Skip to main content

Advertisement

Yerba Maté (Illex Paraguariensis) ingestion augments fat oxidation and energy expenditure during exercise at various submaximal intensities

Nutrition & Metabolism volume 11, Article number: 42 (2014) | Download Citation

Article metrics

Abstract

Background

Ingesting Yerba Maté (YM) has become widely popular for health promotion, obesity prevention and body weight reduction, primarily due its thermogenic effectiveness. However, the YM effects on fat metabolism during exercise, when fat metabolism is already increased several fold, are unknown. The present study investigated whether acute YM ingestion augments fat metabolism parameters of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and energy expenditure derived from FAO (EEFAO) during exercise with several intensities.

Methods

Fourteen healthy males and females were randomised in a repeated measures crossover experimental design. All participants ingested either 1000 mg of YM or placebo capsules (PLC) 60 min before performing two incremental exercise ergometry tests. Power output was initiated at and increased by 0.5 W.kg-1 of body weight every 3 min stage, until reaching peak oxygen uptake V ˙ O 2 Peak . Expired gases and stoichiometric indirect calorimetry were used to analyse FAO and EEFAO. Capillary blood samples were collected and analysed for blood lactate concentration (BLC) at rest and at each submaximal and maximal power output.

Results

YM significantly increased FAO and EEFAO by 24% in all submaximal exercise intensities below 70% of V ˙ O 2 peak (p < 0.001, ANOVA main effects) with post hoc tests showing a higher FAO and EEFAO (p < 0.05) at the lower exercise intensities (e.g. 0.26 ± 0.09 vs. 0.35 ± 0.10 and 0.25 ± 0.12 vs. 0.33 ± 0.11 g.min-1 at 40 and 50% of V ˙ O 2 peak respectively). These changes were combined with a trend towards a decrease in BLC (P = 0.066), and without a significant difference in V ˙ O 2 peak , peak power, peak RER, or peak BLC.

Conclusions

Acute YM ingestion augments the exercise dependent increase in FAO and EEFAO at submaximal exercise intensities without negatively affecting maximal exercise performance, suggesting a potential role for YM ingestion to increase the exercise effectiveness for weight loss and sports performance.

Introduction

Yerba Maté (YM), the dried leaves and branches of the plant Illex Paraguariensis, is currently consumed by over 1 million people worldwide, traditionally by many South American countries, and more recently in North America and Europe in the form of YM tea beverage made from the aqueous extracts of the dried leaves and stem. The active ingredients of YM include polyphenols and caffeoyl derivatives (caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3, 4-Dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4, 5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid and 3,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid), phytosterols and saponins[1, 2]. These active ingredients have been suggested to explain several biomedical properties associated with YM ingestion including anti-oxidant, vasodilatory, lipid lowering properties, anti-mutagenic and anti-glycation effects[3]. These properties have often accompanied weight and fat loss and increased energy metabolism as recently demonstrated in mice studies[4–7].

The reported effects in humans are limited to one study that showed an increase in resting metabolic rate and reduced respiratory quotient after prolonged resting periods of 1–4 hrs, induced by acute YM ingestion[8]. However, those resting effects may be further augmented during exercise, especially considering that energy metabolism is already stimulated as a result of increasing exercise intensity. It is established that fatty acid oxidation (FAO) predominantly contributes to energy expenditure (EE) at low and moderate exercise intensities and that carbohydrate oxidation (CHO) predominates at higher exercise intensities above anaerobic threshold[9, 10]. It has been shown that achieving higher absolute FAO and higher EE derived from FAO (EEFAO) at a given exercise intensity or power output, particularly those associated with aerobic exercise training in the low and moderate intensity domains, is associated with improved metabolic health and enhanced endurance exercise performance outcomes[11–15]. Therefore, given the suggested thermogenic effectiveness of YM at rest[8], it remains unknown whether and how YM ingestion affects FAO and its contribution to EE during exercise.

This study aims to investigate the acute effects of YM ingestion on FAO and EE derived from FAO (EEFAO) during exercise of varied intensities. It is hypothesised that YM ingestion increases FAO and enhances EEFAO during exercise.

Methods

Design and participants

The study followed a double-blind crossover repeated measures experimental design. All environmental conditions were maintained the same during all experimental conditions (Mean ± SD: 20 ± 1°C, 775.6 ± 12 mmHg and 51.1 ± 6.1%) for air temperature, barometric pressure and relative humidity respectively. The study gained institutional ethical approval and was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association and all participants gave their written informed consent to participate. Sample size calculations were based on achieving a large effect size based on the least meaningful difference induced by thermogenic supplements on EE in previous studies[16], and provided a power of 90% for a significance alpha level of 5%.

The participants were fourteen healthy adults, seven males and seven females [Mean ± SD: age = 20.8 ± 3.4 yr, height = 171.8 ± 10.0 cm, body mass = 70.4 ± 11.3 kg, body mass index (BMI; in kg.m-2) = 23.8 + 0.11]. Participants were assigned randomly to each experimental condition within a period of two weeks. Female participants were studied in days 1 to 7 of their menstrual cycle to minimise the influence of cyclical changes in female hormones.

All participants were screened prior to the start of the testing in order to determine that they are free from illness and any type of orthopaedic limitation or injury, and also that they meet the exclusion criteria defined as follows: A) History of any cardiovascular or respiratory disease, hypertension, liver or kidney disease, musculoskeletal or neuromuscular or neurological disease, autoimmune disease, cancer, peptic ulcers or anaemia. B) Taking medications, as well as a family history of heart problems, high blood pressure, and/or stroke, and being pregnant or breastfeeding. C) Consuming any ergogenic aid or above habitual caffeine consumption rate (200 mg/day) for at least one week prior to the study based on all types of caffeinated beverages (coffee, energy drinks, soft drinks, caffeine supplements or medications). All Participants refrained from taking any supplements for the duration of the study and were instructed to refrain from strenuous exercise or alcohol and caffeine consumption for at least 24 hours before each test. Participants have also completed a 24-hrs food diary and were asked to replicate it before the second visit.

Experimental procedures and protocols

All participants reported to the Physiology Laboratory on two separate occasions following 10 hrs overnight fast, and each testing session (between 0700 and 1000) was separated by at least three days within two weeks period. Participants who had no previous laboratory experience were habituated in a separate laboratory visit, which included repeating the exercise and ingestion protocol within similar laboratory conditions. Anthropometric measurements included stature and body mass (Seca Alpha, Hamburg, Germany). During each visit participants ingested either 1000 mg (2× 500 mg capsule) YM or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose placebo empty capsules (PLC). Two capsules with similar coatings of either YM and PLC capsules were placed within an empty water cup and taken in the same way with a 100 ml of water. The YM capsules contained a standardised ground YM leaves (batch number 0422009/2012) with a natural content of approximately 1.5% caffeine (Rio Trading Company, Brighton, United Kingdom). Immediately following the ingestion, participants rested for 60 minutes in a semi-recumbent position in quiet laboratory condition. For the estimation of FAO and CHO at rest and during exercise, breath by breath cardiorespiratory measurements included oxygen uptake V ˙ O 2 , carbon dioxide production V ˙ CO 2 and respiratory exchange ratio (RER), using an online gas analyzer (Metalyzer Cortex 3B, Leipzig, Germany). The metabolic measurement system was calibrated prior to each test as follows: flow sensor and gas analyzers were calibrated using calibration gases of known concentration (16% for O2, and 5% for CO2), and for the gas volume a 3 liter volume calibration syringe (Hans Rudolph, Kansas, USA) was used.

Exercise protocol

All participants followed an incremental exercise assessment using an electromagnetically braked cycling ergometer (Schoberer Rad Messtechnik, SRM, Ergo, Julich, Germany). The ergometer was calibrated before use and similar cycling positions were applied in both tests for each participant, which included adjusting the handlebar and saddle height and distance, crank length and toe clip positions during the first visit and re-applying the same position in the following visit. The cycling protocol consisted of three-minute incremental stages that were initiated at and increased by 0.5 W.kg-1 of body mass. Participants cycled at 60–70 rpm throughout the whole test until volitional exhaustion defined as meeting the at least two of V ˙ O 2 peak termination criteria: RER value > 1.1, heart rate within 10 beats.min-1 of age-predicted maximum heart-rate, or achieving levelling-off of V ˙ O 2 . Peak power (Ppeak) was calculated as the highest power output achieved during the last completed incremental stage, plus the fraction of time spent in any final non-completed stage multiplied by the power increment. Similar verbal encouragement was provided to all participants throughout the exercise tests.

All tests were followed by a sufficient cool down for at least 20 min, in which participants consumed at least 200 ml of water, and instructed to stay hydrated and consume at least 2 litres of water during the day of the test.

Blood sampling

Capillary blood samples (5 μl) were collected from the pin prick of the finger tip, at rest, during the last 30 s of each incremental exercise stage and immediately after exhaustion at min 1, 3 and 5. Blood samples were further analyzed for blood lactate using a portable analyzer (Lactate Pro LP1710, Arkray inc. Japan).

Data processing and statistical analysis

V ˙ O 2 , V ˙ C O 2 and RER were averaged for the last minute of each 5 min of the 60 min rest, and averaged for the last minute of each incremental stage. RER was calculated as V ˙ C O 2 / V ˙ O 2 . FAO and CHO were estimated using the stoichiometric indirect calorimetry equations assuming minimal protein contribution during exercise[17] (Eq. 1 and 2). Caloric equivalents were applied to estimate EEFAO and EECHO.

FAO=1.695× V ˙ O 2 -1.701× V ˙ C O 2
(1)
CHO=4.585× V ˙ C O 2 -3.226× V ˙ O 2
(2)

All data were described as mean and standard deviation. A mixed measure ANOVA (YM x power outputs) was applied to detect the effects of YM ingestion on RER and FAO, with YM supplement as within factors, and stage power increments as between factors, and Bonferroni post hoc test was applied to analyse the differences at each power output increment. Paired t-test was applied to detect the differences between YM and PLC at baseline and at maximal exercise performance. For all statistics SPSS V21 was used and the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Following the 60 min rest after YM ingestion, no significant difference was found for either resting BLC (1.4 ± 0.32 vs. 1.5 ± 0.30 mmol.l-1) or resting RER (0.82 ± 0.08 vs. 0.81 ± 0.05) for PLC vs. YM respectively.

However, during exercise YM significantly reduced RER (P < 0.001, ANOVA main effects), (Figure 1) and increased FAO (P < 0.001, ANOVA main effects), (Figure 2). The YM effects on RER and on FAO were independent of the increase in power output (P < 0.001 in both conditions) and there was no interaction effects between the power output increase and YM supplement (Figures 1 and2). Conversely, CHO was reduced in YM compared with PLC (Figure 3).

Figure 1
figure1

Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) at submaximal intensities in YM compared with PLC (P <  0.001, ANOVA main effects).

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Fat oxidation rate (FAO) at submaximal intensities for YM compared with placebo (P <  0.001, ANOVA main effects).

Full size image
Figure 3
figure3

Carbohydrate oxidation rate (CHO) at submaximal intensities for YM compared with placebo (P <  0.001, ANOVA main effects).

Full size image

In terms of energy expenditure contribution, irrespectively of exercise intensity increase (no interaction effects) YM increased EEFAO (P < 0.001), and decreased and EECHO (P < 0.01), (Table 1).

Table 1 Energy expenditure contributions (Mean ± SD) from FAO (EE FAO ) and CHO (EE CHO ) at submaximal intensities in YM compared with PLC (all P < 0.001, ANOVA main effects)
Full size table

There was also a trend, though not significant towards a reduced BLC (P = 0.066) in YM condition compared with PLC (Figure 4) at submaximal exercise. However, at peak level no difference was found in either peak BLC (BLCpeak), V ˙ O 2 peak , Ppeak or peak RER (RERpeak) in YM compared with PLC (Table 2).

Figure 4
figure4

Blood lactate concentration (BLC) at submaximal intensities for YM compared with placebo ( P =  0.066, ANOVA main effects).

Full size image
Table 2 Maximal data (Mean ± SD) in YM compared with PLC
Full size table

Discussion

The key finding of the present study is that YM ingestion augments FAO and reduces CHO reliance during exercise, over a wide range of exercise intensities, particularly in the light and moderate domains that are known to be effective training intensities and are often prescribed for a variety of population groups with the aim of weight loss, disease prevention and improving endurance exercise performance[13–15, 18]. Augmented metabolic benefits of YM ingestion when combined with exercise could consequently contribute to the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity associated metabolic health risks including diabetes and hyperinsulinaemia, hypercholestrolaemia and cancer[19, 20].

In both treatment conditions FAO was increased similarly as a function of power output, but higher FAO was found in the YM condition at exercise intensities below 70% of V ˙ O 2 peak (Figures 1 and2). Within this range of exercise intensities, FAO is well known to be utilised as a primary fuel source for energy expenditure (30-70%), while CHO predominates at heavy exercise intensities until reaching CHO saturation level (corresponding to RER = 1)[9, 10, 12]. Therefore, increased FAO and EEFAO with YM ingestion in the light and moderate exercise intensity domains may augment both exercise dependent outcomes associated with those intensities[11, 14], and may augment metabolic and anti-adiposity markers associated with YM ingestion, such as decreased differentiation of pre-adipocytes and reduced accumulation of lipids in adipocytes[3–5].

It is well documented that FAO and lipolysis increase several fold during exercise than at rest[10, 21, 22], and the present study is the first to demonstrate the positive effects of YM ingestion during exercise, particularly submaximal exercise, rather than at rest. Only one study reported a reduction in RER during 1–4 hrs of rest in healthy individuals who ingested 1 g of YM[8], which is similar to the present study. In comparison, the present study, using a similar dosage and following one hr rest, found that the differences in RER in YM vs. PLC become more prominent and significant during exercise (Figure 1), which corresponded to 24% increase in both FAO and EE derived from FAO (Table 1). This increase proposes YM as a promoter of fat metabolism during exercise.

The exercise induced metabolic effects found in the present study could be attributed to a number of reasons related to the major constituents of YM. Perhaps, the main effects YM function found on FAO are explained by central mechanisms and glycogen sparing of caffeine[23], which is found to have the highest concentration of 1% to 2% (naturally occurring ~1.5% in the present study) of dry weight of YM leaves and stem[24]. This caffeine amount (approximately 80 mg) is considered low compared with other multi-ingredient thermogenic supplements that reported increased FAO and EE (only at rest) where caffeine content exceeds 350 mg[25], which suggests that other active ingredients may have contributed to the present findings. The remaining reported compounds of YM include saponins, which are attributed to anti-lipolytic and hypocholestrolaemic properties when administered chronically, and caffeoyl derivatives (caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3, 4-Dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4, 5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid and 3, 5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid) which are thought to have higher concentration compared with green or black tea and to have mainly anti-oxidant properties[1]. It has recently been shown that plasma lipid profile (triglycerides, fatty acids and total cholesterol) is ameliorated in mice fed with YM, combined with a positive effect on leptin’s central and peripheral induced feedback loop that regulates adipose tissues, energy balance and EE[26]. However, it is difficult to link these mechanisms with the acute effects during exercise in humans, though recent studies have suggested an acute effect of exercise on changes in lipid profile[27], which could be augmented by the ingestion of YM. It is also important to note that YM has a number of amino acids (i.e. Glutamic acid, Proline), minerals (P, Fe and Ca) and vitamins (C, B1 and B2) which have energy metabolism properties[1, 3], which could influence exercise metabolic outcomes[28], though further research is required to determine their potential relationship.

Perhaps the closest supplement to compare the found increase in FAO contribution to total EE is green tea (Camella Sinesis). This is due to several similar active ingredients especially the phenolic antioxidant content in both YM and green tea, though catechin polyphenols have been shown to be highly abundant in green tea, while saponins and some caffeoyl derivatives are abundant in YM[1, 3]. The present study administered 1 g of YM, almost half of the dosage of 1.8 g of green tea extract (no caffeine) administered by Venables et al.[14, 16], and close to the dose of 525 mg of green tea extracts (375 mg catechins and 150 mg caffeine) with similar percentage of 1% of caffeine administered within 24 hrs by Dulloo et al.[19, 29]. In comparison to the effects on EE reported in these studies, and only considering the similar active ingredients to those found in YM, the relatively small dosage of YM administered in the present study seem to be effective in further stimulating FAO and EE contribution to total FAO during exercise intensities in the moderate domain (Table 1), which is in agreement with the latter studies. However, the increase in FAO found in the present study of 0.09 g.min-1 is higher than a ~0.06 g.min-1 increase with green tea ingestion[16] and is close to 0.11 g.min-1 that was reported with an exercise training intervention[14]. Comparative analysis of YM and green tea that have used several measurement techniques have demonstrated higher content of active ingredients (approximately 50 more active ingredients) than those found in green tea[1, 3], which suggest a potential important role for YM in metabolic health, and future research may elicit the potential health outcomes of combining YM with exercise training.

The study relied on an effective exercise protocol that is known reflect a wide range of exercise intensities, including effective training exercise intensities in the light and moderate domains (corresponding to RER ≤ 1) which are considered effective for a number of metabolic health, weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction outcomes in a variety of population and age groups[14, 30–32]. For example, training at intensities that correspond to maximal FAO has been associated with improved insulin sensitivity and fat loss[14]. Increased reliance on EE from FAO energy fuel sources with approximately 0.5-1.0 kcal.min-1 increase (P < 0.01) in EE from FAO and reduction in EE from CHO as induced by YM compared with PLC (Table 1) reflects a rightward shift in the intensity at the cross-over point defined as the power output when EE from CHO fuel sources predominates over EE from FAO, and hence it reflects an improvement in muscle glycogen sparing capacity, which is a known determining factor for endurance exercise performance[12]. Even though assessing YM effectiveness when combined with exercise training requires further investigations, the present study suggest a potential role for YM in increasing the training effectiveness at the cross-over point intensities[33, 34], that have been tested within this study.

The YM dependent reduction (though non-significant) in BLC during exercise (Figure 4), is indicative of an effect on exercise tolerance and delaying fatigue mechanisms[35], are also in line with lower reliance on CHO as an energy fuel and increased reliance on FAO at exercise intensities corresponding to RER < 1 (Figure 3), which are all in the submaximal intensity domain, and agree with the dynamic interrelationship between BLC, CHO and FAO[11, 12].

The present study relied on well-established metabolic markers that are based on capillary blood and cardiorespiratory gas measurements to demonstrate the YM effects during carefully selected exercise protocol with several intensity domains[11, 15, 18, 34]. However, future studies need to further investigate the blood-based fat metabolic variables such as glycerol and non-esterified fatty acids, which would confirm the mechanisms behind any putative increase in lipid mobilisation and utilisation. Moreover, assessing both YM and plasma lipids post-ingestion for the active ingredients (eg. caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3, 4-Dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4, 5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid and 3,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid, phytosterols and saponins) would confirm the bioavailability of YM’s active ingredients.

It is also important to note that the YM effects on FAO and EE within the present protocol, particularly at sub-maximal intensities, may need to be further investigated using a variety of exercise protocols before any exercise training recommendations can be drawn. In particular, combining YM supplementation with supra-maximal and sprint type protocols, and training studies that utilises the recently publicised high-intensity interval training could be further investigated.

To conclude, acute ingestion of YM before exercise enhances fat metabolism during light and moderate exercise intensities, without negatively affecting maximal performance. These effects also suggest a glycogen sparing potential for exercise performance. Further research is required on specific long-term strategies that combine YM with exercise to accelerate weight loss outcomes and potentially enhance metabolic health outcomes.

Author contributions

AA designed this study, analysed the data, prepared the figures, and prepared and finalized the manuscript.

Abbreviations

YM:

Yerba Maté

FAO:

Fatty acid oxidation

CHO:

Carbohydrate oxidation

EE:

Energy expenditure

EEFAO:

Energy expenditure derived from FAO

EECHO:

Energy derived from CHO

PLC:

Placebo capsules

V ˙ O 2 :

oxygen uptake

V ˙ C O 2 :

carbon dioxide production

RER:

Respiratory exchange ratio

V ˙ O 2 peak :

peak oxygen uptake

BLC:

Blood lactate concentration

BMI:

Body Mass Index

BLCpeak:

peak blood lactate concentration

Ppeak:

Peak power output

RERpeak:

peak respiratory exchange ratio

References

  1. 1.

    Heck CI, de Mejia EG: Yerba Mate Tea (Ilex paraguariensis): a comprehensive review on chemistry, health implications, and technological considerations. J Food Sci. 2007, 72 (9): R138-R151. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00535.x.

  2. 2.

    Bastos DHM, De Oliveira DM, Matsumoto RLT, Carvalho PO, Ribeiro ML: Yerba maté: pharmacological properties, research and biotechnology. Med Aromat Plant Sci Biotech. 2007, 1: 37-46.

  3. 3.

    Bracesco N, Sanchez AG, Contreras V, Gugliucci A: Recent advances on Ilex paraguariensis research: minireview. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 136 (3): 378-384. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.06.032.

  4. 4.

    Borges MC, Vinolo MA, Nakajima K, de Castro IA, Bastos DH, Borelli P, Fock RA, Tirapegui J, Curi R, Rogero MM: The effect of mate tea (Ilex paraguariensis) on metabolic and inflammatory parameters in high-fat diet-fed Wistar rats. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013, 64 (5): 561-569. 10.3109/09637486.2012.759188.

  5. 5.

    Kang YR, Lee HY, Kim JH, Moon DI, Seo MY, Park SH, Choi KH, Kim CR, Kim SH, Oh JH, Cho SW, Kim SY, Kim MG, Chae SW, Kim O, Oh HG: Anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effects of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) in C57BL/6 J mice fed a high-fat diet. Lab Anim Res. 2012, 28 (1): 23-29. 10.5625/lar.2012.28.1.23.

  6. 6.

    Arçari DP, Bartchewsky W, dos Santos TW, Oliveira KA, DeOliveira CC, Gotardo ÉM, Pedrazzoli J, Gambero A, Ferraz LF, Carvalho Pde O, Ribeiro ML: Anti-inflammatory effects of yerba maté extract (Ilex paraguariensis) ameliorate insulin resistance in mice with high fat diet-induced obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011, 335 (2): 110-115. 10.1016/j.mce.2011.01.003.

  7. 7.

    Arçari DP, Bartchewsky W, dos Santos TW, Oliveira KA, Funck A, Pedrazzoli J, de Souza MF, Saad MJ, Bastos DH, Gambero A, Carvalho Pde O, Ribeiro ML: Antiobesity effects of yerba maté extract (Ilex paraguariensis) in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009, 17 (12): 2127-2133. 10.1038/oby.2009.158.

  8. 8.

    Martinet A, Hostettmann K, Schutz Y: Thermogenic effects of commercially available plant preparations aimed at treating human obesity. Phytomedicine. 1999, 6 (4): 231-238. 10.1016/S0944-7113(99)80014-2.

  9. 9.

    Romijn JA, Coyle EF, Sidossis LS, Gastaldelli A, Horowitz JF, Endert E, Wolfe RR: Regulation of endogenous fat and carbohydrate metabolism in relation to exercise intensity and duration. Am J Physiol. 1993, 265 (3 Pt 1): E380-E391.

  10. 10.

    Van Loon LJ, Greenhaff PL, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Saris WH, Wagenmakers AJ: The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilisation in humans. J Physiol. 2001, 536: 295-304. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00295.x.

  11. 11.

    Alkhatib A: Predictors of exercise performance. Trends in Human Performance Research. Edited by: Duncan MJ, Lyons M. 2010, New York: NOVA Science Publisher, 168-183.

  12. 12.

    Brooks GA, Mercier J: Balance of carbohydrate and lipid utilization during exercise: the "crossover" concept. J Appl Physiol. 1994, 76 (6): 2253-2261.

  13. 13.

    Pérez-Martin A, Dumortier M, Raynaud E, Burn JF, Fédou C, Bringer J, Mercier J: Balance of substrate oxidation during submaximal exercise in lean and obese people. Diabetes Metab. 2001, 27 (4 Pt 1): 466-474.

  14. 14.

    Venables MC, Jeukendrup AE: Endurance training and obesity: effect on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40 (3): 495-502. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31815f256f.

  15. 15.

    Croci I, Byrne NM, Choquette S, Hills AP, Chachay VS, Clouston AD, O’Moore-Sullivan TM, Macdonald GA, Prins JB, Hickman IJ: Whole-body substrate metabolism is associated with disease severity in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2013, 62 (11): 1625-1633. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302789.

  16. 16.

    Venables MC, Hulston CJ, Cox HR, Jeukendrup AE: Green tea extract ingestion, fat oxidation, and glucose tolerance in healthy humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 87 (3): 778-784.

  17. 17.

    Péronnet F, Massicotte D: Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci. 1991, 16 (1): 23-29.

  18. 18.

    Achten J, Gleeson M, Jeukendrup AE: Determination of the exercise intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002, 34 (1): 92-97. 10.1097/00005768-200201000-00015.

  19. 19.

    Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Bautista L, Franzosi MG, Commerford P, Lang CC, Rumboldt Z, Onen CL, Lisheng L, Tanomsup S, Wangai P, Razak F, Sharma AM, Anand SS: Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case–control study. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9497): 1640-1649. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67663-5.

  20. 20.

    Blair SN, Brodney S: Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999, 31 (11 Suppl): S646-S662.

  21. 21.

    Arner P, Kriegholm E, Engfeldt P, Bolinder J: Adrenergic regulation of lipolysis in situ at rest and during exercise. J Clin Invest. 1990, 85: 893-898. 10.1172/JCI114516.

  22. 22.

    Wolfe RR, Klein S, Carraro F, Weber JM: Role of triglyceride-fatty acid cycle in controlling fat metabolism in humans during and after exercise. Am J Physiol. 1990, 258: E382-E389.

  23. 23.

    Graham TE: Caffeine and exercise: metabolism, endurance and performance. Sports Med. 2001, 31 (11): 785-807. 10.2165/00007256-200131110-00002.

  24. 24.

    Ito E, Crozier A, Ashihara H: Theophylline metabolism in higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997, 1336 (2): 323-330. 10.1016/S0304-4165(97)00045-7.

  25. 25.

    Outlaw J, Wilborn C, Smith A, Urbina S, Hayward S, Foster C, Wells S, Wildman R, Taylor L: Effects of ingestion of a commercially available thermogenic dietary supplement on resting energy expenditure, mood state and cardiovascular measures. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2013, 10 (1): 25-10.1186/1550-2783-10-25.

  26. 26.

    Hussein GM, Matsuda H, Nakamura S, Hamao M, Akiyama T, Tamura K, Yoshikawa M: Mate tea (Ilex paraguariensis) promotes satiety and body weight lowering in mice: involvement of glucagon-like peptide-1. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011, 34 (12): 1849-1855. 10.1248/bpb.34.1849.

  27. 27.

    Shaheen HA, Alpert PT, Navalta J, Tandy RD, Young JC, Santo AS: The effect of acute endurance exercise on lipoproteins: a comparison of the nuclear magnetic resonance technique with the conventional lipid profile in healthy men. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014, 39 (2): 233-237. 10.1139/apnm-2013-0139.

  28. 28.

    Kreider RB, Wilborn CD, Taylor L, Campbell B, Almada AL, Collins R, Cooke M, Earnest CP, Greenwood M, Kalman DS, Kerksick CM, Kleiner SM, Leutholtz B, Lopez H, Lowery LM, Mendel R, Smith A, Spano M, Wildman R, Willoughby DS, Ziegenfuss TN, Antonio J: ISSN exercise & sport nutrition review: research & recommendations. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2010, 7: 7-10.1186/1550-2783-7-7.

  29. 29.

    Dulloo AG, Duret C, Rohrer D, Girardier L, Mensi N, Fathi M, Chantre P, Vandermander J: Efficacy of a green tea extract rich in catechin polyphenols and caffeine in increasing 24-h energy expenditure and fat oxidation in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999, 70 (6): 1040-1045.

  30. 30.

    Carnier J, De Mello MT, Ackel-DElia C, Corgosinho FC, Campos RM, de Sanches PL, Masquio DC, Bueno CR, Ganen Ade P, Martins AC, Caranti DA, Tock L, Clemente AP, Tufik S, Dâmaso AR: Aerobic training (AT) is more effective than aerobic plus resistance training (AT+RT) to improve anorexigenic/orexigenic factors in obese adolescents. Appetite. 2013, 69: 168-173.

  31. 31.

    Donnelly JE, Honas JJ, Smith BK, Mayo MS, Gibson CA, Sullivan DK, Lee J, Herrmann SD, Lambourne K, Washburn RA: Aerobic exercise alone results in clinically significant weight loss for men and women: midwest exercise trial 2. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013, 21 (3): E219-E228. 10.1002/oby.20145.

  32. 32.

    Alkhatib A, Klonizakis M: Effects of Exercise Training and Mediterranean Diet on Reducing Post-Menopausal Vascular Risk. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2014, 57 (1): 33-47.

  33. 33.

    Billat V, Sirvent P, Lepretre PM, Koralsztein JP: Training effect on performance, substrate balance and blood lactate concentration at maximal lactate steady state in master endurance-runners. Pflugers Arch. 2004, 447 (6): 875-883. 10.1007/s00424-003-1215-8.

  34. 34.

    Venables MC, Achten J, Jeukendrup AE: Determinants of fat oxidation during exercise in healthy men and women: a cross-sectional study. J Appl Physiol. 2005, 98 (1): 160-167.

  35. 35.

    Brooks GA: Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985, 17 (1): 22-34.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all volunteers who took part in this study. The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Academy of Sport and Physical Activity, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK

    • Ahmad Alkhatib

  2. Sport Science Program, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, P.O. Box 2713, Qatar

    • Ahmad Alkhatib

Authors

  1. Search for Ahmad Alkhatib in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Alkhatib.

Additional information

Competing interest

The author declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Plant
  • Ingestion
  • Metabolism
  • Weight loss
  • Thermogenic

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us