Skip to content

Advertisement

Nutrition & Metabolism

Research
Open Access

Chronic leucine supplementation improves glycemic control in etiologically distinct mouse models of obesity and diabetes mellitus

Nutrition & Metabolism20107:57

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-7-57

©  Guo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

Received: 8 March 2010

Accepted: 12 July 2010

Published: 12 July 2010

Abstract

Background

Leucine may function as a signaling molecule to regulate metabolism. We have previously shown that dietary leucine supplementation significantly improves glucose and energy metabolism in diet-induced obese mice, suggesting that leucine supplementation could potentially be a useful adjuvant therapy for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Since the underlying cause for obesity and type 2 diabetes is multifold, we further investigated metabolic effects of leucine supplementation in obese/diabetes mouse models with different etiologies, and explored the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Methods

Leucine supplementation was carried out in NONcNZO10/LtJ (RCS10) - a polygenic model predisposed to beta cell failure and type 2 diabetes, and in B6.Cg-Ay/J (A y ) - a monogenic model for impaired central melanocortin receptor signaling, obesity, and severe insulin resistance. Mice in the treatment group received the drinking water containing 1.5% leucine for up to 8 months; control mice received the tap water. Body weight, body composition, blood HbA1c levels, and plasma glucose and insulin levels were monitored throughout and/or at the end of the study period. Indirect calorimetry, skeletal muscle gene expression, and adipose tissue inflammation were also assessed in A y mice.

Results

Leucine supplementation significantly reduced HbA1c levels throughout the study period in both RCS10 and A y mice. However, the treatment had no long term effect on body weight or adiposity. The improvement in glycemic control was associated with an increased insulin response to food challenge in RCS10 mice and decreased plasma insulin levels in A y mice. In leucine-treated A y mice, energy expenditure was increased by ~10% (p < 0.05) in both dark and light cycles while the physical activity level was unchanged. The expression levels of UCP3, CrAT, PPAR-alpha, and NRF-1, which are known to regulate mitochondrial oxidative function, were significantly increased in the soleus muscle of leucine-treated Ay mice whereas the expression levels of MCP-1 and TNF-alpha and macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue were significantly reduced.

Conclusions

Chronic leucine supplementation significantly improves glycemic control in multiple mouse models of obesity and diabetes with distinct etiologies. The metabolic benefits of leucine supplementation are likely mediated via multiple mechanisms in different tissues, but are not necessarily dependent of weight reduction.

Keywords

HbA1c LevelPlasma Insulin LevelEpididymal Adipose TissueAdipose Tissue InflammationLeucine Supplementation

Background

Impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes are prevalent metabolic disorders, and are commonly associated with obesity. Considerable interest has been generated in recent years in dietary approaches for the prevention and treatment of obesity and the associated insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus because the interaction between diet and genetic predisposition plays a significant role in the development of these metabolic disorders. In obese and insulin resistant individuals, protein-rich diets are associated with better glycemic control and plasma lipid profile, and, when used therapeutically for weight reduction, promote energy expenditure and greater relative fat reduction, compared to isocaloric, high carbohydrate or high fat diets [1–5]. However, the molecular mechanism for the observed metabolic benefits of protein-rich diet is not fully understood. It has been postulated that increased intake of leucine, an essential branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) and a natural component of dietary proteins, may play an important role in mediating the metabolic benefits of protein-rich diet [6, 7]. Indeed, increasing evidence suggests that altered leucine/BCAA intake and metabolism could have significant effects on macromolecule and energy metabolism. Genetic knockout of branched-chain aminotransferase 2 (BCATm), which catalyzes the first step of BCAA catabolism, leads to dramatically elevated plasma levels of BCAAs, increased energy expenditure, and lean phenotype in mice [8]. Leucine supplementation with 50% food restriction results in lower adiposity in rats, compared to the control animals that are subjected to the same 50% food restriction without leucine supplementation [9]. Chronic supplementation with BCAAs also increases hepatic and muscle glycogen concentration in exercised rats [10]. However, metabolic effects of leucine and/or BCAA supplementation may be complex, and some of the beneficial effects have not always been seen. Newgard et al reported that dietary supplementation of BCAA reduces high fat diet-induced weight gain in mice, but induces insulin resistance [11].

We have investigated whether dietary leucine supplementation is able to mimic the effects of protein-rich diet on glucose and energy metabolism in C57BL/6J mice on a high fat diet (DIO mice) [7]. We have shown that doubling dietary leucine intake over a 14-week period significantly increases energy expenditure, attenuates high fat diet-induced weight gain, and improves glucose and cholesterol metabolism in these DIO mice [7]. However, given the complexity of the underlying causes for obesity and type 2 diabetes and of the potential effects of leucine and/or BCAA on energy and glucose metabolism [7–9, 11, 12], we sought in this study to further investigate the metabolic effects of long term leucine supplementation in two additional mouse models of obesity and diabetes with distinct etiologies and disease severities, and to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms. NONcNZO10/LtJ (RCS10), a congenic strain generated by combining quantitative trait loci from New Zealand Obese (NZO/HlLt) and nonobese nondiabetic (NON/LtJ) mice, is a recently established polygenic mouse model of obesity and type 2 diabetes [13]. Although the exact nature of the quantitative traits loci responsible for the obesity and diabetes phenotype of RCS10 is not yet fully defined, the polygenic nature and the relatively mild obesity of this model closely resemble human type 2 diabetes. Male RCS10 mice are characterized by maturity-onset obesity, hepatic insulin resistance, beta cell failure, and full-fledged diabetes around 6 months of age if they are put on a diet containing ~20% calories from fat [13, 14]. The second model studied is B6.Cg-A y /J (A y ), which segregates for a mutation (yellow) in the agouti gene that impairs melanocortin receptor signaling (MC3R and MC4R) in the central nervous system [15]. In the C57BL/6J inbred background, male A y mice are mildly hyperphagic, hypometabolic, and extremely insulin resistant. Although male A y mice are glucose intolerant, they rarely develop frank diabetes due to strong beta-cell compensations. Thus, the A y model, compared to the RCS10 model, represents the other end of the spectrum of impaired glucose homeostasis, in which insulin resistance dominates the disease process.

Materials and Methods

Animal husbandry, diets and leucine supplementation

Seven to eight-week-old male NONcNZO10/LtJ (RCS10) and B6.Cg-A y /J (A y ) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Animal protocols were in compliance with the accepted standards of animal care, and were approved by the Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were maintained at 22°C on a 12:12 light-dark cycle (0700-1900), and had ad libitum access to the breeder chow (Purina Mouse Diet 20 5058, 21.8%, 21.6% and 56.6% calories from protein, fat, and carbohydrates, respectively). The breeder chow diet, which contains twice as much fat calories as the regular chow, increases the rate of weight gain in A y mice and is necessary for the development of overt diabetes with high frequency in male RCS10 mice (Jackson Laboratory website). Leucine was supplemented via the drinking water containing 1.5% (wt vol-1) L-leucine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as previously described [7, 16]. Since rodents consume the majority of water with meals during the dark cycle, supplementation via drink water should achieve similar effects as supplementation through food. This method of supplementation was chosen mainly out of the consideration of convenience. The controls were sex- and age-matched mice fed the same diet with regular tap water as drinking water.

Determination of body composition, plasma amino acid concentrations, and blood HbA1c, glucose and insulin levels

Body composition was determined using a Minispec TD-NMR Spectrometer (Bruker Optics, TX). HbA1c levels were determined using DCA 2000 Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Reagent Kit (Bayer, HealthCare, LLC, Elkhart, IN). Plasma amino acid concentrations were determined by the Hormone Analytic Core of the Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center at the Vanderbilt University. Blood glucose levels were measured in tail-vein blood using Glucometer Elite (Bayer, Elkhart, IN). Plasma insulin levels were determined using an ELISA kit (Mercodia Inc, Winston Salem, NC). Because plasma glucose and insulin levels are regulated by different mechanisms in different feeding states, we measured them in three feeding states to assess the effect of leucine treatment on these mechanisms. The three feeding states are defined as: the fed state - measurements were taken at the 4th hour of the dark cycle; the basal state - measurements were taken at the 7th hour of the light cycle after 5 hour food and leucine deprivation; the fast state - measurements were taken after 24 hour food and leucine deprivation. During the food and leucine deprivation, all mice were supplied with the regular tap water to prevent them from dehydration. In order to minimize the effects of feeding manipulation and handling (collecting ~50 ul blood for insulin analysis) on their metabolism, the mice were tested in the three feeding states in the following order, the fed state, the basal state, and the fast state during the testing period after 2, 4 or 8 month leucine treatment. A 2-day resting period was given between testing, and the animals were allowed to recover from the 24 hour fast for at least one week. The interpretations of the data obtained in the different feeding states are described in the text where they are relevant. To further compare the regulation of glucose-insulin homeostasis in response to acute meal ingestion in leucine-treated and control mice, we also conducted a fasting-refeeding experiment in RCS10 mice at the end of 8 month leucine treatment. The mice in both leucine and control groups were deprived of food and leucine (for the leucine group) and supplied with the regular tap water for 24 hours (11 am-11 am). Food was then re-introduced with the regular tap water and 1.5% leucine solution for the control and leucine groups, respectively. The mice were allowed to feed ad lib for 3 hours before bloods were collected for determination of plasma glucose and insulin. Food and water intake during the 3 hour refeeding period were recorded.

Measurement of food intake and indirect calorimetry

Daily food intake and water (or leucine solution) consumption were determined twice a week in individually-housed mice during the first two months of leucine treatment in both RCS10 and A y mice. Indirect calorimetry was performed in A y mice at the end of 4 month leucine-treatment (LabMaster, TSE Systems, Inc. Chesterfield MO). Oxygen consumption, locomotive activity, respiration exchange ratio (RER, VCO2/VO2), and food intake were measured continuously during the same 12:12 light-dark cycles. The same diet and leucine regimens were continued during indirect calorimetry. Data were collected over a 3 day period following 2 days of adaptation to the metabolic cage.

Determination of mRNA expression

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used to determine mRNA expression as previously described [17]. Briefly, total RNA was isolated using RNAeasy mini-columns (Qiagen, CA), and reverse-transcribed into single-stranded cDNA using random hexamers and M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, CA). Quantitative amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using Bio-Rad iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA). All RT-PCR reactions were done in duplicates. Cyclophilin A mRNA level was used to normalize total RNA input. Cycle numbers at a set fluorescence threshold within the exponential amplification range (Ct) were used to calculate expression levels of the genes of interest (relative to cyclophilin A). Changes in gene expression in leucine-treated mice were expressed relatively the control values. Following gene-specific primers were used for mRNA quantification in this study: cyclophilin A, 5'-atggcactggcggcaggtcc-3' (forward), 5'-ttgccattcctggacccaaa-3' (reverse); UCP3, 5'-caagggagcggaccactcc-3' (forward) 5'-ctctctcctccagttcccatg-3' (reverse); CrAT, 5'- tgccagttgagttcctggga-3', 5'- tctgatctgaggtgagcggt-3' (reverse); CPT-1B, 5'-ggcaacagttggttccaactact-3' (forward), 5'-caggaagcttaggcatgtacgtt-3' (reverse); PPAR-alpha, 5'-tcatacatgacatggagaccttg-3' (forward), 5'-actggcagcagtggaagaatc-3' (reverse); NRF-1, 5'-ggagcacttactggagtcc-3' (forward), 5'-ctgtccgatatcctggtggt-3' (reverse); NRF-2, 5'-ggggaacagaacaggaaaca-3' (forward), 5'-ccgtaatgcacggctaagtt-3' (reverse); TBP, 5'-ggcctctcagaagcatcacta-3' (forward), 5'-gccaagccctgagcataa-3' (reverse); aP2, 5'-gacgacaggaaggtgaagagc-3' (forward), 5'-gcctttcataacacattccacc-3' (reverse); leptin, 5'-tgacaccaaaaccctcatca-3' (forward), 5'-agcccaggaatgaagtcca-3' (reverse); MCP-1, 5'-ctgaagccagctctctcttcct-3' (forward), 5'-tccttcttggggtcagcacaga-3' (reverse); TNF-alpha, 5'-ccaccacgctcttctgtcta-3' (forward), 5'-agctgctcctccacttggtg-3' (reverse); F4/80, 5'-ctttggctatgggcttccagtc-3' (forward), 5'-gcaaggaggacagagtttatcgtg-3' (reverse).

Immunohistochemical analysis of adipose tissue

Adipose tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 days and then paraffin-embedded according to the standard procedure. Tissue sections (7 um) were stained with anti mouse F4/80 antibody (Cat # MF8000, Invitrogen, CA) and then counter-stained with hematoxylin as previously described [18]. The level of macrophage infiltration was assessed by visual examination of the positive staining under the light microscopy.

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences between leucine-treated and control mice were assessed using t-tests (STATISTICA V6, StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). A 2-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Correlation analysis was used to assess relationships between HbA1C and plasma glucose and insulin levels.

Results

Long term leucine supplementation prevents the development of overt diabetes in RCS10 mice

Leucine supplementation was started in 8-week-old RCS10 mice and lasted for 8 months. The average water consumption measured during the first two months was not significantly different between the control (7.8 ± 0.2 ml/day) and leucine group (7.6 ± 0.1 ml/day). The average leucine intake via drinking water was 114.5 ± 15 mg/day, 1.9-fold the daily leucine intake from the chow during this period. Food intake during the first 2 months of treatment was significantly lower in leucine-treated mice (3.80 ± 0.14 g/day), relative to the control mice (4.19 ± 0.16 g/day) (p < 0.05) (Fig 1A). Weight gain during this period was also reduced in leucine-treated mice (10.1 ± 0.66 g vs. 13.1 ± 0.41 g, p < 0.01) (Fig 1B). However, no significant difference in body weight or adiposity was observed between the leucine-treated and control mice at the end of 4 and 8 month treatment (Fig 1B-1C).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Leucine supplementation improves glycemic control independent of energy balance in NONcNZO10/LtJ (RCS10) mice. A: The average daily food intake measured during the first two months of leucine-treatment. B-D: Body weight (B), body composition (C), and HbA1c levels (D) in the control and leucine-treated RCS10 mice before (0 mo) and after 2, 4, and 8 months of leucine-treatment. * indicates p < 0.05, control vs. leucine-treated, n = 7.

HbA1c levels were significantly lower in leucine-treated RCS10 mice relative to the control mice at the end of 2, 4, and 8 month treatment (p < 0.05 at all points) (Fig 1D). At the end of 8-month study period, more than 50% of the control mice developed overt diabetes with HbA1c levels greater than 9%, while none of the leucine-treated mice had HbA1c levels greater than 7.8%. The average HbA1c levels at 8 month were 8.68 ± 0.60% (ranging from 6.2%-10.4%) in the control groups and 6.67 ± 0.41% in the leucine group (ranging from 4.7%-7.8%). Blood glucose levels were also significantly lower or trended lower in leucine-treated RCS10 mice, compared to the control mice in all of the feeding states (Fig 2A). Basal and fast insulin levels were not significantly different at the end of 8 month-study (Fig 2B), but insulin secretion in response to refeeding was significantly more robust in leucine-treated mice than in control mice (Fig 2B). Three-hour refeeding following a 24 hr fast resulted in an average 15.8-fold increase (over the fast level) in plasma insulin levels in leucine-treated mice (ranging from 6.1 to 29.6 fold), but only 6.5-fold increase in control mice (ranging from 2.8 to 10.0 fold) (p < 0.05). The absolute plasma insulin levels after the 3 hour refeeding were also significantly higher in leucine-treated mice (29.5 ± 5.5 vs. 11.0 ± 2.1 ng/ml, p < 0.01). Food intake during the refeeding period was not significantly different between the groups (1.23 ± 0.05 vs. 1.37 ± 0.15 g). Plasma leucine concentration was 38.6% (p < 0.05) higher in leucine-treated mice than in the control mice after the 3 hour refeeding; the concentrations of other amino acids examined were not significantly different between the two groups (Fig 2C). To further examine the relationship between glycemic control and beta cell function in RCS10 mice at the end of 8 month leucine treatment, HbA1c levels were related to plasma glucose and insulin levels after the 3 hour refeeding. HbA1c levels were positively correlated with the fed plasma glucose levels (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) (Fig 2D). The plotting of HbA1c levels against plasma insulin levels (Fig 2E) revealed that beta-cell decompensation was most conspicuous in the mice with HbA1c levels >9.0% (circled data points in Fig 2D and 2E), all of which were in the control group. These results suggest that the improvement in glycemic control in leucine-treated RCS10 mice may be attributable in part to the increased insulin response to feeding and decreased postprandial plasma glucose levels.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Leucine supplementation improves glucose and insulin homeostasis and prevents overt diabetes in RCS10 mice. A: Plasma glucose levels in the fed (or after 3 hour refed), basal (after five hour of food and leucine deprivation), and fast states in the control and leucine-treated RCS10 mice after 4 or 8 months of leucine-treatment. B: Plasma insulin levels in the refed, basal, and fast states in the control and leucine-treated mice at the end of 8 month study. C: Plasma concentrations of leucine and other amino acids after 3 hour-refeeding. D: The relationship between HbA1c levels and plasma glucose levels after the refeeding. There was a significant correlation between the two parameters (F = 29.46, p < 0.001), which fits the following equation (refed glu = -284 + 69.58x HbA1c, Standard error of estimation is 80.245). E: The relationship between HbA1c levels and plasma insulin levels after 3 hr refeeding. There was no statistically significant correlation between HbA1c levels and refed plasma insulin levels at the end of 8 month treatment. Beta cell decompensation was evident in the mice with overt diabetes (HbA1c > 9%, circled). * and ** indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, control vs. leucine-treated, respectively, n = 7.

Long term leucine supplementation improves glucose-insulin homeostasis in yellow agouti (A y ) mice independent of weight reduction

Metabolic effects of leucine supplementation were examined in two age groups of A y mice. In the first group, the treatment was started at 8 weeks of age and lasted for 4 months. The average food intake (3.99 ± 0.10 vs. 4.21 ± 0.09 g/day) and water consumption (7.3 ± 0.6 vs. 7.5 ± 0.7 ml/day) during the first two months of treatment were not significantly different between leucine-treated A y mice and their controls. Body weight was not significantly different between the control and leucine groups after 2 and 4 months of treatment (Fig 3A), nor was the body composition (data not shown). Again, HbA1c levels were significantly lower in leucine-treated mice than in control mice after 2 months (4.8 ± 0.3% vs. 5.7 ± 0.5%, p < 0.05) and 4 months (6.3 ± 0.2% vs. 7.2 ± 0.3%, p < 0.05) (Fig 3B). Effects of leucine supplementation on body weight and HbA1c levels were similar in the second group of A y mice (old A y ), in which the treatment was started at 5 months of age and lasted for 10 weeks. At the end of the 10-week treatment, body weight was not significantly different between the control and leucine groups (Fig 3C), but the HbA1c level was significantly lower in leucine-treated mice, relative to the control mice (p < 0.05) (Fig 3D). While the HbA1c level rose from 4.2% to 6.4% in the control group during this period, it was virtually unchanged in the leucine-treated group (4.3% to 4.6%).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Leucine supplementation improves glycemic control independent of energy balance in yellow agouti ( A y ) mice. A-B: Body weight (A) and HbA1c levels (B) of the young A y mice before and after 2 and 4 months of leucine treatment. Leucine supplementation and breeder chow diet were started at 2 months of age (n = 8). C-D: Body weight (C) and HbA1c levels (D) of the old A y mice before and after 10 weeks of leucine treatment. Leucine supplementation and breeder chow diet were started at 5 months of age (n = 6). * indicates p < 0.05, control vs. leucine-treated at the end of the study.

Fed plasma glucose levels were also significantly lower in leucine-treated A y mice than in control mice at the end of 4 month treatment (p < 0.01) (Fig 4A), and were positively correlated with the HbA1c levels in these mice (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) (Fig 4B). Although basal and fast blood glucose levels were not significantly different between the control and leucine groups, the corresponding plasma insulin levels were 38.5% and 33.9% lower, respectively, in leucine-treated mice, relative to the control mice (both p < 0.05) (Fig 4C-4D), suggesting that leucine supplementation may have improved insulin sensitivity in the basal and fast states in these mice. Plasma insulin levels in the fed state did not differ significantly between the control and leucine groups (0.80 ± 0.11 vs. 1.11 ± 0.21 μg ml-1, p = 0.16) (Fig 4E).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Leucine supplementation improves glucose and insulin homeostasis in A y mice. A: Plasma glucose levels in the fed, basal and fast states after 4 months of leucine treatment. B: Positive correlation between HbA1c levels and plasma glucose levels in the fed state, which fits the following equation (fed glu = -392 + 116 × HbA1c, F = 18.1, Standard error of estimation 93.184, F = 18.1, p < 0.001). C-E: Plasma insulin levels in the fed, basal and fast states after 4 months of leucine treatment. * and ** indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, control vs. leucine-treated, respectively, n = 8.

Leucine supplementation increases metabolic rates and the expression of genes involved in energy metabolism in skeletal muscle

In order to determine the effect of long term leucine supplementation on energy metabolism, indirect calorimetry was performed in the A y mice at the end of 4 month leucine-treatment. Rates of oxygen consumption were ~10.7% and 8.9% higher, respectively, in the light and dark cycles in leucine-treated mice, relative to control mice (both p < 0.05) (Fig 5A). No increase in locomotive activity in leucine-treated mice was observed (Fig 5B). The respiratory exchange ratio (RER, VCO2/VO2) was slightly lower and food intake was slight higher in leucine-treated mice, compared to the control mice, although the differences were not statistically significant (Fig 5C-5D).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Leucine supplementation increases the resting metabolic rates in A y mice. A-C: rates of oxygen consumption (A), locomotive activities (B) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER, VCO2/VO2) (C) in the light and dark cycles in young A y mice at the end of 4 month treatment. D. Food intake per unit of fat-free body mass (FFM) during the indirect calorimetric analysis. * indicates p < 0.05, control vs. leucine-treated, n = 8.

In order to further understand the effect of leucine supplementation on energy metabolism at the molecular level, we next examined the expression level of key genes involved in fatty acid metabolism and mitochondrial function in the skeletal muscle of Ay mice. The mRNA levels for uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3), carnitine acetyltransferase (CrAT), peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha), and nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF-1) were significantly higher in the soleus muscle of leucine-treated mice than in control mice (Fig 6). The mRNA levels for carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1B (CPT-1B) and nuclear respiratory factor 2 (NRF-2) were also increased although the differences were not statistically significant. The expression level of TATA-binding protein (TBP) was unaltered. These results suggest that long term leucine treatment may increase energy expenditure by selectively stimulating the expression of a set of key genes involved in fatty acid metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis in the skeletal muscle.
Figure 6
Figure 6

Leucine supplementation increases skeletal muscle expression of genes involved in regulating energy metabolism in A y mice. Messenger RNA levels of uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3), carnitine acetyltransferase (CrAT), carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B (CPT-1B), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha), nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF-1), nuclear respiratory factor 2 (NRF-2), and TATA-binding protein (TBP) were determined in the soleus muscle of young A y mice after 4 months of treatment. The expression levels in leucine-treated mice are expressed relatively to the levels of the control mice. * and ** indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively, control vs. leucine-treated, n = 8.

Long term leucine-supplementation decreases adipose tissue inflammation in A y mice

Obesity and insulin resistance have been associated with adipose tissue inflammation in both humans and rodents [18–22]. In order to assess the effect of leucine supplementation on adipose tissue inflammation, we examined the expression of several proinflammatory markers and macrophage infiltration in leucine-treated and control A y mice. Messenger RNA levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and F4/80, a specific marker of macrophage, were significantly decreased in the epididymal adipose tissue of leucine-treated A y mice, relative to the control mice (Fig 7A). In contrast, mRNA levels of two adipocyte-specific genes, aP2 and leptin, were not significantly different between the two groups (Fig 7A). Consistent with the decreased mRNA expression of F4/80 gene, immunostaining of the epididymal adipose tissue with anti-mouse F4/80 antibody confirmed that the degree of macrophage infiltration in the epididymal adipose tissue was also decreased in leucine-treated A y mice, relative to the control mice (Fig 7B). These results suggest that long term leucine supplementation may attenuate adipose tissue inflammation associated with obesity.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Leucine supplementation decreases adipose tissue inflammation in A y mice. A: messenger RNA levels of aP2, leptin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), and F4/80, a macrophage-specific marker, in the epididymal adipose tissue of leucine-treated and control young A y mice at the end of 4 month study period. The expression levels in leucine-treated mice are expressed relatively to the levels of the control mice. * and ** indicate p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively, control vs. leucine-treated, n = 8. B. Immunohistochemical staining of F4/80 of epididymal adipose tissue of leucine-treated and control young A y mice. The arrows indicate the nuclei positive for F4/80 staining.

Discussion

We have shown in the current study that dietary leucine supplementation significantly improves glucose-insulin homeostasis in two etiologically distinct mouse models of obesity/diabetes, RCS10 and A y , even though the treatment has no long term effect on energy balance in these mouse models. We have further shown that the metabolic benefits of leucine supplementation in A y mice are associated with increased resting metabolic rates, reduced adipose tissue inflammation, and increased expression of genes involved in regulating energy metabolism and mitochondrial function in the skeletal muscle.

A novel finding of the study is that long term leucine supplementation prevents the development of full-fledged diabetes in RCS10 mice, which are prone to beta cell failure [13]. More than 50% of the control mice developed severe diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 9%) at 10 months of age, but none of the leucine-treated mice had HbA1c higher than 7.8%. We found that leucine-treated RCS10 mice, relative to the control mice, demonstrated ~ 2-fold increase in insulin response to food challenge, suggesting that leucine supplementation may have direct effects on postprandial insulin secretion. We found that while food intake during the refeeding period was not significantly different between the two groups, leucine supplementation resulted in 38.6% increase in plasma leucine concentration in RCS10 mice at the end of 3 hour refeeding, a result similar to that observed in the DIO mouse model in our previous study [7]. Since leucine is a known insulin secretagogue [23–26], elevated postprandial plasma leucine level may be in part responsible for the more robust insulin response to feeding in RCS10 mice. Additionally, the lower plasma glucose levels in the presence of similar plasma insulin levels in leucine-treated RCS10 mice in the basal and fast states suggests that leucine supplementation may also improve hepatic insulin sensitivity in these mice, which is known to develop hepatic insulin resistance [13, 14, 27, 28]. The increased postprandial insulin secretion and the apparently improved hepatic insulin sensitivity may both contribute to the better glycemic control and prevention of full-fledged diabetes in leucine-treated RCS10 mice.

In A y mice, which develop severe insulin resistance but have robust beta-cell compensations, leucine supplementation also appears to improve insulin sensitivity. Plasma insulin levels were lower in leucine-treated A y mice than in the control mice in all of the feeding states at the end of 4 month treatment. The lower plasma insulin levels, together with the lower HbA1c and/or plasma glucose levels are suggestive of an improvement of insulin sensitivity in these mice. Furthermore, the effects of leucine supplementation on glucose and insulin homeostasis in A y mice are consistent with those observed in our previous study - insulin and glucose tolerance tests have shown that leucine supplementation improves insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in DIO mice [7].

Leucine supplementation significantly decreased adipose tissue inflammation in A y mice, which could be an important mechanism for the improved glucose metabolism in these mice as adipose tissue inflammation and increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in causing insulin resistance [18, 19, 22, 29–31]. We found that adipose tissue expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and macrophage infiltration were both decreased in the epididymal adipose tissue of leucine-treated A y mice, relative to the control mice. Mechanism for the decreased adipose tissue inflammation in leucine-treated mice remains to be investigated. Activation of mTORC1 has also been shown to suppresses inflammation and lipolysis [32, 33], two of the known risk factors for obesity-associated insulin resistance [29, 34–36]. It is conceivable that long term leucine supplementation may lead to chronic, low grade activation of mTORC1, which in turn suppresses fatty acid release and inflammation, resulting in improved insulin sensitivity in the obese mice.

Long term leucine supplementation also has significant effects on energy metabolism in A y mice. Oxygen consumption was increased in both light and dark cycles in the absence of increased locomotive activity in A y mice, suggesting that leucine supplementation increases the resting metabolic rate in these mice. Similar increases in the resting metabolic rate are also observed in leucine-treated DIO mice as we have previously reported [7]. As in the DIO mice and RCS10 mice, plasma leucine concentration was likely elevated only in the fed state but not in the basal state in Ay mice. Thus, it appears that in these obese mouse models chronic dietary leucine supplementation increases energy expenditure independent of the acute effects of meal or leucine ingestion. The increases in the expression of UCP3, CrAT, PPAR-alpha, and NRF-1 in the skeletal muscle of leucine-treated A y mice further support this notion. Consistent with the data in A y mice, significant increases in the expression of the above genes as well as NRF-2 are also observed in the soleus muscle of leucine-treated DIO mice, relative to their respective controls, after 14 weeks of leucine treatment (unpublished observation). Many studies have shown that obesity and insulin resistance are commonly associated with impaired fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial function [36–41]. Thus, improved energy metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative function could be an important mechanism for the improvements in glucose-insulin homeostasis in leucine-treated mice. The effect of leucine supplementation on the resting metabolic rate in both A y and DIO mice bears a striking resemblance to that of protein-rich diets [42, 43], and is supportive of the postulation that leucine is a key mediator of the metabolic benefits of protein-rich diet [6, 7].

The effects of chronic leucine supplementation on energy balance are complex. As discussed above, leucine supplementation increases metabolic rates in both A y mice and DIO mice [7]. We also found that food intake and the rate of weight gain were significantly lower in leucine-treated RCS10 mice, relative to the controls, during the first 2 months of treatment. The initial suppressive effect of leucine on food intake is not entirely unexpected as acute central administration of leucine has been shown to suppress food intake and body weight in rats [44, 45]. However, despite these changes, body weight and adiposity were not significantly different in either RCS10 or A y mice at the end of the study period. It is possible that the lack of long term effects of leucine supplementation on energy balance in RCS10 and A y mice may be due in part to compensatory changes in energy intake in the later phase of treatment. As many previous studies have also shown, the regulation of energy balance in humans and rodents is redundant and compensatory changes occur when energy balance is perturbed. Furthermore, such compensatory changes appear to be strongly biased against negative energy balance (see [46, 47] for review). Indeed, the increase in the metabolic rate in leucine-treated A y mice at the end of 4-month treatment was accompanied by a non-statistically significant increase in food intake. In our previous study, food intake was also increased in association with increased energy expenditure in leucine-treated DIO mice at the end of 14 week study period, although in this particular model the increase in food intake was apparently not sufficient to offset the large increase in energy expenditure [7].

Conclusions

Altering dietary leucine intake has a significant impact on energy metabolism. Chronic leucine supplementation lowers HbA1c level and improves glucose and insulin homeostasis in multiple mouse models of obesity and diabetes. The metabolic benefits of leucine supplementation are associated with increased metabolic rates, improved gene expression profile in skeletal muscle, and decreased inflammation in adipose tissue, but are not necessarily dependent of weight reduction.

Dietary intervention, either alone or as part of a therapeutic regimen, is important in the prevention and management of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Although the physiology of human and mouse are clearly distinct, they nonetheless share many common derangements in insulin action and beta cell function that lead to type 2 diabetes. Thus, increasing dietary leucine intake via leucine supplementation may also prove beneficial to obese individuals susceptible to impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes. The efficacy of leucine supplementation in improving glucose-insulin homeostasis in obese humans should be investigated.

List of Abbreviations used

RCS10: 

NONcNZO10/LtJ

A y : 

B6.Cg-A y /J

UCP3: 

uncoupling protein 3

(CrAT): 

carnitine acetyltransferase

PPAR-alpha: 

peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor alpha

NRF-1: 

nuclear respiratory factor 1

NRF-2: 

nuclear respiratory factor 2

CPT-1B: 

carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B

TBP: 

TATA-binding protein

MCP-1: 

monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

TNF-alpha: 

tumor necrosis factor alpha

DIO: 

diet-induced obesity

BCAA: 

branched-chain amino acid

mTORC1: 

mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are in debts to Dr. Rudy Leibel for helpful discussions, and Katie Stewart and Yan Leyfman for excellent technical assistance. The work was supported in part by grants from National Institutes of Health, R01DK063034, P30DK026687, and P30DK63068.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Molecular Genetics, Columbia University, USA
(2)
Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Columbia University, USA
(3)
Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, USA

References

  1. Westerterp-Plantenga MS: The significance of protein in food intake and body weight regulation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003, 6: 635-638. 10.1097/00075197-200311000-00005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Layman DK, Boileau RA, Erickson DJ, Painter JE, Shiue H, Sather C, Christou DD: A reduced ratio of dietary carbohydrate to protein improves body composition and blood lipid profiles during weight loss in adult women. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 411-417.Google Scholar
  3. Layman DK, Shiue H, Sather C, Erickson DJ, Baum J: Increased dietary protein modifies glucose and insulin homeostasis in adult women during weight loss. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 405-410.Google Scholar
  4. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, McGuckin BG, Brill C, Mohammed BS, Szapary PO, Rader DJ, Edman JS, Klein S: A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 2082-2090. 10.1056/NEJMoa022207.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum JI, Layman DK, Freund GG, Rahn KA, Nakamura MT, Yudell BE: A reduced carbohydrate, increased protein diet stabilizes glycemic control and minimizes adipose tissue glucose disposal in rats. J Nutr. 2006, 136: 1855-1861.Google Scholar
  6. Layman DK, Walker DA: Potential importance of leucine in treatment of obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr. 2006, 136: 319S-323S.Google Scholar
  7. Zhang Y, Guo K, LeBlanc RE, Loh D, Schwartz GJ, Yu YH: Increasing dietary leucine intake reduces diet-induced obesity and improves glucose and cholesterol metabolism in mice via multimechanisms. Diabetes. 2007, 56: 1647-1654. 10.2337/db07-0123.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. She P, Reid TM, Bronson SK, Vary TC, Hajnal A, Lynch CJ, Hutson SM: Disruption of BCATm in mice leads to increased energy expenditure associated with the activation of a futile protein turnover cycle. Cell Metab. 2007, 6: 181-194. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Donato J, Pedrosa RG, Cruzat VF, Pires IS, Tirapegui J: Effects of leucine supplementation on the body composition and protein status of rats submitted to food restriction. Nutrition. 2006, 22: 520-527. 10.1016/j.nut.2005.12.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. de Araujo JA, Falavigna G, Rogero MM, Pires IS, Pedrosa RG, Castro IA, Donato J, Tirapegui J: Effect of chronic supplementation with branched-chain amino acids on the performance and hepatic and muscle glycogen content in trained rats. Life Sci. 2006, 79: 1343-1348. 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.03.045. Epub 2006 Apr 1322View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Newgard CB, An J, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Stevens RD, Lien LF, Haqq AM, Shah SH, Arlotto M, Slentz CA: A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2009, 9: 311-326. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nairizi A, She P, Vary TC, Lynch CJ: Leucine supplementation of drinking water does not alter susceptibility to diet-induced obesity in mice. J Nutr. 2009, 139: 715-719. 10.3945/jn.108.100081.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Leiter EH, Reifsnyder PC: Differential levels of diabetogenic stress in two new mouse models of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004, 53: S4-11. 10.2337/diabetes.53.2007.S4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cho YR, Kim HJ, Park SY, Ko HJ, Hong EG, Higashimori T, Zhang Z, Jung DY, Ola MS, Lanoue KF: Hyperglycemia, maturity-onset obesity, and insulin resistance in NONcNZO10/LtJ males, a new mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 293: E327-336. 10.1152/ajpendo.00376.2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu D, Willard D, Patel IR, Kadwell S, Overton L, Kost T, Luther M, Chen W, Woychik RP, Wilkison WO: Agouti protein is an antagonist of the melanocyte-stimulating-hormone receptor. Nature. 1994, 371: 799-802. 10.1038/371799a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynch CJ, Hutson SM, Patson BJ, Vaval A, Vary TC: Tissue-specific effects of chronic dietary leucine and norleucine supplementation on protein synthesis in rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 283: E824-835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang Y, Guo KY, Diaz PA, Heo M, Leibel RL: Determinants of leptin gene expression in fat depots of lean mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002, 282: R226-R234.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Weisberg SP, McCann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW: Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112: 1796-1808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Xu H, Barnes GT, Yang Q, Tan G, Yang D, Chou CJ, Sole J, Nichols A, Ross JS, Tartaglia LA: Chronic inflammation in fat plays a crucial role in the development of obesity-related insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112: 1821-1830.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Christiansen T, Richelsen B, Bruun JM: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is produced in isolated adipocytes, associated with adiposity and reduced after weight loss in morbid obese subjects. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005, 29: 146-150. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802839.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Bouloumie A, Curat CA, Sengenes C, Lolmede K, Miranville A, Busse R: Role of macrophage tissue infiltration in metabolic diseases. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005, 8: 347-354. 10.1097/01.mco.0000172571.41149.52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrante AW: Obesity-induced inflammation: a metabolic dialogue in the language of inflammation. J Intern Med. 2007, 262: 408-414. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01852.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao ZY, Li G, Najafi H, Wolf BA, Matschinsky FM: Glucose regulation of glutaminolysis and its role in insulin secretion. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 1535-1542. 10.2337/diabetes.48.8.1535.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Floyd JC, Fajans SS, Conn JW, Knopf RF, Rull J: Stimulation of insulin secretion by amino acids. J Clin Invest. 1966, 45: 1487-1502. 10.1172/JCI105456.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Li C, Najafi H, Daikhin Y, Nissim IB, Collins HW, Yudkoff M, Matschinsky FM, Stanley CA: Regulation of leucine-stimulated insulin secretion and glutamine metabolism in isolated rat islets. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 2853-2858. 10.1074/jbc.M210577200. Epub 2002 Nov 2819View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. van Loon LJ, Kruijshoop M, Menheere PP, Wagenmakers AJ, Saris WH, Keizer HA: Amino acid ingestion strongly enhances insulin secretion in patients with long-term type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 625-630. 10.2337/diacare.26.3.625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sutton GM, Trevaskis JL, Hulver MW, McMillan RP, Markward NJ, Babin MJ, Meyer EA, Butler AA: Diet-genotype interactions in the development of the obese, insulin-resistant phenotype of C57BL/6J mice lacking melanocortin-3 or -4 receptors. Endocrinology. 2006, 147: 2183-2196. 10.1210/en.2005-1209.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Heijboer AC, Voshol PJ, Donga E, van Eden CG, Havekes LM, Romijn JA, Pijl H, Corssmit EP: High fat diet induced hepatic insulin resistance is not related to changes in hypothalamic mRNA expression of NPY, AgRP, POMC and CART in mice. Peptides. 2005, 26: 2554-2558. 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.05.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Hotamisligil GS, Murray DL, Choy LN, Spiegelman BM: Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibits signaling from the insulin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 4854-4858. 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4854.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi H, Kokoeva MV, Inouye K, Tzameli I, Yin H, Flier JS: TLR4 links innate immunity and fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116: 3015-3025. 10.1172/JCI28898. Epub 2006 Oct 3019View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kanda H, Tateya S, Tamori Y, Kotani K, Hiasa K, Kitazawa R, Kitazawa S, Miyachi H, Maeda S, Egashira K: MCP-1 contributes to macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis in obesity. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116: 1494-1505. 10.1172/JCI26498. Epub 2006 May 1411View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Weichhart T, Costantino G, Poglitsch M, Rosner M, Zeyda M, Stuhlmeier KM, Kolbe T, Stulnig TM, Horl WH, Hengstschlager M: The TSC-mTOR signaling pathway regulates the innate inflammatory response. Immunity. 2008, 29: 565-577. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang C, Yoon MS, Chen J: Amino acid-sensing mTOR signaling is involved in modulation of lipolysis by chronic insulin treatment in adipocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 296: E862-868. 10.1152/ajpendo.90651.2008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Weisberg SP, Hunter D, Huber R, Lemieux J, Slaymaker S, Vaddi K, Charo I, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW: CCR2 modulates inflammatory and metabolic effects of high-fat feeding. J Clin Invest. 2006, 116: 115-124. 10.1172/JCI24335. Epub 2005 Dec 2008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim JK, Fillmore JJ, Chen Y, Yu C, Moore IK, Pypaert M, Lutz EP, Kako Y, Velez-Carrasco W, Goldberg IJ: Tissue-specific overexpression of lipoprotein lipase causes tissue-specific insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 7522-7527. 10.1073/pnas.121164498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Koves TR, Ussher JR, Noland RC, Slentz D, Mosedale M, Ilkayeva O, Bain J, Stevens R, Dyck JR, Newgard CB: Mitochondrial overload and incomplete fatty acid oxidation contribute to skeletal muscle insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2008, 7: 45-56. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Cunningham JT, Rodgers JT, Arlow DH, Vazquez F, Mootha VK, Puigserver P: mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1alpha transcriptional complex. Nature. 2007, 450: 736-740. 10.1038/nature06322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Schieke SM, Phillips D, McCoy JP, Aponte AM, Shen RF, Balaban RS, Finkel T: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway regulates mitochondrial oxygen consumption and oxidative capacity. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 27643-27652. 10.1074/jbc.M603536200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson-Fritch L, Nicoloro S, Chouinard M, Lazar MA, Chui PC, Leszyk J, Straubhaar J, Czech MP, Corvera S: Mitochondrial remodeling in adipose tissue associated with obesity and treatment with rosiglitazone. J Clin Invest. 2004, 114: 1281-1289.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu L, Shi X, Choi CS, Shulman GI, Klaus K, Nair KS, Schwartz GJ, Zhang Y, Goldberg IJ, Yu YH: Paradoxical coupling of triglyceride synthesis and fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle overexpressing DGAT1. Diabetes. 2009, 58: 2516-2524. 10.2337/db08-1096.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Lowell BB, Shulman GI: Mitochondrial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2005, 307: 384-387. 10.1126/science.1104343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Labayen I, Diez N, Parra D, Gonzalez A, Martinez JA: Basal and postprandial substrate oxidation rates in obese women receiving two test meals with different protein content. Clin Nutr. 2004, 23: 571-578. 10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Westerterp KR, Wilson SA, Rolland V: Diet induced thermogenesis measured over 24 h in a respiration chamber: effect of diet composition. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999, 23: 287-292. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Cota D, Proulx K, Smith KA, Kozma SC, Thomas G, Woods SC, Seeley RJ: Hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. Science. 2006, 312: 927-930. 10.1126/science.1124147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Blouet C, Jo YH, Li X, Schwartz GJ: Mediobasal hypothalamic leucine sensing regulates food intake through activation of a hypothalamus-brainstem circuit. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 8302-8311. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1668-09.2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwartz MW, Woods SC, Seeley RJ, Barsh GS, Baskin DG, Leibel RL: Is the energy homeostasis system inherently biased toward weight gain?. Diabetes. 2003, 52: 232-238. 10.2337/diabetes.52.2.232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Leibel RL: Molecular physiology of weight regulation in mice and humans. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008, 32: S98-108. 10.1038/ijo.2008.245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Guo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Nutrition & Metabolism

ISSN: 1743-7075

Contact us