Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

Small dense LDL cholesterol is associated with metabolic syndrome traits independently of obesity and inflammation

Contributed equally
Nutrition & Metabolism201916:7

  • Received: 11 October 2018
  • Accepted: 10 January 2019
  • Published:



Small dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-c) has been established to be highly associated with metabolic disorder. However, the relationship between circulating sdLDL-c and the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has not been fully established.


A total of 1065 Chinese males (45.07 ± 11.08 years old) without diabetes and general obesity was recruited into a population-based, cross-sectional study. The MetS was defined based on the updated National Cholesterol Education Program/ Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for Asian Americans. Serum sdLDL-c concentration was measured by a homogeneous assay method and its relationship with MetS and its traits was investigated.


Serum sdLDL-c concentrations increased gradually with increasing numbers of MetS components (p < 0.001) and the proportion of patients with MetS increased gradually with increasing sdLDL-c levels (p for trend< 0.001). For the second, third, and fourth sdLDL-c quartiles versus the first, the OR (95% CI) for MetS were 4.47(2.41,8.28), 5.47(2.97,10.07) and 8.39(4.58,15.38) (p < 0.001 for trend) after multivariate adjustment. The stratified analysis conducted according to LDL-c levels showed that the OR between serum sdLDL-c levels and MetS was greater in those LDL-c levels lower than 3.3 mmol/L (OR = 22.97; 95% CI, 7.64–69.09) than in those LDL-c levels higher than 3.3 mmol/L (OR = 17.49; 95% CI, 4.43–68.98). Mediation analysis showed sdLDL-c mediated 38.6% of the association of waist circumference with triglycerides, while the association between sdLDL-c and MetS components did not mediate by hsCRP.


This study found that high sdLDL-c concentrations were associated with the presence of MetS independently of central obesity and inflammation.


  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Small dense LDL cholesterol
  • Lipid metabolism


Metabolic syndrome (MetS) represents a group of clinical and laboratory abnormalities (central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia) that augment the risk of developing atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and all-cause of mortality [13]. The prevalence of MetS has increased at an alarming rate worldwide over the last two decades [46]. In China, the prevalence of MetS has increased by approximately 20% from 2001 to 2010 (9.8% in 2001 vs 31.0% in 2010) according to the criterion of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)-the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III), which translates to an estimated 260 million adults with increased MetS [79]. Many studies have shown that MetS was an independent risk factor in the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases such as T2DM, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and so forth [1012]. Although the exact molecular mechanism of MetS remains elusive, identifying the key markers associated with MetS development and progression is very essential.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is one of the body’s lipoproteins and an important carrier of cholesterol in the circulation. High levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) were associated with a high risk of developing CVD [13]. Over the past two decades, interest has grown in the predictive value of LDL particle size, and the determination of LDL particles has been included into the guidelines of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists for prevention of atherosclerosis [14]. Small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-c), a type of smaller LDL-c, is considered an emerging risk factor for T2DM and CVD. SdLDL-c levels have been found the association with elevated triglyceride (TG) levels and low HDL-c concentrations, constitutes the ‘proatherogenic lipoprotein phenotype’, a common feature of T2DM and MetS [1517]. The potential mechanism maybe partly because of the lower affinity for the LDL receptor and its multiple atherogenic modifications in blood [18]. And subjects with higher sdLDL-c levels have been shown to be associated with an increased risk factor for cardiovascular disease both in cross-sectional and prospective observational studies [1922].

Moreover, high circulating sdLDL-c levels were also associated with obesity and systemic inflammation [23, 24]. Obesity, which is usually accompanied by systemic inflammation, has long been regarded as the main origin of MetS. Indeed, dyslipidemia and inflammation, the main and unifying hypothesis to describe the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, are both associated with sdLDL-c [2527]. In addition, there is an interaction between dyslipidemia and inflammation, the pro-inflammatory pathway can directly affect lipid metabolism, including elevated level of triglyceride-rich very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), triglyceride (TG) and free fatty acids (FFA) [28]. At high TG levels status, VLDL particles are initially converted to large LDL particles and subsequently converted to small dense LDL, resulting in an increase of sdLDL-c level in circulation [29]. Inversely, lipids can also directly induce an inflammatory reaction, and cholesterol feeding can promote the inflammatory reaction, which in turn may contribute to the development of MetS [30, 31].

However, studies focus on the relationship between sdLDL-c with MetS and its components is limited. Besides, there were no previous studies conducted mediation analysis to investigate the detail of which factors mediate the associations between central obesity, inflammation, sdLDL-c and Mets in humans. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the association of sdLDL-c concentration with the presence of MetS and its components in 1065 Chinese males without general obesity and diabetes.


Subjects and settings

Study participants were recruited from the locoman health screening in Shaoguan Railway Hospital (Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, China) from April 2016 to August 2017. There were 1842 males aged 20–70 years participated in this cross-sectional study. For the present study, exclusion criteria were the existence of any infectious or significant hematologic disorders, thyroid dysfunction, severe liver and/or renal insufficiency, malignant tumors and those with missing variables. Subjects were also excluded if they were admitted from the Emergency Room or receiving treatment from the clinic, resulting in a total of 1065 participants without diabetes and general obesity for the final analyses. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sun Yat-sen University, conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.


Participants were interviewed to collect information on demographic characteristics, behavioral habits, medical history and the use of medication by a standardized questionnaire. Smoking habits and alcohol consumption were classified into three groups: never, past, or current. Current smoker was defined as subject who smoked at least one cigarette per day for more than 6 months. Current drinker was defined as subject who drank any type of alcoholic beverage at least once a week for more than half a year. Physical activity defined as taking physical activity at least once a week during the past 12 months.

Clinical measurements of each subject were extracted from an electronic medical record system. Trained nurses measured height, weight, waist circumference and blood pressure using a standard protocol [25]. Body mass index (BMI) was defined as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters, BMI ≥28 kg/m2 was defined as general obesity [3234]. Men with waist ≥90 cm was defined as central obesity. Blood samples were taken after at least 12-h’s fast in the morning and collected for the measurement of sdLDL-c, which were measured by a homogeneous assay method (sdLDL-EX “Seiken”, Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) using the Hitachi Automatic Analyzer 7600–020 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) [19, 35]. Total blood cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c and TG were measured enzymatically using an automatic analyzer (Hitachi 747 autoanalyzer, Hitachi) using a commercial assay kit (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). LDL-c ≥ 3.3 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) was defined as high LDL-c [36]. Serum levels of high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) were determined by a high-sensitivity turbidimetric assay (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

Definition of MetS

MetS was defined based on the updated National Cholesterol Education Program/ Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for Asian Americans as having at least three of the following components: 1) waist circumference ≥ 90 cm for men or ≥ 80 cm for women; 2) TG ≥1.7 mmol/L; 3) HDL cholesterol <1.03 mmol/L for men or <1.30 mmol/L for women; 4) blood pressure (BP) ≥130/85 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medications; 5) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥5.6 mmol/L, previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes or treatment with oral antidiabetic agents or insulin [37] .

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed variables, whereas median with interquartile range (IQR) for variables with a skewed distribution and numbers (percentages) for the categorical variables. Student’s T-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for the comparisons between continuous variables. Differences between categorical data were assessed with the χ2 test. Adjusted mean differences in metabolic variables across sdLDL-c quartiles were calculated using linear regression analysis. Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was performed by binary Logistic regression analysis to quantify the relationship between sdLDL-c with MetS and its clusters. Stratified analysis was used to evaluate the effect of LDL-c level on the association between sdLDL-c and MetS. A causal mediation analysis, the Process Macro for SPSS, was used to analyze the extent to which sdLDL-c explains the association of central obesity with MetS components and the extent to which hsCRP mediates the effect of sdLDL-c on MetS component values. Effects were estimated by means of nonparametric bootstrapping with 5000 resamples and percentile-based confidence intervals [38]. A two-sided P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS program (ver 20.0, SPSS).


Characteristics of study participants

The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. The average age was 45.07 ± 11.08 years of all the subjects, of whom 27.9% had MetS and 31.3% were central obesity. The median sdLDL-c concentration was 1.03(0.73,1.31) mmol/L and the mean hsCRP concentration was 1.78 ± 3.28 mg/L. Compared to subjects without MetS, subjects with MetS had higher sdLDL-c and hsCRP levels (both p < 0.05). In addition, the sdLDL-c/LDL-c was significantly higher in MetS subjects compared with non-MetS subjects (p < 0.001), while levels of LDL-c were similar in subjects with or without MetS (p > 0.05). SdLDL-c level increased gradually with the number of MetS components (Fig. 1). The sdLDL-c levels increased gradually from the subjects without MetS (0.71 mmol/L) to those with all 5 MetS components (1.10 mmol/L).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of subjects with or without the MetS



(N = 1065)

Metabolic syndrome

(n = 297)

Non-metabolic syndrome

(n = 768)

P value

Age, years

45.07 ± 11.08

48.57 ± 8.55

43.71 ± 11.64

< 0.001

Current Smoker, n (%)

643 (60.4)

185 (62.6)

457 (59.5)


Current Drinker, n (%)

423 (39.7)

115 (40.1)

308 (40.1)


Physical activity, n (%)

758 (71.2)

208 (70.0)

550 (71.6)


Hypertension, n (%)

96 (9.0)

45 (15.2)

51 (6.6)

< 0.001

Central obesity, n (%)

333 (31.3)

202 (68.0)

131 (17.1)

< 0.001

BMI, kg/m2

23.53 ± 2.46

24.94 ± 2.03

22.98 ± 2.4

< 0.001

Waist circumference, cm

85.11 ± 7.88

90.41 ± 6.54

83.06 ± 7.39

< 0.001

TC, mmol/L

5.44 ± 1.12

5.61 ± 1.10

5.37 ± 1.12


TG, mmol/L

1.94 ± 1.37

2.92 ± 1.74

1.56 ± 0.96

< 0.001

HDL-c, mmol/L

1.25 ± 0.28

1.11 ± 0.27

1.31 ± 0.26

< 0.001

LDL-c, mmol/L

3.56 ± 0.93

3.52 ± 0.98

3.58 ± 0.90


SBP, mm Hg

127.82 ± 15.04

134.52 ± 14.54

125.23 ± 14.43

< 0.001

DBP, mm Hg

87.26 ± 11.14

92.42 ± 10.08

85.26 ± 10.89

< 0.001

FPG, mmol/L

5.19 ± 0.57

5.47 ± 0.61

5.08 ± 0.51

< 0.001

hsCRP, mg/L

1.78 ± 3.28

2.25 ± 3.16

1.60 ± 3.31


SdLDL-c/LDL-c, %

28.31 (22.03,35.32)

34.79 (29.63,41.15)

25.91 (20.64,32.11)

< 0.001

sdLDL-c, mmol/L

1.03 (0.73,1.31)

1.23 (0.95,1.50)

0.94 (0.66,1.22)

< 0.001

Values were means±SD or medians in cases of continuous variables and numbers (percentages) in case of categorical data. For differences across the groups of calculated with χ2 test and analysis of variance for categorical and continuous data, respectively. sdLDL-c small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, BMI body mass index, HDL high-density lipoprotein, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, HDL-c high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-c low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, hsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, FPG fasting plasma glucose, n number. To convert sdLDL-c to mg/dL, multiply by 38.6

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Serum sdLDL-c concentration according to the number of MetS components

Correlations between serum sdLDL-c levels and MetS–related parameters

Partial Spearman correlation analysis showed that sdLDL-c was significantly positively correlated with MetS–related parameters, such as TG, HDL-c, FPG and waist circumference after adjusting for age, smoking, drinking and physical activity (p < 0.001, Table 2). The strongest correlation was between sdLDL-c and TG (r = 0.454, p < 0.001). Besides, the sdLDL-c level was significantly positively correlated with LDL-c (r = 0.609, p < 0.001), while there was no significant correlation between sdLDL-c and hsCRP (r = 0.051, p = 0.100).
Table 2

Multivariable-adjusted Spearman correlation coefficients of serum sdLDL-c concentration and MetS-related parameters






< 0.001



< 0.001



< 0.001







Waist circumference


< 0.001



< 0.001




Spearman correlation coefficients were adjusted by age, smoking, drinking and physical activity; sdLDL-c Small dense LDL cholesterol, MetS Metabolic syndrome, TG Triglyceride, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hsCRP high-sensitivity C reactive protein, FPG fasting plasma glucose, BP Blood pressure;

Association of serum sdLDL-c levels with MetS and its components

The proportion of MetS and its related metabolic disorders increased across sdLDL-c quartiles. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the sdLDL-c level was associated with high waist circumference, high TG and low HDL-c, independent of age, smoking, drinking and physical activity (Table 3, model 1). After additionally adjusting for FPG, hsCRP and anthropometric measurements, the association remained significantly between sdLDL-c and MetS-related dyslipidemia (high TG and low HDL-c), and high TG concentration had the strongest association with sdLDL-c level (Table 3, model 2). Subjects with higher quartiles of sdLDL-c had an increased likelihood of having MetS compared with those in the lowest quartile. The ORs (95% CI) for MetS in the second, third, and fourth sdLDL-c quartile versus the first were 4.47(2.41,8.28), 5.47(2.97,10.07) and 8.39(4.58,15.38), respectively (p < 0.001 for trend, Table 3, model 2).
Table 3

Percentages and adjusted ORs (95% CI) for MetS and its related components for comparison of the three highest sdLDL-c quartiles with the first quartile


Quartile of serum sdLDL-c, mmol/L

P for trend

Q1 (< 0.73)

n = 265

Q2 (0.73–1.03) n = 267

Q3 (1.03–1.31)

n = 267

Q4 (≥1.31)

n = 266

High waist circumference (%)





< 0.001

Model 1


1.44 (0.96,2.16)

1.59 (1.06,2.38)

2.05 (1.37,3.06)


Model 2a


1.32 (0.79,2.22)

1.46 (0.88,2.44)

1.67 (1.00,2.77)


High TG (%)





< 0.001

Model 1


11.16 (5.77,21.61)

32.97 (17.01,63.88)

85.09 (42.97,168.48)

< 0.001

Model 2


8.91 (4.88,16.24)

27.30 (14.93,49.93)

65.93 (35.26,123.29)

< 0.001

Low HDL-c (%)






Model 1


1.85 (1.18,2.90)

1.88 (1.19,2.97)

1.13 (0.69,1.84)


Model 2


1.70 (1.10,2.64)


1.03 (0.64,1.65)


High BP (%)






Model 1


1.54 (1.08,2.21)

1.29 (0.90,1.85)

1.57 (1.08,2.27)


Model 2


1.49 (1.03,2.17)

1.48 (1.03,2.13)

1.15 (0.79,1.67)


High FPG (%)






Model 1


1.03 (0.65,1.61)

1.40 (0.90,2.16)

1.41 (0.90,2.15)


Model 2a


1.07 (0.69,1.66)

1.32 (0.86,2.02)

1.34 (0.87,2.06)


High hsCRP (%)






Model 1


1.05 (0.59,1.88)

1.69 (0.98,2.91)

1.69 (0.98,2.91)


Model 2a


1.10 (0.62,1.93)

1.62 (0.93,2.75)

1.44 (0.83,2.49)



syndrome (%)





< 0.001

Model 1


4.06 (2.35,7.01)

5.56 (3.24,9.52)

8.46 (4.96,14.44)

< 0.001

Model 2


4.47 (2.41,8.28)

5.47 (2.97,10.07)



< 0.001

ORs were estimated from Logistic regression models; Model 1 was adjustment for age, smoking, drinking and physical activity; Model 2 was additionally adjustment for FPG, hsCRP, BMI, and waist circumference based on model 1; Percentages shown in the table were unadjusted results; aThe variable used in the direct definition of the outcome variable (FPG, waist circumference or hsCRP) was excluded from the adjustment variables

The effect of LDL-c level on the association between sdLDL-c and MetS

Stratified analysis of the effect of LDL-c level on the association between sdLDL-c and MetS. Results showed that the OR (95% CI) between serum sdLDL-c levels and MetS was 22.97(7.64,69.09) in group of those LDL-c levels lower than 3.3 mmol/L, whereas in the group of those LDL-c level higher than 3.3 mmol/L, the OR (95% CI) was 17.49(4.43,68.98), which indicates the association was more prominent in the group of those LDL-c levels lower than 3.3 mmol/L (Fig. 2). Furthermore, results showed that the proportion of patients with MetS increased gradually with increasing sdLDL-c/LDL-c level (p for trend< 0.001) and the OR between sdLDL-c/LDL-c level and MetS was significantly elevated in the higher sdLDL-c/LDL-c quartiles. (Additional file 1: Fig. S1 and Table S1).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Effect of LDL-c subgroups on the association between sdLDL-c and MetS

SdLDL-c mediated the effect of waist circumference on MetS–related parameters

Causal mediation analysis showed that sdLDL-c mediated 38.6% of the association between waist circumference with TG concentration and 13.5% of the association of waist circumference with FPG (Table 4). FPG mediated about 7.3% of the association of sdLDL-c with BMI (Additional file 1: Table S2). While hsCRP did not mediate any of the associations of sdLDL-c and MetS (Additional file 1: Table S3). This result was consistent with the finding in Table 2 that there was no association between sdLDL-c and hsCRP.
Table 4

SdLDL-c mediated fraction of the effect of waist circumference on MetS–related parameters






BMI, kg/m2







P value

< 0.001

< 0.001

> 0.05

TG, mmol/L









P value

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.05

< 0.05

HDL, mmol/L



− 0.0062

(− 0.0084,-0.0040)



P value

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.05

SBP, mmHg






(− 0.0178,0.0140)

P value

< 0.001

< 0.001

> 0.05

DBP, mmHg







P value

< 0.001

< 0.001

> 0.05

FPG, mmol/L









P value



< 0.05

< 0.05

hsCRP, mg/L







P value



> 0.05

The total effect, direct effect, and sdLDL-c mediated effect of waist circumference on each MetS-related parameter and the proportion of the total effect of waist circumference that is mediated by sdLDL-c were showed in the table; The 95% CI was calculated by nonparametric bootstrapping, Process Macro for SPSS; The model was adjusted for age, smoking, drinking and physical activity


Small dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-c), is a distinct LDL cholesterol subclass, which is associated with raised TG and decreased HDL-c levels in adiposity and diabetes, playing a distinct metabolic role in atherosclerosis [24]. However, the relationship of sdLDL-c with MetS and its components has not been fully established. In the present study, we found that sdLDL-c was strongly associated with MetS and its components, independently of central obesity and inflammation in subjects without general obesity and diabetes. Our results showed that sdLDL-c level increased gradually with the number of MetS components and the proportion of patients with MetS increased gradually with increasing sdLDL-c levels. Besides, the OR between serum sdLDL-c levels and MetS was greater in lower LDL-c levels than in higher LDL-c levels, suggesting that the association between sdLDL-c and MetS was independent of LDL-c levels. Notably, the causal mediation analysis revealed that sdLDL-c mediated 38.6% of the association between waist circumference and TG concentration, while hsCRP did not mediate any of the associations of sdLDL-c and MetS. Thus, our findings indicated that a higher level of sdLDL-c might be a key marker associated with MetS progression even before the appearance of central obesity, diabetes and inflammation.

MetS is a complex of clinical features and the main feature of which is obesity. Individuals with obesity show characteristic imbalance of metabolic profile which is associated with profound changes in insulin sensitivity, inflammatory reaction and other biochemical metabolites alterations, making an individual more potential to metabolic disorders [3942]. Studies have found an increased level of plasm sdLDL-c particles in general obese participants [43]. Our study also found a positive association of sdLDL-c with FPG and waist circumference, a simple anthropometric measure of central obesity, after multivariate adjustment. However, due to the lack of evidence for the detail of which factors mediate the associations between central obesity, diabetes and sdLDL-c in humans, determining which of their pathway associated with MetS acts first is difficult. Mediation analysis demonstrated that sdLDL-c only explained 13.5% of the waist circumference with FPG and FPG did not mediate any of the association of sdLDL-c with MetS, except 7% of the association of sdLDL-c with BMI. Besides, the present study including subjects without general obesity and diabetes, we were able to address the association between sdLDL-c and MetS was independent of waist circumference and FPG, indicating that central obesity may not be an original cause of the relationship between sdLDL-c level and MetS.

The inflammatory reaction is also an important predictor of MetS and usually accompanied with obesity, which is usually performed as a low grade, systemic inflammation, such as C-reactive protein [44, 45]. Study has found that higher hsCRP levels correlated with smaller LDL size and implied that low-grade inflammation was closely linked to alterations in lipoprotein metabolism [46]. In our study, however, we found there was no significant relationship between sdLDL-c and hsCRP after adjusting for other variables. The reason for the inconsistent results compared with former studies were likely due to the subjects in our study are non-obese and non-diabetes, both are the main causes of inflammation [40]. Furthermore, studies found that increased oxidative stress played an important role in the initiation and progression of metabolic disorders [47, 48]. SdLDL-c is the precursor of oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) and study has revealed that higher ox-LDL concentrations were associated with MetS and its components independently of central obesity and insulin resistance [49], suggesting that oxidative stress may represent the mechanistic pathway through which high sdLDL-c status promote the metabolic disorders. Accordingly, our study indicated that sdLDL-c is directly associated with MetS and its components, initially acting in parallel with central obesity and inflammation.

A possible explanation for the result that sdLDL-c was strongly associated with MetS and its components, independent of LDL-c, central obesity, inflammation and other variables, is the shift in the metabolites used to produce energy [50]. Energy metabolism disorder is the main reason, while dyslipidemia, central obesity, inflammation, oxidative stress and diabetes emerging as secondary consequences. Normally, the apo B-containing triglyceride-rich VLDL, which is secreted by the liver, was under the action of hepatic lipase to form normal-size LDL that remains in circulation for 2 days. At high TG condition, VLDL particles are initially converted to large LDL particles then thereafter converted to sdLDL-c, which can remain in circulation for about 5 days [29]. Our study showed that sdLDL-c mediated 38.6% of the association between waist circumference and TG concentration, which was the strongest that we found among the MetS components, maybe partly because of their common participation in lipids pathways. In addition, the composition of HDL-c can be altered in the high VLDL condition, leading to increased catabolism of lipid particles [51]. We found that as the increase of sdLDL-c level, HDL-c level increased significantly in the fourth quartile of sdLDL-c levels. This result is consistent with the recent study that a U-shaped association between HDL-c and mortality was found, suggesting that an extremely high concentration of HDL-c is a risk factor for metabolic disorders [52, 53]. Maybe the potential trigger for elevated HDL-c levels associated with high mortality is due to the high level of sdLDL-c, but the mechanisms require investigating in the future study.

There were several limitations to our study. Firstly, this was a cross-sectional study, which is unable to identify any causal relationships between sdLDL-c and MetS. Secondly, regressions were adjusted for the main potential confounders, but there may still exist some residual confounding because of unmeasured or unknown confounders. Third, we do not detect the level of HOMA-IR, which is the marker of insulin resistance. Finally, our study includes only middle-aged Chinese males, whether such mediation effect was present in females, other populations or other age groups should be studied in the future.


In conclusion, this study shows that higher sdLDL-c concentrations are associated with MetS and its components independently of central obesity and inflammation. What’s more, the association between sdLDL-c and MetS is more pronounced in lower LDL-c levels than in higher LDL-c levels. Levels of sdLDL-c may play a role as the key marker associated with MetS and its components in parallel with central obesity and inflammation.



95% CI: 

95% confidence interval


Adult Treatment Panel III


Body mass index


Blood pressure


Cardiovascular disease


fasting plasma glucose


high-density lipoprotein


high-sensitivity C reactive protein


Interquartile range


Low-density lipoprotein


Metabolic syndrome


National Cholesterol Education Program


Odds Ratio


oxidized LDL


Standard deviation


Small dense LDL cholesterol


type 2 diabetes mellitus


total cholesterol




Very low-density lipoproteins



We would like to thank the staff in Shaoguan railway Hospital for technical assistance and supplying site for investigation.


The Guangzhou Science and Technology Innovation Committee (201510010220) supported this work.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MX conceived and designed the experiments. JF and YL collected and analyzed the data as well as wrote the manuscript. SY, NC, XB, QK, JS contributed to questionnaires and data collecting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sun Yat-sen University, conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food, Nutrition and Health; Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Nutrition Translation; Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University (Northern Campus), Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China


  1. Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, Krauss RM. Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 1988;260:1917–21. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sniderman AD, Couture P, Martin SB, Degraaf J, Lawler PR, Cromwell WC, Wilkins JT, Thanassoulis G. Hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular risk: a cautionary note about metabolic confounding. J Lipid Res 2018;jlr. R082271. R082271.
  3. Tsai SS, Lin YS, Chen ST, Chu PH. Metabolic syndrome positively correlates with the risks of atherosclerosis and diabetes in a Chinese population. Eur J Intern Med. 2018.
  4. Dekker JM, Girman C, Rhodes T, Nijpels G, Stehouwer CD, Bouter LM, Heine RJ. Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn study. Circulation. 2016;112:666–73. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Aguilar M, Bhuket T, Torres S, Liu B, Wong RJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012. JAMA. 2015;313:1973–4. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Prasad DS, Kabir Z, Dash AK, Das BC. Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: a community study from urban eastern India. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012;3:204–11. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gu D, Reynolds K, Wu X, Chen J, Duan X, Reynolds RF, Whelton PK, He J. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and overweight among adults in China. Lancet. 2005;365:1398–405. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hou X, Lu J, Weng J, Ji L, Shan Z, Liu J, Tian H, Ji Q, Zhu D, Ge J. Impact of waist circumference and body mass index on risk of Cardiometabolic disorder and cardiovascular disease in Chinese adults: a National Diabetes and metabolic disorders survey. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57319. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Lu J, Wang L, Li M, Xu Y, Jiang Y, Wang W, Li J, Mi S, Zhang M, Li Y. Metabolic syndrome among adults in China: the 2010 China noncommunicable disease surveillance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:507–15. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mcneill AM, Rosamond WD, Girman CJ, Golden SH, Schmidt MI, East HE, Ballantyne CM, Heiss G. The metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:385. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bataille V, Perret B, Dallongeville J, Arveiler D, Yarnell J, Ducimetière P, Ferrières J. Metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease risk in a population-based study of middle-aged men from France and Northern Ireland. A nested case-control study from the PRIME cohort Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:475–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hawa MI, Thivolet C, Mauricio D, Alemanno I, Cipponeri E, Collier D, Hunter S, Buzzetti R, De LA, Pozzilli P. Metabolic syndrome, diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008;32:160–4. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Navarese EP, Robinson JG, Kowalewski M, Kolodziejczak M, Andreotti F, Bliden K, Tantry U, Kubica J, Raggi P, Gurbel PA. Association between baseline LDL-C level and Total and cardiovascular mortality after LDL-C lowering: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2018;319:1566–79. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Jellinger PS, Smith DA, Mehta AE, Ganda O, Handelsman Y, Rodbard HW, Shepherd MD, Seibel JA. AACE task force for the Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of atherosclerosis writing committee. Endocr Pract. 2012;18:270–93. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1415–28. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rizzo M, Kotur-Stevuljevic J, Berneis K, Spinas G, Rini GB, Jelic-Ivanovic Z, Spasojevic-Kalimanovska V, Vekic J. Atherogenic dyslipidemia and oxidative stress: a new look. Transl Res. 2009;153:217–23. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ivanova EA, Melnichenko VA, Grechko AV, Orekhov AN. Small dense low-density lipoprotein as biomarker for atherosclerotic diseases. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2017.
  18. Diffenderfer MR, Schaefer EJ. The composition and metabolism of large and small LDL. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2014;25:221–6. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoogeveen RC, Gaubatz JW, Sun W, Dodge RC, Crosby JR, Jiang J, Couper D, Virani SS, Kathiresan S, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne CM. Small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations predict risk for coronary heart disease: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. ATVB. 2014;34:1069–77. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Meguro Y, Ito Y, Koba S, Yokota Y, Hirano T, Ban Y, Tsunoda F, Sato T, Shoji M, Suzuki H. 515 small dense LDL-cholesterol is superior to LDL-cholesterol for determining severe coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2011;12:109–10. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Rizzo M, Berneis K. The clinical relevance of low-density-lipoproteins size modulation by statins. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2006;20:205–17. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Arai H, Kokubo Y, Watanabe M, Sawamura T, Ito Y, Minagawa A, Okamura T, Miyamato Y. Small dense low-density lipoproteins cholesterol can predict incident cardiovascular disease in an urban Japanese cohort: the Suita study. Journal of Atherosclerosis & Thrombosis. 2013;20:195. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Magkos F, Mohammed BS, Mittendorfer B. Effect of obesity on the plasma lipoprotein subclass profile in normoglycemic and normolipidemic men and women. Int J Obesity. 2008;32:1655. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nikolic D, Katsiki N, Montalto G, Isenovic ER, Mikhailidis DP, Rizzo M. Lipoprotein subfractions in metabolic syndrome and obesity: clinical significance and therapeutic approaches. Nutrients. 2013;5:928–48. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, Ray KK, Packard CJ, Bruckert E, Hegele RA, Krauss RM, Raal FJ, Schunkert H, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European atherosclerosis society consensus panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2459–72. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Taşcılar ME, Özgen T, Cihan M, Abacı A, Yeşilkaya E, Eker İ, Serdar M. The effect of insulin resistance and obesity on low−density lipoprotein particle size in children. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2010;2:63–6. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Pothineni NVK, Subramany S, Kuriakose K, Shirazi LF, Romeo F, Shah PK, Mehta JL. Infections, atherosclerosis, and coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3195–201. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Diepen JA, Berbée JF, Havekes LM, Rensen PC. Interactions between inflammation and lipid metabolism: relevance for efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2013;228:306–15. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Borén J, Adiels M. Lipid metabolism in metabolic syndrome. In: Mateuszuk Ł, editor. A systems biology approach to study metabolic syndrome. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London NewYork; 2013. p. 157–67.Google Scholar
  30. Tannock LR, O'Brien KD, Knopp RH, Retzlaff B, Fish B, Wener MH, Kahn SE, Chait A. Cholesterol feeding increases C-reactive protein and serum amyloid a levels in lean insulin-sensitive subjects. Circulation. 2005;111:3058–62. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Patel S, Di BB, Nakhla S, Heather AK, Mitchell TW, Jessup W, Celermajer DS, Barter PJ, Rye KA. Anti-inflammatory effects of apolipoprotein A-I in the rabbit. Atherosclerosis. 2010;212:392–7. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou BF. Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults - study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2015;11:S685–93. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Song-Ming DU, G-SM Y-PLI, Hong-Yun FANG, Xiao-Qi HU, Xiao-Guang YANG, Yong-Hua HU. Relationship of body mass index, waist circumference and cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese adult. Biomed Environ Sci. 2010;23:92–101. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen C. Overview of obesity in mainland China. Obes Rev. 2010;9:14–21. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Albers JJ, Kennedy H, Marcovina SM. Evaluation of a new homogenous method for detection of small dense LDL cholesterol: comparison with the LDL cholesterol profile obtained by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:556–61. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program. (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. JAMA. 2001;285:2486–97. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Jr SS. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–52. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hayes AF, Matthes J. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:924–36. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vinik AI. The metabolic basis of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Clin Cornerstone. 2005;7:27–35. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-α: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. 1993;259:87. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kern PA, Ranganathan S, Li C, Wood L, Ranganathan G. Adipose tissue tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 expression in human obesity and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;280:E745. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Jama the Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001;286:327–34. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sirikul K, Rungsunn T, David B, Davies IG. Prevalence of plasma small dense LDL is increased in obesity in a Thai population. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;14:1–8. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Lumeng CN, Saltiel AR. Inflammatory links between obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:2111–7. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson AR, Milner JJ, Makowski L. The inflammation highway: metabolism accelerates inflammatory traffic in obesity. Immunol Rev. 2012;249:218–38. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Vekic J, Jelic-Ivanovic Z, Spasojevic-Kalimanovska V, Memon L, Zeljkovic A, Bogavac-Stanojevic N, Spasic S. High serum uric acid and low-grade inflammation are associated with smaller LDL and HDL particles. Atherosclerosis. 2009;203:236–42. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Abdilla N, Tormo MC, Fabia MJ, Chaves FJ, Saez G, Redon J. Impact of the components of metabolic syndrome on oxidative stress and enzymatic antioxidant activity in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2007;21:68. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberts CK, Barnard RJ, Sindhu RK, Jurczak M, Ehdaie A, Vaziri ND. Oxidative stress and dysregulation of NAD(P) H oxidase and antioxidant enzymes in diet-induced metabolic syndrome. Metabolism-clinical & Experimental. 2006;55:928–34. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Hurtado-Roca Y, Bueno H, Fernandezortiz A, Ordovas JM, Ibañez B, Fuster V. Oxidized LDL is associated with metabolic syndrome traits independently of central obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2017;66:474–82. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ordovas JM, Corella D. Metabolic syndrome pathophysiology: the role of adipose tissue: new strategies to prevent cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease. Nutrition Metabolism & Cardiovascular Diseases. 2008;74:S10–4. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Rashid S, Watanabe T, Sakaue T, Lewis GF. Mechanisms of HDL lowering in insulin resistant, hypertriglyceridemic states: the combined effect of HDL triglyceride enrichment and elevated hepatic lipase activity. Clin Biochem. 2003;36:421–9. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamer M, O'Donovan G, Stamatakis E. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality: too much of a good thing? ATVB 2018;ATVBAHA.117.310587.
  53. Madsen CM, Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Extreme high high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is paradoxically associated with high mortality in men and women: two prospective cohort studies. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2478–86. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2019