Open Access

MTOR signaling and ubiquitin-proteosome gene expression in the preservation of fat free mass following high protein, calorie restricted weight loss

  • Cassandra M McIver1Email author,
  • Thomas P Wycherley2 and
  • Peter M Clifton1, 3
Nutrition & Metabolism20129:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-83

Received: 27 March 2012

Accepted: 27 August 2012

Published: 14 September 2012

Abstract

Caloric restriction is one of the most efficient ways to promote weight loss and is known to activate protective metabolic pathways. Frequently reported with weight loss is the undesirable consequence of fat free (lean muscle) mass loss. Weight loss diets with increased dietary protein intake are popular and may provide additional benefits through preservation of fat free mass compared to a standard protein, high carbohydrate diet. However, the precise mechanism by which a high protein diet may mitigate dietary weight loss induced reductions in fat free mass has not been fully elucidated. Maintenance of fat free mass is dependent upon nutrient stimulation of protein synthesis via the mTOR complex, although during caloric restriction a decrease (atrophy) in skeletal muscle may be driven by a homeostatic shift favouring protein catabolism. This review evaluates the relationship between the macronutrient composition of calorie restricted diets and weight loss using metabolic indicators. Specifically we evaluate the effect of increased dietary protein intake and caloric restricted diets on gene expression in skeletal muscle, particularly focusing on biosynthesis, degradation and the expression of genes in the ubiquitin-proteosome (UPP) and mTOR signaling pathways, including MuRF-1, MAFbx/atrogin-1, mTORC1, and S6K1.

Keywords

High protein diet Fat free mass Caloric restriction Skeletal muscle MTORC1 MuRF-1

Introduction

Current primary treatment strategies for obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) are to consume a low-fat (<30% of total energy) diet with reduced caloric intake and participate in increased physical activity to create a negative energy balance. In overweight and obese individuals, even a modest reduction in weight (5 kg) can have significant health benefits including improved insulin sensitivity[1] pancreatic islet β-cell function[2], glucose homeostasis, blood pressure[3] and markers of cellular oxidative damage[4]. However, during lifestyle modification induced weight loss the loss of metabolically active fat free mass (FFM) is frequently reported as an undesirable consequence[5]. Emerging evidence suggests a high ratio of protein to carbohydrate in a low-fat, caloric restricted (CR) diet may mitigate FFM reductions during weight loss through increasing muscle protein synthesis and/or reducing protein catabolism, thereby improving net muscle protein balance[6]. The precise mechanism by which an increased dietary protein intake may mitigate weight loss induced reductions in FFM has not been fully elucidated.

During eucaloric conditions the continual breakdown of protein that occurs in the body’s organs and vital tissues is replenished in the post-absorptive state via supply of amino acids derived primarily from the skeletal muscle component of FFM[7]. In turn, during fed states, skeletal muscle proteins are replenished through a feeding stimulated increase in muscle protein synthesis that occurs almost exclusively due to the protein constituent of the ingested food[8]. Once requirements for adequate substrate to replenish skeletal muscle are exceeded, the feeding induced muscle protein response is inhibited[9]. Providing there is adequate dietary protein intake, muscle protein gains which occur in the fed state balances the loss of muscle protein which occurs in the post absorptive state allowing day to day skeletal muscle mass to remain relatively constant[7, 10]. However, excess nutrient intake of amino acids and glucose, beyond the bodies requirement to maintain homeostasis and energy production for cellular processes, leads to insulin resistance in skeletal muscle via a dysregulation of the insulin signaling pathway and potentially promoting protein catabolism[11, 12].

The FFM reduction that typically occurs during CR weight loss also implies a negative net skeletal muscle protein balance. There are a number of plausible mechanisms, several of them mediated by dietary protein that may provide some explanation for the negative net protein balance. These include an elevated rate of breakdown of muscle protein in response to caloric restriction via up-regulation of protein catabolism enzymes[13, 14]; an inadequate per-meal dose of dietary protein and subsequently reduced maximal post-meal rate of muscle protein synthesis[8, 15]; a reduced number of meals/protein ingestions throughout the day and subsequently a reduced number of periods of elevated muscle protein synthesis[16, 17]; and/or a reduced rate of post-meal muscle protein synthesis relating to the type/quality of dietary protein being ingested[18, 19]. Although it is likely an increased dietary protein intake during CR mitigates reductions in FFM through one or more of these mechanisms, further well controlled randomised clinical trials are required to investigate the contribution of each of these factors and whether an optimal dietary configuration exists that can completely stave off FFM loss. This review evaluates current evidence suggesting an increased dietary protein intake during CR weight loss may mitigate FFM reduction in overweight and obese persons via decreased protein catabolism and improve metabolic factors when compared with standard protein, high carbohydrate, CR weight loss diets. Candidate mechanisms are discussed with a focus on the ubiquitin-proteosome (UPP) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways and their association with CR and retention of FFM.

High protein, caloric restriction and weight loss in humans

A high protein, CR diet is typically considered to constitute ~30% daily total energy from protein, 40% from carbohydrate and 30% from fat, with caloric intakes ~6000 kj/day (1400 kcal) for women and 7000 kj/day (1600 kcal) for men. A standard protein or high carbohydrate diet is typically comprised of ~15% daily total energy from protein, 55% from carbohydrate and 30% from fat.

A high protein, low fat diet compared to a high carbohydrate, standard protein CR diet has been demonstrated to result in greater weight loss[2025] and metabolic advantages (greater reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides in men[26, 27] and reduced FFM loss in women[2831]) (Table 1). However, there are also a number of studies that have shown no differences in total weight loss[28, 30, 3234] or retention of FFM[22, 23, 3537] when high protein CR diet regimes are compared to a high carbohydrate diet. Further confounding evidence also exists with at least one study showing a greater loss of FFM in hyperinsulinemic males following a high protein diet compared the standard-protein diet[38]. However, this loss was only 0.9 kg and the authors conclude that hyperinsulinemic obese subjects, in contrast to normoinsulinemic subjects, seem to achieve better weight reduction, less decline in energy expenditure, and normalization of insulin levels on a high protein compared to a isocaloric high carbohydrate diet.
Table 1

Change (Δ) in fat free mass (FFM), fat mass and total body weight ± standard error of the mean in women from previous studies examining the effects of increased dietary protein intake and weight loss on body composition (Farnsworth et al. [[28]]; Luscombe-Marsh et al. [[65]]; Noakes et al. [[25]]; Layman et al. [[29]]; Piatti et al ., 1994 [[31]])

Author

Population

N (M/F)

Intervention

ΔFFM†

ΔFat mass†

ΔTotal body weight†

Farnsworth et al.[28]

Healthy Obese

57 (14/43)

HP Diet vs SP Diet (equal% energy from fat) 12 weeks energy restriction

HP Diet −0.1 ± 0.3**

HP Diet −6.6 ± 0.5

HP Diet −6.6 ± 0.5

4 weeks energy balance

SP Diet −1.5 ± 0.3

SP Diet −7.1 ± 2.0

SP Diet −7.4 ± 0.5

Luscombe-Marsh et al.[65]

Healthy Obese

57 (25/32)

LF-HP Diet vs HF-SP Diet 12 weeks energy restriction

LF-HP Diet −2.2 ± 0.5*

LF/HP Diet −4.3 ± 0.8

LF-HP Diet −7.8 ± 0.8

4 weeks energy balance

HF-SP Diet −3.1 ± 0.5

HF/SP Diet −4.8 ± 1.2

HF-SP Diet −7.9 ± 1.3

Layman et al.[29]

Healthy Obese

25 F

High protein vs High Carbohydrate (similar% energy from fat)

HP Diet −0.88 ± 0.3**

HP Diet-5.6 ± 0.5

HP Diet −7.53 ± 1.4

10 weeks energy restriction

HC Diet −1.21 ± 0.6

HC Diet-4.7 ± 0.7

HC Diet −6.96 ± 1.36

Noakes et al.[25]

Healthy Obese

100 F

HP vs SP Diet (equal% energy from fat)

HP Diet −1.5 ± 0.3

HP Diet −5.7 ± 0.6

HP Diet −7.6 ± 0.4

12 weeks energy restriction

SP Diet −1.8 ± 0.3

SP Diet −4.5 ± 0.5

SP Diet −6.9 ± 0.5

Piatti et al.[31]

Healthy Obese

25 F

HP vs SP Diet (equal% energy from fat)

HP Diet −1.40 ± 0.6**

HP Diet −3.2 ± 0.6

HP Diet −4.5 ± 0.4

21 days energy restriction

SP Diet −3.02 ± 0.6

SP Diet −3.3 ± 0.5

SP Diet −6.4 ± 0.9

†Data from women only.

**Indicates a significant retention of lean mass in the HP diet group and *indicates a trend.

An increased thermogenic effect may give high protein diets a metabolic advantage over high carbohydrate diets. Dietary protein has been shown to have a substantially greater effect on basal thermogenesis (compared to carbohydrate or fat)[39, 40] and nitrogen turnover is increased (indicating protein synthesis is elevated)[39]. In eucaloric studies a short term (3-month) increase in daily protein intake significantly decreased body fat and preserved lean mass in healthy lean participants[41]. However, long term high protein dietary intake (>1.8 g.kg-1 day-1) in newly diagnosed insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) and healthy lean participants was found to increase plasma insulin concentrations and decrease glucose oxidation resulting in a state of insulin resistance and glucose intolerance but these were small observational studies and not controlled interventions[42, 43].

Caloric restriction and lean muscle in humans

Although studies unanimously observe favourable benefits from CR for reducing body weight and fat mass, a confounding complication is the reduction of FFM (muscle atrophy) which is frequently reported[5, 44]. FFM is the main determinant of resting metabolic rate (RMR)[45], which suggests a decrease in FFM could hinder the progress of weight loss and may predispose to weight regain[46, 47]. Furthermore, lost FFM is typically not fully recovered in individuals who regain weight, predisposing them to the burden of “sarcopenic obesity”[48]. In women, deterioration in muscle performance has been observed as early as perimenopause, increasing their vulnerability to sarcopenia compared to age-matched men[49]. Loss of FFM may also have detrimental effects in older persons whereby accelerated muscle loss correlates negatively with functional capacity for independent living[50]. Skeletal muscle atrophy, caused by an imbalance of protein synthesis and catabolism, is readily apparent in conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes, cancer cachexia, spinal cord injury and muscular disuse. A review of dietary protein for muscle atrophy in cachexia by Op den Kamp et al.[51] found that supplementation with dietary protein (>1.5 g.kg-1 day-1) alone or in combination with exercise training maintains or even improves muscle mass in these patients. In addition, protein supplementation (30 g/d) during weight maintenance has been demonstrated to limit weight regain following weight loss[52].

The mechanisms by which an increased dietary protein intake mitigates dietary weight loss induced reductions in FFM, as found in some studies, may be explained by examination of the molecular pathways involved in the control of muscle protein synthesis (hypertrophy) and breakdown (atrophy). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and PKB/Akt are believed to play key roles as central targets in the protein synthesis[53] and degradation pathways[54]. Amino acids and insulin activate muscle protein synthesis via a complex serine-threonine protein kinase, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway (Figure 1A) resulting in cellular mass growth[55]. Nutrient overload, in particular increased fat and elevated circulating amino acids, have been shown to cause β-cell compensation and increased activation of mTOR which can lead to insulin resistance in peripheral insulin-responsive tissues[56]. Beyond dysregulation of glucose homeostasis, impaired insulin signaling in muscle contributes to the muscle loss observed in obesity by promoting protein catabolism through the expression of ubiquitin ligases and hence a possible explanation as to why high mTOR activity in muscles of obese humans and mice does not result in muscle hypertrophy (Reviewed in[11]). Individuals with type 2 DM may also have impaired insulin-mediated protein synthesis[57, 58] as amino acid signaling to mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) requires co-stimulation with insulin[59] which generates an inhibitory feedback loop on insulin receptor substrate proteins[56]. This is in contrast to older adults (>65 years) whereby a blunted muscle protein synthesis response has been observed compared with young adults (<30 years) following resistance exercise[60], indicating that older adults may have an impaired ability to respond to a protein anabolic stimulus resulting in acute dysregulation of this signaling pathway[61]. A lack of nutrients (i.e. fasting and possibly CR) have also been proposed to activate adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated kinase (AMPK) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent deacetylases, such as (Sirtuin 1) SIRT1, which in turn suppresses the mTOR pathway[62].
Figure 1

A schematic representation depicting A; the protein synthesis pathway in skeletal muscle involving the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Insulin, and amino acids (including leucine) initiate activation of a cascade of protein and lipid kinases ultimately resulting in enhanced mTOR activity, facilitating the phosphorylation of S6K1 and hyper-phosphorylation of 4E-BP, resulting in enhanced availability of eIF4E for binding eIF4G and forming an active eIF4F complex resulting in increased protein synthesis [adapted from Layman[88], Anthony et al.[89], Drummond et al.[61], Um et al.[98] and Kimball[90, 93] and B; our proposed mechanism whereby high protein calorie restricted weight loss increases IGF-1 activating the PI3K/Akt pathway, thereby phosphorylating (P) FoxO transcription factors and down-regulating the expression of E3 enzymes atrogin-1 and MuRF-1, leading to a reduction in protein degradation in skeletal muscle cells. PGC-1α, SIRT1 and AMPK are also proposed to inhibit the expression of FoxO transcription factors and therefore suppress protein breakdown [adapted from Lecker et al.[70], Bodine et al.[99], Anthony et al.[89] and Blagosklonny et al.[62]. Dashed lines indicate an interaction with an unknown mechanism. Red lines indicate an inhibitory signal to the pathway, and C; Summarisation of protein biosynthetic and degradation events following standard protein, high carbohydrate compared to high protein, calorie restricted weight loss.

There is a strong indication that dysregulation of mTOR signaling, and therefore a reduced ability to maintain protein synthesis, occurs in translation initiation, as older subjects have lower p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (p70S6K1) phosphorylation and blunted extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-interacting kinase 1 (MNK1) signaling compared to younger subjects following exercise at the same relative intensity[63]. Nutrient excess, in particular high-fat diets, can reduce the ability of leptin and insulin to promote mTORC1 activity and reduce food intake[11] indicating that diet quality may be a driving factor in our ability to maintain protein synthesis rather than age. Others have found no alteration of protein levels of IRS-1, mTOR or p70S6K in obese and type 2 DM skeletal muscle compared to age-matched lean participants, although a reduction in mTOR phosphorylation in obese and type 2 DM groups and reduced System L transporters, amino acid transporter/solute carrier family 43, member 2 (LAT4) and solute carrier family 3-activator of dibasic and neutral amino acid transport, member 2 (CD98hc) in the type 2 DM group have been reported[64].

Numerous studies have shown that women tend to lose less FFM (e.g. 0.1 kg compared to 1.5 kg) with high protein CR diets than with a standard protein diet (Table 1)[28, 29, 31, 65], although others show no significant differences in total weight loss or total fat loss between groups. The FFM sparing ability from increased protein:carbohydrate ratio in a CR diet may be mediated by the effect of protein intake on insulin secretion[66] and proteolysis[13]. Proteolysis mainly occurs via the ubiquitin- proteosome pathway (UPP), which degrades both cytosolic and nuclear proteins[67], as well as myofibrillar proteins[68], which comprise most of the protein in adult skeletal muscle[69]. Studies have shown during fasting and possibly other insulin-deficient states, a reduction in protein synthesis and increased proteolysis occur through decreased signaling by the PI3K/Akt pathway[70] as IGF-1/insulin blocks transcriptional up-regulation of key mediators of skeletal muscle atrophy[54]. IGF-1/insulin also inhibits the expression of two E3 ligases, muscle atrophy F-box protein (MAFbx/atrogin-1) and muscle-specific RING finger protein 1 (MuRF-1)[71].

Ubiquitin-proteosome pathway, CR and muscle protein degradation

During CR a decrease (atrophy) in skeletal muscle may be driven by a homeostatic shift favouring protein catabolism which may have a significant impact on FFM retention. Muscle protein degradation is a complex process in which lysosomal proteases, the Ca2+ − dependent proteases, the caspases and the UPP have been implicated[72]. Autophagic and proteosomal activity decline during aging and may contribute to age-related muscle loss[73, 74]. In contrast, evidence in rodents suggests that CR increases the activity and effectiveness of these cellular quality control processes through prevention of an increase in protein carbonyl accumulation[75], delaying the age associated increase of chymotrypsin-like activity, an indicator of proteaosome activity[76]. The stimulation of proteolysis observed during atrophy has been shown to be partly due to the activation of the UPP[77] and therefore this pathway may be pivotal in FFM loss during weight loss. In rodents, CR has been shown to decrease plasma insulin and serum IGF-1 concentrations up to 40%[78] (reviewed in[79]), which may impact negatively on skeletal muscle. As IGF-1 has been shown to block transcriptional up-regulation of a number of ubiquitin-ligases[54], a decrease in circulating IGF-1 would result in up-regulation of MAFbx/atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 in skeletal muscle leading to increased proteolysis and hence FFM loss. In humans, long term severe CR (1 and 6 years) did not reduce serum IGF-1 levels. However, a reduction in protein intake (1.67 to 0.95 g.kg-1.day-1) during CR for 3 weeks in a small number of volunteers resulted in a reduction in serum IGF-1 (152 ng.mL-1)[78]. A 12 week CR high protein, high red meat diet in men also found IGF-related peptides significantly increased total (HP 23%; HC 18%) and bioactive (HP 18%; HC 15%) IGF-1[80] compared to a high carbohydrate (standard protein) diet. In weight stable older, postmenopausal women an increased dietary protein intake (30 g whey supplement/day for 2 years) without CR significantly increased serum IGF-1 compared to placebo[81] indicating that increased dietary protein, through its ability to increase IGF-1 during CR, may prevent increased proteolysis via inhibition of up-regulation of key ubiquitin-ligases (Figure 1B).

High protein, low-carbohydrate diets are also accompanied by increased stimulation of glucagon and insulin production within the endocrine pancreas, high glycogen turnover and to some extent stimulation of gluconeogenesis[42, 43]. Undefined insulin levels may stimulate PI3K/Akt, phosphorylating the forkhead transcription factor (FoxO) resulting in cytoplasmic retention and the repression of target gene expression[82]. Therefore a high protein CR diet for weight loss may suppress key regulatory elements of the UPP. Initiation of FoxO1 phosphorylation by PKB in skeletal muscle may decrease FoxO’s ability to stimulate the expression of the ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes MAFbx/atrogin-1 and MuRF-1[83] which, when up-regulated, are essential for protein degradation and hence muscle atrophy (Figure 1B). Following ultra-endurance exercise and exercise in combination with weight loss the amount of ubiquitin-conjugated proteins and chymotrypsin-like activity has been shown to be decreased[72, 84]. Up-regulation of mRNA transcripts MuRF1, F-box and C2 proteosome subunits were also observed as were the autophagy regulatory proteins Atg7 and LC3B[84] indicating that during ultra-endurance exercise cellular quality control processes are required to possibly improve skeletal muscle function by repairing muscle damage. Therefore we propose that high protein, CR weight loss diets may phosphorylate PKB/Atk and FoxO leading to suppression of MAFbx/atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 transcription resulting in deceleration of proteolysis that occurs during CR in skeletal muscle (Figure 1C) resulting in a preservation of FFM.

Dietary protein intake and protein synthesis

Recently it was shown that a short-term, isocaloric high protein diet (10 days, >130 g/day protein) increased whole body protein turnover and amino acid (leucine) oxidation with no increase in muscle protein synthesis or mitochondrial function in either young (<25 years) or older (>70 years) participants. This indicates that higher protein intakes may stimulate protein synthesis following meal ingestion but may not enhance basal protein synthesis. However, postabsorptive protein catabolism (both breakdown and amino acid oxidation) was increased during the high protein diet[85]. Little is known about whether this occurs with high protein diets during CR. Dairy products, which contain whey protein, are often a key component of a high protein, low-fat diet. Whey contains both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor activity and a high concentration of leucine, a branched-chain amino acid (BCAA)[86]. The inclusion of whey protein in CR regimes may result in greater preservation of skeletal muscle and accelerated loss of adipose tissue during negative energy balance[86, 87]. There is also increasing evidence to suggest that BCAA’s, particularly leucine, have a significant role in metabolic regulation beyond their fundamental role as substrates for protein synthesis[86, 88].

The regulation of skeletal muscle protein turnover also involves the interactions of gene transcription and translation and numerous pre- and post-transcriptional modifications[61]. Leucine stimulates signal transduction pathways that modulate mRNA translation initiation thereby up-regulating protein synthesis[8991]. Alpha-ketoisocaproic acid, a leucine metabolite has been identified to stimulate the phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein (PHAS-I), a recently discovered regulator of translation initiation during cell mitogenesis[92]. The action of leucine in the insulin signaling pathway is initiated by mTORC1[59, 93], which is activated by a variety of hormones (e.g. insulin) and nutrients (e.g. amino acids) that stimulate cell growth and proliferation, while it is repressed by other hormones (e.g. glucocorticoids)[94]. The mTOR complex also controls important functions in peripheral organs including muscle oxidative metabolism, white adipose tissue differentiation, β-cell dependent insulin secretion[95] and muscle autophagy[11].

Increases in amino acid concentrations stimulate mTOR kinase activity (Figure 1A) to initiate phosphorylation of the inhibitory eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein (4E-BP1) causing it to dissociate from the eukaryotic translational initiation factor E (eIF4E). Once dissociated, eIF4E is available to bind with eIF4G to form an active initiation complex. Leucine has been suggested to stimulate protein synthesis in skeletal muscle through both insulin-dependent and independent mechanisms. The insulin-dependent mechanism is associated with signaling through mTOR via phosphorylation of eIF4E-binding protein1 (4E-BP1) and S6K1[59], in contrast to the insulin-independent effect by an unknown mechanism that may involve phosphorylation of eIF4G and/or its association with eIF4E[90]. However, Amino acid availability also increases intracellular Ca2+ levels which can activate mTORC1 by means of a Ca2+/calmodulin-mediated activation of a Class III PI 3-kinase, human vacuolar protein sorting 34 (hVps34)[96, 97], phosphorylating both S6K1 and 4E-BP1. As part of this mTOR signaling cascade, IGF-1 has also been shown to activate translation and muscle protein synthesis via tuberous sclerosis 2/tuberin (TSC2). PKB works by phosphorylating TSC2 at phosphorylation sites that are distinct from AMPK phosphorylation sites[53]. This pathway has been suggested to be suppressed or deactivated by caloric restriction via the activation of AMPK and SIRT1, which also occurs with Metformin administration (mimics CR), and possibly deactivating the insulin/PI3K pathway[62]. To what extent obesity causes a dysregulation of this pathway is unclear. Less is also clear about how high protein CR weight loss impacts on this pathway.

Conclusion

The mechanism behind the preservation of lean muscle following high protein, CR weight loss has been proposed to be the increased consumption of amino acids, in particular leucine, stimulating increased muscle protein synthesis via the mTOR signaling pathway. However, in contrast to findings in animal models, studies in humans have found no alteration of protein levels of IRS-1, mTOR or p70S6K in obese and type 2 DM skeletal muscle compared to age-matched lean participants and CR may in fact deactivate this pathway. Therefore stimulation of the mTOR pathway to increase protein synthesis does not fully explain the retention of FFM seen in high protein, weight loss dietary intervention studies. Here we propose that the key mechanism may involve the suppression of regulatory elements of the UPP in skeletal muscle to prevent atrophy. As a reduction of FFM appears to be a confounding complication to weight loss, understanding the underlying biological mechanisms that occur in response to macronutrient composition may help us to provide more comprehensive dietary information for health care providers and individuals to facilitate healthy weight loss and long term weight maintenance for the treatment of obesity.

Abbreviations

4E-BP1: 

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein

ACE: 

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

Akt: 

Serine/threonine protein kinase

AMP: 

Adenosine monophosphate

AMPK: 

AMP-activated kinase

Atg7: 

Autophagy-related protein 7

BCAA: 

Branched-chain amino acid

BMI: 

Body mass index

Ca2+

Calcium

CD-36: 

Cluster of differentiation, CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)

CD98hc: 

Solute carrier family 3 (activators of dibasic and neutral amino acid transport), member 2

CR: 

Caloric restriction

DM: 

Diabetes Mellitus

eIF4E/G: 

The eukaryotic translational initiation factor E and G

ERK1/2: 

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2

FFM: 

Fat free mass

FoxO1/3: 

Forkhead transcription factor 1 and 3

GLUT4: 

Glucose transporter 4

hVps34: 

Human vacuolar protein sorting 34

IGF-1: 

Insulin-like growth factor 1

IGF-R: 

Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor

IR: 

Insulin receptor

IRS-1: 

Insulin receptor substrate 1

LAT4: 

System L amino acid transporter/solute carrier family 43, member 2

LC3B: 

Iutophagy-related ubiquitin-like modifier

MAFbx/atrogin-1: 

Iuscle atrophy F-box protein

MAP: 

Iitogen-activated protein

MNK1: 

MAP kinase-interacting kinase 1

mTOR: 

Mammalian target of rapamycin

mTORC1: 

MTOR complex 1

MuRF-1: 

Muscle ring finger-1

NAD+

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

P70S6K1: 

P70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1

PDK-1: 

Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 1

PGC-1α: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ co-activator 1 alpha

PHAS-1: 

Phosphorylated heat- and acid-stable protein

PI3K: 

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt

PKB: 

Protein kinase B

PYY3-36: 

Peptide YY 3–36

Raptor/RPTOR: 

Regulatory associated protein of MTOR, complex 1

Rheb/GTP: 

Ras homolog enriched in brain/guanosine 5'-triphosphate

RMR: 

Resting metabolic rate

S6K1: 

S6 kinase 1

SIRT1: 

The mammalian ortholog of Sir2, sirtuin 1

TSC1/2: 

Tuberous sclerosis 1/2

UCP3: 

Uncoupling protein 3

UPP: 

Ubiquitin-proteosome pathway.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Cassandra M McIver was supported by a CSIRO Office of the Chief Executive (OCE) Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Food and Nutritional Sciences
(2)
Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia
(3)
Baker IDI

References

  1. Brinkworth GD, Noakes M, Clifton PM, Buckley JD: Obesity (Silver Spring). Effects of a Low Carbohydrate Weight Loss Diet on Exercise Capacity and Tolerance in Obese Subjects. 2009Google Scholar
  2. Utzschneider KM, Carr DB, Barsness SM, Kahn SE, Schwartz RS: Diet-induced weight loss is associated with an improvement in beta-cell function in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 2704-2710. 10.1210/jc.2003-031827.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H: Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 2683-2693. 10.1056/NEJMoa035622.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Marquez-Quinones A, Mutch DM, Debard C, Wang P, Combes M, Roussel B, Holst C, Martinez JA, Handjieva-Darlenska T, Kalouskova P, Jebb S, Babalis D, Pfeiffer AF, Larsen TM, Astrup A, Saris WH, Mariman E, Clement K, Vidal H, Langin D, Viguerie N: Adipose tissue transcriptome reflects variations between subjects with continued weight loss and subjects regaining weight 6 mo after caloric restriction independent of energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010, 92: 975-984. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stiegler P, Cunliffe A: The role of diet and exercise for the maintenance of fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate during weight loss. Sports Med. 2006, 36: 239-262. 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Manders RJ, Koopman R, Beelen M, Gijsen AP, Wodzig WK, Saris WH, van Loon LJ: The Muscle Protein Synthetic Response to Carbohydrate and Protein Ingestion Is Not Impaired in Men with Longstanding Type 2 Diabetes. J Nutr. 2008, 138: 1079-1085.Google Scholar
  7. Wolfe RR: The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84: 475-482.Google Scholar
  8. Cuthbertson D, Smith K, Babraj J, Leese G, Waddell T, Atherton P, Wackerhage H, Taylor PM, Rennie MJ: Anabolic signaling deficits underlie amino acid resistance of wasting, aging muscle. FASEB J. 2005, 19: 422-424.Google Scholar
  9. Bohe J, Low JF, Wolfe RR, Rennie MJ: Latency and duration of stimulation of human muscle protein synthesis during continuous infusion of amino acids. J Physiol. 2001, 532: 575-579. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0575f.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Phillips SM, Hartman JW, Wilkinson SB: Dietary protein to support anabolism with resistance exercise in young men. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005, 24: 134S-139S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Laplante M, Sabatini DM: mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012, 149: 274-293. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Saha AK, Xu XJ, Balon TW, Brandon A, Kraegen EW, Ruderman NB: Insulin resistance due to nutrient excess: Is it a consequence of AMPK downregulation?. Cell Cycle. 2011, 10: 3447-3451. 10.4161/cc.10.20.17886.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Garlick PJ, McNurlan MA, Ballmer PE: Influence of dietary protein intake on whole-body protein turnover in humans. Diabetes Care. 1991, 14: 1189-1198. 10.2337/diacare.14.12.1189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Villareal DT, Smith GI, Shah K, Mittendorfer B: Obesity (Silver Spring). Effect of Weight Loss on the Rate of Muscle Protein Synthesis During Fasted and Fed Conditions in Obese Older Adults. 2011Google Scholar
  15. Glynn EL, Fry CS, Drummond MJ, Timmerman KL, Dhanani S, Volpi E, Rasmussen BB: Excess leucine intake enhances muscle anabolic signaling but not net protein anabolism in young men and women. J Nutr. 2010, 140: 1970-1976. 10.3945/jn.110.127647.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore DL, Robinson MJ, Fry JL, Tang JE, Glover EI, Wilkinson S, Prior T, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM: Ingested protein dose response of muscle and albumin protein synthesis after resistance exercise in young men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 89: 161-168.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Slater G, Phillips SM: Nutrition guidelines for strength sports: sprinting, weightlifting, throwing events, and bodybuilding. J Sports Sci. 2011, 29 (Suppl 1): S67-77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tang JE, Moore DR, Kujbida GW, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM: Ingestion of whey hydrolysate, casein, or soy protein isolate: effects on mixed muscle protein synthesis at rest and following resistance exercise in young men. J Appl Physiol. 2009, 107: 987-992. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00076.2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tang JE, Phillips SM: Maximizing muscle protein anabolism: the role of protein quality. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009, 12: 66-71. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32831cef75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Baba NH, Sawaya S, Torbay N, Habbal Z, Azar S, Hashim SA: High protein vs high carbohydrate hypoenergetic diet for the treatment of obese hyperinsulinemic subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999, 23: 1202-1206. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Evangelista LS, Heber D, Li Z, Bowerman S, Hamilton MA, Fonarow GC: Reduced body weight and adiposity with a high-protein diet improves functional status, lipid profiles, glycemic control, and quality of life in patients with heart failure: a feasibility study. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009, 24: 207-215.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Flechtner-Mors M, Boehm BO, Wittmann R, Thoma U, Ditschuneit HH: Enhanced weight loss with protein-enriched meal replacements in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010, 26: 393-405. 10.1002/dmrr.1097.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Labayen I, Diez N, Gonzalez A, Parra D, Martinez JA: Effects of protein vs. carbohydrate-rich diets on fuel utilisation in obese women during weight loss. Forum Nutr. 2003, 56: 168-170.Google Scholar
  24. Lasker DA, Evans EM, Layman DK: Moderate carbohydrate, moderate protein weight loss diet reduces cardiovascular disease risk compared to high carbohydrate, low protein diet in obese adults: a randomized clinical trial. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2008, 5: 30-10.1186/1743-7075-5-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Noakes M, Keogh JB, Foster PR, Clifton PM: Effect of an energy-restricted, high-protein, low-fat diet relative to a conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet on weight loss, body composition, nutritional status, and markers of cardiovascular health in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 1298-1306.Google Scholar
  26. Clifton PM, Bastiaans K, Keogh JB: High protein diets decrease total and abdominal fat and improve CVD risk profile in overweight and obese men and women with elevated triacylglycerol. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009, 19: 548-554. 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.10.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Krauss RM, Blanche PJ, Rawlings RS, Fernstrom HS, Williams PT: Separate effects of reduced carbohydrate intake and weight loss on atherogenic dyslipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 1025-1031. quiz 1205Google Scholar
  28. Farnsworth E, Luscombe ND, Noakes M, Wittert G, Argyiou E, Clifton PM: Effect of a high-protein, energy-restricted diet on body composition, glycemic control, and lipid concentrations in overweight and obese hyperinsulinemic men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78: 31-39.Google Scholar
  29. Layman DK, Boileau RA, Erickson DJ, Painter JE, Shiue H, Sather C, Christou DD: A reduced ratio of dietary carbohydrate to protein improves body composition and blood lipid profiles during weight loss in adult women. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 411-417.Google Scholar
  30. Leidy HJ, Carnell NS, Mattes RD, Campbell WW: Higher protein intake preserves lean mass and satiety with weight loss in pre-obese and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007, 15: 421-429. 10.1038/oby.2007.531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Piatti PM, Monti F, Fermo I, Baruffaldi L, Nasser R, Santambrogio G, Librenti MC, Galli-Kienle M, Pontiroli AE, Pozza G: Hypocaloric high-protein diet improves glucose oxidation and spares lean body mass: comparison to hypocaloric high-carbohydrate diet. Metabolism. 1994, 43: 1481-1487. 10.1016/0026-0495(94)90005-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleiner RE, Hutchins AM, Johnston CS, Swan PD: Effects of an 8-week high-protein or high-carbohydrate diet in adults with hyperinsulinemia. MedGenMed. 2006, 8: 39-Google Scholar
  33. Luscombe ND, Clifton PM, Noakes M, Farnsworth E, Wittert G: Effect of a high-protein, energy-restricted diet on weight loss and energy expenditure after weight stabilization in hyperinsulinemic subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003, 27: 582-590. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802270.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Stamets K, Taylor DS, Kunselman A, Demers LM, Pelkman CL, Legro RS: A randomized trial of the effects of two types of short-term hypocaloric diets on weight loss in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004, 81: 630-637. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kasim-Karakas SE, Almario RU, Cunningham W: Effects of protein versus simple sugar intake on weight loss in polycystic ovary syndrome (according to the National Institutes of Health criteria). Fertil Steril. 2009, 92: 262-270. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker B, Noakes M, Luscombe N, Clifton P: Effect of a high-protein, high-monounsaturated fat weight loss diet on glycemic control and lipid levels in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25: 425-430. 10.2337/diacare.25.3.425.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Treyzon L, Chen S, Hong K, Yan E, Carpenter CL, Thames G, Bowerman S, Wang HJ, Elashoff R, Li Z: A controlled trial of protein enrichment of meal replacements for weight reduction with retention of lean body mass. Nutr J. 2008, 7: 23-10.1186/1475-2891-7-23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Torbay N, Baba NH, Sawaya S, Bajjani R, Habbal Z, Azar S, Hashim SA: High protein vs high carbohydrate hypoenergetic diet in treatment of obese normoinsulinemic and hyperinsulinemic subjects. Nutr Res. 2002, 22: 587-598. 10.1016/S0271-5317(02)00359-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Feinman RD, Fine EJ: Thermodynamics and metabolic advantage of weight loss diets. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2003, 1: 209-219. 10.1089/154041903322716688.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Veldhorst MA, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR: Gluconeogenesis and energy expenditure after a high-protein, carbohydrate-free diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 90: 519-526. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27834.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Soenen S, Westerterp-Plantenga MS: Changes in body fat percentage during body weight stable conditions of increased daily protein intake vs. control. Physiol Behav. 2010, 101: 635-638. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.09.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Linn T, Geyer R, Prassek S, Laube H: Effect of dietary protein intake on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996, 81: 3938-3943. 10.1210/jc.81.11.3938.Google Scholar
  43. Linn T, Santosa B, Gronemeyer D, Aygen S, Scholz N, Busch M, Bretzel RG: Effect of long-term dietary protein intake on glucose metabolism in humans. Diabetologia. 2000, 43: 1257-1265. 10.1007/s001250051521.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Chaston TB, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE: Changes in fat-free mass during significant weight loss: a systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007, 31: 743-750.Google Scholar
  45. Ravussin E, Lillioja S, Knowler WC, Christin L, Freymond D, Abbott WGH, Boyce V, Howard BV, Bogardus C: Reduced Rate of Energy-Expenditure as a Risk Factor for Body-Weight Gain. 1988, 318: 467-472.Google Scholar
  46. Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Lejeune MP, Nijs I, van Ooijen M, Kovacs EM: High protein intake sustains weight maintenance after body weight loss in humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004, 28: 57-64. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Pasman WJ, Saris WH, Muls E, Vansant G, Westerterp-Plantenga MS: Effect of exercise training on long-term weight maintenance in weight-reduced men. Metabolism. 1999, 48: 15-21. 10.1016/S0026-0495(99)90004-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Beavers KM, Lyles MF, Davis CC, Wang X, Beavers DP, Nicklas BJ: Is lost lean mass from intentional weight loss recovered during weight regain in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 94: 767-774.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Phillips SK, Rook KM, Siddle NC, Bruce SA, Woledge RC: Muscle weakness in women occurs at an earlier age than in men, but strength is preserved by hormone replacement therapy. Clin Sci (Lond). 1993, 84: 95-98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller SL, Wolfe RR: The danger of weight loss in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008, 12: 487-491. 10.1007/BF02982710.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Op den Kamp CM, Langen RC, Haegens A, Schols AM: Muscle atrophy in cachexia: can dietary protein tip the balance. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009, 12: 611-616. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283319399.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lejeune MP, Kovacs EM, Westerterp-Plantenga MS: Additional protein intake limits weight regain after weight loss in humans. Br J Nutr. 2005, 93: 281-289. 10.1079/BJN20041305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Wackerhage H, Rennie MJ: How nutrition and exercise maintain the human musculoskeletal mass. J Anat. 2006, 208: 451-458. 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00544.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Glass DJ: Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy signaling pathways. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005, 37: 1974-1984. 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.04.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Hands SL, Proud CG, Wyttenbach A: mTOR's role in ageing: protein synthesis or autophagy?. Aging (Albany NY). 2009, 1: 586-597.Google Scholar
  56. Leibowitz G, Cerasi E, Ketzinel-Gilad M: The role of mTOR in the adaptation and failure of beta-cells in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008, 10 (Suppl 4): 157-169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Chun KH, Choi KD, Lee DH, Jung Y, Henry RR, Ciaraldi TP, Kim YB: In vivo activation of ROCK1 by insulin is impaired in skeletal muscle of humans with type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011, 300: E536-542. 10.1152/ajpendo.00538.2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ruiz-Alcaraz AJ, Liu HK, Cuthbertson DJ, McManus EJ, Akhtar S, Lipina C, Morris AD, Petrie JR, Hundal HS, Sutherland C: A novel regulation of IRS1 (insulin receptor substrate-1) expression following short term insulin administration. Biochem J. 2005, 392: 345-352. 10.1042/BJ20051194.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Kimball SR, Jefferson LS: Control of translation initiation through integration of signals generated by hormones, nutrients, and exercise. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 29027-29032. 10.1074/jbc.R110.137208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Kumar V, Selby A, Rankin D, Patel R, Atherton P, Hildebrandt W, Williams J, Smith K, Seynnes O, Hiscock N, Rennie MJ: Age-related differences in the dose–response relationship of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise in young and old men. J Physiol. 2009, 587: 211-217. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.164483.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Drummond MJ, Dreyer HC, Fry CS, Glynn EL, Rasmussen BB: Nutritional and contractile regulation of human skeletal muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling. J Appl Physiol. 2009, 106: 1374-1384. 10.1152/japplphysiol.91397.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Blagosklonny MV: Calorie restriction: decelerating mTOR-driven aging from cells to organisms (including humans). Cell Cycle. 2010, 9: 683-688. 10.4161/cc.9.4.10766.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Drummond MJ, Dreyer HC, Pennings B, Fry CS, Dhanani S, Dillon EL, Sheffield-Moore M, Volpi E, Rasmussen BB: Skeletal muscle protein anabolic response to resistance exercise and essential amino acids is delayed with aging. J Appl Physiol. 2008, 104: 1452-1461. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00021.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Gran P: Anabolic signalling in skeletal muscle : impact of diet and disease. 2011, In School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin UniversityGoogle Scholar
  65. Luscombe-Marsh ND, Noakes M, Wittert GA, Keogh JB, Foster P, Clifton PM: Carbohydrate-restricted diets high in either monounsaturated fat or protein are equally effective at promoting fat loss and improving blood lipids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 762-772.Google Scholar
  66. Franch HA, Price SR: Molecular signaling pathways regulating muscle proteolysis during atrophy. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005, 8: 271-275. 10.1097/01.mco.0000165005.01331.45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Glickman MH, Ciechanover A: The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev. 2002, 82: 373-428.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Solomon V, Goldberg AL: Importance of the ATP-ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the degradation of soluble and myofibrillar proteins in rabbit muscle extracts. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 26690-26697. 10.1074/jbc.271.43.26690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhao J, Brault JJ, Schild A, Cao P, Sandri M, Schiaffino S, Lecker SH, Goldberg AL: FoxO3 coordinately activates protein degradation by the autophagic/lysosomal and proteasomal pathways in atrophying muscle cells. Cell Metab. 2007, 6: 472-483. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.11.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Lecker SH, Goldberg AL, Mitch WE: Protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in normal and disease states. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006, 17: 1807-1819. 10.1681/ASN.2006010083.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Sacheck JM, Ohtsuka A, McLary SC, Goldberg AL: IGF-I stimulates muscle growth by suppressing protein breakdown and expression of atrophy-related ubiquitin ligases, atrogin-1 and MuRF1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 287: E591-601. 10.1152/ajpendo.00073.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Kim HJ, Jamart C, Deldicque L, An GL, Lee YH, Kim CK, Raymackers JM, Francaux M: Endoplasmic reticulum stress markers and ubiquitin-proteasome pathway activity in response to a 200-km run. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011, 43: 18-25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Ponnappan U: Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is compromised in CD45RO + and CD45RA + T lymphocyte subsets during aging. Exp Gerontol. 2002, 37: 359-367. 10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00203-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Wohlgemuth SE, Seo AY, Marzetti E, Lees HA, Leeuwenburgh C: Skeletal muscle autophagy and apoptosis during aging: effects of calorie restriction and life-long exercise. Exp Gerontol. 2010, 45: 138-148. 10.1016/j.exger.2009.11.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Selsby JT, Judge AR, Yimlamai T, Leeuwenburgh C, Dodd SL: Life long calorie restriction increases heat shock proteins and proteasome activity in soleus muscles of Fisher 344 rats. Exp Gerontol. 2005, 40: 37-42. 10.1016/j.exger.2004.08.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Hepple RT, Qin M, Nakamoto H, Goto S: Caloric restriction optimizes the proteasome pathway with aging in rat plantaris muscle: implications for sarcopenia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008, 295: R1231-1237. 10.1152/ajpregu.90478.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Jagoe RT, Lecker SH, Gomes M, Goldberg AL: Patterns of gene expression in atrophying skeletal muscles: response to food deprivation. FASEB J. 2002, 16: 1697-1712. 10.1096/fj.02-0312com.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Fontana L, Weiss EP, Villareal DT, Klein S, Holloszy JO: Long-term effects of calorie or protein restriction on serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentration in humans. Aging Cell. 2008, 7: 681-687. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00417.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Speakman JR, Mitchell SE: Caloric restriction. Mol Aspects Med. 2011, 32: 159-221. 10.1016/j.mam.2011.07.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Belobrajdic DP, Frystyk J, Jeyaratnaganthan N, Espelund U, Flyvbjerg A, Clifton PM, Noakes M: Moderate energy restriction-induced weight loss affects circulating IGF levels independent of dietary composition. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010, 162: 1075-1082. 10.1530/EJE-10-0062.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhu K, Meng X, Kerr DA, Devine A, Solah V, Binns CW, Prince RL: The effects of a two-year randomized, controlled trial of whey protein supplementation on bone structure, IGF-1, and urinary calcium excretion in older postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2011, 26: 2298-2306. 10.1002/jbmr.429.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Matsuzaki H, Daitoku H, Hatta M, Tanaka K, Fukamizu A: Insulin-induced phosphorylation of FKHR (Foxo1) targets to proteasomal degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 11285-11290. 10.1073/pnas.1934283100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. de Palma L, Marinelli M, Pavan M, Orazi A: Ubiquitin ligases MuRF1 and MAFbx in human skeletal muscle atrophy. Joint Bone Spine. 2008, 75: 53-57. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.04.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Wohlgemuth SE, Lees HA, Marzetti E, Manini TM, Aranda JM, Daniels MJ, Pahor M, Perri MG, Leeuwenburgh C, Anton SD: An exploratory analysis of the effects of a weight loss plus exercise program on cellular quality control mechanisms in older overweight women. Rejuvenation Res. 2011, 14: 315-324. 10.1089/rej.2010.1132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Walrand S, Short KR, Bigelow ML, Sweatt AJ, Hutson SM, Nair KS: Functional impact of high protein intake on healthy elderly people. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 295: E921-928. 10.1152/ajpendo.90536.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Layman DK: Protein quantity and quality at levels above the RDA improves adult weight loss. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004, 23: 631S-636S.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Zemel MB: Proposed role of calcium and dairy food components in weight management and metabolic health. Phys Sportsmed. 2009, 37: 29-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Layman DK: The role of leucine in weight loss diets and glucose homeostasis. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 261S-267S.Google Scholar
  89. Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS: Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr. 2001, 131: 856S-860S.Google Scholar
  90. Kimball SR, Jefferson LS: Signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms through which branched-chain amino acids mediate translational control of protein synthesis. J Nutr. 2006, 136: 227S-231S.Google Scholar
  91. Crozier SJ, Kimball SR, Emmert SW, Anthony JC, Jefferson LS: Oral leucine administration stimulates protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle. J Nutr. 2005, 135: 376-382.Google Scholar
  92. Xu G, Kwon G, Marshall CA, Lin TA, Lawrence JC: McDaniel ML: Branched-chain amino acids are essential in the regulation of PHAS-I and p70 S6 kinase by pancreatic beta-cells. A possible role in protein translation and mitogenic signaling. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 28178-28184. 10.1074/jbc.273.43.28178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Kimball SR: The role of nutrition in stimulating muscle protein accretion at the molecular level. Biochem Soc Trans. 2007, 35: 1298-1301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Kimball SR, Do AN, Kutzler L, Cavener DR, Jefferson LS: Rapid turnover of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) repressor REDD1 and activation of mTORC1 signaling following inhibition of protein synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 3465-3475.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Catania C, Binder E, Cota D: mTORC1 signaling in energy balance and metabolic disease. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011, 35: 751-761. 10.1038/ijo.2010.208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Byfield MP, Murray JT, Backer JM: hVps34 is a nutrient-regulated lipid kinase required for activation of p70 S6 kinase. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 33076-33082. 10.1074/jbc.M507201200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Nobukuni T, Kozma SC: Thomas G: hvps34, an ancient player, enters a growing game: mTOR Complex1/S6K1 signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007, 19: 135-141. 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Um SH, D'Alessio D, Thomas G: Nutrient overload, insulin resistance, and ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1, S6K1. Cell Metab. 2006, 3: 393-402. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Bodine SC, Stitt TN, Gonzalez M, Kline WO, Stover GL, Bauerlein R, Zlotchenko E, Scrimgeour A, Lawrence JC, Glass DJ, Yancopoulos GD: Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2001, 3: 1014-1019. 10.1038/ncb1101-1014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© McIver et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement