K, Steiner G: The severity of coronary atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus is related to the number of circulating triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997,17(12):3633-3638.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wallace AM, McMahon AD, Packard CJ, Kelly A, Shepherd J, Gaw A, Sattar N: Plasma leptin and the risk of cardiovascular disease in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS). Circulation 2001,104(25):3052-3056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ota T, Takamura T, Hirai N, Kobayashi K: Preobesity in World Health Organization classification involves the Metabolic Syndrome in Japanese. Diabetes Care 2002,25(7):1252-1253. 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1252View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ong PJL, Dean TS, Hayward CS, Monica PLD, Sanders TAB, Collins P: Effect of fat and carbohydrate consumption on endothelial function. The Lancet 354(9196):2134. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03374-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Naderali EK, Williams G: Effects of short-term feeding of a highly palatable diet on vascular reactivity in rats. Eur J Clin Invest 2001,31(12):1024-1028. 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2001.00908.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Naderali EK, Williams G: Prolonged endothelial-dependent and -independent arterial dysfunction induced in the rat by short-term feeding with a high-fat, high-sucrose diet. Atherosclerosis 2003,166(2):253-9. 10.1016/S0021-9150(02)00367-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. German JB, Dillard CJ: Saturated fats: what dietary intake? Am J Clin Nutr 2004,80(3):550-559.Google Scholar
  20. Marsset-Baglieri A, Fromentin G, Tome D, Bensaid A, Makkarios L, Even PC: Increasing the Protein Content in a Carbohydrate-Free Diet Enhances Fat Loss during 35% but Not 75% Energy Restriction in Rats. J Nutr 2004,134(10):2646-2652.Google Scholar
  21. Krauss RM, Blanche PJ, Rawlings RS, Fernstrom HS, Williams PT: Separate effects of reduced carbohydrate intake and weight loss on atherogenic dyslipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr 2006,83(5):1025-1031.Google Scholar
  22. Keogh JB, Grieger JA, Noakes M, Clifton PM: Flow-mediated dilatation is impaired by a high-saturated fat diet but not by a high-carbohydrate diet. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005,25(6):1274-1279. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000163185.28245.a1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Naderali EK, Fatani S: The effects of fenofibrate on metabolic and vascular changes induced by chocolate-supplemented diet in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 2005,521(1-3):99-104. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.07.027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Vogel MDRA, Corretti MDMC, Plotnick MDGD: Effect of a single high-fat meal on endothelial function in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol 1997,79(3):350-4. 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00760-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Seo T, Qi K, Chang C, Liu Y, Worgall TS, Ramakrishnan R, Deckelbaum RJ: Saturated fat-rich diet enhances selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl esters in the arterial wall. J Clin Invest 2005,115(8):2214-2222. 10.1172/JCI24327View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Verhamme P, Quarck R, Hao H, Knaapen M, Dymarkowski S, Bernar H, Van Cleemput J, Janssens S, Vermylen J, Gabbiani G: Dietary cholesterol withdrawal reduces vascular inflammation and induces coronary plaque stabilization in miniature pigs. Cardiovasc Res 2002,56(1):135-44. 10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00515-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Pelkman CL, Fishell VK, Maddox DH, Pearson TA, Mauger DT, Kris-Etherton PM: Effects of moderate-fat (from monounsaturated fat) and low-fat weight-loss diets on the serum lipid profile in overweight and obese men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2004,79(2):204-212.Google Scholar
  28. Volek J, Feinman R: Carbohydrate restriction improves the features of Metabolic Syndrome. Metabolic Syndrome may be defined by the response to carbohydrate restriction. Nutr Metab 2005,2(1):31. 10.1186/1743-7075-2-31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Appel LJ, Sacks FM, Carey VJ, Obarzanek E, Swain JF, Miller ER III, Conlin PR, Erlinger TP, Rosner BA, Laranjo NM, Charleston J, McCarron P, Bishop LM, for the OmniHeart Collaborative Research G: Effects of protein, monounsaturated fat, and carbohydrate intake on blood pressure and serum lipids: results of the OmniHeart Randomized Trial. JAMA 2005,294(19):2455-2464. 10.1001/jama.294.19.2455View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Suter PM: Carbohydrates and dietary fiber. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2005, 170: 231-261.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bays H, Dujovne CA: Adiposopathy is a more rational treatment target for metabolic disease than obesity alone. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2006,8(2):144-56. 10.1007/s11883-006-0052-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Marques-Lopes I, Forga L, Martinez JA: Thermogenesis induced by a high-carbohydrate meal in fasted lean and overweight young men:: insulin, body fat, and sympathetic nervous system involvement. Nutrition 2003,19(1):25-9. 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00950-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Barbagallo CM, Rizzo M, Noto D, Frasheri A, Pernice V, Rubino A, Pieri D, Pinto V, Cefalu AB, Giordano C: Accumulation of apoE-enriched triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in patients with coronary artery disease. Metabolism 2006,55(5):662-8. 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.01.005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Corrado E, Muratori I, Tantillo R, Contorno F, Coppola G, Strano A, Novo S: Relationship between endothelial dysfunction, intima media thickness and cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic subjects. Int Angiol 2005, 24: 52-58.Google Scholar
  35. Kuno T, Hozumi M, Morinobu T, Murata T, Mingci Z, Tamai H: Antioxidant vitamin levels in plasma and low density lipoprotein of obese girls. Free Radic Res 1998, 28: 81-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sato J, O'Brien T, Katusic ZS, Fu A, Nygren J, Singh R, Nair KS: Dietary antioxidants preserve endothelium dependent vasorelaxation in overfed rats. Atherosclerosis 2002,161(2):327-33. 10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00649-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fatani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement