Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

The association between parenteral nutrition and pancreatic injury in adult patients: a retrospective observational study

Nutrition & Metabolism volume 19, Article number: 73 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background and objective

Patients on parenteral nutrition (PN) are at high risk of both liver and pancreatic injury. More efforts were focused on liver, however, limited data is available to evaluate the effects of PN on pancreas. Thus, we performed a retrospective observational study to evaluate the association between PN and pancreatic injury in Chinese adult patients.

Methods

Adult patients (18–80 years), who received PN for a week or longer, and with repeated measurements of pancreatic enzymes, were included in the analysis. Pancreatic injury was confirmed by serum level of pancreatic amylase (P-AMYwas 53 U/L or higher) or lipase (LP was 63 U/L or higher), which were evaluated at baseline and following every week during PN duration. Age, sex, body weight, height, diagnosis of diseases, history of diseases, surgery, white blood cell, c-reactive protein, liver and renal function, fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, and daily energy supplied by PN and enteral nutrition were abstracted from medical records.

Results

A total number of 190 adult patients (125 men, 65 women) were included in the study. The average age and BMI were 61.8 ± 13.0 years and 21.7±3.3 kg/m2, while medium serum level of P-AMY and LP were 29.0 U/L (quartile range: 18.0, 47.0) and 33.0 U/L (quartile range: 19.0, 58.0), respectively at baseline. The median duration of PN was 15 days (quartile range: 11.0, 21.0). The prevalence of pancreatic injury was 42.1% (80/190) while it was 28.4% (54/190), 43.3% (77/178), 47.8% (44/92) after one-, two-, and three-week or longer PN adminstration. The proportion of daily energy supplement by PN (OR = 3.77, 95%CI: 1.87, 7.61) and history of infection were positively (OR = 3.00, 95%CI: 1.23, 7.36), while disease history for diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.15, 0.98) and cancer (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23, 0.95), were negetively associated with pancreatic injury. Total bile acids were associated with the increment of P-AMY (beta = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.39, 1.56) and LP (beta = 2.55, 95%CI: 0.98, 4.12) by multi-variate linear regression.

Conclusion

PN was associated with pancreatic injury, as demonstrated by the increase of both serum P-AMY and LP.

Introduction

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a crucial intervention for patients who cannot meet energy and nutrient requirements through oral intake or tube feeding. Cumulative evidences have proved that PN does improve nutritional status, shorten hospital stay, and decrease mortality [1,2,3]. However, inappropriate implementation of PN may also cause a series of complications, including PN-associated liver diseases, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and injury to the intestinal barrier [4, 5]. PN-associated adverse effects have been found to be caused mainly by the inhibition of digestive enzymes and biliary sludge, with numerous studies referring to hepatobiliary dysfunction and cholestasis [6,7,8]. Pancreas performs both endocrine and exocrine functions, providing digestive juices and bile acids from the bile duct to hydrolyze macromolecules [9]. Therefore, it is highly likely that PN might affect the exocrine pancreas as a consequence of bypassing normal digestion or cholestasis, which results in an impaired digestive and absorptive function.

Several studies have reported that PN suppressed the function of the exocrine pancreas. The first animal study was performed in 1977, evaluating the association between PN and dog pancreatic secretion and found that pancreatic secretion reduced after initiation of PN [10]. Niederau et al. 11conducted a self-control trial on healthy volunteers in 1985 and found that amino acids significantly stimulated the pancreatic secretion of trypsin and chymotrypsin, but without obvious effects of intravenous lipid or glucose on pancreatic secretion. Most published studies focused on the effects of intravenous single macronutrients, such as glucose, lipid, or amino acids on pancreatic exocrine function. However, all-in-one mixtures are recommended by ASPEN, ESPEN, and CSPEN to assure stable administration of macro- and micronutrients [11,12,13]. Data regarding the association between PN administrated by all-in-one mixtures and pancreas are limited. Therefore, we performed the current retrospective observational study to evaluate the association between PN and pancreatic exocrine function, which was regularly measured by P-AMY and LP [14,15,16], in a group of Chines adult patients on PN for one week or longer.

Subjects and methods

Study population

This is a single-center retrospective obeservational study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ren Ji Hospital (Project no. KY2021-048) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. As a retrospective data analysis, patients’ written consent was waived by the same committee .

All participants were recruited from Ren Ji Hospital from 1 to 2020 to 1 Dec 2021. The inclusion criteria were as following: (1) aged between 18 and 80 years; (2) who received PN for one week or longer (3) whose serum level of P-AMY and LP were repeatedly measured. The exclusion criteria were those: (1) aged less than 18 years or more than 90 years; (2) with missing data; (3) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73m2, because urinary excretion of lipase decreased in patients with chronic kidney diseases [17]; (4) with serum level of alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase ≥ 1.5 ULN (upper limit of normal value) and serum level of direct bilirubin ≥ 2 ULN based on the diagnostic criteria of cholestasis [7, 8]; (5) with history of confirmed liver, gall bladder and pancreas injuries (e.g., cancer, acute or chronic inflammation, trauma, abused drugs, autoimmune disease), rheumatic disease, organ transplant and pregnancy; (6) admitted to critical care units.

The intial inclusion resulted in 477 patients receiving PN, which was trimmed to 321 after sequential inclusion. After excluding those who lost follow-up, the final number of participants were 190. (Fig. 1). There were no significant differences among the participants in gender ratio, disease history and major clinical parameters in and out of the study. (Supplementary Table 1. The comparison of baseline characteristics between participants in and out of the study).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The process of sample recruitment. Abbreviation: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; P-AMY, pancreatic amylase; LP, lipase;

Full size image

PN regimens and follow-up

A professional nutrition support team reviewed the patients and prescribed PN regimens. The indication for PN was based on the insufficient oral intake or tube feeding that cannot meet 60% of the daily requirement [12]. These patients were reviewed daily by the same nutrition support team. Other sources of energy supply, such as enteral nutrition and oral intake, were also recorded and calculated. For each patient, the duration of PN, enteral nutrition and oral intake were accounted separately from the initial to the last day of PN treatment.

Biochemical parameters

Biochemical parameters were monitored and recorded at baseline and were measured repeatedly for seven consecutive days after initiation of PN. Blood samples were drawn after at least an 8 h fast. Baseline parameters were analyzed within 24 h before PN (day 0). Subsequent analyses were performed at a 7-day interval until PN was stopped (e.g., day 7, day 14). Serum levels of P-AMY and LP were measured by the enzyme colorimetry analysis (Roche 701 Bioanalyzer, Roche, UK). Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase, gamma glutamyl-transferase, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, bile acids, alanine transferase and aspartate transferase were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Roche 701 Bioanalyzer, Roche, UK). Fasting blood glucose, albumin, pre-albumin, and creatinine were also measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Roche 701 Bioanalyzer, Roche, UK). The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2-level race Eq. 1 [8]. White blood cells were measured using an automated hematology analyzer (DxH 690T, Beckman Coulter, USA). The concentration of C-reaction protein was measured by the immunoturbidimetric method (CardioPhase hsCRP kit, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Germany). All the measurements above were completed in the Clinical Laboratory of the Ren Ji Hospital.

Other clinical information

Age, sex, diagnosis, history of disease and surgery, body weight and height were recorded from the medical record. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is defined as the presence of diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal distension, or intestinal obstruction [18]. The IBW (ideal body weight) was calculated as [current body height (cm) − 80) × 0.7] in men and [current body height (cm) − 70) × 0.6] in women [19].

Definition of pancreatic injury

Pancreatic injury were confirmed by serum of P-AMY (≥53 U/L) or LP (≥63 U/L) based on the normal range recommended by the Clinical Laboratory of Ren Ji Hospital. Serum levels of P-AMY and LP were repeated measured every 7 day [14, 15].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 software (IBM, Armonk, New York, United States). For the hypothesis testing, a two-sided test with a 5% significant level was used. Data with normal distribution were presented as mean±standard and the differences between the groups were tested by non-paired student tests. Non-normally distributed data were presented in median and quartile ranges, and the differences between groups were tested using the Chi-square method.

We performed univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression modeling to evaluate the association between baseline clinical features and pancreatic injury. Potential parameters were selected by Univariable regression (p < 0.2) and refered to relatively clinical trials [20,21,22]. Nive parameters (sex, age, the proportion of daily energy supplement by PN, surgery, diabetes mellitus, cancer, infection, gastrointestinal dysfuction, fistula) entered multivariate binary logistic regression model. Risk factors for PN-related liver dysfunction were evaluated by Spearman correlation and linear regression analysis. Two-step linear regression modeling was performed to evaluate the association between the serum level of liver function and pancreatic enzymes. Univariable regression was first carried out to identify eligible factors based on p value (p < 0.2). Using the regression results, four parameters (alanine transferase, aspartate transferase, total bile acids, gamma glutamyl-transferas) were included in the multivariate regression model.

Results

A total of 190 patients (125 men and 65 women) were included in this study. The average age and BMI were 61.8 ± 13.0 years and 21.7±3.3 kg/m2, while medium serum level of P-AMY and LP were 29.0 U/L (quartile range: 18.0, 47.0 U/L) and 33.0 U/L (quartile range: 19.0, 58.0 U/L), respectively at baseline. In the current study, 71.1% of the participants were fasted, 68.4% of them were with cancer, and 77.9% started PN after surgery. Baseline characteristics of biochemical indicators showed no statistical differences between groups. (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics in 190 patients receiving parenteral nutrition
Full size table

The median duration of PN was 15 days (quartile range: 11.0, 21.0 d). Daily energy supplement was 18.7 ± 5.5 kcal/kg/d by PN based on current body weight, while it was 18.3 ± 4.0 kcal/kg/d based on ideal body weight. The details for macronutrients supplement based on current and ideal body weight were shown in Table 1.

The prevalence of pancreatic injury was 28.4% (54/190), 43.2% (77/178), 47.8% (44/92) after one-, two-, three-week or longer administration of PN and the total prevalence was 42.1% (80/190). The proportion of daily energy supplement by PN (OR = 3.77, 95%CI: 1.87, 7.61) and history of infection were positively (OR = 3.00, 95%CI: 1.23, 7.36), while disease history for diabetes mellitus (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.15, 0.98) and cancer (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.23, 0.95), were negetively associated with pancreatic injury. Compared with men, women on PN were marginally associated with high risk of pancreatic injury (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 0.92, 3.52) (Table 2). The increment of P-AMY and LP were associated with aspartate transferase (r=-0.39 and − 0.22, p < 0.05) and total bile acids (r = 0.22 and 0.25, p < 0.05) (Table 3). Serum levels of P-AMY, LP, gamma glutamyl-transferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bile acids increased after PN administration, compared with baseline measurements (Fig. 2, all p < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that total bile acids were associated with the increment of P-AMY (β = 0.98, 95%C.I.:0.39 ~ 1.56) and LP (β = 2.55, 95%C.I.:0.98 ~ 4.12) (Table 4).

Table 2 The association between clinical parameters and pancreatic injury in 190 patients receiving parenteral nutrition: multivariate logistic regression
Full size table

>

Table 3 The correlation between the changes of P-AMY and LP with liver function in 190 patients receiving parenteral nutrition: univariate correlation analysis
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The curve of serum pancreatic enzymes and liver function during the PN treatment. Abbreviation: ALT, alanine transferase; AST, aspartate transferase; AKP, alkaline phosphatase; γ-GT, gamma glutamyl-transferase; TBI, total bilirubin; DBI, direct bilirubin; TBA, total bile acids; P-AMY, pancreatic amylase; P, lipase;

Full size image
Table 4 The association between the changes of P-AMY and LP with liver function in 190 patients receiving parenteral nutrition: linear regression analysis
Full size table

Discussion

In this retrospective study of 190 Chinese adults patients receiving PN, we found that 42.1% (80/190) of participants were confirmed with pancreatic injury, as demonstrated by elevated serum levels of P-AMY or LP. Our results supported that PN was at least partially accountable for pancreatic injury.

Consistent with our results, a retrospective study (n = 102) reported that the prevalence of elevated serum levels of lipase and amylase was higher in patients with PN compared to those without PN [23]. Pancreatic enzymes were even higher as the diseases deteriorated 16]. Previou studies have confirmed that PN suppress the function of the exocrine pancreas [10, 24]. Although PN were thought to have no obvious effects on pancreatic secretion in humans [21, 22], our study demonstrated that long-term (≥ one week or longer) PN might lead to pancreatic injury. A series of studies suggested PN treatment could lead to dysfunction and atrophy of the pancreas. Fan et al. reported that pancreas weight and the concentration of pancreatic amylase were lower in the PN group compared with control group [14] and found that pancreatic atrophy and dysfunction might be the possible mechanism [25]. They concluded that intravenous hypertonic glucose resulted in atrophy of the pancreas by the suppression of the stimulatory effect of cholecystokinin on pancreas [26]. Gabrielson et al. found diffuse, moderate pancreatic epithelial cell necrosis, along with acinar atrophy and interstitial fibrosis in piglets underwent 3-week total PN [27]. Another animal study also confirmed pancreatic injury in rats [14] after 7-day total PN. Therefore, pancreatic functions as well as the effects on digestive enzymes and hormones, should be considered when administering PN.

Our study showed that the changes in serum P-AMY and LP were closely associated with the changes in the serum level of liver enzymes and total bile acids, which implied that PN-related elevation of pancreatic enzymes were linked with hepatic complications. This finding was supported by some previous studies. O’Keefe SJ et al. recruited 27 healthy men to evaluate pancreaticobiliary secretory and metabolic responses to enteral and parenteral feeding [28]. They found that intravenous feeding suppressed the secretion of both pancreatic enzymes and bile acid and lowered the plasma concentrations of gastrin and cholecystokinin. Meessen ECE et al. evaluated the effects of intravenous nutrition on circulating level of bile acids and gut hormones in 8 healthy lean men [29]. They found significant increases in bile acids after PN initiation. Bile acids could have harmful effects on pancreatic duct cells [30, 31]. Consistent with above-mentioned studies, we also observed that serum bile acids were significantly associated with serum level of pancreatic enzymes, which indicated that bile acids might play an important role in PN related pancreatic injury. Philip D Hardt et al. reviewed the studies on intensive care patients and draw a conclusion that elevation in enzyme levels could reflect pancreatic injury and the development of biliary sluge could be one of the contributing factors [32].

The strengthen of our study included its cohort study design and deliberated control of potential confoundings. However, some limitations must be concerned. First, as a retrospective study, 131 patients were exclude, which might cause bias. However, baseline characteristics between the patients in and out of the study were similar. Second, although hepato-pancreatic diseases and patients in critical care unit were excluded, patients included in the study tended to have more severe disease and had high risk of pancreatic injury. Third, we could not exclude the possibility that pancreatic injury was caused or was partially induced by infection. We collected data on inflammation biomarkers (e.g., white blood cell and C-reactive protein) and found no significant differences between the two groups (i.e., with and without pancreatic injury). A well-designed prospective study with randomized control to Total PN and other nutritional support is recommended to validate the findings of this study.

Conclusion

PN could impair pancreatic exocrine function and pancreatic injury was usually accompanied with liver dysfunction. It is necessary to monitor serum level of pancreatic enzymes in order to early confirmation and treatment of pancreatic injury.

Availability of data and Materials

The data and SAS code were available upon reasonable request (Renying Xu, email address: 721,001,735@shsmu.edu.cn).

References

  1. Johnson MJ, Lapillonne A, Bronsky J, Domellof M, Embleton N, Iacobelli S, Jochum F, Joosten K, Kolacek S, Mihatsch WA, Moltu SJ, Puntis JWL, Riskin A, Shamir R, Tabbers MM, Van Goudoever JB, Saenz de Pipaon M. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN Working Group on Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition. Research priorities in pediatric parenteral nutrition: a consensus and perspective from ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN. Pediatr Res. 2021 Sep 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01670-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34475525.

  2. Hamdan M, Puckett Y. Total parenteral nutrition. 2021 Jun 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. PMID: 32644462.

  3. Puzio TJ, Kozar RA. Nutrition in the critically ill surgical patient. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Dec;26(6):622 – 27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000764. PMID: 33002971.

  4. Żalikowska-Gardocka M, Przybyłkowski A. Review of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020 Jun;6(2):65–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2019.95528. Epub 2020 May 21. PMID: 32728621; PMCID: PMC7380469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Guglielmi FW, Boggio-Bertinet D, Federico A, Forte GB, Guglielmi A, Loguercio C, Mazzuoli S, Merli M, Palmo A, Panella C, Pironi L, Francavilla A. Total parenteral nutrition-related gastroenterological complications. Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Sep;38(9):623–42. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 Jun 12. PMID: 16766237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fousekis FS, Mitselos IV, Christodoulou DK. New insights into intestinal failure-associated liver disease in adults: a comprehensive review of the literature. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan-Feb;27(1):3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_551_20. PMID: 33642350; PMCID: PMC8083246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasdelli AS, Agostini F, Pazzeschi C, Guidetti M, Lal S, Pironi L. Assessment of intestinal failure associated liver disease according to different diagnostic criteria. Clin Nutr. 2019 Jun;38(3):1198–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.04.019. Epub 20188 May. PMID: 29778510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beath SV, Kelly DA. Total parenteral nutrition-induced cholestasis: prevention and management. Clin Liver Dis. 2016 Feb;20(1):159–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2015.08.009. Epub 20159 Oct. PMID: 26593297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Keefe SJ. Physiological response of the human pancreas to enteral and parenteral feeding. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006 Sep;9(5):622-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mco.0000241675.63041.ca. PMID: 16912561.

  10. Johnson LR, Schanbacher LM, Dudrick SJ, Copeland EM. Effect of long-term parenteral feeding on pancreatic secretion and serum secretin. Am J Physiol. 1977 Dec;233(6):E524-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1977.233.6.E524. PMID: 413441.

  11. Compher C, Bingham AL, McCall M, Patel J, Rice TW, Braunschweig C, McKeever L. Guidelines for the provision of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Jan;46(1):12–41. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2267. Epub 2022 Jan 3. PMID: 34784064.

  12. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Martindale RG, Waitzberg D, Bischoff SC, Singer P. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2021 Jul;40(7):4745–61. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PMID: 34242915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chinese Society of Nutritional Oncology, Chinese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Chinese expert consensus on the safety of parenteral nutrition. Electron J Metab Nutr Cancer. 2021 Oct;8(5):495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fan BG, Salehi A, Sternby B, Axelson J, Lundquist I, Andrén-Sandberg A, Ekelund M. Total parenteral nutrition influences both endocrine and exocrine function of rat pancreas. Pancreas. 1997 Aug;15(2):147 – 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006676-199708000-00006. PMID: 9260199.

  15. Baumler MD, Nelson DW, Ney DM, Groblewski GE. Loss of exocrine pancreatic stimulation during parenteral feeding suppresses digestive enzyme expression and induces Hsp70 expression. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 Mar;292(3):G857-66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00467.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 30. PMID: 17138970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National research coordination group of the critical III children secondary pancreatic injury. Relationship between changes of increased amylase or lipase levels and pancreas injury in critically ill children. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2016;54(9):658–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.09.006. PMID:27596079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong X, Ma Y, Chen J, Luo Q, Yu X, Li Y, Xu J, Huang S, Wang L, Huang W, Wang M, Xu G, Zhang L, Zuo L, Wang H. Chinese eGFR Investigation Collaboration. Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate in the Chinese population. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Mar;28(3):641–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs491. Epub 2012 Nov 29. PMID: 23197682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McClave SA, Gualdoni J, Nagengast A, Marsano LS, Bandy K, Martindale RG. Gastrointestinal dysfunction and feeding intolerance in critical illness: do we need an objective scoring system? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 Jan 7;22(1):1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-019-0736-z. PMID: 31912312.

  19. Liu HT, Wu SC, Tsai CH, Li C, Chou SE, Su WT, Hsu SY, Hsieh CH. Association between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Mortality in Older Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. Nutrients. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):3861. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123861. PMID: 33348716; PMCID: PMC7766904.

  20. Hameed AM, Lam VW, Pleass HC. Significant elevations of serum lipase not caused by pancreatitis: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2015 Feb;17(2):99–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12277. Epub 20143 Jun. PMID: 24888393; PMCID: PMC4299384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sagar P, Wai D, Poon P, Macfie J, Mitchell C. The effects of major abdominal surgery, enteral and parenteral nutrition on pancreatic function and morphology. Clin Nutr. 1994 Oct;13(5):314-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5614(94)90055-8. PMID: 16843405.

  22. Qin HL, Su ZD, Zou Y, Fan YB. Effect of parenteral and enteral nutrition combined with octreotide on pancreatic exocrine secretion of patients with pancreatic fistula. World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug 15;10(16):2419-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2419. PMID: 15285034; PMCID: PMC4576303.

  23. Ferreira M, Coelho R, Luzio J, Coutinho P. Increased lipase and amylase levels in critically ill patients: retrospective study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008 Dec;20(4):362–9. PMID: 25307241.

  24. Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Erckenbrecht J. Effects of intravenous infusion of amino acids, fat, or glucose on unstimulated pancreatic secretion in healthy humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1985 May;30(5):445–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fan BG, Andrén-Sandberg A. I.v. hypertonic glucose stimulates the exocrine pancreas in rat. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 Jan-Feb;30(1):40 – 4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/014860710603000140. PMID: 16387898.

  26. Fan BG. Effects of parenteral nutrition on the exocrine pancreas in response to cholecystokinin. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Jan-Feb;32(1):57–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/014860710803200157. PMID: 18165448.

  27. Gabrielson KL, Remillard RL, Huso DL. Zinc toxicity with pancreatic acinar necrosis in piglets receiving total parenteral nutrition. Vet Pathol. 1996 Nov;33(6):692-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/030098589603300608. PMID: 8952028.

  28. O’Keefe SJ, Lee RB, Anderson FP, Gennings C, Abou-Assi S, Clore J, Heuman D, Chey W. Physiological effects of enteral and parenteral feeding on pancreaticobiliary secretion in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003 Jan;284(1):G27-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00155.2002. PMID: 12488233.

  29. Meessen ECE, Bakker GJ, Nieuwdorp M, Dallinga-Thie GM, Kemper EM, Olde Damink SW, Romijn JA, Hartmann B, Holst JJ, Knop FK, Groen AK, Schaap FG, Soeters MR. Parenteral nutrition impairs plasma bile acid and gut hormone responses to mixed meal testing in lean healthy men. Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):1013–21. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Jul 14. PMID: 32747206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferdek PE, Jakubowska MA, Gerasimenko JV, Gerasimenko OV, Petersen OH. Bile acids induce necrosis in pancreatic stellate cells dependent on calcium entry and sodium-driven bile uptake. J Physiol. 2016 Nov 1;594(21):6147–6164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP272774. Epub 2016 Aug 8. PMID: 27406326; PMCID: PMC5088250.

  31. Tran QT, Tran VH, Sendler M, Doller J, Wiese M, Bolsmann R, Wilden A, Glaubitz J, Modenbach JM, Thiel FG, de Freitas Chama LL, Weiss FU, Lerch MM, Aghdassi AA. Role of Bile Acids and Bile Salts in Acute Pancreatitis: From the Experimental to Clinical Studies. Pancreas. 2021 Jan 1;50(1):3–11. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001706. PMID: 33370017; PMCID: PMC7748038.

  32. Hardt PD, Mayer K, Ewald N. Exocrine pancreatic involvement in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009 Mar;12(2):168 – 74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e328322437e. PMID: 19202388.

Download references

Acknowledgements

none.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (17dz2272000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Key Program (81630039).

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200092, Shanghai, China

      Xiao-min Zhang & Wei Cai

    2. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200127, Shanghai, China

      Xiao-min Zhang, Yi-quan Zhou, Yan-ping Wan, Hao-jie Li, Zhi-qi Chen, An-qi Song, Mo-lian Tang & Renying Xu

    3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shanghai, China

      Wei Cai

    4. Shanghai Institute of Pediatric Research, No. 1665, Kong Jiang Road, 200092, Shanghai, China

      Wei Cai

    Authors
    1. Xiao-min Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Yi-quan Zhou
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Yan-ping Wan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Hao-jie Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Zhi-qi Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. An-qi Song
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Mo-lian Tang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Renying Xu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Wei Cai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    Xiao-min Zhang, Wei Cai, and Ren-ying Xu equally contributed to the conception and design of the research; Yi-quan Zhou and Yan-ping Wan contributed to the design of the research; Hao-jie Li contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data; Zhi-qi Chen contributed to the analysis of the data; An-qi Song and Mo-lian Tang to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. All authors drafted the manuscript, critically revised the manuscript, agree to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript.

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Renying Xu or Wei Cai.

    Ethics declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. As a de-identified secondary data analysis, patient consent was waived by the same committee.

    Consent for publication

    All the authors have read the paper and agreed to submit the paper.

    Competing interests

    The authors declared no conflict of interests.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    †Renying Xu and Wei Cai have contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Zhang, Xm., Zhou, Yq., Wan, Yp. et al. The association between parenteral nutrition and pancreatic injury in adult patients: a retrospective observational study. Nutr Metab (Lond) 19, 73 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-022-00706-z

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-022-00706-z

    Keywords

    Nutrition & Metabolism

    ISSN: 1743-7075

    Contact us